Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 農業經濟學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51356
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor雷立芬
dc.contributor.authorWe-Tei Luen
dc.contributor.author呂威德zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T13:31:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-08
dc.date.copyright2016-03-08
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016-02-02
dc.identifier.citation邱顯貴、儲聖涵、賴廷曜、林育如、黃正宏、江志偉,2003。「知識價值鏈模式的應用及價值創新:以臺灣的電子產業為例」,《中華管理評論》。6卷,2期,116-134。
林美倫,2007。「研發支出對經營績效及股權評價影響之研究」,《台南科大學報》。26期,115-134。
林灼榮、蔡榮德、邱敬貿、康家維,2007。「研發投入與人力資本對台灣紡織與通訊產業生產效率攸關性之研究」,《東吳經濟商學學報》。58期,89-120。
馬泰成,2005。「知識經濟與併購」,《東海管理評論》。7卷,1期,121-136。
詹淑清、郭迺鋒、游淑慧,2002。「R&D 支出對新竹科學園區積體電路廠商獲利實證分析-多元迴歸與區別分析法之應用」,《企銀季刊》。25卷1期,189-209。
蔡蕙安、陳致綱,2002。「研究發展外溢效果對廠商成本結構之影響-台灣高科技產業之實證分析」,《經濟論文叢刊》。30卷,2期,175-204。
歐進士,1998。「我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯之實證研究」,《中山管理評論》。6卷2期,357-386。
Anthony, J.H. and K. Ramesh, 1992. “Association between Accounting Performance Measures and Stock Prices: A Test of the Life Cycle Hypothesis,” Journal of Accounting and Economics. 15(2-3): 203-227.
Arrow, K.J., 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 609-626. Edited by Universities-National Bureau. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Barber, B.M. and J.D. Lyon, 1996. “Detecting Abnormal Operating Performance: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics,” Journal of Financial Economics. 41(3): 359-399.
Barber, B.M. and J.D. Lyon, 1997. “Detecting Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics,” Journal of Financial Economics. 43(3): 341-372.
Bernstein, J.I. and M.I. Nadiri, 1988. “Interindustry R&D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-Tech Industries,” American Economic Review. 78(2): 429-434.
Bharadwaj, A.S., S.G. Bharadwaj and B.R. Konsynski, 1999. “Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q,” Management Science. 45(7): 1008-1024.
Brav, A., C. Geczy and P.A. Gompers, 2000. “Is the Abnormal Return Following Equity Issuances Anomalous?,” Journal of Financial Economics. 56(2): 209-249.
Brown, J.L. and L.K. Krull, 2008. “Stock Options, R&D, and the R&D Tax Credit,” The Accounting Review. 83(3): 705-734.
Carhart, M.M., 1997. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance,” Journal of Finance. 52(1): 57-82.
Chan, L.K.C., J. Lakonishok and T. Sougiannis, 2001. “The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures,” Journal of Finance. 56(6): 2431-2456.
Chan, K., Y.H. Lin and Y.Z. Wang, 2015. “The Imformation Content of R&D Reductions,” Journal of Empirical Finance. 34: 131-155.
Chan, S.H., J.D. Martin and J.W. Kensinger, 1990. “Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value,” Journal of Financial Economics. 26(2): 255-276.
Ciftci, M. and W.M. Cready, 2011. “Scale Effects of R&D as Reflected in Earnings and Returns,” Journal of Accounting and Economics. 52(1): 62-80.
Cohen, D., R. Mashruwala and T. Zach, 2010. “The Use of Advertising Activities to Meet Earnings Benchmarks: Evidence from Monthly Data,” Review of Accounting Studies. 15(4): 808-832.
Cohen, L., K. Diether and C. Malloy, 2013. “Misvaluing Innovation,” The Review of Financial Studies. 26(3): 635-666.
Daniel, K. and S. Titman, 2006. “Market Reactions to Tangible and Intangible Information,” Journal of Finance. 61(4): 1605-1643.
Dickinson, V., 2011. “Cash Flow Patterns as a Proxy for Firm Life Cycle,” The Accounting Review. 86(6): 1969-1994.
Eberhart, A.C., W.F. Maxwell and A.R. Siddique, 2004. “An Examination of Long-Term Abnormal Stock Returns and Operating Performance Following R&D Increases,” Journal of Finance. 59(2): 623-650.
