Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/53053Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊國鑫(Kuo-Hsin Yang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hsuan Chan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 詹于萱 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T16:41:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-08-07 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-06 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Allen, T. M., Bathurst, R. J., Holtz, R. D., Walters, D. and Lee, W. F. (2003). A new working stress method for prediction of reinforcement loads on geosynthetic walls. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 40(5), 976-994. Anastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, G., Bransby, M. F., Davies, M. C. R. and EI Nahas, A. (2007). Fault rupture propagation through sand: finite-element analysis and validation through centrifuge experiments. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 133(8), 943-958. Ardah, A., Abu-Farsakh, M. Y. and Voyiadjis, G. Z. (2018). Numerical evaluation of the effect of differential settlement on the performance of GRS-IBS. Geosynthetics International, 25(4), 427-441. ASTM D4595. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Geotextiles by the Wide-Width Strip Method. ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA. ASTM D5262. Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Unconfined Tension Creep and Creep Rupture Behavior of Geosynthetics. ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA. ASTM D5321. Standard Test Method for Determining the Shear Strength of Soil-Geosynthetic and Geosynthetic-Geosynthetic Interfaces by Direct Shear. ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA. ASTM D6706. Standard Test Method for Measuring Geosynthetic Pullout Resistance in Soil. ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA. ASTM D7181. Standard Test Method for Consolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils. ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA. Bonilla, M.G. (1967). Historic Surface Faulting in the Continental United States and Adjacent parts of Mexico. U.S.G. S., TID-24124. Bray, J. D., Ashmawy, A., Mukhopadhyay, G. and Gath, E. M. (1993). Use of geosynthetics to mitigate earthquake fault rupture propagation through compacted fill. Proceedings of the Geosynthetics '93 Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 1, 379-392. Bray, J. D., Seed, R. B., Cluff, L. S. and Seed, H. B. (1994). Earthquake fault rupture propagation through soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 120(3), 543-561. Bray, J. D. (2001). Developing mitigation measures for the hazards associated with earthquake surface fault rupture. A Workshop on Seismic Fault-Induced Failures–Possible Remedies for Damage to Urban Facilities, Japan Society for Promotion of Science, University of Tokyo, Japan. Bray, J. D. (2009). Earthquake surface fault rupture design considerations. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 37-45. Brinkgreve, R. B. J., Kumarswamy, S., Swolfs, W. M., Zampich, L. and Ragi Manoj, N. (2019). PLAXIS 2D Manual, Plaxis bv, Bentley Systems, Inc., Netherlands. Chen, Y. G., Chen, W. S., Lee, J. C., Lee, Y. H. and Lee, C. T. (2001). Surface rupture of 1999 chi-chi earthquake yields insights on active tectonics of central Taiwan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(5), 977-985. Faccioli, E., Anastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, G., Callerio, A. and Paolucci, R. (2008). Fault rupture–foundation interaction: selected case histories. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 6(4), 557-583. FHWA. (2009). Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes-Volume I. U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, NHI-10-024. Garcia, F. E. and Bray, J. D. (2019). Discrete element analysis of earthquake fault rupture-soil-foundation interaction. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 145(9), 04019046. Gazetas, G., Pecker, A., Faccioli, E., Paolucci, R. and Anastasopoulos, I. (2008). Preliminary design recommendations for dip-slip fault–foundation interaction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 6(4), 677-687. Kelson, K. I., Kang, K. H., Page, W. D., Lee, C. T. and Cluff, L. S. (2001). Representative styles of deformation along the Chelungpu fault from the 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake: geomorphic characteristics and responses of man-made structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91(5), 930-952. Kobayashi, Y. (1976). Hazards from surface faulting in earthquakes. Bulletin of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute, 26(4), 213-240. Kost, A. D., Filz, G. M., Cousins, T. and Brown, M. C. (2014). Full-scale investigation of differential settlements beneath a GRS bridge. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2462(1), 28-36. Kuwano, J., Tachibana, S., Ishigaki, T. and Tatta, N. (2013). Confined-reinforced subgrade to reduce differential settlement of road pavement. Proceedings of 5th KGS-JGS Geotechnical Engineering Workshop, Seoul, Korea, 149-154. Lade, P. V. and Lee, K. L. (1976). Engineering Properties of Soils. Report UCLA-ENG-7652, University of California, Los Angeles, California. Langharr, H. L. (1951). Dimensional Analysis and Theory of Models. John Wiley Sons, Inc., New York, USA. Lazarte, C. A., Bray, J. D., Johnson, A. M. and Lemmer, R. E. (1994). Surface breakage of the 1992 Landers earthquake and its effects on structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society, 84(3), 547-561. Loli, M., Kourkoulis, R. and Gazetas, G. (2018). Physical and numerical modeling of hybrid foundations to mitigate seismic fault rupture effects. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 144(11), 04018083. Matsuda, T. (1975). Magnitude and recurrence interval of earthquakes from a fault. Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan. 2nd ser.), 28(3), 269-283. (In Japanese) Miao, L., Wang, F., Han, J. and Lv, W. (2014). Benefits of geosynthetic reinforcement in widening of embankments subjected to foundation differential settlement. Geosynthetics International, 21(5), 321-332. Naeij, M., Soroush, A. and Javanmardi, Y. (2019). Numerical investigation of the effects of embedment on the reverse faultfoundation interaction. Computers and Geotechnics, 113, 103098. Oettle, N. K. and Bray, J. D. (2013). Geotechnical mitigation strategies for earthquake surface fault rupture. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 139(11), 1864-1874. Ohta, H., Ishigaki, T. and Tatta, N. (2013). Retrofit technique for asphalt concrete pavements after seismic damage. Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris. 1333-1336. Rajesh, S. and Viswanadham, B. V. S. (2015). Numerical simulation of geogrid-reinforced soil barriers subjected to differential settlements. International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, 15(4), 04014062. Rowe, P. W. (1962). The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of articles in contact. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, 269, 500-527. Sadat, M. R., Huang, J., Bin-Shafique, S. and Rezaeimalek, S. (2018). Study of the behavior of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls subjected to differential settlements. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 46(1), 77-90. Stulgis, R. P., Soydemir, C., Telgener, R. J., and Hewitt, R. D. (1996). Use of geosynthetics in ‘piggyback landfills’: a case study. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 14(7-8), 341-364. Viswanadham, B. V. S. and K'o' ̈nig, D. (2004). Studies on scaling and instrumentation of a geogrid. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 22(5), 307-328. Viswanadham, B. V. S. and K'o' ̈nig, D. (2009). Centrifuge modeling of geotextile-reinforced slopes subjected to differential settlements. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(2), 77-88. Viswanadham, B. V. S. and Muthukumaran, A. (2007). Influence of geogrid layer on the integrity of compacted clay liners of landfills. Soils and Foundations, 47(3), 517-532. Wells, D. L. and Coppersmith, K. J. (1994). New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(4), 974-1002. Yang, K. H., Chiang, J., Lai, C. W., and Lin, M. L. (2020). Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil foundations across a normal fault. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 48(3), 357-373. Zornberg, J. G. and Arriaga, F. (2003). Strain distribution within geosynthetic-reinforced slopes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 129(1), 32-45. 吳亮均 (2017),正斷層錯動引致上覆土層變形及其對橋梁上部結構型式及樁基礎互制之研究,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系碩士論文,台北。 李錫堤、康耿豪、鄭錦桐、廖啟雯 (2000),921集集大地震之地表破裂及地盤變形現象,地工技術,第81期,第5-18頁。 林銘郎、李崇正、黃文正、黃文昭 (2014),重要活動斷層構造特性調查研究活動斷層近地表變形特性研究(100~103年)成果總報告,經濟部中央地質調查所委託報告。 紀宗吉、邱禎龍、李原希、劉桓吉 (2000),車籠埔斷層沿線地表變形致災案例探討,經濟部中央地質調查所特刊第十二號,第235-254頁。 連永旺、黃漢勇 (1999),大地裂痕,地工技術研究發展基金會,台北。 黃文正、陳致言、劉思妤、林燕慧、林啟文、張徽正 (2000),台灣中部大甲溪至頭汴坑溪九二一集集地震地表變形模式,經濟部中央地質調查所特刊第十二號,第63-87頁。 蔡明宏 (2011),三軸壓縮試驗下加勁土壤力學行為與加勁材應變發展之研究,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文,台北。 賴兆偉 (2018),加勁基礎受正斷層作用之物理模型試驗研究,國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文,台北。 鍾春富 (2007),逆斷層錯動引致上覆土層變形行為及對結構物影響之研究,國立臺灣大學土木工程學系博士論文,台北。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/53053 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 斷層錯動使得地盤上、下盤形成相對位移,產生之剪裂帶向地表發展會造成嚴重的地表變形,使結構物損壞並倒塌。當線性結構物無可避免地必須通過斷層帶時,若以具有柔性特質之加勁土壤基礎(Geosynthetic-reinforced soil foundation)替代剛性混凝土結構將可減緩斷層錯動造成之地表差異沉陷、降低地表角變量並維持上部結構之穩定性及通行性。 本研究以有限元素法分析加勁土壤基礎減緩斷層錯動引致之地表變形行為,探討加勁材抵抗正斷層錯動之力學機制,包含阻斷效應及張力膜效應。首先透過物理模型試驗結果驗證本研究數值分析方法之合理性,接著透過一系列之參數分析,改變加勁材鋪設長度、勁度、最大張力強度、土壤基礎厚度、回填土模數以及界面強度折減因子,評估不同土壤參數及加勁材參數抵抗正斷層錯動之效果,並用以提出加勁土壤基礎之設計方法。數值分析之基本模型(Baseline case)為土壤厚度3 m、平均鋪設三層地工合成材料之加勁土壤基礎,受傾角60°之正斷層錯動,最大錯動量為S = 1.5 m而最大垂直錯動比S/H達50 %。透過觀察地表最大角變量、剪裂帶發展過程、加勁材應變發展長度以及最大張力應變值評估加勁土壤基礎抵抗斷層錯動之效果。 研究結果顯示,所建立之數值模型可以有效模擬加勁土壤基礎受正斷層作用下之剪裂帶發展及地表變形行為。當加勁材鋪設長度超過正斷層錯動引致之張力區範圍時,加勁材即可有效減緩主要沉陷區之地表角變量。鋪設較長之加勁材則能有效發揮阻斷效應,阻止基礎內剪裂帶繞行至加勁材末端並向上發展至地表,有效防止地表因剪裂帶繞行造成二次沉陷的產生,亦可同時避免加勁材拉出作用。此外,由數值分析結果可得知地表最大角變量將隨著加勁材張力發展增加而降低,兩者大約呈線性關係,證實了加勁材之張力膜效應。最後,本研究透過多變量迴歸分析獲得預測地表最大角變量及加勁材最大張應變之迴歸式,建立加勁土壤基礎在正斷層錯動下抗斷裂與抗拉出之設計方法。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | A fault rupture may bring serious structural damages. To prevent potential damages, one possible solution is to use geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) foundation under linear infrastructure to cross the fault. The GRS foundation was adopted to accommodate the differential settlement, reduce the fault-induced angular distortion and maintain the stability and serviceability of the embankment. This study focused on the performance of GRS foundations subjected to fault-induced differential settlement. A series of numerical simulations are conducted in finite element program and validated with physical model tests. The validated numerical model is then used to develop the baseline case properties which is a GRS foundation in 3 m height, with 3 layers of reinforcement, subjected to normal fault displacement in a dip of 60°. Afterwards, a serious parameter study is conducted through changing the parameters which are reinforcement length, foundation height, reinforcement stiffness, reinforcement tensile strength, soil stiffness and soil-reinforcement interface strength reduction factor to investigate the mechanism of reinforcement preventing fault rupture propagation. The results show that the numerical analysis methodology is well-validated and could simulate the surface deformation of GRS foundations subjected to normal fault movement. While the reinforcement length exceeds the range of tension zone caused by normal fault, GRS foundation can effectively reduce surface angular distortion at primary settlement. Build up longer reinforcement can limit the shear ruptures propagate up to the ground surface or winding around at the end of reinforced zone and then avoid secondary settlement take shape. In addition, the numerical results indicate that ground surface maximum angular distortion decrease with reinforcement tensile force increase, which confirmed the tension membrane effect. Finally, multiple regression analysis method is used to obtain the regression formula to predict maximum angular distortion and reinforcement maximum tensile strain. The responses are adopted for the design method of GRS foundation subjected to normal fault. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:41:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0508202015000300.pdf: 10265291 bytes, checksum: b0689bf97acad312bf83a4072b4262a3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I 摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 X 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 1.2 研究方法 4 1.3 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 斷層錯動引致之危害 7 2.1.1 剪裂帶發展及地表表徵 8 2.1.2 地表變形減緩措施 9 2.1.3 數值分析於斷層錯動之相關研究 12 2.2 加勁土壤結構 15 2.2.1 受差異沉陷之行為 15 2.2.2 設計規範 21 第三章 數值模式與驗證 24 3.1 數值分析方法 24 3.1.1 分析軟體 25 3.1.2 分析模式 25 3.1.3 土壤組成律模式 27 3.2 數值模型驗證 31 3.2.1 驗證之物理模型試驗介紹 31 3.2.2 材料參數校正 44 3.2.3 模型驗證 50 第四章 參數分析與力學機制 59 4.1 參數分析流程 59 4.2 加勁材鋪設長度 61 4.3 加勁材勁度 70 4.4 加勁材最大張力強度 76 4.5 土壤基礎厚度 81 4.6 回填土模數 87 4.7 介面強度折減因子 92 4.8 參數敏感度分析 97 第五章 設計方法建立 101 5.1 加勁材破壞應變設計(抗斷裂) 102 5.2 加勁材鋪設長度設計(抗嚴重拉出) 104 5.2.1 張力區影響長度 104 5.2.2 主動破壞幾何推算 110 5.3 地表最大角變量之預測 111 5.4 案例試算說明 115 第六章 結論與建議 117 6.1 結論 117 6.2 建議 118 參考文獻 119 問題與回覆 124 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 差異沉陷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地表角變量 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 有限元素法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 正斷層 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 加勁土壤基礎 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Geosynthetic-reinforced soil foundation | en |
| dc.subject | Normal fault | en |
| dc.subject | Surface angular distortion | en |
| dc.subject | Differential settlement | en |
| dc.subject | Finite element analysis | en |
| dc.title | 加勁土壤基礎受正斷層錯動之有限元素法分析與設計方法建立 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Finite Element Analysis and Design Method of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Foundation subjected to Normal Fault Movement | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃文昭(Wen-Chao Huang),李嶸泰(Jung-Tai Li),阮仲如(Zhong-Ru Ruan) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 加勁土壤基礎,正斷層,有限元素法,差異沉陷,地表角變量, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Geosynthetic-reinforced soil foundation,Normal fault,Finite element analysis,Differential settlement,Surface angular distortion, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 128 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202002470 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 土木工程學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0508202015000300.pdf Restricted Access | 10.02 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
