請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54338完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林以正 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ka-Wai Ng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳嘉惠 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T02:51:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Baumeister, Roy F., & Leary, Mark R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Baumeister, Roy F., Vohs, Kathleen D., Aaker, Jennifer L., & Garbinsky, Emily N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505-516. Brewer, Marilynn B, & Gardner, Wendi. (1996). Who is this' We'? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(1), 83. Buhrmester, Michael D., Gomez, Angel, Brooks, Matthew L., Morales, J. Francisco, Fernandez, Saulo, & Swann, William B., Jr. (2012). My Group's Fate Is My Fate: Identity-Fused Americans and Spaniards Link Personal Life Quality to Outcome of 2008 Elections. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(6), 527-533. Chen, FangFang, Jing, Yiming, Hayes, Adele, & Lee, JeongMin. (2013). Two Concepts or Two Approaches? A Bifactor Analysis of Psychological and Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 1033-1068. Deci, Edward L, & Ryan, Richard M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior: Plenum, New York. Ellemers, Naomi, Spears, Russell, & Doosje, Bertjan. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 161-186. Fei, Xiaotong. (1948). From the Soil: The Foundations of Cinese Society. Hong Kong: Phoenix Books Culture Publishing Co. Ltd. Gomez, Angel, Brooks, Matthew L., Buhrmester, Michael D., Vazquez, Alexandra, Jetten, Jolanda, & Swann, William B., Jr. (2011). On the Nature of Identity Fusion: Insights Into the Construct and a New Measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 918-933. Gomez, Angel, Francisco Morales, J., Hart, Sonia, Vazquez, Alexandra, & Swann, William B., Jr. (2011). Rejected and Excluded Forevermore, but Even More Devoted: Irrevocable Ostracism Intensifies Loyalty to the Group Among Identity-Fused Persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1574-1586. Leach, Colin Wayne, van Zomeren, Martijn, Zebel, Sven, Vliek, Michael LW, Pennekamp, Sjoerd F, Doosje, Bertjan, Spears, Russell. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: a hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(1), 144. Lyubomirsky, Sonja, & Lepper, HeidiS. (1999). A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137-155. Mael, Fred, & Ashforth, Blake E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. Preacher, Kristopher J, & Hayes, Andrew F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891. Ryan, Richard M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of personality, 63(3), 397-427. Ryan, Richard M., & Deci, Edward L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. Steger, Michael F., Frazier, Patricia, Oishi, Shigehiro, & Kaler, Matthew. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80-93. Swann, William B., Jr., Buhrmester, Michael D, Gomez, Angel, Jetten, Jolanda, Bastian, Brock, Vazquez, Alexandra, Cui, Lijuan. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of personality and social psychology, 106(6), 912. Swann, William B., Jr., Gomez, Angel, Buhrmester, Michael D., Lopez-Rodriguez, L, Jimenez, J, & Vazquez, Alexandra. (in press). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Swann, William B., Jr., Gomez, Angel, Dovidio, John F., Hart, Sonia, & Jetten, Jolanda. (2010). Dying and Killing for One's Group: Identity Fusion Moderates Responses to Intergroup Versions of the Trolley Problem. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1176-1183. Swann, William B., Jr., Gomez, Angel, Seyle, D. Conor, Morales, J. Francisco, & Huici, Carmen. (2009). Identity Fusion: The Interplay of Personal and Social Identities in Extreme Group Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995-1011. Swann, William B., Jr., Jetten, Jolanda, Gomez, Angel, Whitehouse, Harvey, & Bastian, Brock. (2012). When Group Membership Gets Personal: A Theory of Identity Fusion. Psychological Review, 119(3), 441-456. Tajfel, Henri, & Turner, John C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33, 47. Yang, K. S. (1992). Chinese psychology and behaviors: Methods and concepts. In K. S. Yang & A. B. Yu (Eds.), The social orientation of Chinese. Taipei, Taiwan: Gui Guan. Yuki, Masaki. (2003). Intergroup comparison versus intragroup relationships: A cross-cultural examination of social identity theory in North American and East Asian cultural contexts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 166-183. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54338 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Self-sacrifice is universally considered to be a noble virtue among social norms. The identity fusion theory illustrates why some people pursue pro-social goals and can identify who is more likely to commit on self-sacrifice by using imagery scenarios or self-report measures. Despite the abundance of the evidence about the self-sacrifice aspects of fused individuals, very little is known about how identity fusion performs on important psychological aspects, such as well-being. Thus, I extended previous research to bridge the gap between identity fusion, well-being and pro-group behavior with a real-world social protest happened in Taiwan. A total of 1,785 participants were recruited through internet during the period of the social protest. Results showed that the degree to which people who are fused with groups, including country and family, was positively correlated to well-being and pro-group behavior. In addition, the visceral feeling of oneness with family mediated the link of fusion with country and individuals’ well-being, but suppressed one’s attitudes toward protecting Taiwan. The role of family on identity fusion would be discussed from a perspective of collectivistic cultures. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:51:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01227126-1.pdf: 516569 bytes, checksum: 460031edee0ccff8299f826daffa6647 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Identity fusion and identification theory..................................................... 1 1.2 Linked the strong feeling of oneness to well-being................................... 4 1.3 The mediating role of fusion with family.......................... .......................... 5 2 Method.................................................................................................................. 7 3 Results................................................................................................................. 10 4 Discussions and Conclusion.............................................................................. 14 References.............................................................................................................. 18 Appendix................................................................................................................ 22 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 國家一體感如何促進幸福感和利團體行為？
家庭一體感的中介效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | How Fusion With Country Enhances Well-being And Pro-group Behavior?
The Mediating Role of Fusion with Family | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王叢桂,孫蒨如 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 身份一體感,幸福感,利團體行為,社會認同, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Identity fusion,Well-being,Pro-group behavior,Social identity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 23 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 504.46 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。