請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54370
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳端容 | |
dc.contributor.author | Li-Yuan Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳立源 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T02:53:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-14 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-09-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻:
1.楊盈盈、李發耀、徐會棋、莊喬琳、李文興、張景智、陳震寰、葉振聲、鄭浩民、黃金洲、黃加璋、戴政宏 (2011)。探討師資培訓計畫對PGY1臨床教師教授與評估PGY1住院醫師六大核心能力技巧的效果。醫學教育,15(2), 120-133。 2.朱宗信(2009)。ACGME六大核心能力於一般醫學教育與衝擊。醫療品質雜誌。3(3),75-78。 3.鄭希彥、陳偉德、黃俊寅、陳祖裕、李采娟(2011)。培養醫學生在醫療體系下行醫能力的新課程。醫學教育,15(2),96-105。 4.蔡詩力、陳聖欣、鄭敏潔、何明蓉(2011)。臨床溝通技能教學、評估與課程整合工作坊紀實。醫學教育,15(2),191-198。 5.李維倫(2011)。反思臨床心理學訓練:探究美國「科學家-實務者」模式與專業能力學習的本質。中華心理衛生學刊,24(2),173-207。 6.陳威麗(2010)。反思技巧-臨床護理教學指引。榮總護理,27(3),225-230。 7.許玉雲、王美卿(2012)。反思寫作在護理上之應用:以反思實習日誌為例,志為護理。慈濟護理雜誌,11(1),68-73。 二、英文文獻: 1.Batalden, P.,Leach, D.,Swing, S.(2002).General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education.Health Aff,21,103-111. 2.Fang, C.L.,Hsu, L.C.,Chen, W.(2011).Bridging Medical Student Stress and ACGME General Competencies: A Pilot Study of the Problem-Solving Conference.Webmed Central Medical Education,2(5),WMC001948. 3.Miller, D.C.,Montie, J.E.,Faerber, G.J.(2003).Evaluating the Accreditation Council on graduate medical education core clinical competencies: Techniques and feasibility in a urology training program.J Urol,170,1312-1317. 4.Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. January 9, 2002 2002;287(2):226-235. 5.Aronson L. Twelve tips for teaching reflection at all levels of medical education. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):200-205. 6.Koole S, Dornan T, Aper L, et al. Using video-cases to assess student reflection: Development and validation of an instrument. BMC Medical Education. 2012/04/20 2012;12(1):1-8. 7.DasGupta S, Charon R. Personal illness narratives: Using reflective writing to teach empathy. Academic Medicine. 2004;79(4):351-356. 8.Fins JJ, Gentilesco BJ, Carver A, et al. Reflective practice and palliative care education: A clerkship responds to the informal and hidden curricula. Academic Medicine. 2003;78(3):307-312. 9.Maudsley G, Strivens J. Promoting professional knowledge, experiential learning and critical thinking for medical students. Medical Education. 2000;34(7):535-544. 10.Johnson C, Bird J. How to: teach reflective practice http://www.caerdydd.ac.uk/pgmde/resources/howtoreflective.pdf. 11.Driessen E, Tartwijk Jv, Dornan T. The self critical doctor: helping students become more reflective. BMJ. 2008-04-10 00:00:00 2008;336(7648):827-830. 三、網路資料: 1.國立政治大學教務處通識教育中心學習反思日誌:http://newdoc.nccu.edu.tw/coursemap/209a7134-ad48-452c-ab48-2e78f0c55277.pdf 2.布迪厄“反思社會學”及其對社會學研究的啓示:http://www.intermargins.net/intermargins/TCulturalWorkshop/academia/scholar%20and%20specialist/bourdieu/pb03.htm 3.教學分享:數學教學反思:http://www.alearn.org.tw/mag/doc/j001001.htm 4.學習反思:http://eportfolio.just.edu.tw/web/s997433016/6 5.成大一般內科ACGME介紹:http://www.ccd.mohw.gov.tw/public/news/handouts/92173ce1e55e68725ecccc53feec514a.pdf 6.ACGME的概要-慈濟醫療志業學習網:http://lms.tzuchi.com.tw/km/met/course/info.php?id=227 7.ECFMG:http://www.ecfmg.org/echo/acgme-core-competencies.html 8.醫療的六大核心能力:http://ortho.clmed.ncku.edu.tw/~cjlin/othernote/572.html 9.華藝線上圖書館:http://www.airitilibrary.com/Home/Index 10.台北醫學大學my2tmu-981級臨床人文反思課程平台:http://my2.tmu.edu.tw/course/19415 11.反思學習法在領導人才培訓的應用:http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/64505/2/4-53.pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54370 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 美國畢業後醫學教育評鑑委員會於1999年提出現代醫師須具備的六大核心能力,分別為:1.病人照護(patient care)2.醫學知識(Medical Knowledge)3.從工作中學習及成長(Practice-based learning and improvement)4.人際關係及溝通技巧(Interpersonal and communication skills)5.專業素養(Professionalism)及6.制度下之臨床工作(Systems-based practice),然而臺灣現行也引進該制度並依該架構來評核及訓練我們的住院醫師,但從住院醫師訓練才開始評核是否為時已晚?
