請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54175完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 周雍強 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hui Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 呂家慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T02:43:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-27 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] Aaker, D. A. (1996). The value of brand equity. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), 27–32.
[2] Abratt, R., & Motlana, P. (2002). Managing co-branding strategies: Global brands into local markets. Business Horizons, 45(5), 43–50. [3] Aghion, P., & Bolton, P. (1987). Contracts as a Barrier to Entry. The American Economic Review, 77(3), 388–401. [4] Baker, W., Marn, M., & Zawada, C. (2001). Price smarter on the net. Harvard Business Review, 79(2), 122–127. [5] Balasubramanian, S., & Bhardwaj, P. (2004). When Not All Conflict Is Bad: Manufacturing-Marketing Conflict and Strategic Incentive Design. Management Science, 50(4), 489–502. [6] Banerjee, B., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2003). Advertising competition under consumer inertia. Marketing Science, 22(1), 131–144. [7] Banker, R. D., Khosla, I., & Sinha, K. K. (1998). Quality and Competition. Management Science, 44(9), 1179–1192. [8] Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. (2004). Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection. Organization Science, 15(3), 259–275. [9] Bork, R. H. (1978). The Antitrust Paradox, New York: Basic Books, 13(2), 403–421. [10] Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth. [11] Campbell, A. (1997). Buyer-supplier partnerships: flip sides of the same coin? Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 12(6), 417–434. [12] Cole, J. (1999). Airbus Industrie charges Boeing is inciting price war in Asian deal. Wall Street Journal-Eastern Edition, 233(119), A4. [13] Corstjens, M., & Doyle, P. (1981). A model for optimizing retail space allocations. Management Science, 27(7), 822–833. [14] Desai, K. K., & Keller, K. L. (2002). The Effects of Ingredient Branding Strategies on Host Brand Extendibility. Journal of Marketing, 66, 73–93. [15] Dyer, J. H. (1997). “Effective interfirm collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535–556. [16] Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S., & Chu, W. (1998). “Strategic supplier segmentation: the next “best practice” in supply chain management”, California Management Review, 40(2), 57–77. [17] Emden, Z., Calantone, R. J., & Droge, C. (2006). Collaborating for new product development: selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value. Journal of product innovation management, 23(4), 330–341. [18] Emshwiller, J. R. (1991). Supplier struggles to improve quality as big firms slash their vendor rolls. Wall Street Journal, BI–B2. [19] Erevelles, S., Stevenson, T. H., Srinivasan, S., & Fukawa, N. (2008). An analysis of B2B ingredient co-branding relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 940–952. [20] Gammoh, B. S., Voss, K. E., & Chakraborty, G. (2006). “Consumer Evaluation of Brand Alliance Signals,” Psychology & Marketing, 32(6), 465–486. [21] Gammoh, B. S., Voss, K. E., & Chakraborty, G. (2006). Consumer evaluation of brand alliance signals. Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), 465–486. [22] Geary, S., & Zonnenberg, J. P. (2000). What it means to be best in class. Supply Chain Management Review, 4(3), 43–48. [23] Ghosh, M., & John, G. (2009). When should original equipment manufacturers use branded component contracts with suppliers? Journal of Marketing Research, 46(5), 597–611. [24] Guiltinan, J. P. (1987). The Price Bundling of Services: A Normative Framework. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 74–85. [25] Helmig, B., Huber, J., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2008). Co-branding: The state of the art. Schmalenbach Business Review, 60, 359–377. [26] Hitt, M. A., Dacin, T., Levitas, E. Arregle, J., & Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449–467. [27] Hoetker, G. (2005). How much you know versus how well I know you: selecting a supplier for a technically innovative component. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1), 75–96. [28] Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal 39, 41–57. Reprinted in Dean RD, Leahy WH and McKee DL (eds) Spatial economic theory (Free Press, New York), 103–118. [29] Huang, J., Leng, M., & Parlar M. (2012). Demand Functions in Decision Modeling: A Comprehensive Survey and Research Directions. Decision Sciences. [30] Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C. (2006). Buyer-supplier relationships: The impact of supplier selection and buyer-supplier engagement on relationship and firm performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(10), 755–775. [31] Kass, G. V. (1980). An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data. Applied Statistics, 29(2), 119–127. [32] Kotler, P., & Pfoertsch, W. (2010). Managing Ingredient Brands and Measuring the Performance of InBrands. In Ingredient Branding, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 277–330. [33] Leuthesser, L., Kohli, C., & Suri, R. (2003). 2+2=5? A framework for using co-branding to leverage a brand. The Journal of Brand Management, 11(1), 35–47. [34] McCarthy, M. S., & Norris, D. G. (1999). Improving competitive position using branded ingredients. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(4), 267–285. [35] Mesak, H., & Mwans, T. (1998). Modelling advertising budgeting and allocation decisions using modified multinomial logit market share models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(12), 1260–1269. [36] Moorthy, K. S. (1988). Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Science, 7(2), 141–168. [37] Mudambi, S. M., Doyle, P., & Wong, V. (1997). An exploration of branding in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(5), 433–446. [38] Ng, W. L. (2007). An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 186 (2008), 1059–1067. [39] Norris, D. G. (1992). Ingredient branding: a strategy option with multiple beneficiaries. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(3), 19–31. [40] Park, C. W., Jun, S. Y., & Shocker, A. D. (1996). Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(4), 453–466. [41] Posner, R. A. (1976). Antitrust Law. An Eco- nomic Perspective, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [42] Prince, M., & Davies, M. (2002). Co-branding partners: What do they see in each other? Business Horizons, 45(5), 51–55. [43] Quinlan, J. R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann. [44] Quinlan, J.R. (1979). Discovering rules by induction from large collections of examples. Expert systems in the micro electronic age, 168–201. Edinburgh University Press. [45] Rao, A. R., & Ruekert, R. W. (1994). Brand alliances as signals of product quality. MIT Sloan Management Review, 36(1), 87–97. [46] Ryu, I., So, S., & Koo, C. (2009). The role of partnership in supply chain performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(4), 496–514. [47] Shannon, C. E. (1949). Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems. Bell System Technical Journal, 28(4), 656–715. [48] Simonin, B. L., & Ruth, J. A. (1998). Is a Company Known by the Company It Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30–42. [49] Simpson, P. M., Siguaw, J. A., & White, S. C. (2002). Measuring the performance of suppliers: an analysis of evaluation processes. Journal of Supply Chain Management Winter, 29–41. [50] Spethmann, B., & Benezra, K. (1994). Co-brand or be damned. Brandweek, 35(45), 20. [51] Su, Q., Song, Y. T., Li, Z., & Dang, J. X. (2008). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on cooperative strategy. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 14(4), 263–272. [52] Swait, J., Erdem T., Louviere J., & Dubelaar C. (1993). The equalization price: A measure of consumer-perceived brand equity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, 23–45. [53] Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [54] Urban, T. L. (2005). Inventory models with inventory-level-dependent demand: A comprehensive review and unifying theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 162(3), 792–804. [55] Vaidyanathan, R., & Aggarwal, P. (2000). Strategic brand alliances: implications of ingredient branding for national and private label brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(4), 214–228. [56] Vandenbosch, M. B., & Weinberg, C. B. (1995). Product and price competition in a two-dimensional vertical differentiation model. Marketing Science, 14(2), 224–249. [57] Voss, K.E., & Tansuhaj, P. (1999). Consumer Perspective on Foreign Market Entry. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 11(2), 39–58. [58] Wang, G., Huang, S. H., & Dismukes, J. P. (2004). Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. International Journal of Production Economics, 91(1), 1–15. [59] Washburn, J. H., Till, B. D., & Priluck, R. (2000). Co-branding: brand equity and trial effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(7), 591–604. [60] Washburn, J. H., Till, B. D., & Priluck, R. (2004). Brand alliance and customer‐based brand‐equity effects. Psychology & Marketing, 21(7), 487–508. [61] Weber, C. A., Current, J., & Desai, A. (2000). An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(2), 90–98. [62] Zeydan, M., Çolpan, C., & Çobanoğlu, C. (2011). A combined methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 2741–2751. [63] 金偉燦(W. Chan Kim)和芮妮．莫伯尼(Renée Mauborgne)。2007。藍海策略(BLUE OCEAN STRATEGY)。初版。台灣：天下文化。 [64] 楊翔宇。1999。樹葉節點數目限制下的決策樹建構。碩士論文。台灣：國立中央大學資訊管理學系。 [65] 葉瓊雯。2014。智權元件供應商以產品差異化原則探討通路夥伴選擇決策。碩士論文。台灣：國立臺灣大學工業工程學研究所。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54175 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣產業以代工製造為主，擁有技術與成本等製程優勢，部分代工廠商雖已累積相當程度的智財權，卻仍受品牌廠商的牽制與面臨價格競爭，若欲改變現今的困境，則代工廠商須從供給端走向需求端，朝要素品牌發展，機會相較終端品牌大。當代工廠商累積智財權後，此時稱為元件供應商，若欲成為要素品牌，會先面臨宿主產品的選擇問題。
本文從智權元件供應商之觀點，探討這個夥伴選擇問題以及其分析方法。本文以一家元件供應商對應到兩家差異化產品廠商的三元結構為供應鏈模式，首先探討元件供應商是否能經由整合投資的策略，改變市場既有均衡及潛在市場規模而順利切入下游產品市場。在確定供應商有運作的空間後，進一步分析夥伴選擇的問題。 本研究藉由情境分析，並透過決策樹的建構與廠商間的動態賽局，歸納出各子集合下兩產品廠商的反應，並予以擬定元件供應商之對策。最終證明若智權元件供應商欲快速讓終端市場認識該品牌，則對於元件供應商而言，同時與兩間廠商合作將是最好的策略，又從元件供應商的對策表可以發現，僅在品質差異程度和價格彈性皆小時，元件供應商要同時與兩廠商進行合作，其他則是先與強的廠商合作，此符合實際情形。另外，合作順序不等於遊說順序，多數情況下，強的廠商主動與元件供應商合作，此時供應商僅需遊說弱的廠商。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Contract manufacturer is the main industry in Taiwan’s manufacture industries. Even though having technical and cost advantages, being in charge of the brand manufacturers and facing price competition. The chance for the contract manufacturer to build up an ingredient brand is easier than a product brand. After getting the intellectual property rights, contract manufacturer as component suppliers, may face the issue of selecting host products.
Based on the triadic supply chain configuration with one component supplier and two product manufacturers, this study first discusses if the component supplier could change the market equilibrium and increase the potential market size. Then the study analyzes the partner selection problem in next step. By numerical analysis, we can build up the decision tree and figure out the relationship between the manufacturers’ strategy game and the supplier’s countermeasure. This paper has proven that the best strategy for the supplier is to collaborate with two manufactures. Several results are obtained. First, the degree of quality difference is the determinant factor. Second, the order of the cooperation does not mean the order of the persuading. This paper concludes that the strong manufacturer would take the initiative to cooperate in most cases, so the supplier only need to persuade the weak manufacturer. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:43:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02546011-1.pdf: 2268354 bytes, checksum: 108531686822e92e87c687c3ec0cfefd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
誌謝 i 摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究背景 1 1.2研究問題分析 3 1.3研究目的 7 第二章 文獻回顧 8 2.1夥伴關係與智權元件 8 2.1.1 夥伴關係 8 2.1.2 夥伴選擇 9 2.1.3 智權元件 12 2.2需求函數 15 2.2.1需求函數分類 15 2.2.2產品品質 18 2.2.3價格和品質的模型 19 2.3品牌聯合 22 2.3.1品牌聯盟定義與分類 22 2.3.2品牌聯合的效益 25 2.3.3要素品牌 27 2.4決策樹演算法 35 第三章 元件供應商與雙占市場均衡 39 3.1 下游兩廠商之競爭基礎模型 39 3.1.1 模型假設與符號定義 39 3.1.2 需求函數設定 40 3.1.3基礎模型分析與討論 43 3.2元件供應商切入之市場均衡 44 3.2.1模型假設 46 3.2.2需求函數設定 47 3.3競爭模型之因子分析 53 3.3.1投資單價(g) 53 3.3.2價格彈性(B) 54 3.3.3品質彈性(r) 55 3.3.4品質差異程度(ka-kb) 57 3.3.5小結 58 3.4 策略分析比較 59 3.4.1外溢效果 59 3.4.2 策略二和策略三之比較 61 第四章 元件供應商之夥伴選擇 69 4.1 三策略比較 69 4.2 決策樹建立 72 4.3 元件供應商的行動 76 4.4 決策樹的敏感度分析 87 第五章 結論 90 參考文獻 91 附錄一 需求函數(較為一般性) 98 附錄二 情境設計(B為絕對的形式) 101 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 具整合投資需要的智權元件供應商通路夥伴選擇 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Partner Selection Based on Integration Investment for a Proprietary Component Supplier | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳慧敏,洪一薰,黃奎隆 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 智權元件,要素品牌,品牌聯合,夥伴選擇,整合投資,雙占市場,決策樹, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Proprietary Component,Ingredient Branding,Co-branding,Partner Selection,Integration Investment,Duopoly Market,Decision Tree, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 101 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 工業工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.22 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。