請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5309完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃光國(Kwang-Kuo Hwang),黃?莉(Li-li Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jun-hong Jiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 江俊宏 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-15T17:55:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-01 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-15T17:55:37Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-11 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-10 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 大津秀一 (2010) 。 《死前會後悔的25件事》(詹慕如譯) (原文: 死セシわズ後悔エペアシ２５，2009，致知出版社) 。 台北：天下。
王叢桂 (2004) 。 父母職責信念與工作價值觀 。 《應用心理研究》 ，22，201-216。 利翠珊 (1995) 。 夫妻互動歷程之探討：以台北地區年輕夫妻為例的一項初探性研究 。 《本土心理學研究》 ，4，260-321。 林麗雲 (1991) 。 《中國人的愛與苦》 。台北：張老師文化出版社。 金樹人、林清山、田秀蘭 (1989) 。 我國大專生生涯發展定向之研究 。 《教育心理學報》 ，22，167-190。 周玉慧、黃朗文 (2007) 。 中年生活評估與憂鬱之關係：以情緒支持為中介 。《人文及社會科學集刊》 ，19(4)，439-471。 柄谷行人 (2011) 。 《倫理21》(林暉鈞譯) (原文: 倫理21，2003，平凡社)。台北：心靈工坊文化。 陳舜文 (1994) 。 《人際關係與爭議解決程序之選擇：由關係性質之組型探討》 。國立臺灣大學心理研究所，碩士論文。 許詩淇、黃囇莉 (2009) 。 天下無不是的父母？――父母角色義務對親子衝突與親子關係之影響 。 《中華心理學刊》 ，51(3)，295-317。 黃光國 (1995) 。 庶人倫理與士之倫理：儒家思想的內在結構 。 見黃光國 (著)：《知識與行動：中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋》，第六章，235-276 。台北：心理出版社。 黃光國 (2004) 。 儒家社會中的生活目標與角色義務 。 《本土心理學研究》 ，22，121-193。 黃囇莉、朱瑞玲 (2007) 。 《是亂流? 還是潮起、潮落? ——尋找台灣的「核心價值」及其變遷》 。 發表於台灣的社會變遷1985∼2005：台灣社會變遷調查計畫第十一次研討會，12 月21-22日。主辦單位：中央研究院社會學研究所。 楊智馨、林世華 (1998) 。 大學生生涯發展狀況與自我認定狀態之關係 。 《教育心理學報》 ，30(2)，1-16。 楊國樞 (2004) 。 華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究：社會取向與個人取向的觀點。 《本土心理學研究》 ，22，11-80。 楊國樞、葉明華 (2005) 。 家族主義與泛家族主義。見楊國樞、黃光國、楊中芳（主編） ： 《華人本土心理學》 ，第八章，249-292，台北：遠流 。 楊國樞、劉奕蘭、張淑慧、王琳 (2010) 。 華人雙文化自我的個體發展階段：理論建構的嘗試 。 《中華心理學刊》 ，52(2)，113-132。 葉明華、楊國樞 (1997) 。 中國人的家族主義：概念分析與實徵衡鑑 。 《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》 ，83，169-225。 顧建平編著 (2008) 。 《漢字圖解字典》 。北京：東方出版中心。 Auhagen, A. E., & Bierhoff, H. W. (2001). Responsibility at the beginning of the third millennium. In A. E. Auhagen & H. W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon (pp. 179–184). London: Routledge. Ballet, J., Dubois, J.-L. ＆ Mahieu, F. (2007). Responsibility for each other’s freedom: Agency as the source of collective capability. Journal of Human Development, 8(2), 185-202. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961-981. Birnbacher, D. (2001). Philosophical foundations of responsibility. In A. E. Auhagen, & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon (pp. 9–22). London: Routledge. Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley. Blustein, D. L., Devenis, L. E., & Kidney, B. A. (1989), Relationship between the identity formation process and career development, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 196-202. Britt, T. W. (1999). Engaging the self in the field: Testing the triangle model of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 696–706. Byrne, R. M. (2002). Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 426-431. Connolly, T., Ordonez, L. D., & Coughlan, R. (1997). Regret and responsibility in the evaluation of decision outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 73-85. Connolly, T , & Zeelenberg M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212-216 Crawford, M. T., McConnell, A. R., Lewis, A. C., Sherman, S. J. (2002). Reactance, compliance, and anticipated regret. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 56-63 Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton. Frank, S. J., Pirsch, L. A., & Wright, V. C. (1990). Late adolescents' perceptions of their relationships with their parents: Relationships among deidealization, autonomy, relatedness, and insecurity and implications for adolescent adjustment and ego identity status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19(6), 571-588. Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228. Gan, S. P.(2007-8). Human cloning: An impassable ethical minefield. Contemporary Chinese Thought, 39(2), 78-90. Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1994). The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 357-365. Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379-395. Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Varieties of regret: a debate and partial resolution. Psychological Review, 105, 602-605. Gilovich, T., Wang, R. F., Regan, D. & Nishina, S. (2003). Regrets of action and inaction across cultures. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 34, 61-71 Girotto, V., Ferrante, D., Pighin, S., & Gonzalez, M. (2007). Postdecisional counterfactual thinking by actors and readers. Psychological Science, 18, 510–515. Hamilton, V. L., & Sanders, J. (1992). Everyday justice: Responsibility and the individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility. NewYork: Oxford University Press. Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Hur, T., Roese, N. J., & Namkoong, J. (2009). Regret in the east and west: Role of intrapersonal versus interpersonal norms. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 151-156. Hwang, K. K. (1997-8) Guanxi and Mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7(1), 17-37. Hwang, K. K. (1998). Two moralities: Reinterpreting the finding of empirical research on moral reasoning in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 1, 211-238. Hwang, K. K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 163-183. Hwang, K. K. (2011). The mandala model of self. Psychological Studies, 56(4), 329-334. Iyengar, S. S. (2010). The art of choosing. New York: Twelve. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the role of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349-366. Jose, P. E. (2013). Doing statistical mediation and moderation. New York: NY: Guilford Press. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, E Slovic, & A. Tversky, (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press. Landman, J. (1987). Regret: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 17, 135-160. Larson, B. A. (1996). Environmental policy based on strict liability: Implications of uncertainty and bankruptcy. Land Economics, 72(1), 33–42. Lenk, H. & Maring, M. (2001). Responsibility and technology. In A. E. Auhagen, & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon (pp. 93–107). London: Routledge. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805-824. Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence, In J. Adelson (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, (pp. 59-187). New York: John Wiley. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. Montada, L. (2001). Denial of responsibility. In A.E. Auhagen & H.W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon (pp. 79-92). London: Routledge. N'gbala, A., & Branscombe, N. R. (1997). When does action elicit more regret than inaction and is counterfactual mutation the mediator of this effect? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 324-343. Ordonez L. D., & Connolly T. (2000). Comment regret and responsibility: A reply to Zeelenberg et al. (1998) . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 132-142. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 1-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Roese, N. (2004). Twisted pair: Counterfactual thinking and the hindsight bias. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 258-273). Oxford: Blackwell. Roese, N. (2005). If only: How to turn regret into opportunity. New York, NY: Broadway Books. Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M. (1993). The structure of counterfactual thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 312-319. Roese, N. J., & Summerville, A. (2005). What we regret most . . . and why. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1273-1285. Roese, N. J., Pennington, G. L., Coleman, J., Janicki, M., Li, N. P. & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex differences in regret: All for love or some for lust? Personality Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 770–780. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). New York: Academic. Seta, J. J., McElroy, T., & Seta, C. E. (2001). To do or not to do: Desirability and consistency mediate judgments of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 861-870. Shaver, K. G., & Schutte, D. A. (2001). Towards a broader psychological foundation for responsibility. In A. E. Auhagen, & H.-W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility: The many faces of a social phenomenon (pp. 35–47). London: Routledge. Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on perchurse decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 105-118. Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580-591. Sugden, R. (2004). The opportunity criterion: Consumer sovereignty without the assumption of coherent preferences. American Economic Review 94, 1014-1033. Tafarodi, R., Marshall, T., & Katsura, H. (2001). Standing out in Japan and Canada. Paper presented at the 4th Biannual Conferences on Asian Association of Social Psychology, Melbourne, Australia. Tsiros, M. (1998). Effect of regret on post-choice valuation: The case of more than two alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 48-69. Triandis, H. C. (2005). Issues in individualism and collectivism research. In R. M. Sorrentino, D. Cohen, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Culture and social behavior: The tenth ontario symposium (pp. 207-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Waterman, A. S. (1981). Individualism and interdependence. American Psychologist, 36, 762-783. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag. Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford. Wrosch, C., & Heckhausen, J. (2002). Perceived control of life regret: Good for young and bad for old adults. Psychology and Aging, 17, 340-350. Yamaguchi, S. (1994). Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 175-188). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Zeelenberg M. (1999). Anticipated regret, expected feedback, and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 93-106. Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2007). A theory of regret regulation 1.0. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 3-18. Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W.W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Reconsidering the relation between regret and responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 254-272. Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W.W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). Rejoinder regret and responsibility resolved ? Evaluating Ordonez and Connolly’s (2000) conclusions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 143-154 Zeelenberg, M., Van den Bos, K., van Dijk, E., & Pieters, R. (2002). The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 314-327. Zeigarnik, B. (1935). On finished and unfinished tasks. In K. Lewin (Ed.), A dynamic theory of personality (pp. 300–314). NewYork: McGrawHill. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5309 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 華人子女做決定時，父母常要子女聽從他們的意見。本研究探討當結果不佳時，子女聽或不聽父母的話，是如何透過盡責與咎責來影響親子的後悔程度。本研究採實驗故事法讓子女與家長閱讀不同故事後評量。研究一顯示，子女聽話比不聽話使子女更後悔，且為家庭犧牲需要性高低會調節子女後悔程度。此外，歸咎父母責任會中介聽不聽話對子女的後悔程度，但歸咎自己責任則否。研究二顯示，父母因沒要求子女聽話而事前未盡責比盡責使父母更後悔，但子女聽話父母要事後負責比子女不聽話使父母更後悔。此外，父母歸咎自身責任會中介子女聽不聽話對父母的後悔程度，但歸咎子女責任則否。研究三顯示，在弱義務事件，子女聽話比不聽話使子女更後悔，是透過事後咎責而中介；在強義務事件，子女不聽話比聽話使子女更後悔，是透過事前盡責而中介。整體而言，子女決定是否聽話，可思考聽話事件的義務性強弱。若強義務事件因聽話能事前對父母盡責，或弱義務事件因不聽話而事後不對父母咎責，則能讓人較不後悔。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | When making decisions, Chinese parents often ask their children to obey them. This research explored that when obeying or disobeying parents led to poor results, how ex ante responsibility fulfillment and ex post responsibility attribution altered the degrees of regret. Using scenario experiments, we assessed the attitudes of children and parents. Study 1 showed that in choosing college majors, obeying parents made children more regretful than disobeying, and responsibility attribution to parents mediated the effects of obeying or disobeying on regret, but responsibility attribution to self did not. Study 2 provided that in choosing college majors, parents who have not asked their children to obey them and have not fulfilled ex ante responsibility were more regretful than those who have; but with children obeying, parents were more regretful than children disobeying due to more ex post responsibility attributed to themselves. Further, the responsibility parents attributed to themselves mediated the effects of obeying or disobeying on regret, but responsibility attribution to children did not. Study 3 demonstrated that in a weak-duty event, obeying parents made children more regretful than disobeying, and attributing ex post responsibility to parents mediated the effects of obeying or disobeying on regret; in a strong-duty event, disobeying parents made children more regretful than obeying, and fulfilling ex ante responsibility to parents mediated the effects of obeying or disobeying on regret. Overall, when children contemplate on whether to obey or disobey their parents, they can consider the degree of duty associated with the event. If obeying parents can fulfill ex ante responsibility to parents in a strong-duty event, or disobeying parents can not attribute ex post responsibility to parents in a weak-duty event, then we are less likely to regret. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-15T17:55:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-D92227001-1.pdf: 2229034 bytes, checksum: 5238c6d7b003b457317019d8d1ab3d9b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒 論………………………………………………… 01
第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………… 03 第一節 後 悔……………………………………… 03 第二節 責 任……………………………………… 14 第三節 義 務……………………………………… 20 第四節 本研究的問題與主要假設………………… 25 第三章 研究一………………………………………………… 27 第一節 研究一前導研究…………………………… 30 第二節 研究一之一………………………………… 33 第三節 研究一之二………………………………… 38 第四節 研究一綜合討論…………………………… 47 第四章 研究二………………………………………………… 51 第一節 研究二之一………………………………… 53 第二節 研究二之二………………………………… 66 第三節 研究二綜合討論…………………………… 80 第五章 研究三………………………………………………… 83 第一節 研究三之一………………………………… 85 第二節 研究三之二………………………………… 95 第三節 研究三之三………………………………… 108 第四節 研究三綜合討論…………………………… 125 第六章 總結與綜合討論……………………………………… 127 參考文獻………………………………………………………… 133 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 事後咎責 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 後悔 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 聽話 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 不聽話 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 義務 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 事前盡責 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | obeying | en |
| dc.subject | attribute ex post responsibility | en |
| dc.subject | fulfill ex ante responsibility | en |
| dc.subject | duty | en |
| dc.subject | disobeying | en |
| dc.subject | regret | en |
| dc.title | 義務本位社會中的責任與後悔：聽不聽父母的話對後悔的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Responsibility and Regret in a Duty-based Society: The Effects of Obeying or Disobeying Parents on Regret | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王叢桂(Chung-kwei Wang),利翠珊(Tsui-shan Li),周玉慧(Yuh-Huey Jou),劉奕蘭(Yi-Lan Liu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 後悔,聽話,不聽話,義務,事前盡責,事後咎責, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | regret,obeying,disobeying,duty,fulfill ex ante responsibility,attribute ex post responsibility, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 141 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-10 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf | 2.18 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。