請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52490完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭佳昆 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ya-Min Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳雅敏 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T16:16:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-10-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. New York:Oxford University Press.
2. Alexander, C. (2002). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe. Book 1: The phenomenon of life. Berkeley, CA: The Center for Environmental Structure. 3. Alexandris, K., Funk, D. C., & Pritchard, M. (2011). The impact of constraints on motivation, activity attachment, and skier intentions to continue. Journal of leisure research, 43(1), 56-79. 4. Anderson, D. H., & Fulton, D. C. (2008). Experience preferences as mediators of the wildlife related recreation participation: Place attachment relationship. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13(2), 73-88. 5. Appleyard, D. (1969). Why buildings are known. Environment and behavior, 1(2), 131-156. 6. Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment： An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences, 22(4), 233-257. 7. Brook, I. (2003). Making here like there: place attachment, displacement and the urge to garden. Ethics, Place and Environment, 6(3), 227-234. 8. Brown, G., & Raymond, C. (2007). The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography, 27(2), 89-111. 9. Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization : The case of trout fishermen. Journal of leisure research, 9(3), 174-187. 10. Bryan, H. (1979). Conflict in the great outdoors： Toward understanding and managing for diverse sportsmen preferences. Bureau of Public Administration, University of Alabama. 11. Budruk, M., Wilhem Stanis, S. A., Schneider, I. E., & Heisey, J. J. (2008). Crowding and experience-use history: A study of the moderating effect of place attachment among water-based recreationists. Environmental Management, 41(4), 528-537. 12. Burley, D. (2007). Are the social and physical really so different? Elements in the development of an attachment to place. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. 13. Cavin, J., Cavin, D., Kyle, G., Hammitt, W. E., & Absher, J. (2004). Examining the structure of the leisure involvement/place bonding relationship in three sumter national forest camping areas. Paper presented at the Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. 14. Cheng, C.-K., & Kuo, H.-Y. (2015). Bonding to a new place never visited: Exploring the relationship between landscape elements and place bonding. Tourism Management, 46(1), 546-560. 15. Chipman, B. D., & Helfrich, L. A. (1988). Recreational specializations and motivations of Virginia river anglers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 8(4), 390-398. 16. Devine-Wright, P. (2014). Dynamics of place attachment in a climate changed world. Place attachment:Advances in theory, methods, and applications, 165-176. 17. Ditton, R. B., Loomis, D. K., & Choi, S. (1992). Recreation specialization: Re-conceptualization from a social worlds perspective. Journal of leisure research, 24(1), 33-51. 18. Dorow, M., & Arlinghaus, R. (2012). The relationship between personal commitment to angling and the opinions and attitudes of German anglers towards the conservation and management of the european eel Anguilla anguilla. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 32(3), 466-479. 19. Driver, B. L. (1976). Toward a better understanding of the social benefits of outdoor recreation participation. In Proceedings of the southern states recreation research applications workshop (USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-9; pp. 63-189). Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 20. Eisenhauer, B. W., Krannich, R. S., & Blahna, D. J. (2000). Attachments to special places on public lands： An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Society & Natural Resources, 13(5), 421-441. 21. Erber, M. W., Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (1995). Attitude strength, attitude stability, and the effects of analyzing reasons. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, 433-454. 22. Fedler, A. J., & Ditton, R. B. (1986). A framework for understanding the consumptive orientation of recreational fishermen. Environmental Management, 10(2), 221-227. 