請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51632
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 馬鴻文 | |
dc.contributor.author | Pei-Chiun Li | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李培群 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:42:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-02-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-12-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ames, M. R. and Zemba, S. G., 2010. Multi-pathway Risk Assessment of Stack Emissions from the SECIL Cement Kilns at Maceira and Pataias, Cambridge Environmental Inc (source: http://www.cambridgeenvironmental.com/files/mpra/AmesZemba2010PataiasMaceiraPortugal.pdf )
Buckinghamshire County Council, 2010. Greatmoor energy from waste facility, Technical Appendix 6/B: human health risk assessment. (http://www.fccenvironment.co.uk/assets/files/pdf/Greatmoor/environmental-statement/chapter6/appendix-6-b.pdf) Chakraborty, J., 2004. The geographic distribution of potential risks posed by industrial toxic emissions in the U.S., Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 39: 559-575. Chen, P.C., Su, H.J., and Ma, H.W., 2013. Trace anthropogenic arsenic in Taiwan--substance flow analysis as a tool for environmental risk management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 53: 13-21. Cordioli,M., Vincenzi, S., and De Leo, G. A., 2013. Effects of heat recovery for district heating on waste incineration health impact: A simulation study in Northern Italy, Science of the Total Environment, 44: 369-380. Demidova, O. and Cherp, A., 2005. Risk assessment for improved treatment of health considerations in EIA, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25: 411-429. EnHealth, 2012. Environmental Health Risk Assessment – Guidelines for assessing human health risks from environmental hazards, Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Commonwealth of Australia. Enzygo consultancy, 2012. East London Sustainable Energy Facility (ELSEF), Fairview Industrial Park, Rainham, Environmental Statement Volume 1. European Commission, 2010. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance.EUR 24708 EN. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union. Frey, H.C., and Hubbell, B., 2009. A Risk-based Assessment And Management Framework For Multi-pollutant Air Quality, Paper 2009-A-235-AWMA, Proceedings, 102nd Annual Conference and Exhibition, Air & Waste Management Association, Detroit, Michigan, June 16-19. Hauschild, M. Z., Jolliet, O., and Huijbregts, M. A. J., 2011. A bright future for addressing chemical emissions in life cycle assessment, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16: 697-700. Hertwich, E. G., Mateles, S. F., Pease, W. S., and Mckone, T. E., 2001. Human toxicity potentials for life-cycle assessment and toxics release inventory risk screening, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 20: 928-939. Horvath, A., Hendrickson, C. T., Lave, L. B., McMichael, F. C., and Wu, T. S., 1995. Toxic emissions indices for green design and inventory, Environmental Science & Technology, 29: 86-90. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 1987. Lead and lead compounds. In: Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity: An Updating of IARC Monographs 1-42. Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans. pp. 230-232. Jia, C. Q., Guardo, A. D., and MacKay, D., 1996. Toxics release inventories: opportunities for improved presentation and interpretation, Environmental Science & Technology, 30: 86-91. Kroon, H., Groenendael, J. and Ehrlen, J., 2000. Elasticities: a review of methods and model limitations, Ecology, 8: 607-618. Kumar, A., 2004. Understanding the USEPA’s AERMOD Modeling System, Department of Civil Engineering University of Toledo. Kumar, A., Dixit, S., Varadarajan, C., Vijayan, A., and Masuraha, A., 2006. Evaluation of the AERMOD dispersion model as a function of atmospheric stability for an urban area, Environmental Progress, 25: 141-151. Landis, 2005. Regional scale ecological risk assessment. Using the relative risk model. Edited by W. G. Landis. CRC PRESS. Lim, S. R., Lam, C. W., and Schoenung, J. M., 2010. Quantity-based and toxicity-based evaluation of the U.S. Toxics Release Inventory, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 178: 49-56. Linkov, I., Burmistrov, D., Cura, J., and Bridges, T.S., 2002. Risk-based management of contaminated sediments: consideration of spatial and temporal patterns in exposure modelling, Environmental Science & Technology 36: 238-246. Lobscheid, A.B., Maddalena, R.L., and McKone, T.E., 2004. Contribution of locally grown foods in cumulative exposure assessments, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 14:60–73. Loos, M., Ragas, A. M. J., Schipper, A. M., and Lopes, J. P. C., 2006. A spatially explicit individual-based controlled random walk model to determine exposure levels and risks of environmental contaminants for terrestrial organisms in river floodplains. Department of Environmental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, NoMiracle report Deliverable 4.2.1., Nijmegen, 82 p. Ma, H.W., Shih, H.C., Hung, M.L., Chao, C.W., and Li, P.C., 2012. Integrating input output analysis with risk assessment to evaluate the population risk of arsenic, Environmental Science & Technology, 46: 1104-1110. MacLeod, M., Bennett, D. H., Perem, M., Maddalena, R. L., McKone, T. E., and Mackay, D., 2004. Dependence of intake fraction on release location in a multimedia framework, a case study of four contaminants in North America, Journal of Industry Ecology, 8: 89-102. Miller, R.E., and Blair, P.D., 2009. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press. Morra, P., Bagli, S., and Spadoni, G., 2006. The analysis of human health risk with a detailed procedure operating in a GIS environment, Environ. Int. 32: 444-454. Morra, P., Lisi, R., Spadoni, G., and Maschio, G., 2009. The assessment of human health impact caused by industrial and civil activities in the Pace Valley of Messina, Sci. Total Environ. 407: 3712-3720. Morselli, L., Passarini, F., Piccari, L., Vassura, I., and Bernardi, E., 2011. Risk assessment applied to air emissions from a medium-sized Italian MSW incinerator, Waste Management & Research, 29: S48-S56. Mutel, C.L., Pfister, S., and Hellweg, S., 2012. GIS-based regionalized life cycle assessment: how big is small enough? Methodology and case study of electricity generation, Environmental Science & Technology, 46: 1096-1103. Omenn, G.S., 2007. The Risk Assessment–Risk Management Paradigm. In M. Robson and W. Toscano (Eds.), Risk assessment for environmental health (pp. 11-30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Palma-Oliveira, J., Zemba, S. G., Ames, M. R., Green, L. C., and Linkov, I. , 2012. Uncertainty in Multi-Pathway Risk Assessment for Combustion Facilities, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 18: 501-516. Potting, J. and Hauschild, M.Z., 2006. Spatial Differentiation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: A decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11:11 – 13. Pratt, G. C., Dymond, M., Ellickson, K., and The, J., 2012. Validation of a Novel Air Toxic Risk Model with Air Monitoring, Risk Analysis, 32: 96-112. RAIS (The Risk Assessment Information System), http://rais.ornl.gov/ Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., and Bras, B., 2008. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment part 2: impact assessment and interpretation, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13: 374-388. Robson, M. and Ellerbusch, F., 2007. Introduction to risk assessment in public health. In M. Robson and W. Toscano (Eds.), Risk assessment for environmental health (pp. 1-10). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. RPS Planning and Development consultancy, 2008. Energy from Waste Incinerator (EFW) including Infrastructure plus that for Combined Heat and Power (CHP), Incinerator Bottom Ash (IBA) Processing Plant with Outside Storage Area, and Air Pollution Control Residue (APCR) Disposal Facility, Visitor & Office Accommodation and Landscaping within the Sutton Courtenay Resource Recovery Park, Environmental Statement Chapter 7: Air Quality and Human Health Risk Assessment. Sedlbauer, K., Braune, A., Humbert, S., Margni, M., Schuller, O., and Fischer, M., 2007. Spatial differentiation in LCA--Moving forward to more operational sustainability, Technology Assessment Theory and Practice, 16: 24-31. Steinemann, A., 2000. Rethinking human health impact assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20: 627-645. Suh, S., ed., 2009. Handbook of input-output economics in industrial ecology. Dordrecht, Netherlands : Springer. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), http://www.oehha.ca.gov/Listservs/default.asp U.S. EPA, 2001. Risk assessment guidance for superfund: volume 3 Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment (Part A). Washington, D.C.: OERR. U.S. EPA, 2011a. An overview of methods for EPA’s National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment, Office of Air Quality, Planning, and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. U.S. EPA, 2011b. Regulatory impact analysis for the federal implementation plans to reduce interstate transport of fine particulate matter and ozone in 27 states; correction of SIP approvals for 22 states, Office of Air and Radiation (EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491). Umweltbundesamt, 2006. IMProving the IMPlementation of Environmental IMPact Assessment (Final Report), 6th Framework Programme. US EPA, 2004. User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model-AERMOD, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Washington, DC. (EPA-454/B-03-001) USEPA, 2005. Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities, EPA530-R-05-006. 行政院農委會 (2012) 101 年農業統計年報,台北:農委會。 行政院農委會 (2014) 103 年糧食供需年報,台北:農委會。 行政院環保署,2014a,台灣地區排放量資料庫(Taiwan Emission Data System,TEDs 8.1),http://teds.epa.gov.tw/new_main2-0-1.htm 行政院環保署編印,2014b,中華民國環境保護統計年報,台北:環保署。 曠永銓、許珮蒨,2005,AERMOD煙流模式在台灣地區之應用研究,中興工程期刊,第八十八期,第55-62頁。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51632 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 傳統的健康風險評估主要著重在評估單一污染源的影響,每一個單一污染源可能均符合法規或管制標準;然而,在國家尺度或區域尺度的風險評估架構下,風險的來源在於受體經由不同的暴露途徑而接觸到污染物質,而造成暴露的方式則可分為直接的與間接的,直接的暴露為受當地污染排放影響或鄰近污染排放跨區域傳輸的影響,間接的暴露為透過農產品運銷而接觸到其他區域所排放的污染物質。在現階段的風險評估中,間接暴露的影響是極少被提及的,這可能造成忽略了部分的風險危害。
本研究考量多重污染源所造成的累積性效應,以建立大尺度的區域風險評估方法為目的,將跨區域影響之因素納入評估流程,並採用敏感度分析的概念,建立不同區域與產業之排放量,對不同區域受體所產生風險的關係,作為判定風險減量效率之依據。利用各縣市間農產品的運銷量進行受體暴露量的修正,建立跨區域風險傳輸模型。結果顯示考量農產運銷對風險結果的排序有很大的影響,同時呈現出各縣市不同的風險來源,不再只是鄰近的污染源所造成,更有可能透過農產運銷的方式將風險轉移。利用風險轉移率來計算考量農產運銷後的風險變化,對於風險轉移率大於1的地區,代表因透過農產運銷將受污染之農產品輸入進來,提高暴露機會而增加了風險,顯示若在傳統的風險評估架構下,其風險是被低估的,因此考量跨區域風險傳輸是必要的。 將總排放量與風險評估結果進行比較,發現不論是否考量農產運銷的影響,排放量的高低與造成各縣市風險高低的排序,並沒有存在一致性,即高排放量的地區並不一定使當地成為高風險地區。因此,本研究利用敏感度分析的概念,分別將各縣市總排放量和產業總排放量作為分析之變數,計算風險減量之敏感度和彈性,探討不同地區不同產業類別的排放減量對各縣市風險減量的有效程度,並將其整合成風險減量效率的分數,以反映整體風險減量的效果;結果顯示,電子零組件製造業和飲料製造業的分數高於其他產業,在縣市別的部分以雲林、苗栗和彰化的分數高於其他縣市。 應用本研究之分析方法,可以找出對特定地區風險減量有效的管制對象,針對高風險敏感度和高風險彈性的地區進行排放管制,所得到的效果是最大的;另一方面其也反映了產生風險的潛勢,若未來在選擇新設場址時,高風險敏感度和高風險彈性的地區是不適宜的,因其造成的影響較大且較廣;而就產業別而言,高風險敏感度和高風險彈性的產業必須加強管制,因其增加一部分排放量,則可能影響到許多縣市。同時可藉由此研究可判別出不同的區域,其風險來源主要為當地貢獻或是由其他地區轉移而來,提供資訊給管理者作為決定加強排放管制對象的依據。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The conventional health risk assessment is the process used to estimate the health effect of a certain emission source. Each source may meet the emission control standards. However, at national or regional scales, receptors expose to contaminants from all emission sources. Local emission sources are a dominant and direct factor for health risk. Emission sources directly affect contaminant inhalation and food intake via local agricultural products. Moreover, the transportation of agricultural products is an indirect factor causing the transfer of risk between different areas through ingestion of agricultural products obtained from other areas. This indirect exposure pathway is rarely included in the conventional health risk assessment.
The objective of this study is to reveal the effect of assessment including the transportation of agricultural products, evaluating the results of exposure to local and non-local food as a spatial attribute. Furthermore, human health risk results from the quantity of emissions, the location and geography of emission sources, and the transportation of food. Because of the complexity of risk, the other aim of this research is to assess the health risk caused by total emission sources, to identify the spatial distribution of risk, and to estimate the effectiveness of risk reduction. The results show that the transportation of agricultural products is the major and indirect factor causing the transfer of risk. Local receptors may ingest food which contaminated by other emission sources and transported to local market. The risk transfer ratio was developed to reveal the effect of including the transportation factor of agricultural products in each area. If the ratio is greater than 1, the risks increase as a result of importing agricultural products, i.e., people ingest contaminated food from other counties. Assessments that do not include the transportation of agricultural products may not represent the overall real situation. In this study, an adjusted method incorporating transportation of agricultural products has been developed for assessing transfer of risks. This approach is valuable for assessing the overall health risks because it describes indirect impacts on site-specific health risks and the proportion of health risks derived from other locations. Moreover, high emissions in a county do not correspond to high risk. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop an evaluation method to effectively reduce risk. To understand how risk evaluation is dependent on the variability of emissions, sensitivity and elasticity analysis were adopted in this study, and designed a risk score to rank the efficiency of risk reduction. The results indicate that highest risk scores with respect to the emissions reduction of each industry sector are electronic parts and components and beverage. The highest risk scores with respect to the emissions reduction of each area are Changhua and Yunlin. This indicates that emissions reduction in these industry sectors or areas would more efficiently reduce the risks. The findings of this study illustrate the need to evaluate the efficiency of risk reduction. The government and decision-makers can be proactive in targeting industry sectors and areas when establishing environmental policy and managing health risk. Moreover, risk scores can identify the reduction potential of each sector or area. This method can provide more holistic information for risk management and prevents the development of increased risk. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:42:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-F95541203-1.pdf: 2248546 bytes, checksum: 2d5adff68ebdb7a95a575b27be9be6e8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
目錄 V 表目錄 VII 圖目錄 VIII 第一章、緒論 1 1.1 研究緣起 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究架構 4 第二章、文獻回顧 6 2.1 環境問題的空間特性 6 2.2 健康風險評估方法的應用 8 2.3 健康風險評估的空間特性 14 2.3.1 區域尺度風險評估方法 14 2.3.2 風險減量之空間問題 15 第三章、研究方法 17 3.1 單一污染源之釋放評估 19 3.2 跨區域風險傳輸模型 23 3.3 產業區域風險模型建立 26 3.4 風險減量效率評估方法 29 第四章、結果與討論 31 4.1 全台鉛排放量分析 32 4.2 跨區域風險傳輸的影響 40 4.3 區域別與產業別風險分析 54 4.4 風險減量效率分析 58 4.4.1 風險減量敏感度及彈性分析 58 4.4.2 風險減量效率分數 71 4.5 風險減量效率之應用 78 第五章、結論與建議 82 5.1 結論 82 5.2 建議 85 參考文獻 86 附件A、多介質傳輸模式設定 93 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以區域風險評估之方法探討風險轉移及風險降低策略之有效性 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A regional risk assessment approach to evaluate the transfer of risk and the effectiveness of risk reduction | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李公哲,張慶源,吳先琪,闕蓓德 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 健康風險評估,區域風險評估,農產運銷,風險轉移,風險減量效率, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Health risk assessment,Regional risk assessment,Transportation of agricultural products,Transfer of risk,Efficiency of risk reduction, | en |
dc.relation.page | 102 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-12-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。