請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51338
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 藍文欽(Wen-Chin Lan) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ru-Hsing Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許如星 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:30:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-03-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-02-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文部分
王生台(無日期)。認識聖經。2015年2月25日,取自:http://www.lsmchinese.org/cgi-bin/bible365/guide/comparison.htm 王新生(2010)。聖經精讀。上海市:復旦大學出版社。 江淑卿、郭生玉(1997)。不同學習過程的概念構圖策略對促進知識結構專家化與理解能力之效果研究。師大學報,42,1-16。 余民寧(1997)。有意義的學習—概念構圖之研究。台北市:商鼎文化出版社。 岑紹麟(2003)。國際聖經百科全書:聖經研究篇-經文與抄本(原作者:S. K. Soderlund, C. F. Sitterly, & J. H. Greenlee)。香港:漢語聖經協會。(原著出版年:1986) 李常受(2008)。真理課程:一級卷一。台北市:臺灣福音書房。 李常受(2011)。真理課程:一級卷二。台北市:臺灣福音書房。 李常受(2012)。認識聖經。台北市:臺灣福音書房。 李湜源(1978)。中文聖經翻譯簡史。景風,53,2-14。 林原宏(1996)。知識結構分析—徑路搜尋、多向度量尺和集群分析的方法論探討。測驗統計年刊,4,47-69。 林儷燕(2011)。IFLA推動國際書目控制發展之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學圖書資訊學系,新北市。 香港聖經公會(2006)。聖經的由來—成典、流傳和翻譯。2015年7月7日,取自:http://www.hkbs.org.hk/themes/hkbs2/files/Origin.PDF 倪柝聲(1986)。什麼是新約。台北市:臺灣福音書房。 徐蕙芬、戴怡正譯(2007)。書目紀錄功能要件最終報告。台北市:文華書局。 海丁氏(1994)。上海廣學會編譯:聖經大辭典。北京:中央編譯社。 張郁嵐(2010)。聖經是神默示的麼。台北市:臺灣福音書房。 張迺貞、蔡育欽(2011)。建置FRBR圖書館自動化系統雛型之研究(在CMARC環境實作FRBR轉換—以KOHA圖書館管理系統為例)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號NSC 99-2410-H-036-009),未出版。 張慧銖(2002)。從作品與書目關係探討圖書館目錄之目的。中國圖書館學會會報,69,155-175。 張慧銖(2007)。NBINet採用FRBR模式之可行性研究。圖書資訊學研究,1(2),33-53。 張慧銖(2011)。圖書館電子資源組織:從書架到網路。台北市:華藝。 張慧銖(2014)。中華民國圖書館學會103年資訊組織進階班:FRBR的發展與應用。2015年7月2日,取自:www.flysheet.com.tw/OCLCTW/download/FRBRof Application.pdf 張慧銖(2015)。RDA之緣起與發展。中華民國一○三年圖書館年鑑,217-242。 張慧銖、林時暖(2004)。書目紀錄功能需求之發展。中國圖書館學會會報,73,45-61。 莊柔玉(2000)。基督教聖經中文譯本權威現象研究。香港:國際聖經協會。 莊雅棠(2008)。書中之書:聖經的價值與影響。台北市:圓神出版社。 郭衛寧(2005)。FRBR與OPAC發展。圖書館雜誌,24(9),49-54。 陳立原(2006)。以Ontology和FRBR技術分析博碩士論文探討圖書資訊學之學科發展與知識關連(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。 陳亞寧(2013)。以關鍵字使用分析探討社會標記者與索引專家的文獻標引心智模式(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。 陳和琴(2003)。書目記錄功能需求(FRBR)初探。在淡江大學資訊與圖書館學學系編,2003年資訊科技與圖書館學術研討會論文集(179-200頁)。新北市:淡江大學資訊與圖書館學學系。 陳淑君(2007)。書目紀錄功能需求(FRBR)模型應用在線上目錄之研究。黃世雄教授七秩榮慶籌備小組編,現代圖書館回顧與前瞻學術研討會暨黃世雄教授七秩榮慶研討會論文集(61-82頁)。台北縣:淡江大學。 陳嫻壎(2005)。學習概念相關性之認知結構評量研究—以資料聚類與形式概念為分析工具(未出版之碩士論文)。中原大學資訊工程學系,桃園。 黃台珠、熊召弟、王美芬、佘曉清、靳知勤、段曉林、熊同鑫(譯)(2002)。促進理解之科學教學(原作者:Joel J. Mintzes, James H. Wandersee and Joseph D. Novak)。台北市:心理。(原著出版年:1984) 黃慕萱(1994)。線上檢索類型之研究。資訊傳播與圖書館學,1(1),39-49。 黃慕萱(2000)。影響個人心智模型之因素初探。圖書館資訊學刊,12(15),19-36。 黃慕萱(2002)。詞彙選用之決策樹與心智模型之研究─以臺灣大學學生檢索PsycLIT光碟資料庫為例。圖書資訊學刊,17,1-33。 黃龍光(2012)。淺談日內瓦聖經。聖經年刊,1,9-17。 董桂存(2014)。FRBR模型應用於中文書目紀錄的有效性研究—以中國國家圖書館為例。圖書館學研究,23,47-53。 臺灣聖經公會資料室(2001)。中英文聖經為什麼不一樣?。聖經季刊,1(1)。取自:http://www.biblesociety-tw.org/bmag/bmag02/whydifferent.htm。 臺灣福音書房(2008)。新舊約聖經恢復本。台北市:臺灣福音書房。 趙維本(1993)。譯經溯源─現代五大中文聖經翻譯史。香港:中國神學研究院。 蔡家齊(2007)。中文線上公用目錄系統FRBR功能設計之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。 禤浩榮、王敏賢(2003)。國際聖經百科全書:聖經研究篇-總論與正典(原作者:J. Orr, E. F. Harrison, R. K. Harrison, G. L. Robinson & R. P. Meye)。香港:漢語聖經協會。(原著出版年:1986) 錢敏、朱晶晶、張紅(2011)。大學生用户心智模型测量研究。情報科學,5,752-756。 錢樹弘(2015)。基督教教友讀經經驗與數位聖經需求之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。世新大學資訊傳播學系,台北市。 鮑維均、黃錫木、羅慶才、張略、岑紹麟(2006)。聖經正典與經外文獻導論。香港:基道出版社。 謝建成、廖婉竹(2013)。以路徑搜尋分析建構大學圖書館網站之研究。教育資料與圖書館學,50(4),597-626。 二、 英文部分 Ayres, M. L. (2005). Case studies in implementing functional requirements for bibliographic records [FRBR]: AustLit and MusicAustralia. The Australian Library Journal, 54(1), 43-54. Bennett, Lavoie, & O’Neill. (2003). The concept of a work in WorldCat: an application of FRBR. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 27, 45–59. Bilal, D., & Wang, P. (2005). Children’s conceptual structures of science categories and the design of Web directories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1303-1313. Blandford, A., Makri, S., Gow, J., Rimmer, J., Warwick, C. &Buchanan, G. (2007). A library or just another information resource? A case study of users’ mental models of traditional and digital libraries. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 58 (3), 433-445. Borgman, C.L. (1985). The user's mental model of an information retrieval system: Effects on performance. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Stanford University. Bowie, W. R. & Hendel, R. S. (1997). Bible: History of the English Bible. In Encyclopedia Americana (1997 ed.,Vol. 3, pp. 716-719). Danbury: Scholastic Library Publishing. Brant, D.S. (2001). Information technology literacy: task knowledge and mental models. Library Trends, 50(1), 73-86. Budanović, M. P., & Žumer, M. (2015). Investigating Mental Models of Cataloguers as the First Step Towards the Development of Intuitive Cataloguer’s Tools. In: F. Pehar, C., Schlogl, C. Wolff. (Eds.). Reinventing Information Science in the Networked Society. Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science. Gluckstadt: Verlag Werner Hulsbusch, 106-117. Burke, D. G. (2009). Translation that openeth the window: Reflections on the history and legacy of the King James Bible. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. Butow, E. (2007). User interface design for mere mortals. Boston: Addison-Wesley. Canas, A. J., Bunch, L., & Reiska, P. (2010). Cmap Analyses: an extensible concept map analyses tool. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Concept Mapping, Vina del Mar, Chile, 75- 83. Canas, A. J., Hill, G., Carff, R., Suri, N., Lott, J., Eskridge, T., et al. (2004b). CmapTools: A knowledge modeling and sharing environment. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the first international conference on concept mapping (Vol. I, 125-133). Pamplona, Spain: Universidad Publica de Navarra. Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1123-1130. Carlyle, A. & Becker, S. R. (2008). ASIS&T 2008 annual meeting poster FRBR and the 'known-item' search. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 1–9. Carlyle, A. (2006). Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model. Library Resources & Technical Services, 50(4), 264-273. Carroll, J. M., Olson, J. R. (1987). Mental models in human-computer interaction. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Christensen, G. & Olson, J. (2002). Mapping consumers’ mental models with ZMET. Psychology and Marketing, 19(6), 477–501. Cooper, A., Reimann, R. , Cronin, D., Noessel, C., Csizmadi, J. & LeMoine, J. (2014). About face 3: the essentials of interaction design (4th edition). Indiana: John Wiley & Sons. Coyle, K. (2016). FRBR, before and after: A look at our bibliographic models. Chicago: American Library Association. Craik, K.W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Dickey, T. J. (2013). FRBRization of a library catalog: better collocation of records, leading to enhanced search, retrieval, and display. Information Technology and Libraries, 27(1), 23-32. Dimitroff, A. (1992). Mental models theory and search outcome in a bibliographic retrieval system. Library and Information Science Research, 14(2), 141-56. Eden, B. (Ed.) (2006). Functional requirements of bibliographic records [special issue]. Library Technology Reports, 42(6). Espley, J. L. & Pillow, R. (2012). The VTLS implementation of FRBR. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 369-386. Fattahi, R. (1997). The relevance of cataloguing principles to the online environment: An historical and analytical study. (Unpublished PhD thesis, School of Information, Library and Archive Studies, University of New South Wales). Retrieved March 5, 2015, from http://profsite.um.aci.ir/,fattahi/thesis1.htm. Fiore, S., Cuevas, H., Oser, R. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand connections: the facilitative effects of diagrams on mental model development and task performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 185-99. Foreman, K. J. (1971). Introduction to the Bible. Richmond, VA: John Knox Press. Goldmsith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of Education Psychology, 83, 88-96. Hickey, T.B., O’Neill, E. T., & Toves, J. (2002). Experiments with the IFLA functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR). D-Lib Magazine, 8(9). Hsu, Y. C. (2006). The effects of metaphors on novice and expert learners' performance and mental-model development. Interacting with Computers, 18(4), 770-792. IFLA FRBR Review Group. (2014). FRBR bibliography. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.ifla.org/node/881. IFLA Study Group on the functional requirements for bibliographic records. (2009). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report. Retrieved March 1, from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf. Interlink (2004). The knowledge network organizing tool (KNOT) software. Retrieved May 1, 2015, from http://interlinkinc.net/KNOT.html. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR). (2009). Functional requirements for authority data: a concept model. Munchen: K. G. Sauer. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kerr, S.T. (1990). Wayfinding in an electronic database: the relative importance of navigational cues vs. mental models. Information Processing & Management, 26(4), 511-523. Langan-Fox, J., Code, S., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2000). Team mental models: techniques, methods, and analytic approaches. Human Factors, 42(2), 242-271. Layne, S. S. (2011). Functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR). In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, Third Edition. (pp.1884-1891). New York: Taylor and Francis. Le Boeuf, P. (Ed.). (2005). Functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR): Hype or cure-all? [Special issue]. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39(3-4). Le Boeuf, P. (Ed.). (2012). The FRBR family of models [special issue]. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7). Leskovec, M. (2005). Delo, izrazna oblika, pojavna oblika: kaj uporabniki res iŠčejo? [Work, expression, manifestation: What are users really looking for]. BS thesis. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta. Li, P. (2007). Doctoral students’ mental models of a web search engine: an exploratory study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Canada. Living Stream Ministry. (n.d.). Introducing the recovery version Holy Bible. Retrieved from: http://www.recoveryversion.org/download/HolyBible_Broch.pdf Madison, O. (2005) The origins of the IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39(3-4), 15-37. Maxwell, Robert L. (2000). FRBR: A guide for the perplexed. Chicago: American Library Association. Mayer, Richard E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 43-64. Mcgrath, K., Kules, B., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2011). FRBR and Facets Provide Flexible, Work-Centric Access to Items in Library Collections. In Proceeding of the 11th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 49-52). New York: ACM. Merčun, T., Švab, K., Harej, V. & M. Žumer (2013). Creating better library information systems: the road to FRBR-land. Information Research, 18(3), paper C07. Merčun, T., Žumer, M., & Aalberg, T. (2012). Presenting and exploring the complexity of bibliographic relationships. In H. H. Chen and G. Chowdhury (Eds.) The 14th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries 2012 (pp. 63–66). Berlin: Springer. Michell, G., Dewdney, P. (1998). Mental models theory: applications for library and information science. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 39(4), 275-281. Nardi, B. (1996). Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp.7-16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Nida, E. A. (1960). Message and mission: The communication of christian faith. New York: Harper & Row. Nielsen, J. (2004). Card sorting: how many users to test. Retrieved April 30, 2015, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040719.html Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In Gentner, D., Stevens, A. L. (Eds.), Mental models (pp.7-14). Hillsdale, Nj: Lawrence Erlbaum Association. Norman, D. A. (1998), The design of everyday things. London: MIT Press. Norman, D. A. (2005). Emotional design. New York: Basic Books. Novak, J. D. & Canas, A. J. (2006). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them (technical report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01). Retrieved April 30, 2015, from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlying ConceptMaps.pdf Novak, J. D. & Gowin, D. B (1984). Learning how to learn. London, England: Cambrige university press. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. O’Neill, E. (2002). FRBR (functional requirements for bibliographic records): application of the entity- relationship model to Humphry Clinker. Library Resources and Technical Services, 46(4), 150-159. Oliver, C., & American Library Association. (2010). Introducing RDA: A guide to the basics. Chicago: American Library Association. Orlinsky, H. M., & Bratcher, R. G. (1991). A history of bible translation and the north american contribution. Atlanta, Georgia: Scholar Press. Paul, C. L. (2008). A Modified Delphi approach to a new card sorting methodology. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(1), 7-30. Peponakis, M. (2012). Conceptualizations of the cataloging object: a critique on current perceptions of FRBR group 1 entities. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 587-602. Pisanski, J & Žumer, M. (2010a). Mental models of the bibliographic universe: part 1 : mental models of descriptions. Journal of Documentation, 66(5), 643-667. Pisanski, J & Žumer, M. (2010b). Mental models of the bibliographic universe: part 2 : comparison task and conclusions. Journal of Documentation, 66(5), 668-680. Pisanski, J. & Žumer, M. (2007). Functional requirements for bibliographic records/ an investigation of two prototypes. Program, 41(4), 400-417. Pisanski, J. & Žumer, M. (2012). User verification of the FRBR conceptual model. Journal of Documentation, 68(4), 582-592. Pisanski, J., Pisanski, T., & Žumer, M. (2013). A new approach to complex web site organization. Journal of Information Science, 39(6), 805-814. Riva, P. (2003). Defining the boundaries: FRBR, AACR and the serial. Serials Librarian, 45(3), 15–21. Riva, P. (2007). Introducing the functional requirements for bibliographic records and related IFLA developments. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 33(6), 7-11. Riva, P. (2015). FRBR review group initiatives and the world of linked data. JLIS.it, 4(1), 105-117. Riva, P., & Oliver, C. (2012). Evaluation of RDA as an implementation of FRBR and FRAD. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 564-586. Rogerson, J. W. (2012). Bible world : Introduction to the Bible (3rd Edition). London: Durham. Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 349-363. Ruiz-primo, M. & Shavelson, R. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of research in science teaching, 33 (6), 569-600. Ryken, L. (2002). The word of God in English: Criteria for excellence in Bible translation. Wheaton, Ill: Crossway Books. Schvaneveldt, R.W., Durso, F.T., Dearholt, D.W. (1989). Network structures in proximity data. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 249-284). New York: Academic Press. Slone, D.J. (2002). The influence of mental models and goals on search patterns during Web interaction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(13), 1152- 1169. Smiraglia, R. P., Riva, P., & Žumer, M. (2014). The FRBR family of conceptual models: toward a linked bibliographic future. Routledge. Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. MIT Press, Cambridge. Taniguchi, S. (2003). Conceptual modeling of component parts of bibliographic resources in cataloging. Journal of Documentation, 59(6), 692-708. Taylor, Arlene. (2007). Understanding frbr: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. Terry, B. (2014). English bible translations. Retrieved March 31, 2015, from http://bible.ovc.edu/terry/interpretation/translat.htm. The Economist. (2007). The battle of the books; the bible vs the koran. The Economist, 385, 80. Retrieved March 31, 2015, from http://www.economist.com/node/10311317 The Editors of Encyclopadia Britannica. (2014). Biblical literature. In Encyclopadia Britannica. Retrieved May 21, 2015, from http://global.britannica.com/topic/ biblical-literature/ The-Christian-canon The Editors of Encyclopadia Britannica. (2015). Biblical translation. In Encyclopadia Britannica Online. Retrieved May 21, 2015, from http://global.britannica.com/ topic/ biblical-translation Tillett, B. B. (2003). What is FRBR? a conceptual model for the bibliographic universe. Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress. Retrieved March 3, 2015, from: www.loc.gov/cds/downloads/FRBR.PDF Tillett, B. B. (2005). FRBR and cataloging for the future. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39(3-4), 197-205. Tullis, T., & Albert, B. (2013). Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Tullis, T., & Wood, L. (2004). How many users are enough for a card-sorting study?. Retrieved April 30, 2015, from http://home.comcast.net/~tomtullis/publications/ UPA2004CardSorting.pdf United Bible Societies. (2014). Global Scripture access report - 2014 annual progress. Retrieved July 27, 2015, from http://www.unitedbiblesocieties.org/wp-content/ uploads/2015/04/Global-Scripture-Access-Report-2014-Annual-Progress1.pdf Upchurch, L., Rugg, G., & Kitchenham, B. (2001). Using card sorts to elicit web page quality attributes. IEEE Software, 18(4), 84-89. Veldof, J. & Beavers, K. (2002) Going mental: tackling mental models for the online library tutorial. Research Strategies, 18(1), 3-20. Warn, Y. (1990). On the dynamics of mental models. In M. Tauber, D. Ackerman (Eds.), Mental models and human-computer interaction (pp. 73-93). Heidelberg: Springer. Wegner, P. D. (1999). The journey from texts to translation: The origin and development of the Bible. Michigan: BridgePoint Books. Weinschenk, S. (2011). 100 things every designer needs to know about people. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Westbrook, L. (2006). Mental models: a theoretical overview and preliminary study. Journal of information science, 32(6), 563-579. Westbrook, L. (2008). Unanswerable questions at the IPL: user expectations of email reference. Journal of Documentation, 65(3), 367-395. Wiggins, B. (2012, March 2). Library of Congress Announces Its Long-Range RDA Training Plan. Retrieved March 21, 2015, from: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/news_rda_implementation_date.html Williams, M.D., Hollan, J.D., Stevens, A.L. (1983). Human Reasoning About a Simple Physical System. In D, Gentner and A.L, Stevens. eds. Mental Models (pp.131-153). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Yee, M.M. (1998). What is a work? In J. Weihs (Ed.), Principles and future od AACR: proceedings of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR (pp. 62–104). Chicago: American Library Association. Yee, M.M. (2005). FRBRization: a method for turning online public finding lists into online public catalogs. Information Technology and Libraries, 24(3), 77-95. Zeng, M. L., Žumer, M., Salaba, A., & IFLA Working Group on the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records (FRSAR). (2011). Functional requirements for subject authority data (FRSAD): A conceptual model. Berlin: De Gruyter Saur. Zhang, X. & Chignell, M. (2001). Assessment of the effects of user characteristics on mental models of information retrieval systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(6), 445-459. Zhang, Y. & Salaba A. (2009a). Implementing FRBR in libraries: Key issues and future directions. New York: Neal-Shuman Publishers. Zhang, Y. & Salaba, A. (2009b). What is next for functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR)? A delphi study. Library Quarterly, 79(2), 233-255. Zhang, Y. & Salaba, A. (2012). What do users tell us about FRBR-based catalogs? Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 50(5-7), 705-723. Zhang, Y. (2008). Undergraduate students’ mental models of the web as an information retrieval system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2087-2098. Zhang, Y. (2008a). Undergraduate students' mental models of the web as an information retrieval system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2087-2098. Zhang, Y. (2008b). The influence of mental models on undergraduate students’ searching behavior on the Web. Information Processing & Management, 44(3), 1330-1345. Zhang, Y. (Ed.) (2007). Functional requirements for bibliographic records [special issue]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 33(6). Zhang, Y., Salaba, A., Zumer, M., Mercun, T., Bowen, J., Kilzer, R., & Neal, D. (2011). Developing FRBR-based library catalogs for users. American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-4. Žumer, M. (2011). Do we need to change? Do we want to change?: The future of Bibliographic information systems. ProInflow: časopis pro informačni vědy, 3(2), 138-149. Žumer, M., Pisanski, J., Vilar, P., Harej, V., Merčun, T., Švab, K. (2011). Breaking barriers between old practices and new demands: The price of hesitation. Paper presented at World Library and Information Congress: The 77th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Puerto Rico. Retrieved January 4, 2016, from: http://conference.ifla.org/past-wlic/2011/80-zumer-en.pdf Žumer, M., Salaba, A., & Zhang, Y. (2012). User verification of the FRBR conceptual model and testing of FRBR prototypes. In H. -H. Chen, G. Chowdhury (Eds.), The Outreach of Digital Libraries: A Globalized Resource Network (pp. 148-151). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51338 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 書目紀錄功能需求(FRBR)因兼具聚合書目關係和展現書目層次的預期效益,故自其問世以來即成為圖書資訊界所廣為重視的概念模型。不過,雖然FRBR聲稱是以使用者為導向的概念模型,但其無論在草創時期、或是在後續的發展中,皆未進行使用者研究,以致學界與業界並未確知FRBR的概念模型能否反映使用者對書目世界的認知結構。針對此研究缺口,本研究有別於過去FRBR的研究多是採用設計者和研究者為使用者考量的觀點,而是改由使用者的觀點對FRBR的概念模型本身進行測試和驗證。
由於書目關係較複雜的作品較能使FRBR概念模型的效益得以發揮,故本研究選擇《新舊約聖經全書》作為探析使用者之書目世界心智模型的測試作品,而研究對象則選定18位同質性較高的基督徒大學生和研究生。本研究兼採卡片分類法、概念繪圖法和比較任務法共三種引出心智模型的方法,以較全面而完整的角度探析使用者的書目世界心智模型,研究結果分別呈現三種心智模型引出方法所提取和產出之使用者的團體書目世界心智模型。經由比較發現,使用者的團體書目世界心智模型與FRBR概念模型之間約有70%的相似度,研究結果亦從書目實體和書目關係的兩方面呈現二者的異同之處。本研究依據研究發現,分別從理論和實務的角度,對FRBR的概念模型和以FRBR為基礎之圖書館線上公用目錄的開發和建置提出相關建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) is a model with great potential for library catalogs, especially for organizing and collocating bibliographic records, displaying relationships, and improving navigation. Since its inception, FRBR has become a widely discussed topic in the library community. Although FRBR assumes a user-focused approach, there were no user studies actually conducted during the development process of FRBR. With FRBR’s user focus, the lack of user engagement is a problem needed to be explored. The aim of this study is to fill the research gap.