23. Filo, K., Funk, D. C., & O’Brien, D. (2008). It’s really not about the bike： Exploring attraction and attachment to the events of the Lance Armstrong Foundation. Journal of Sport Management, 22(5), 501-525. 24. Fisher, M. R. (1997). Segmentation of the angler population by catch preference, participation, and experience: a management-oriented application of recreation specialization. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 17(1), 1-10. 25. Galloway, S. (2012). Recreation Specialization Among New Zealand River Recreation Users: A Multiactivity Study of Motivation and Site Preference. Leisure Sciences, 34(3), 256-271. 26. George, B. P. (2004). Past visits and the intention to revisit a destination: place attachment as the mediator and novelty seeking as the moderator. Journal of Tourism Studies, 15(2), 51-66. 27. Giuliani, M. V., & Feldman, R. (1993). Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 267-274. 28. Gobster, P. H. (2002). Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele. Leisure Sciences, 24(2), 143-159. 29. Gosling, E., & Williams, K. J. (2010). Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(3), 298-304. 30. Graefe, D. A., & Dawson, C. P. (2013). Rooted in Place: Understanding Camper Substitution Preferences. Leisure Sciences, 35(4), 365-381. 31. Gustafson, P. (2013). Place attachment in an age of mobility. Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications. Routledge:London. 32. Haggard, L. M., & Williams, D. R. (1992). Identity affirmation through leisure activities: Leisure symbols of the self. Journal of leisure research, 24(1), 1-18. 33. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. 34. Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2004). Experience use history, place bonding and resource substitution of trout anglers during recreation engagements. Journal of leisure research, 36(3), 356-378. 35. Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2006). Place bonding for recreation places: Conceptual and empirical development. Leisure studies, 25(1), 17-41. 36. Hammitt, W. E., & Cole, D. N. (1998). Wildland Recreation: Ecology and Management (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 37. Hammitt, W. E., Kyle, G. T., & Oh, C. O. (2009). Comparison of place bonding models in recreation resource management. Journal of leisure research, 41(1), 57-72. 38. Havitz, M. E., & Dimanche, F. (1997). Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advances. Journal of leisure research, 29(3), 245-278. 39. Havitz, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1995). How enduring is enduring involvement? A seasonal examination of three recreational activities. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 255-276. 40. Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of environmental psychology, 18(1), 5-29. 41. Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 273-281. 42. Hummon, D. M. (1992). Community attachment:Local sentiment and sense of place. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 253-277). New York and London, NY: Plenum. 43. Hvenegaard, G. T. (2002). Birder specialization differences in conservation involvement, demographics, and motivations. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7(1), 21-36. 44. Inalhan, G., & Finch, E. (2004). Place attachment and sense of belonging. Facilities, 22(5/6), 120-128. 45. Jenkins, J., & Pigram, J. (2013). Encyclopedia of leisure and outdoor recreation. London: Routledge. 46. Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 233-248. 47. Kaltenborn, B. P. (1997). Nature of place attachment: A study among recreation homeowners in southern Norway. Leisure Sciences, 19(3), 175-189. 48. Kaltenborn, B. P., & Bjerke, T. (2002). Associations between landscape preferences and place attachment: a study in R?ros, Southern Norway. Landscape Research, 27(4), 381-396. 49. Kruger, L. E., & Jakes, P. J. (2003). The importance of place: Advances in science and application. Forest Science, 49(6), 819-821. 50. Kuentzel, W. F. (2001). How specialized is specialization research? Journal of leisure research, 33(3), 351-356. 51. Kuentzel, W. F., & Heberlein, T. A. (2006). From novice to expert? A panel study of specialization progression and change. Journal of leisure research, 38(4), 496-512. 52. Kyle, G., Bricker, K., Graefe, A., & Wickham, T. (2004a). An examination of recreationists' relationships with activities and settings. Leisure Sciences, 26(2), 123-142. 53. Kyle, G., & Chick, G. (2004). Enduring leisure involvement: The importance of personal relationships. Leisure studies, 23(3), 243-266. 54. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Absher, J. D. (2003a). The moderating role of place attachment on the relationship between attitudes toward fees and spending preferences. Leisure Sciences, 25(1), 33-50. 55. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2003b). An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Journal of leisure research, 35(3), 249-273. 56. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004b). Effect of activity involvement and place attachment on recreationists' perceptions of setting density. Journal of leisure research, 36(2), 209-231. 57. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004c). Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(2), 213-225. 58. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005a). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment and behavior, 37(2), 153-177. 59. Kyle, G., & Mowen, A. J. (2005b). An examination of the leisure involvement-agency commitment relationship. Journal of leisure research, 37(3), 342-363. 60. Kyle, G., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. (2004d). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(4), 439-454. 61. Lee, S.-H., Graefe, A. R., & Li, C.-L. (2007). The effects of specialization and gender on motivations and preferences for site attributes in paddling. Leisure Sciences, 29(4), 355-373. 62. Lee, T. H., & Shen, Y. L. (2012). The influence of leisure involvement and place attachment on destination loyalty:Evidence from recreationists walking their dogs in urban parks. Journal of environmental psychology,33(1),76-85. 63. Lewicka, M. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(1), 35-51. 64. Lewicka, M. (2011a). On the Varieties of People’s Relationships With Places Hummon’s Typology Revisited. Environment and behavior, 43(5), 676-709. 65. Lewicka, M. (2011b). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of environmental psychology, 31(3), 207-230. 66. Lewicka, M. (2013). Localism and Activity as two dimensions of people-place bonding: The role of cultural capital. Journal of environmental psychology,36(2),43-53. 67. Little, B. R. (1976). Specialization and the varieties of environmental experience: Empirical studies within the personality paradigm. In S. Wapner, S. Cohen, & B. Kaplan (Eds.).Experiencing the environment (pp. 81-116). New York: Plenum Press. 68. Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. New York: Plenum Press. 69. Manfredo, M. J., Driver, B. L., & Tarrant, M. A. (1996). Measuring leisure motivation: A meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. Journal of leisure research, 28(3), 188-213. 70. Manfredo, M. J., & Larson, R. A. (1993). Managing for wildlife viewing recreation experiences: An application in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin,21(3) ,226-236. 71. Manning, R. E. (2010). Studies in outdoor recreation. Oregon State University Press Corvallis, OR. 72. Manzo, L. C. (2003). Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(1), 47-61. 73. Manzo, L. C., & Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications. Oxon: Routledge. 74. Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of planning literature, 20(4), 335-350. 75. McHugh, K. E., & Mings, R. C. (1996). The circle of migration: Attachment to place in aging. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86(3), 530-550. 76. McIntyre, N., & Pigram, J. (1992). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle‐based campers. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 3-15. 77. Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and behavior, 30(4), 504-519. 78. Mesch, G. S., & Talmud, I. (2010). Internet connectivity, community participation, and place attachment:A longitudinal study. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(8),1095-1110. 79. Milligan, M. J. (1998). Interactional past and potential: The social construction of place attachment. Symbolic interaction, 21(1), 1-33. 80. Mitchell, M., Force, J., Carroll, M., & McLaughlin, W. (1993). Forest places of the heart: incorporating special spaces into public management. Journal of forestry, 91(4), 32-37. 81. Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail‐trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17-31. 82. Moore, R. L., & Scott, D. (2003). Place attachment and context: Comparing a park and a trail within. Forest Science, 49(6), 877-884. 83. Needham, M. D., Scott, D., & Vaske, J. J. (2013). Recreation Specialization and Related Concepts in Leisure Research. Leisure Sciences, 35(3), 199-202. 84. Oh, C.-O., Lyu, S. O., & Hammitt, W. E. (2012). Predictive linkages between recreation specialization and place attachment. Journal of leisure research, 44(1), 70-87. 85. Oh, C.-O., Sutton, S. G., & Sorice, M. G. (2013). Assessing the role of recreation specialization in fishing site substitution. Leisure Sciences, 35(3), 256-272. 86. Payton, M. A., Fulton, D. C., & Anderson, D. H. (2005). Influence of place attachment and trust on civic action: A study at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge. Society and Natural Resources, 18(6), 511-528. 87. Petty, R, E' Haugtvedt, C. p' & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In:R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds), Attitude Strength: Antecendents and Consequences (pp. 93-130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 88. Pierskalla, C. D., Lee, M. E., Stein, T. V., Anderson, D. H., & Nickerson, R. (2004). Understanding relationships among recreation opportunities: A meta-analysis of nine studies. Leisure Sciences, 26(2), 163-180. 89. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of environmental psychology. 90. Raymond, C. M., Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2010). The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(4), 422-434. 91. Roberts, E. (1996). Place and spirit in public land management. In Driver, B. L. et al. (Eds) Nature and the Human Spirit, pp. 61–80 (State College, PA: Venture Publishers). 92. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(1), 1-10. 93. Schreyer, R., & Beaulieu, J. T. (1986). Attribute preferences for wildland recreation settings. Journal of leisure research,18(4), 231-247. 94. Scott, D., & Shafer, C. S. (2001a). Recreational specialization: A critical look at the construct. Journal of leisure research, 33(3), 319. 95. Scott, D., & Shafer, C. S. (2001b). A rejoinder to reviewers' comments. Journal of leisure research, 33(3), 357-361. 96. Seamon, D. (2012). Place, place identity, and phenomenology:A triadic interpretation based on JG Bennett’s systematics. London: Betham Science Publishers. 97. Seamon, D. (2014). Place attachment and phenomenology:The synergistic dynamism of place. Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications. New York: Routledge. 98. Selman, P. (2006). Planning at the landscape scale.London: Routledge. 99. Shamsuddin, S., & Ujang, N. (2008). Making places: The role of attachment in creating the sense of place for traditional streets in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32(3), 399-409. 100. Slama, M. E., & Tashchian, A. (1985). Selected socioeconomic and demographic characteristics associated with purchasing involvement. The Journal of Marketing, 72-82. 101. Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction?: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society &Natural Resources, 16(8), 671-685. 102. Stewart, W. P., Williams, D. R., & Kruger, L. (2013). Place-based conservation: Perspectives from the social sciences.Dordrecht: Springer. 103. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. Cognition, social behavior, and the environment, 441-488. 104. Sutton, S. G., & Ditton, R. B. (2005). The substitutability of one type of fishing for another. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 25(2), 536-546. 105. Teisl, M. F., & O'Brien, K. (2003). Who cares and who acts? Outdoor recreationists exhibit different levels of environmental concern and behavior. Environment and behavior, 35(4), 506-522. 106. Theodori, G. L., Luloff, A., & Willits, F. K. (1998). The Association of Outdoor Recreation and Environmental Concern: Reexamining the Dunlap‐Heffernan Thesis1. Rural Sociology, 63(1), 94-108. 107. Ujang, N. (2010). Place attachment and continuity of urban place identity. Asian Journal of Environment-Behavior Studies, 11, 41-74. 108. Ujang, N., & Zakariya, K. (2015). Place Attachment and the Value of Place in the Life of the Users. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 168, 373-380. 109. Urquhart, J., & Acott, T. (2013). Constructing ‘The Stade’: Fishers' and non-fishers' identity and place attachment in Hastings, south-east England. Marine Policy, 37(1), 45-54. 110. Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., Heberlein, T. A., & Shelby, B. (1982). Differences in reported satisfaction ratings by consumptive and nonconsumptive recreationists. Journal of leisure research, 14(3), 195-206. 