請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52401
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 江東亮(Tung-liang Chiang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-I Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李春怡 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T16:13:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-14 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-09-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Addy, C. L., Wilson, D. K., Kirtland, K. A., Ainsworth, B. E., Sharpe, P., & Kimsey, D. (2004). Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), 440-443.
Bernard, P., Charafeddine, R., Frohlich, K. L., Daniel, M., Kestens, Y., & Potvin, L. (2007). Health inequalities and place: a theoretical conception of neighbourhood. Social Science & Medicine, 65(9), 1839-1852. Blomquist, W., & Parks, R. B. (1995). Fiscal, service, and political impacts of Indianapolis-Marion County's Unigov. Publius, 25(4), 37-54. Carr, J. B., Bae, S.-S., & Lu, W. (2006). City-county government and promises of economic development: A tale of two cities. State and Local Government Review, 38(3), 131-141. Carr, J. B., & Feiock, R. C. (1999). Metropolitan government and economic development. Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 476-488. Chen, Z., Eastwood, D. B., & Yen, S. T. (2007). A decade's story of childhood malnutrition inequality in China: Where you live does matter. China Economic Review, 18(2), 139-154. Chiou, S.-T., & Lu, T.-H. (2014). Changes in geographic variation in the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Taiwan: Possible effects of “leadership style factor”? Health Policy, 114(1), 64-70. Clarke, K. (2006). Voting Rights & City-County Consolidations. Houston Law Review, 43, 621. Diez Roux, A. V. (2001). Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1783-1789. Diez Roux, A. V., & Mair, C. (2010). Neighborhoods and health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186(1), 125-145. Faulk, D., & Grassmueck, G. (2012). City-county consolidation and local government expenditures. State and Local Government Review, 44(3), 196-205. Faulk, D., & Schansberg, E. (2009). An examination of selected economic development outcomes from consolidation. State and Local Government Review, 41(3), 193-200. Feiock, R. C., & Carr, J. B. (1997). A reassessment of city/county consolidation: Economic development impacts. State and Local Government Review, 29(3), 166-171. Gordon, C. (2014). Scale, Scope, Efficiency and Equity in Public Service Provision: How Might We Analyse the 1898 Consolidation of New York City? Available at SSRN 2388550. Haneda, S., Hashimoto, A., & Tsuneyoshi, T. (2012). Evaluating Administrative Efficiency Change in the Post-Merger Period A Study on Ibaraki Prefecture (1979–2004). International Regional Science Review, 35(2), 237-262. Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar US business cycles: an empirical investigation. Journal of Money, credit, and Banking, 29(1), 1-16. Jimenez, B. S., & Hendrick, R. (2010). Is government consolidation the answer? State and Local Government Review, 42(3), 258-270. Kaczynski, A. T., & Henderson, K. A. (2008). Parks and recreation settings and active living: a review of associations with physical activity function and intensity. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 5(4), 619-632. Kushiner, J., & Siegel, D. (2005). Are services delivered more efficiently after municipal amalgamations? Canadian Public Administration, 48(2), 251-267. Leyden, K. M. (2003). Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1546-1551. Macintyre, S., & Ellaway, A. (2000). Ecological approaches: rediscovering the role of the physical and social environment. In I. Kawachi, & L. F. Berkman (Eds.), Social Epidemiology (pp. 332-348). New York: Oxford University Press. Macintyre, S., & Ellaway, A. (2003). Neighborhoods and health: an overview. In I. Kawachi, & L. F. Berkman (Eds.), Neighborhoods and health (pp. 20-42). New York: Oxford University Press. Macintyre, S., Ellaway, A., & Cummins, S. (2002). Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Social Science & Medicine, 55(1), 125-139. Martin, L. L., & Schiff, J. H. (2011). City–County Consolidations: Promise Versus Performance. State and Local Government Review, 43(2), 167-177. Miyazaki, T. (2014). Municipal consolidation and local government behavior: evidence from Japanese voting data on merger referenda. Economics of Governance, 15(4), 387-410. Murphy, K. (2012). Reshaping County Government: A Look at City-County Consolidation, National Association of Counties, Washington, DC. O’Campo, P., O’Brien Caughy, M., Oakes, J., & Kaufman, J. (2006). Measures of residential community contexts. In J. M. Oakes & J. S. Kaufman (Eds.), Methods in social epidemiology (pp. 193-208). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Parkes, A., & Kearns, A. (2006). The multi-dimensional neighbourhood and health: a cross-sectional analysis of the Scottish Household Survey, 2001. Health & Place, 12(1), 1-18. Pickett, K. E., & Pearl, M. (2001). Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55(2), 111-122. Poindexter, G. C. (1995). Towards a Legal Framework for Regional Redistribution of Poverty-Related Expenses. Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 47(3), 3-50. Ravn, M. O., & Uhlig, H. (2002). On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 371-376. Reese, L. A. (2004). Same governance, different day: Does metropolitan reorganization make a difference? Review of Policy Research, 21(4), 595-611. Rosentraub, M. S. (2000). City-county consolidation and the rebuilding of image: the fiscal lessons from Indianapolis's UniGov Program. State and Local Government Review, 32(3), 180-191. Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J. B., & Chen, D. (2003). Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1552-1558. Stephens, G. R., & Wikstrom, N. (2000). Metropolitan government and governance: Theoretical perspectives, empirical analysis, and the future. New York: Oxford University Press Swanson, B. E. (2000). Quandaries of pragmatic reform: A reassessment of the Jacksonville experience. State and Local Government Review, 32(3), 227-238. Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 65(5), 416-424. Vojnovic, I. (2000). The transitional impacts of municipal consolidations. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(4), 385-417. Wainwright, N., & Surtees, P. (2004). Places, people, and their physical and mental functional health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58(4), 333-339. Yeh, C.-C., Cheng, C.-M., & Wu, J.-H. (2012). The Research of City-County Consolidation and People Intentions-an Empirical Study on the Cases of Tainan. Energy Procedia, 16, 1155-1161. 中華民國內政部(2010a)。取自中華民國內政部,縣市改制直轄市資訊網http://web.moi.gov.tw/countyreform/news_content.aspx?id=1 中華民國內政部(2010b)。高雄縣市合併改制計畫(核定本)。取自中華民國內政部,縣市改制直轄市資訊網http://web.moi.gov.tw/countyreform/download.aspx?typeid=1 中華民國內政部(2010c)。臺中縣(市)合併改制計畫書(核定本)。取自中華民國內政部,縣市改制直轄市資訊網http://web.moi.gov.tw/countyreform/download.aspx?typeid=1 中華民國內政部(2010d)。臺南縣(市)合併改併計畫(核定本)。取自中華民國內政部,縣市改制直轄市資訊網http://web.moi.gov.tw/countyreform/download.aspx?typeid=1 江東亮(2003)。臺灣死亡現象之地理差異。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC-91-2320-B-002-165)。臺北市: 國立臺灣大學公共衛生學院衛生政策與管理研究所 行政院主計處(2004)。政府統計。取自行政院主計處 http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct_view.asp?xItem=955&ctNode=3378 林淑敏(2004)。醫療資源與國人健康的關聯(碩士論文)。取自http://thesis.lib.ncu.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search/view_etd?URN=91424023 洪乙禎、林錦鴻(2010)。探討醫療資源和民眾健康差異的相關性-以台灣二十三縣市粗死亡率和事故傷害死亡率為例。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,29(4),347-359。 張順全、賴美淑、徐豈庸(2005)。台灣地理區域社經差異與糖尿病患罹病, 死亡的關聯性探討。