What do users think about the library catalog and the related bibliographic universe? How similar are users’ mental model of bibliographic universe and the FRBR conceptual model? The current study attempts to investigate these questions from user’s perspective. Instead of testing of FRBR prototypes, the study adopts a user-oriented approach to examine and verify the FRBR model. The study chose the Holy Bible as the bibliographic entity of investigation because previous researches suggest that complex works would benefit most from the implementation of FRBR model. A homogenous group of 18 Christian undergraduate and graduate students was purposively selected as research subjects. In order to obtain a more reliable and thorough result, the study employed a combination of three methods for elicitation of mental models, including card sorting, concept mapping, and pairwise rating. The results show three cumulative mental models of the bibliographic universe elicited and produced from the corresponding methods. Through comparing users’ cumulative mental models with the FRBR conceptual model, it is confirmed that they share a similarity of about 70%. The findings also present the similarities and differences between users’ cumulative mental models and the FRBR conceptual model from the persepectives of bibliographic entities and relationships. Finally, based on the research results, several suggestions in both aspects of theory and practice are proposed in the conclusion, which are for the conceptual model of FRBR and the implementation of FRBR-based library catalogs respectively. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:30:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02126005-1.pdf: 29560661 bytes, checksum: de4ba48283d6a2fdb79d2bfecf1de2a7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iv 英文摘要 v 目次 vii 表次 xi 圖次 xiii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究問題 7 第三節 研究範圍與限制 7 第四節 名詞解釋 9 第二章 文獻回顧 11 第一節 書目紀錄功能需求概述 11 一、 FRBR之源起與發展 11 二、 FRBR之概念模型 14 三、 FRBR之使用者任務 25 四、 FRBR之預期效益 26 五、 FRBR之適用館藏類型 31 六、 FRBR之相關評論 32 七、 FRBR之應用實例 34 八、 FRBR未來重要議題 35 第二節 FRBR的使用者研究 36 一、 對FRBR概念模型本身的使用者研究 36 二、 對基於FRBR概念模型之系統的使用者研究 39 第三節 心智模型概述 40 一、 心智模型之定義 40 二、 心智模型與概念模型之比較 43 三、 心智模型的探析方法 45 四、 心智模型在圖資領域的實徵研究 54 第四節 聖經概述 59 一、 聖經總論 60 二、 聖經的早期抄本 68 三、 聖經的近代譯本 71 四、 本研究所涉及之中、英文聖經譯本 78 第三章 研究設計與方法 85 第一節 研究方法 86 第二節 研究對象 87 第三節 資料蒐集 92 一、 卡片分類法 94 二、 概念構圖法 96 三、 成對比較法 97 第四節 資料分析 98 一、 卡片分類法 98 二、 概念構圖法 98 三、 成對比較法 99 第四章 研究結果與討論 101 第一節 卡片分類法之施測結果 101 一、 受測者之整體卡片分類結果 101 二、 受測者之心智模型與FRBR之概念模型的比較 118 三、 受測者之背景對其個人心智模型的影響 127 四、 小結 129 第二節 概念構圖法之施測結果 132 一、 受測者之團體概念圖 132 二、 受測者之心智模型與FRBR之概念模型的比較 140 三、 受測者之背景對其個人心智模型的影響 170 四、 小結 172 第三節 成對比較法之施測結果 175 一、 受測者之整體排名結果 175 二、 受測者之心智模型與FRBR之概念模型的比較 181 三、 受測者之背景對其個人心智模型的影響 184 四、 小結 186 第四節 綜合討論 187 第五章 結論與建議 197 第一節 結論 197 第二節 建議 202 第三節 未來研究之建議 208 參考文獻 213 附錄 229 附錄一 任務說明書與人口背景資料問卷 229 附錄二 卡片分類法題目 232 附錄三 概念構圖法 234 附錄四 成對比較法問卷 239 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 書目紀錄功能需求之使用者研究:使用者書目世界心智模型之初探-以《聖經》作品為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on Users’ Mental Models of the Bibliographic Universe: an Examination of FRBR Group One Entities Based on the Works of the Bible | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳雪華,唐牧群 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 書目紀錄功能需求,使用者研究,心智模型,概念模型,聖經, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR),user study,mental model,conceptual model,the Bible, | en |
dc.relation.page | 239 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-02-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 28.87 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。