請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52782完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張清溪 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsung-Yu Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 謝宗宇 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T16:27:24Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-08-17 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 江豐富 (2006), <外勞引進對本國勞工失業、職業選擇及薪資之影響>, 《臺灣經濟預測與政策》, 37(1), 2006.10, 69-111.
林宗弘 (2009), <臺灣的後工業化: 階級結構的轉型與社會不平等, 1992-2007>, 《臺灣社會學刊》, 43, 2009.12, 93-158. 林明仁 (2005), <內部勞動市場中的升遷與工資>, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 33(1), 2005.03, 59-96. 洪明皇, 鄭文輝 (2013), <台灣高所得者所得份額之變化:1977-2010>, 《調查研究-方法與應用》, 30(2), 2013.10, 47-95. 許聖章 (2007), <臺灣農家所得分配與貿易自由化>, 《農業經濟半年刊》, 81, 2007.06, 93-119. WEL 許碧峰、莊奕琦 (1999), <臺灣不同規模廠商工資差異之實證分析>, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 27(2), 1999.06, 241-267 陳坤銘、楊書菲 (2005), <國際貿易對相對工資之影響-以中國大陸貿易自由化為例>, 《中國大陸研究》, 48(2), 2005.06, 99-122. 陳添枝 (2003), <全球化與兩岸經濟關係>, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 31(3), 2003.09, 331-345. 曹添旺、陳建良、陳隆華 (2006), <國際化對臺灣製造業男性工資差異之影響>, 《人文及社會科學集刊》, 18(2), 2006.06 黃登興 (2014), <台灣薪資停滯現象解析—全球化貿易與投資夥伴>, IEAS Working Paper No. 14-A005, March, 2014 鄭保志 (2004), <工資流動性與終身不均度的年群分析>, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 32(3), 2004.09 劉瑞文 (2001), <產業結構變遷對國內就業與所得分配的影響>, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 29(2), 2001.06, 203-233. 劉錦添、鄒孟文 (1999), <臺灣電子業之實證>, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 27(3), 1999.09, 285-309. 謝中興、江永裕 (2005), <勞動能力分配、生產可分割性與國際分工>, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 33(3), 2005.09, 257-285. 蘇國賢 (2008), 〈台灣的所得分配與社會流動之長期趨勢〉。 187-216, 收錄於王宏仁、李廣均、龔宜君主編, 《跨戒:流動與堅持的台灣社會》。台北: 群學出版社。 Audet, Danis (1996), “Globalization in the Clothing Industry,” in Globalization of Industry: Overview and Sector Reports, Paris: Organization for Economic Corporation and Development. Bell, Daniel (1976), The Coming of Post-industrial Society: a Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic Books. Block, Fred (1990), Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press. Chen, Been-Lon and Mei Hsu (2001), “Time-Series Wage Differential in Taiwan: the Role of International Trade,” Review of Development Economics, 5(2), 336-354. Chow, Grogory (1960), “Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions,” Econometrica, 28(3), 531-534. Feenstra, Robert C. and Gordon H. Hanson (1999), “Productivity Measurement and the Impact of Trade and Technology on Wages: Estimates for the U.S., 1972-1990,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 114(3), 907-940. Feenstra, Robert C. and Gordon H. Hanson (2001), “Global Production Sharing and Rising Inequality: A Survey of Trade and Wages,” NBER Working Paper, Vol.8372. Granger, Clive William John (1969), “Investigation causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods,” Econometrica, 37, 424-438. Granger, Clive William John and Newbold Paul (1974), “Spurious regressions in econometrics,” Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120. Hahn, Jinyong, Petra Todd and Wilbert Van der Klaauw (2001), “Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression Discontinuity Design,” Econometrica, 69, 201-209. Heckscher, Eli (1919), “The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income,” Ekonomisk Tidskrift, 497-512, Reprinted as Chapter 13 in A.E.A. (1949), Readings in the Theory of International Trade, 272-300 (Philadelphia: Blakiston) with a Translation in H. Flam and M. J. Flanders (Eds.). 1991. Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory 43-69. Cambridge: MIT Press Hummels, David, Jun, Ishii and Kei-Mu Yi (2001), “The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade,” Journal of International Economics, 54, 75-96. Jones, Ronald (1956), “Factor proportions and the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem,” Review of Economic Studies, 24, 1-10. Krugman, Paul (1995), “Growing world trade: causes and consequences,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 327-377. Marx, Karl (1865), “Value, Price and Profit,” Speech by Marx to the First International Working Men's Association. https://www.marxists.org/chinese/marx/marxist.org-chinese-marx-1865-5.htm Malthus, Thomas Robert (1798), An Essay on the Principle of Population。《人口論》(中譯本), 台北: 三民出版社。出版於1966。 Marshall, Alfred (1890), Principles of Economics, Prometheus Books. Mohun, Simon (2005), “ Distributive shares in the US economy,1964–2001,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(3), 347-370. Mundell, Robert (1957), “International Trade and Factor Mobility,” American Economic Review, Vol.47, June, 321-335. Murphy, Kevin M., and Welch, Finis (1991), “The Role of International Trade in Wage Differentials,” In Workers and Their Wages: Changing Patterns in the United States, 39-69, ed. Marvin Kosters. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute. Ohlin, Bertil (1924), The Theory of Trade (Handelns Teory), in Flam and Flanders, op.cit, 75-214. Ohlin, Bertil (1933), Interregional and International Trade, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Paitaridis, Dimitris and Lefteris Tsoulfidis (2009), “The Growth of Unproductive Activities, the Rate of Profit, and the Phase-Change of the U.S. Economy,“ Radical Political Economics, 44(2), 213-233. Perraton, Jonathan (2009), “Changes in developed countries' economic systems since the 1980s: implications for developing countries, ” Economy and Society, 38(1), 177-201. Perrucci, Robert and Earl Wysong (2003), The New Class Society: Goodbye American Dream?, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Piketty, Thomas (2013), Capital in the Twenty-First Century: Harvard University Press. Reich, Robert Bernard (1991), The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism, New York: A. A. Knopf. Ricardo, David (1817), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation。《經濟學及賦稅之原理》(中譯本), 上海: 三聯書店。出版於2008。 Sachs , Jeffrey David and Howard J. Shatz (1996), “U.S. Trade with Developing Countries and Wage Inequality,” American Economic Review, 86(2), 234-239. Samuelson, Paul (1948), “International Trand and the Equalization of Factor Prices,” Economic Journal, 58, 163-184. Say, Jean Baptiste (1803), Traité d'économie Politique。《政治經濟學概論》(中譯本), 北京: 商務印書館。出版於1982。 Smith, Adam (1776), The wealth of nations。《國富論》(中譯本), 台北: 先覺出版社, 2000。 Thurow, Lester C. (1999), Building Wealth: the New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and Nations in a Knowledge-based Economy, New York, NY: Harper Business. Tsou, Meng-Wen (2002), “Wage Differentials in Taiwanese Manufacturing, 1982-1997,” Asian Economic Journal , 16, 317-335. Williamson, Jeffrey (1995), “Globalization and Inequality Then and Now: The Late 19th and Late 20th Centuries Compared,” NBER Working Paper, Vol.5491. William, Petty (1662), A Treatise of Taxes & Contributions。《賦稅論》(中譯本), 北京: 中國社會科學出版社。出版於2010。 Wright, Erik Olin (1997), Class Counts. London: Verso. Yeats, Alexander J. (2001), Just How Big Is Global Production Sharing? In: Arndt, S.W. and Kierzkowski, H., Eds., Fragmentation. New Production Patterns in the World Economy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 108-143. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52782 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來台灣大學畢業生薪資停留在22K (二萬二千元) 的普遍現象, 讓人不自覺想知道, 是誰偷了他們的薪水。本論文以此為研究宗旨, 用台灣1982至2011年前後三十年由行政院主計總處調查的「家庭收支調查」薪資資料, 分析台灣在這三十年的薪資差異。
在實證上, 本文以多種型式表現薪資差異, 包括工資成長率、工資成長率離差、工資指數成長、工資指數成長離差等四種。以成長率與指數成長分別衡量工資變化的比率與數量, 離差衡量不均度的變化。解釋變數有國內生產毛額 (GDP) 成長率、物價成長率與職務別虛擬變數等, 分析工資變化受總體經濟因素或職務別之影響。為了探討GDP, 哪一項對薪資有較大的影響力, 本文也將GDP還原為民間消費、投資、政府消費與淨出口等四項為解釋變數, 並對各項結果做因果檢定。另外, 在我們分析的三十年台灣經濟發展過程中, 明顯有經濟結構轉變, 因此本文也以Chow Test檢定轉變年份, 並加入解釋變數。最後, 全球化影響了世界各國的所得分配, 因此我們以貿易依存度作為全球化程度的替代變數, 分析其與工資之間的關係。對使用的所有變數, 本文也做了LLC Test與IPS Test兩種Panel Data的單根檢定,確認使用的時間序列資料為定態。 本文實證結果顯示, 1995年台灣由高成長階段進入低成長階段。台灣的薪資差異, 主要來源於不同職務別工資在高成長時期的差異累積。在這個時期, 政府消費支出增加會壓抑工資成長, 但也縮小職務別工資差異; 到低成長階段後, 政府支出效果剛好相反。經濟低成長階段, 投資增加能在不影響工資不均度下, 提昇工資。與一般人認為全球化導致工資差異擴大的觀點相左, 低成長時期經理人員與一般勞工的工資差異擴散速度反而趨緩, 專業人員與一般勞工的工資差距甚至有收斂現象。在低成長時間, 整體工資停滯且工資差異縮小, 但所得又有增加, 可以合理推測資本所得佔所得份額提升, 這才應該是薪資不漲的原兇, 且導致貧富差距擴大。 根據以上實證結果, 解決台灣工資停滯問題, 重點應在提高專業人員工資上著手。由於投資增加對工資成長最有助益, 並考慮到資本所得份額不斷擴大, 台灣應就制度面改革, 引導投資, 發展知識密集產業, 增加專業人員的勞動需求, 並帶動社會整理工資的提升。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In recent years, 22K (twenty-two thousand NT dollars) college graduates salary prevailing in Taiwan worries the public and leads us to be curious about who stole their salaries. This thesis aims to investigate this issue based on data from 'Family Income and Expenditure Survey' conducted by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, between 1982 and 2011.
Empirically, various forms of wages are calculated and used as the dependent variable, including wages’ growth rate, the deviation of the growth rates, the increment of wage index, and the deviation of the increment. GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth rate, inflation rate, and dummy variables stand for occupations are used as explanatory variables. In order to examine which parts of GDP are more influential, we also decompose GDP into consumption, investment, government spending and net exports as explanatory variables, and applies the causality test to the results. A structural change obviously existed over the period in our study was verified by Chow Test and added to the regressions. Trade dependency ratio was used to stand for globalization, which is widely recognized as a key factor of increasing income inequality worldwide, to test its influence on wages in Taiwan. Finally, LLC Test and IPS Test were applied to our Panel Data and found them are all stationary. Empirical results show that the year of 1995 transferred Taiwan from high-speed gross to low ones. Occupational wage gaps in Taiwan were mainly accumulated during the high-speed gross period while government spending depressed wages’ gross as well as wage gap. The government spending went into opposite effects in the low-speed gross period, but investment play a role to improve wages without broadening wage inequality. To one’s surprise, globalization has slowed down the increment of wage gap between managers and general workers own during the low-speed growth period, and even converge the wage gap between professionals and general workers. The facts that wages stagnated and wage gap narrowed but GDP grew drive us to speculate that capital share booming is the key factor of the phenomenon of 22K college graduate salary. Based on our empirical study, to resolve Taiwan’s wage issue, government policies should stimulate investment, especially in knowledge-intensive industries, in order to increase the demand for professionals which, with some necessary system reform, will increase professional salaries as well as wages in general. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:27:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-P01323023-1.pdf: 5682831 bytes, checksum: d2f085fb1f2c1460a186635255af5a21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 研究動機與方法 1
第一節 研究動機 2 第二節 重視經濟結構轉變 5 第三節 研究方法與全文架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 工資水準的趨勢 8 第二節 全球化對工資的影響 11 第三節 台灣對近代工資問題的研究 14 第四節 小結 16 第三章 理論架構、實證模型與計量方法 18 第一節 理論架構 19 第二節 實證模型 22 第三節 計量方法 27 第四章 實證分析 34 第一節 實證資料 35 第二節 Panel單根檢定 43 第三節 經濟結構變化檢定與自我相關測試 44 第四節 LSDV與結構轉變設計模型分析 48 第五節 GDP組成因子的工資分析 56 第六節 實證結果分析 63 第五章 結論、綜合分析、檢討與建議 67 第一節 結論 68 第二節 綜合分析 70 第三節 檢討與建議 75 參考文獻 79 附錄1 產業間的報酬差異 84 附錄2 為什麼要節制資本 85 附錄3 變數因果關係檢定 86 附錄4 稅務資料的工資水準檢驗 87 附錄5 貿易依存度與工資變化 88 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 工資差異 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 所得不均 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 結構轉變 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 全球化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經濟思想 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | income inequality | en |
| dc.subject | wage differentials | en |
| dc.subject | Economic thought | en |
| dc.subject | globalization | en |
| dc.subject | structural change | en |
| dc.title | 誰偷了我的薪水 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Who stole my salary | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 樊家忠,鍾谷蘭 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 工資差異,所得不均,結構轉變,全球化,經濟思想, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | wage differentials,income inequality,structural change,globalization,Economic thought, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 88 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 5.55 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