醫護科技學刊,7(2),140-148。 陳立剛(2006)。都會區政府體制探究:以台北縣市合併為例。三合一選舉後我國地方自治發展的議題與前瞻,臺北。 陳立剛、李長晏(2003)。全球化治理: 台灣都會治理的困境與體制建構─ 地方政府跨區域合作探究─。中國地方自治,56(2),4-19。 陳政智、徐思涵、廖千妙(2011)。從 [高高平, 區區同] 談福利輸送的價值: 平等只是第一步; 公平才是下一步。社區發展季刊,134,344-351。 陸美祈(2013)。縣市合併對都市發展邊緣化之影響研究—以臺南市曾文溪以北地區為例(碩士論文)。取自華藝線上圖書館。 曾冠球、陳建仁、李長晏(2010)。縣市合併後台北、台中及高雄三大都會區都會治理問題比較分析。第七屆地方治理與城鄉發展學術研討會,新竹:玄奘大學。 湯維玲、蔡佩娟(2011)。縣市合併後高雄市小型學校教育機會均等之探究。課程與教學,14(3),77-96。 黃東益、謝忠安(2014)。縣市合併改制議題之研究: 以高雄市, 臺南市及臺中市為例。東吳政治學報,32(3),51-130。 趙永茂、陳銘顯(2010)。我國地方與新都會發展的挑戰與回應。研考雙月刊,34(6), 23-32。 鄭新輝(2011)。台南縣市合併後之台南市教育整合問題與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊,1(1),15-17。 魏斌、楊惠琪(2011,6月25日)。回應縣市合併 高市造新字「县市」沒過關。蘋果日報。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52401 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究目的:臺灣在2010年底經歷行政區的重劃。其中,三個縣市區域個別合併成三個新的市:臺中市、臺南市,以及高雄市。本研究欲探討縣市的合併是否會縮小原縣、市居民間的死亡率差距。
研究方法:本研究的全年齡、0-4歲以及65歲以上死亡率資料來自衛生福利部,除了粗死亡率以外,也計算出年齡標準化死亡率進行分析。本研究利用hp濾波器分離出時間序列資料的長期趨勢,並使用複迴歸分析解釋縣市合併對於原縣、市之間居民死亡率差距的影響。 研究結果:縣市合併之後,不管是粗死亡率還是年齡標準化死亡率,原縣、市之間的全年齡及65歲以上死亡率的差距都增加,但僅有在65歲以上粗死亡率的分析中達到統計的顯著意義(β=142.2, p=0.000)。而0-4歲死亡率差距雖然在合併之後有稍微縮小,但並未達到統計顯著水準。 結論:本研究無法證實縣市合併對於原縣、市居民間死亡率差距的影響。 關鍵字:都會區治理、縣市合併、死亡率、死亡率差距、hp濾波器 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: An administrative rezoning occurred in Taiwan in 2010. As a result, three city county duals were consolidated into three new cities: Taichung City, Tainan City, and Kaohsiung City. This study aims to investigate whether the consolidation would reduce the city-county mortality gap.
Methods: Data on city/county mortality in total population, children aged 0-4 years, and adults aged 65 years and over, were obtained from Ministry of Health and Welfare. In addition to crude mortality rates, we also calculated age-standardized mortality rates. The Hodrick–Prescott filter was further used to separate long-term trends from time series data. The multiple regression was applied to examine the consolidation effect on mortality rate difference. Results: After the consolidation, the differences in both crude and age-standardized mortality rate between original city and original county have increased for total population and adults aged 65 years and over, but only the effect on the difference in crude mortality rate for adults aged 65 years and over was statistically significant (β=142.2, p=0.000). The difference in mortality rate for children aged 0-4 years has slightly declined after the consolidation, which was not statistically significant. Conclusions: There was no evidence that the consolidations had affected the mortality gap between original city and original county. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:13:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02848022-1.pdf: 1886688 bytes, checksum: d8c6d2ef6923a92454a23e878453c931 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究背景 1 第二節、 研究動機與目的 1 第三節、 論文架構 2 第二章、 文獻回顧 4 第一節、 都會治理理論 4 第二節、 縣市合併相關文獻 6 第三節、 臺灣的縣市合併研究 9 第四節、 健康的地區差異 11 第五節、 研究啟示 14 第三章、 研究材料與方法 16 第一節、 研究問題與架構 16 第二節、 資料來源 17 第三節、 研究變項 20 第四節、 分析方法 23 第四章、 研究結果 25 第一節、 個案說明 25 第二節、 描述性分析 29 第三節、 皮爾森相關係數 66 第四節、 線性迴歸分析 68 第五章、 結論與討論 75 第一節、 研究主要發現 75 第二節、 研究限制 81 第三節、 研究建議 82 第四節、 結論 84 參考文獻 86 附錄一、縣市社經發展表 92 附錄二、歲出歲入表 95 附錄三、模型三迴歸分析表 96 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 縣市合併對原縣、市之間死亡率差距的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of City-County Consolidation on Mortality Difference Between Original City and Original County | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 呂宗學,楊志良 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 都會區治理,縣市合併,死亡率,死亡率差距,hp濾波器, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Metropolitan governance,City–county consolidation,Mortality,Mortality difference,Hodrick–Prescott filter, | en |
dc.relation.page | 97 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.84 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。