Eberhart, A.C., W.F. Maxwell and A.R. Siddique, 2008. “A Reexamination of the Tradeoff between the Future Benefit and Riskiness of R&D Increases,” Journal of Accounting Research. 46(1): 27-52.
Eckbo, B.E., R.W. Masulis and Ø. Norli, 2000. “Seasoned Public Offerings: Resolution of the ‘new issue puzzle’,” Journal of Financial Economics. 56(2): 251-291.
Edvinsson, L. and M.S. Malone, 1997. Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Roots. New York: Harper Business.
Fama, E.F., 1970. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work,” Journal of Financial. 25(2): 383-417.
Fama, E.F. and K.R. French, 1993. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds,” Journal of Financial Economics. 33(1): 3-56.
Fama, E.F., 1998. “Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance,” Journal of Financial Economics. 49(3): 283-306.
Graham, J.R., C.R. Harvey and S. Rajgopal, 2005. “The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting,” Journal of Accounting and Economics. 40(1-3): 3-73.
Griliches, Z., 1979. “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development of Productivity Growth,” The Bell Journal of Economics. 10(1): 92-116.
Grullon, G. and R. Michaely, 2004. “The Information Content of Share Repurchase Programs,” Journal of Finance. 59(2): 651-680.
Hall, Bronwyn H., 1993b. “The Stock Market Valuation of R&D Investment During the 1980’s,” American Economic Review. 83(2): 259-264.
Ikenberry, D., J. Lakonishok and T. Vermaelen, 1995. “Market Underreation to Open Market Share Repurchases,” Journal of Financial Economics. 39(2-3): 181-208.
Jegadeesh, N. and S. Titman, 1993. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency,” Journal of Finance. 48(1): 65-91.
Jensen, M.C., 1986. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers,” American Economic Review. 76(2): 323-329.
Jensen, M.C., 1993. “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems,” Journal of Finance. 48(3): 831-880.
Jones, C.I. and J.C. Williams, 1998. “Measuring the Social Return to R&D,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 113(4): 1119-1135.
Kaplan, R.S., and D.P. Norton, 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance,” Harvard Business Review. 70(1): 71-79.
Lev, B., B. Sarath and T. Sougiannis, 2005. “R&D Reporting Biases and Their Consequences,” Contemporary Accounting Research. 22(4): 977-1026.
Levin, R.C. and P.C. Reiss, 1984. “Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure,” in R&D, Patents and Productivity, pp. 175-208. Edited by Zvi Griliches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Loughran, T. and J.R. Ritter, 1997. “The Operating Performance of Firms Conducting Seasoned Equity Offerings,” Journal of Finance. 52(5): 1823-1850.
Lyon, J.D., B.M. Barber and C.L. Tsai, 1999. “Improved Methods for Tests of Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance. 54(1): 165-201.
Megna, P. and M. Klock, 1993. “The Impact of Intangible Capital on Tobin’s q in the Semiconductor Industry,” American Economic Review. 83(2): 265-269.
Mitchell, M.L. and E. Stafford, 2000. “Managerial Decisions and Long-Term Stock Price Performance,” Journal of Business. 73(3): 287-329.
Penman, S.H. and X.J. Zhang, 2002. “Accounting Conservatism, the Quality of Earnings, and Stock Returns,” The Accounting Review. 77(2): 237-264.
Porter, M.E., 1992. “Capital Choices: Changing the Way America Invests in Industry,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 5(2): 4-16.
Roychowdhury, S., 2006. “Earnings Management through Real Activities Manipulation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics. 42(3): 335-370.
Shi, C., 2003. “On the Trade-Off between the Future Benefits and Riskiness of R&D: A Bondholders’ Perspective,” Journal of Accounting and Economics. 35(2): 227-254.