因此,本研究之目的為: 一、依據六大核心能力之規範,了解台灣醫學生較缺乏哪一項。 二、探討所缺乏之核心能力是否因性別、身分別及成績而有所影響。 三、所分析之結果將可作為臺北醫學大學醫學系之課程設計及改善參考。 本研究採隨機抽樣方式共收集57份跨領域臨床人文反思課程之學生作業進行分析,並使用SAS統計軟體以LOGISTIC迴歸進行分析。 研究對象為醫學系六年級已接觸過臨床實習工作經驗之實習醫學生,研究方法為從實習醫學生照護個案中所撰寫的反思心得,由課程負責教師共同針對該心得圈選出所對應的ACGME能力指標之後,再交叉檢視,分析其架構,透過SAS統計軟體針對性別、身份別、成績等來分析是否因上述因素造成缺乏的核心能力。 迴歸分析研究結果為學生之成績對於六大核心能力中之醫學知識具有顯著影響,而學生對於制度下的臨床工作能力被評定為較缺乏。 研究建議(1)針對制度下的臨床工作能力較缺乏,建議可於大一或大二時,設計一些和醫學制度相關課程供學生修習(2)僅有成績和醫學知識核心能力顯著相關,建議可再強化與其他核心能力相關之課程。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 1999 proposed the modern physicians must have six core competencies, such as patient care, medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and systems-based practice. The system was not only introduced to Taiwan, but also applied to resident’s evaluation and training courses. However, is it too late to start the evaluation at residency?
Therefore, the objectives of this study were: First, to select which skills out of the six core competencies do Taiwanese medical students lack of. Second, to explore if the lack of core competencies be affected by gender, identity, and performance. Third, will the results be used as a reference for future course design at School of Medicine, Taipei Medical University. The study was randomly adopted from samples of 57 subjects from students’ homework of “Multidisciplinary Clinical Reflective Learning in Humanities”. The results were analyzed by SAS statistical software. The research subjects were sixth-grade medical students who had finished clerkship. The instructors select student’s reports that reflect that which competency that fitted ACGME, and analysis with Logistic regression. Finally, the instructors analyze different factors, including gender, identity, and academic performance, to determine which core competencies they are lacking. The results indicated that the grades have significant impact on medical knowledge of the six core competencies. In addition, systems-based practice is most deficient among the six core competencies. In conclusion, School of Medicine could design a series of courses that are related to medical system. Furthermore, School of Medicine could strengthen other courses that are related to medical knowledge of six core competencies. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:53:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01847031-1.pdf: 2847998 bytes, checksum: 8ff79ee180f3f7a91f07a15f14fea466 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員審定書--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01
謝辭------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------02 中文摘要------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------04 英文摘要------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------05 目錄------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------07 圖目錄--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------09 表目錄--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------10 第一章 導論 第一節 實習單位特色與簡介---------------------------------------------------------------11 第二節 研究背景與動機--------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 第三節 研究目的------------------------------------------------------------------------------16 第四節 研究假設------------------------------------------------------------------------------16 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 台灣醫學教育的重大演進---------------------------------------------------------17 第二節 何謂六大核心能力------------------------------------------------------------------19 第三節 何謂反思------------------------------------------------------------------------------21 第四節 如何將反思置入臨床照護---------------------------------------------------------23 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究設計------------------------------------------------------------------------------25 第二節 研究資料------------------------------------------------------------------------------25 第三節 研究流程------------------------------------------------------------------------------25 第四節 資料收集與統計方法---------------------------------------------------------------26 第五節 研究變項的操作型定義------------------------------------------------------------28 第四章 研究結果與分析 第一節 基本人口學資料之分佈情形------------------------------------------------------31 第二節 六大核心能力分布圖及與相關類別變項之分佈情形------------------------32 第三節 六大核心能力與相關類別變項之邏輯斯迴歸分析---------------------------36 第五章 討論與回饋 第一節 是否達成實習目的------------------------------------------------------------------42 第二節 對於實務實習單位的建議與回饋------------------------------------------------43 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論------------------------------------------------------------------------------------47 第二節 研究限制------------------------------------------------------------------------------48 第三節 研究成果與實務建議---------------------------------------------------------------49 第七章 參考文獻------------------------------------------------------------------------------52 附錄 附錄一 『跨領域臨床人文反思』心得寫作作業格式---------------------------------56 附錄二 臺北醫學大學暨附屬醫院聯合人體研究倫理委員會簡易審查證明------59 附錄三 反思心得寫作案例1----------------------------------------------------------------60 附錄三 反思心得寫作案例2----------------------------------------------------------------62 附錄三 反思心得寫作案例3----------------------------------------------------------------64 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 醫學生醫學核心能力之評估-以美國畢業後醫學教育評鑑委員會(ACGME)提出之六大核心能力為分析架構 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Evaluating the Core Competency of Medical Students:
An Analytical Framework of The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, ACGME Core Competency | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林時宜,陳建宇 | |
dc.subject.keyword | ACGME,六大核心能力,實習醫學生,跨領域,反思, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | ACGME,Six core competencies,Clerk,Multidisciplinary,Learning Reflective, | en |
dc.relation.page | 65 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.78 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。