請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52102
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳文方 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Jyun Ho | en |
dc.contributor.author | 何宜駿 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T14:08:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
[1] T.L. Cheung, K. Okamoto, F. Maker III, X. Liu, V. Akella, Markov decision process (MDP) framework for optimizing software on mobile phones, in: Proceedings of the seventh ACM international conference on Embedded software, ACM, (2009) 11-20. [2] T.B. Gage, Lead-acid batteries: key to electric vehicle commercialization. Experience with design, manufacture, and use of EVs, in: Battery Conference on Applications and Advances, 2000. The Fifteenth Annual, IEEE, (2000) [3] Q. Zhang, R.E. White, Calendar life study of Li-ion pouch cells, Journal of Power Sources, 173 (2007) 990-997. [4] Nissan Leaf battery maintenance program will cost $100/month. Available from: http://www.autoblog.com/ [5] A. Millner, Modeling lithium ion battery degradation in electric vehicles, in: Innovative Technologies for an Efficient and Reliable Electricity Supply (CITRES), IEEE, (2010) 349-356. [6] A.A. Pesaran, G.-H. Kim, M. Keyser, Integration issues of cells into battery packs for plug-in and hybrid electric vehicles, in: 24th International Batterie, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium (EVS24), Stavanger, 2009. [7] B. Schumm, The Fifteenth Annual Battery Conference on Applications and Advances, Long Beach, CA, (2000) 89-94. [8] D. Andrea, Battery Management Systems for Large Lithium Ion Battery Packs, Artech House, 2010. [9] D. Doerffel, S.A. Sharkh, Large Lithium-Ion Batteries–a Review, IN: Electric Vehicle Exhibition (EMA 2006), Aschaffenburg (Germany), 14 (2006) 15. [10] D. Murthy, B. Iskandar, R. Wilson, Two-dimensional failure-free warranty policies: two-dimensional point process models, Operations Research, 43 (1995) 356-366. [11] 顏溪成,電池與燃料電池,臺灣大學化學工程學研究所學位論文,2009。 [12] 張偉倫,電動車電池測試驗證國際標準介紹。 Available: http://www.artc.org.tw/ [13] V. Etacheri, R. Marom, R. Elazari, G. Salitra, D. Aurbach, Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: a review, Energy & Environmental Science, 4 (2011) 3243-3262. [14] J. Zhang, J. Lee, A review on prognostics and health monitoring of Li-ion battery, Journal of Power Sources, 196 (2011) 6007-6014. [15] L. Serra, Z. Chehab, Y. Guezennee, G. Rizzoni, An aging model of Ni-MH batteries for hybrid electric vehicles, in: Vehicle power and propulsion, 2005 IEEE conference, IEEE, (2005) 8 [16] R. Spotnitz, Simulation of capacity fade in lithium-ion batteries, Journal of Power Sources, 113 (2003) 72-80. [17] S. Drouilhet, B. Johnson, A Battery Life Prediction Method for Hybrid Power Applications Preprint, in: The 35th AIAA Aerospace Seienees Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada, USA: January, 1997. [18] S. Thein, Y.S. Chang, Decision making model for lifecycle assessment of lithium-ion battery for electric vehicle–A case study for smart electric bus project in Korea, Journal of Power Sources, 249 (2014) 142-147. [19] I. Fernández, C. Calvillo, A. Sánchez-Miralles, J. Boal, Capacity fade and aging models for electric batteries and optimal charging strategy for electric vehicles, Energy, 60 (2013) 35-43. [20] S.-W. Eom, M.-K. Kim, I.-J. Kim, S.-I. Moon, Y.-K. Sun, H.-S. Kim, Life prediction and reliability assessment of lithium secondary batteries, Journal of Power Sources, 174 (2007) 954-958. [21] R. Li, J.-f. Wu, H.-y. Wang, J.-y. Guo, G.-c. Li, Reliability assessment and failure analysis of lithium iron phosphate batteries, Information Sciences, 259 (2014) 359-368. [22] G. Ning, B.N. Popov, Cycle life modeling of lithium-ion batteries, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 151 (2004) A1584-A1591. [23] W. He, N. Williard, M. Osterman, M. Pecht, Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on Dempster–Shafer theory and the Bayesian Monte Carlo method, Journal of Power Sources, 196 (2011) 10314-10321. [24] J.A.M. Penna, C.L. Nascimento, L.R. Rodrigues, Health monitoring and remaining useful life estimation of lithium-ion aeronautical batteries, in: Aerospace Conference, IEEE, (2012) 1-12. [25] M.A. Murtaza, M. Tahir, Optimal data transmission and battery charging policies for solar powered sensor networks using Markov decision process, in: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), IEEE, (2013) 992-997. [26] Q. Qiu, M. Pedram, Dynamic power management based on continuous-time Markov decision processes, in: Proceedings of the 36th annual ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, ACM, (1999) 555-561. [27] K.M. Jung, S.S. Han, D.H. Park, Optimization of cost and downtime for replacement model following the expiration of warranty, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93 (2008) 995-1003. [28] T. Chen, E. Popova, Maintenance policies with two-dimensional warranty, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 77 (2002) 61-69. [29] 胡奇英,劉建庸,馬可夫決策過程引論,西安電子科技大學出版社,2000。 [30] 武峙瑄,運用馬可夫決策模式於製造商新製與再製決策,臺灣大學商學研究所學位論文,2007。 [31] 劉克,實用馬可夫決策過程,清華大學出版社,2004。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/52102 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 現今有許多汽車以鋰電池作為動力系統或系統的一部份,但鋰電池隨著時間,在充電和放電的循環過程中,會逐漸失去其能力與可靠度。為了使電動車主在適合的時間點對電池的維護或更換作適當選擇,本研究首先檢視廠商所提供給電動車主的多項維持方式選擇,一一評估各個維持方式所需支出的費用,針對電池在不同各充放電次數下,協助車主找出符合最小成本支出的決策,同時分析容易影響維持方式選擇的成本參數。電動車主對電池的維持方式除了將電池重複充放電使用外,還有廠商所提供的兩項主流方式,包含電池回收與選擇維護計畫,車主通常會因選擇維護計畫而遇到兩種情況,一為電池健康狀態被診斷高於百分之七十時,車主僅需支付維護計畫的固定成本;二為電池健康狀態低於百分之七十時,電池被判定為失效車主除需支付固定成本外,需支付更換成本。本研究依據有限實驗數據,描述一鋰電池組在經歷特定充放電循環次數下之健康狀態,假設其分佈為常態分佈,接著建構馬可夫決策模式,考慮各充放電循環次數下的電池平均健康狀態,探討車主如何在電動車廠商所提供多項鋰電池維持方式中,於適合的時間點下選擇其中較為有利者。研究結果顯示通常,在電池充放電循環前期,車主應該選擇重複使用,而不應考慮回收,且目前實務上確實反應如此。如果以選擇何時啟用和放棄維護計畫為決策重點,數值分析結果顯示,電池充放電次數於3000次時,反映電池健康狀態介於百分之七十至八十間,應開始啟用維護計畫;而約達4400次時,則應放棄維護計畫。研究結果也顯示,在更換、重製與多項不同成本考量中,維護成本對車主維護決策的選擇最為敏感。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T14:08:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02546009-1.pdf: 1320623 bytes, checksum: 90860be51b71b7eff55de9a0d6f6aa96 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
摘要 I ABSTRACT II 目錄 III 圖目錄 V 表目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究方法與論文架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 鋰電池工作原理與特性 5 2.2 鋰電池發展概況與比較 8 2.3 電池專有名詞解釋 10 2.4 電動車電池組 13 2.5 文獻回顧 15 2.6 小結 16 第三章 車用電池組馬可夫決策模型建構 17 3.1 馬可夫決策模型 17 3.2 模型假設 18 3.3 建構電池組馬可夫決策模型 20 3.3.1 參數說明 20 3.3.2 狀態變數 20 3.3.3 決策變數 21 3.3.4 各狀態成本計算 22 3.4 尋找最佳策略 23 3.4.1 策略迭代法 24 3.4.2 使用策略迭代法之求解步驟 26 3.4.3 求解範例 26 3.4.4 求解範例總結 31 第四章 敏感度分析與實驗設計 33 4.1 敏感度分析 33 4.1.1 改變重製成本 33 4.1.2 改變更換電池組成本 34 4.1.3 改變維護成本 35 4.2 實驗分析 37 4.2.1 實驗因子設定 37 4.2.2 實驗結果分析與探討 39 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 46 5.1 研究結論 46 5.2 研究限制及未來研究方向 47 參考文獻 48 附錄 51 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 考量電池健康狀態下電動車主電池維護方案之選擇 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Selection of an Appropriate Battery Maintenance Plan for Electrical Vehicle Owners in Consideration of Battery Health | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔣明晃,洪一薰 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 電動車,鋰電池,電池維護,健康狀態,馬可夫決策模式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Electrical Vehicle (EV),Lithium-ion Battery,Battery Maintenance,State of Health (SOH),Markov Decision Process, | en |
dc.relation.page | 61 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 工業工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.29 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。