111. Vaske, J. J., Donnelly, M. P., Heberlein, T. A., & Shelby, B. (1982). Differences in reported satisfaction ratings by consumptive and nonconsumptive recreationists. Journal of leisure research, 14(3), 195-206. 112. Wallendorf, M., & Arnould, E. J. (1988). ' My Favorite Things': A Cross-Cultural Inquiry into Object Attachment, Possessiveness, and Social Linkage. Journal of consumer Research,14(4), 531-547. 113. Warzecha, C. A., & Lime, D. W. (2001). Place attachment in Canyonlands National Park: visitors' assessment of setting attributes on the Colorado and Green Rivers. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19(1), 59-78. 114. Wellman, J. D., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Smith, A. C. (1982). Recreation specialization and norms of depreciative behaviour among canoeists. Journal of leisure research, 14(4), 323-340. 115. White, D. D., Virden, R. J., & Van Riper, C. J. (2008). Effects of place identity, place dependence, and experience-use history on perceptions of recreation impacts in a natural setting. Environmental Management, 42(4), 647-657. 116. Wickham, T. D., & Graefe, A. R. (2001). Attachments to Places and Activities: The Relationship of Psychological Constructs to Customer Satisfaction Attributes'. Paper presented at the North-Eastern Recreation Research Symposium, Bolton Landing ,NY. 117. Williams, D. R., & Huffman, M. G. (1986). Recreation specialization as a factor in backcountry trail choice. General Technical Report, Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service(INT-212), 339-344. 118. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 29-46. 119. Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. . Paper presented at the NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio,Texas. 120. Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49(6), 830-840. 121. Wynveen, C. J., Kyle, G. T., Hammitt, W. E., & Absher, J. D. (2008). Exploring the effect of experience use history and place bonding on resource substitution. Proceedings of the 2007 northeastern recreation research symposium; 2007 April 15-17; Bolton Landing, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS. 122. Wynveen, C. J., Kyle, G. T., & Sutton, S. G. (2011). Recreational Activity and Place Meaning. Proceedings of the 2011 northeastern recreation research symposium, Bolton Landing, NY. 123. Wynveen, C. J., Kyle, G. T., & Sutton, S. G. (2012). Natural area visitors' place meaning and place attachment ascribed to a marine setting. Journal of environmental psychology, 32(4), 287-296. 124. Yuksel, A., Yuksel, F., & Bilim, Y. (2010). Destination attachment: Effects on customer satisfaction and cognitive, affective and conative loyalty. Tourism Management, 31(2), 274-284. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52490 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 地方情感是人和特定地點經由長時間互動下產生的情感連結。人透過地方提供的活動能增進人地互動，與地方形成緊密的情感關係，促使活動在地方情感的建立上扮演一個關鍵的角色。地方情感的理論發展目前處於一個緩慢進步的階段，有學者認為這是受到測量量表過於多樣化造成。本研究檢視眾多文獻的地方情感量表，發現他們測量活動的方式各有不同，這種情況可能源自於活動和地方情感的關係不明確所導致。然而，過去已有許多學者投入活動和地方情感的研究，這些文獻大多來自於活動涉入、活動專門化與地方情感之間的關係探討，侷限於單一特定活動的討論；卻很少有研究探討各種活動和地方情感的關係。因此本研究回顧過去與活動相關的文獻，釐清各種活動和地方情感之間可能存在的關係。本研究將地方尺度侷限於遊憩場所，探討人在遊憩場所進行的活動與地方情感的關聯。
研究分為三個部分討論，第一部分先釐清地方情感量表中不同類型的活動問項於量測上的差異，根據過去數十餘篇中外相關文獻使用的量表，將活動問項歸納為三種版本：特定活動、非特定活動與綜合類型。由於使用者在地方通常不只從事一種活動，不同版本(特定/非特定)問項測量出的地方情感可能有所差異。因此調查台北市青年公園進行特定活動 (打籃球、打羽毛球、跳舞) 之使用者；讓同一受測者針對不同版本的活動問項進行填答。第二部分則探討使用者從事活動種類、活動數量和地方情感的關係，已有超過三十篇的研究顯示出活動涉入和地方情感具有正向關係，然而這些研究多關注於單一特定活動。過去研究發現當人們對特定活動的技巧或涉入到達一定程度時，他們不再依賴特定地點。除非人們在此地點上可從事其他種活動，不然難以與地方發展出強烈的情感連結。此外，受到地點提供使用者參與活動數量的差異，活動空間可分為一般活動空間與特定活動空間進行探討。因此於台北市十一處公園與象山親山步道兩種類型空間進行現地調查，了解其中活動種類、活動數量和地方情感的關係。第三部分則探討特定活動空間中活動依附對地方情感的影響模型：當使用者對於活動情感越高時，透過不同的體驗偏好滿足他們的需求，能建立出與地方的情感連結。並且透過了解不同導向的人活動依附對地方情感的影響模型之差異，區分出人的活動情感和地方情感的不同。本部分研究於象山親山步道進行現地問卷調查檢驗活動依附和地方情感的關係模型。 第一部分研究結果顯示使用非特定活動類型的問項涵蓋的情感層面較廣，似乎較能反應出對於地點的不同情感反應。第二部分研究結果則指出在遊憩場所參與不同種類活動的人，其影響地方情感的效果不同；分為正向、負向和無影響關係。使用者從事的活動數量確實因活動空間類型的不同，有不同的地方情感。一般活動空間中，地方情感和使用者從事活動數量正向相關；地方情感越高的人，參與越多活動。特定活動空間的地方情感則可能主要受到特定活動的影響，和使用者從事活動的數量無關。第三部分研究則顯示在特定活動空間中，主要受到使用者對於該特定活動的依附情感決定地方情感，並且會透過體驗偏好中介影響地方情感；活動依附影響地方情感的模型成立。此外，由於活動導向的人和其他導向的人在活動依附對地方情感的影響上有所不同，藉此區分出人對於活動情感和地方情感的差別。 在地方情感理論發展上，未來使用地方情感測量工具時，不同的活動版本測得之地方情感可能不同，需要更小心的處理與解釋。本研究也證實在地方建立情感時，必須去考量多種活動以及活動特性，對於了解地方情感是如何形成有相當的幫助。在景觀規劃與管理上，可於不同遊憩場所中加入多種適當的活動，能增進人與地方的情感，穩定人與地方之間的關係，地方較不易被替代。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Many researchers believed that the affective bond is developed gradually through the long-term interaction with place. The formation of bonding comes from activities that people do in place. Activity is helpful for enhancing people-place interactions; therefore, people develop emotional bonding with place. It supports that activity plays an important role in measuring place bonding. However, in recent years,many researchers measure the people-place emotional bonding using different types of activities. Besides, more than 30 studies have shown that the levels of activity
involvement are positively correlated with place bonding. Most of those studies focused on only one specific activity. However, we can engage in many activities in place. Therefore, it is important to consider the relationship between a variety of activities and affective bonding in recreational sites. The relationship between activity and affective bonding in recreational sites was investigated in three studies. The first study focused on comparing the difference between specific activity and non-specific activities in place bonding scales. The second study examined that the effect of different types of activities on affective bonding. In addition, quantity of activities might correlate with people-place affective bonding. It should also consider types of activity settings because the quantity of activities afforded in settings are not the same. In the third study, activity attachment, experience preference and people-place affective bonding were investigated to find out how emotional bonding in place can be formed through single specific activity. An on‐site survey was conducted for all three experiments. The first results showed that measuring place bonding in different activity types was different. Items with non-Specific activity seem to be more sensitive to measure the affective bonding. The second study showed that different type of activities had positive/non/negative relationships with affective bonding in recreational sites.Respondents’ place attachment was positively correlated with the number of activities that people engaged in general-activities settings; however, such correlation was not observed in the specific-activity settings. The third results revealed that the model of activity attachment influencing place attachment was established. The current study suggests that it is important to pay more attention on designing and handling place bonding scales in the future. The current study also indicated the necessity to consider multiple activities for developing bonding with a place, which will contribute to our understanding of how place bonding was developed. The result would also help landscape designer to manage better landscape planning and design in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:16:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02628305-1.pdf: 1708842 bytes, checksum: 4cec1840d9881557b1bf55848a4938cb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
英文摘要 iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究緣起 1 第二節、 研究目的 3 第三節、 研究流程 4 第二章、 文獻回顧 6 第一節、 地方情感 6 第二節、 活動與地方情感 14 第三章、 不同類型活動問項之情感連結量表比較 24 第一節、 研究背景 24 第二節、 研究方法 28 第三節、 研究結果 33 第四節、 小結 41 第四章、 使用者參與活動種類、活動數量與地方情感之關係 42 第一節、 研究背景 42 第二節、 研究方法 44 第三節、 研究結果 50 第四節、 小結 56 第五章、 單一特定活動對地方情感之影響 58 第一節、 研究背景 58 第二節、 研究方法 60 第三節、 研究結果 66 第四節、 小結 74 第六章、 結論與討論 75 第一節、 研究一：不同類型活動問項之情感連結量表比較 78 第二節、 研究二： 使用者參與活動種類、活動數量與地方情感之關係 81 第三節、 研究三： 單一特定活動對地方情感之影響 85 第四節、 應用與未來研究建議 90 參考文獻 92 附錄一 105 附錄二 108 附錄三 111 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 活動依附 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地方依附 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 活動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地方情感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 活動空間 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | People-place affection bonding | en |
| dc.subject | Activities | en |
| dc.title | 遊憩場所活動與地方情感之關係探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Relationship between Activities and Affective Bonding in Recreational Sites | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 歐聖榮,林晏州,張俊彥,林建堯 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 地方情感,活動,地方依附,活動依附,活動空間, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | People-place affection bonding,Activities, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 113 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.67 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。