Stein, J.C., 1989. “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 104(4): 655-669.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51356-
dc.description.abstract過去國外文獻大多探討增加R&D投入對未來公司績效有正面影響或是減少R&D投入對未來公司績效有負面影響。而在減少R&D投入對未來公司績效有正面影響的議題上,目前僅有少數幾篇國外文獻採用美國資料作為實證分析,而國內尚未探討相關的研究議題。因此,本研究欲針對臺灣產業探討減少R&D投入後,未來公司股價是否存在異常報酬以及經營績效方面是否有顯著變化。此外,本研究以研發強度將全樣本劃分高研發強度產業與低研發強度產業,在股價報酬的部分,使用買進持有異常報酬法以及日曆時間投資組合法計算異常報酬。
結果發現全產業與低研發強度產業皆呈現顯著的負向異常報酬,這樣的結果與Eberhart、Maxwell & Siddique(2004)觀點相互一致,發現臺灣股票市場對於R&D減少所產生的損害有呈現反應不足的現象,也提供一個合理的解釋說明效率市場假說的不存在;經營績效的部分,除了探討減少R&D投入後各期間的經營績效之外,更進一步探討在一段期間內經營績效的變化,結果發現,高研發強度產業呈現半顯著的正向異常績效,搭配其長期異常報酬結果來觀察,可以推論出高研發強度產業符合R&D外溢效果假說;低研發強度產業則呈現半顯著的負向異常績效,搭配其長期異常報酬結果來觀察,可以發現在低研發強度產業中,減少R&D投入除了使投資人產生錯誤反應現象之外,也更加支持著減少R&D投入是不佳的投資決策。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMost of the literatures on R&D only demonstrated if increase in investment of R&D has a positive impact or negative impact on the company's future performance. Only few of them examine how reduction in R&D investment may have a positive impact on the company's future performance in United States. As Taiwan having no previous research on this issue, this study attempted to explore how reduction in investment in R&D generate significant changes in operating performance and abnormal returns by making use of the data including stock price from Taiwanese industries. In addition, this study categorizes the targeted industries into two groups: industries with high intensity of R&D and industries with low intensity of R&D. With calculating the abnormal returns by using the buy and hold abnormal returns method and calendar time portfolio method, the result, which coincide with Eberhart、Maxwell and Siddique(2004) point of view, reveals that the whole industry and industries with low R&D intensity have a negative abnormal returns; therefore, it provides a significant counterevidence for the efficient market hypothesis. For the part of investigating operating performance.
The result manifests that industries with high R&D intensities have a significant positive abnormal half performance; combining the observation of their long-term abnormal returns, it can conclude that the performance of industries with high intensity of R&D consist with R&D spillovers hypothesis. Moreover, industries with low R&D intensity show a half significant negative abnormal performance. With observing the long-term abnormal returns, we can also conclude that industries with low R&D intensity provide an wrong signal to investor; also, reduction in R&D is definitely a inefficient decision of investment.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:31:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-105-R03627037-1.pdf: 1356179 bytes, checksum: 092e72063d10c4dc6db071d0bf8ed851 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………………...................i
謝辭……………………………………………………………………………..…...................ii
摘要……………………………………………………………………........................iii
Abstract………………………………………..……………........................iv
表目錄……………………………………………………………………………....................vi
圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………….................vii
附表目錄…………………………………………………………………………................……viii
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………..................1
  第一節 研究動機………………………………………………...…...........1
  第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………..........5
第二章 文獻回顧………………………………………………………………….................9
  第一節 研究發展相關文獻………………………………………………….......9
  第二節 研究發展對公司績效影響假說…………………………...…..11
第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………….................15
  第一節 衡量長期異常報酬方法………………………..……........15
  第二節 衡量長期經營績效方法…………………………………........22
第四章 實證分析結果與討論……………………………………..........…………….……24
  第一節 資料來源與處理……………..…………..……………….......24
  第二節 長期異常報酬實證結果……………………………..….......33
  第三節 長期經營績效實證結果…………………….............41
  第四節 實證結果彙整…………………………………………….……….......57
第五章 結論……………………………………………………………..………................60
參考文獻…………………………………………………….…………..……………................63
附錄……………………………………………………………………………………...................68
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject經營績效zh_TW
dc.subject長期異常報酬zh_TW
dc.subject經營績效zh_TW
dc.subject長期異常報酬zh_TW
dc.subject減少研究發展費用zh_TW
dc.subject減少研究發展費用zh_TW
dc.subjectR&D Reductionen
dc.subjectOperating Performanceen
dc.subjectR&D Reductionen
dc.subjectLong-term Abnormal Returnsen
dc.subjectOperating Performanceen
dc.subjectLong-term Abnormal Returnsen
dc.title減少研究發展費用對公司績效之影響-以臺灣實證為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Firm Performance following R&D Reduction: Evidences from Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear104-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor何耕宇
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee徐世勳
dc.subject.keyword減少研究發展費用,長期異常報酬,經營績效,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordR&D Reduction,Long-term Abnormal Returns,Operating Performance,en
dc.relation.page78
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2016-02-03
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept農業經濟學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:農業經濟學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-105-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.32 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved