Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 腦與心智科學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52224
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳恩賜(Joshua Goh)
dc.contributor.authorYong-Jheng Tangen
dc.contributor.author湯詠爭zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T16:09:50Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-17
dc.date.copyright2015-09-17
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-08-18
dc.identifier.citationA. S. Bauer, J. Timpe, E.C. Edmonds, A. Bechara, D. Tranel1, and N. L. D. Department. (2014). MYOPIA FOR THE FUTURE OR HYPERSENSITIVITY TO REWARD? AGE-RELATED CHANGES IN DECISION-MAKING ON THE IOWA GAMBLING TASK A, 13(1), 19–24. doi:10.1037/a0029970.MYOPIA
Dayan, P., & Balleine, B. (2002). Reward, Motivation, and Reinforcement Learning. Neuron, 36, 285–298. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627302009637
Denburg, N. L., Cole, C. a, Hernandez, M., Yamada, T. H., Tranel, D., Bechara, A., & Wallace, R. B. (2007). The orbitofrontal cortex, real-world decision making, and normal aging. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1121, 480–98. doi:10.1196/annals.1401.031
Doherty, J. O., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Dissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning, 304(April), 452–454.
Eppinger, B., Hämmerer, D., & Li, S.-C. (2011). Neuromodulation of reward-based learning and decision making in human aging. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06230.x
Eppinger, B., & Kray, J. (2011). To choose or to avoid: age differences in learning from positive and negative feedback. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 41–52. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21364
Eppinger, B., Schuck, N. W., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2013). Reduced striatal responses to reward prediction errors in older compared with younger adults. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 33(24), 9905–12. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2942-12.2013
Huettel, S. A. (2006). Behavioral, but not reward, risk modulates activation of prefrontal, parietal, and insular cortices. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(2), 141–51. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17007234
Mata, R., Josef, A. K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 18–29. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06200.x
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., Coupey, E., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). A constructive process view of decision making: Multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychologica, 80(1-3), 107–141. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(92)90043-D
Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Worthy, D. a, Mata, R., McClure, S. M., & Knutson, B. (2014). Adult age differences in frontostriatal representation of prediction error but not reward outcome. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 672–82. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0297-4
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science (New York, N.Y.), 275(5306), 1593–9. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9054347
Sridharan, D., Levitin, D. J., & Menon, V. (2008). A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(34), 12569–74. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800005105
Staudinger, M. R., Erk, S., Abler, B., & Walter, H. (2009). NeuroImage Cognitive reappraisal modulates expected value and prediction error encoding in the ventral striatum. NeuroImage, 47(2), 713–721. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.095
Timpe, J., & Rowe, K. (2011). White matter integrity, as measured by diffusion tensor imaging, distinguishes between impaired and unimpaired older adult decision-makers: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Cognitive …, 23(6), 760–767. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.578065.White
Venkatraman, V., Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Huettel, S. A. (2009). Separate neural mechanisms underlie choices and strategic preferences in risky decision making. Neuron, 62(4), 593–602. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19477159
Worthy, D. a, & Maddox, W. T. (2012). Age-based differences in strategy use in choice tasks. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5(January), 145. doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00145
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52224-
dc.description.abstract在這個研究中,我們檢視年輕人與老年人在整合機率和回饋大小的決策風格之差異如何影響回饋學習過程中的神經錯誤預測。我們假設較年長的成人採用相對於年輕人而言較不複雜的決策策略,這樣的策略較無法有效的評估決策中的機率與回饋大小的資訊,因此在接收回饋時產生了錯誤預測的差異;再者,錯誤預測的神經反應無法區分採用相似決策策略的年輕人與老年人。我們利用磁震造影技術以及機率選擇作業收集年輕人與老年人的決策策略以及神經錯誤預測反應。研究結果顯示老年人在前額葉紋狀體區呈現減少的正向錯誤預測但較大的負向錯誤預測;此外,於年輕人雙側腦島中出現的對於負向回饋的反應,並未在老年樣本中觀察到。相對於老年人大部份的年輕人採用較為複雜的決策,採用相當於年輕人的決策策略的老年人則在前額葉紋狀體區產生相當於年輕人的錯誤預測反應;然而,決策並不影響年齡在腦島區的反應。這些研究結果顯示決策策略的偏好對於回饋處理中的神經錯誤預測影響多過於生物老化機制。選擇過程中的決策差異解釋了回饋處理過程中,前額葉紋狀體區的錯誤預測年齡差異上的縮減,但值得注意的是,年齡差異在腦島對於負向回饋的影響對於決策風格的調節較不敏感,顯示了生物老化在決策及回饋學習中的重要性。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn this present study, we examined how young and older adult differences in the complexity of strategy during value-based decisions involving integrating probability and magnitude contribute to age differences in neural prediction error responses for outcome learning. We hypothesized that more older adults adopt a less complex strategy than younger adults, with less effective weighting of probability or magnitude information for decisions, resulting in neural prediction error differences upon receiving feedback. Moreover, prediction error responses should not dissociate older from younger adults adopting similar strategies. We assessed complexity of decision strategy and prediction error responses in young and older adults using a lottery choice task in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment. Our results show that older adults had reduced gain prediction error (positive neural response) but greater loss prediction error (negative neural response) in fronto-striatal regions. In addition, whereas younger adult bilateral insula responded to losses, this was not observed in older adults. Further, a greater proportion of younger adults used more complex strategy than older adults. Older adults in the same strategy group as younger adults demonstrated comparable fronto-striatal prediction error responses. However, strategy did not influence age effects on insula responses. These findings suggest that decision strategy preference contributed more to fronto-striatal neural prediction error rather than biological age effects on feedback learning. Once strategy during choice is accounted for, age differences in fronto-striatal prediction error during feedback were eliminated. Notably, age differences in insula response to losses were insensitive to strategy suggesting a more prominent role of biological aging in this brain area for decision-making and feedback-learning.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T16:09:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-R01454008-1.pdf: 3296399 bytes, checksum: 74239fb9f33f8277f26a9f5d5c98514d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents審定書 I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT II
中文摘要 III
ABSTRACT IV
INTRODUCTION 1
MATERIAL AND METHODS 4
PARTICIPANTS 4
TASK STIMULI 5
TASK PROCEDURE 6
BRAIN IMAGE PROTOCOL 6
BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS 7
FMRI DATA PREPROCESSING 8
FMRI DATA STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 9
RESULTS 10
BEHAVIORAL RESULTS 10
FEEDBACK SENSITIVE AREAS ACROSS YOUNG AND OLDER ADULTS 11
AGE DIFFERENCES IN NEURAL RESPONSES OF GAIN AND LOSS IN FEEDBACK PROCESSING AREAS 12
DECISION STRATEGY MODULATED PREDICTION ERROR ACROSS AGE GROUPS 12
DISCUSSION 13
REDUCED PREDICTION ERROR TO GAIN AND LOSS OUTCOMES 13
STRATEGY MODULATED PREDICTION ERROR SENSITIVITY ACROSS AGE GROUPS. 14
THE CRITICAL REGIONS FOR LOSS FEEDBACK PROCESSING 14
REFERENCE 33
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject錯誤預測zh_TW
dc.subject老化zh_TW
dc.subject決策策略zh_TW
dc.subject回饋學習zh_TW
dc.subjectprediction erroren
dc.subjectdecision-making strategyen
dc.subjectfeedback-learningen
dc.subjectagingen
dc.title決策差異於錯誤預測跨年齡之調節zh_TW
dc.titleStrategic Difference Modulate Prediction Error Sensitivity across Age Groupsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee葉怡玉(Yei-Yu Yeh),王道一(Tao-yi Wang)
dc.subject.keyword老化,決策策略,回饋學習,錯誤預測,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordaging,decision-making strategy,feedback-learning,prediction error,en
dc.relation.page33
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2015-08-19
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept腦與心智科學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:腦與心智科學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.22 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved