請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51267完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林能白(Neng-Pei Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ya-Ting Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊雅婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:28:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-02-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-02-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-02-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
中文文獻 2020東京。http://tokyo2020.jp 日本總務省統計局。取自http://www.stat.go.jp/info/wadai/index.htm 2015 中華人民共和國國務院《中國老齡事業的發展》。取自。http://www.scio.gov.cn/xwbjs/index.htm 王月魂 (2007)。閃耀中的銀髮市場:亞洲老年消費力報告。財訊。 王政彥 (2009)。健康終老,幸福家園。麗文文化。 王怡棻譯 (2011)。共同創造到底有多厲害!雷馬斯瓦米、高哈特原著,商周出版。 內政部戶政司 (2008)。內政部人口政策白皮書。 內政部社會司 (2007)。我國長期照顧十年計畫。 內政部社會司 (2009)。中華民國98年老人狀況調查報告。 行政院主計總處。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1。 行政院經濟建設委員會 (2010)。2010年至2060年臺灣人口推計。 行政院經濟建設委員會 (2012)。黃金十年願景計畫。 余朝權 (1994)。產業競爭分析專論。五南圖書出版公司。 吳肖琪、周世珍、沈文君、陳麗華、鍾秉正、蔡誾誾 (2007),我國長期照護相關法規之探討。長期照護雜誌,11 (1),35-50。 吳思華 (1988)。產業政策與企業策略。中華經濟研究所。 吳淑瓊、莊坤洋 (2001)。在地老化:臺灣二十一世紀長期照護的政策方向。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,20 (3) ,192-201。 林冠汾 (2007)。搶佔熟齡市場:最有購買力的新興族群引爆10大商機。臉譜出版社。 林建山 (1991)。產業政策與產業管理:針對我國經濟發展的理論與現實。商略出版社。 邱高生、常如君及東方線上生活型態研究小組 (2004)。熟年世代--臺灣50-64歲生活型態族群研究。統一夢公園生活事業公司。 李文龍 (2003)。抓住3000億老人商機。知本家。 李世代 (1997)。國內老人醫學的發展與動態。長期照護雜誌,1 (2),31-33。 李世代 (2009)。日本、韓國長期照護保險內容與相關法令之研究。行政院經濟建設委員會 李宗派 (2008)。老人保健與銀髮產業之發展趨勢。臺灣老人保健學刊,4 (1),1-22。 李宗派 (2009)。探討嬰兒潮之退休概念與其變遷趨勢。臺灣老人保健學刊,5 (2),70-92。 洪世民譯 (2012)。發現幸福:1000位長者教會我的人生30堂課。卡爾.皮勒原著,財信出版。 洪正宇譯 (2014)。和顧客共創行銷:超越調查界限深入了解顧客。池田紀行、山崎晴生原著,中國生產力中心。 亞歷山大.奧斯瓦爾德 (2012)。獲利世代:自己動手,畫出你的商業模式。亞歷山大.奧斯瓦爾德原著。 高雅玲、陳文棠及臺灣產業科技前瞻研究計畫團隊MIC (2011)。面對9034現象的省思與建議,《思潮ThinkWave》財團法人資訊工業策進會 財團法人中衛發展中心 (2010)。高齡養生照護產業發展計畫。 郭哲誠 (2011)。銀向成功:銀髮族的健康銀行。德威。 陳淑嬌 (2006)。民間團體與政府機關的資源統合運用—以老人住宅為例,台經月刊。 陳淑嬌 (2013)。高齡產業新商機-以養生住宅為例。臺灣經濟研究月刊,2,112-118。 曾怡禎 (2007)。2007年銀髮產業景氣趨勢調查報告。臺灣經濟研究院。 瑪莉.弗隆 (2008)。明日商機。瑪莉.弗隆原著,商周出版 黃煜文譯 (2011)。當世界又老又窮:全球人口老化大衝擊。泰德.費雪曼原著,天下遠見。 新加坡樂齡活動聯會。Singapore Action Group of Elders。取自http://www.sage.sg 經濟部工業局 (2010)。養生照護產業養生照護產業發展推動計畫研究報告。 蔡誾誾、李玉春、吳肖琪、林麗嬋 (2008)。評析我國「長期照顧十年計畫」落實的可行性。長期照護雜誌,12 (1),8-16。 詹文男 (2013)。「國家發展前瞻規劃」委辦研究計畫─推動銀髮服務業產化發展推動銀髮服務業產化發展研究報告。行政院經濟建設委員會 詹文男、蘇孟宗、陳信宏、林欣吾及2025研究團隊 (2015)。《2025臺灣大未來:從世界趨勢看見臺灣機會》資策會產業情報研究所(MIC)、工研院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心(IEK)、中華經濟研究院國際所、臺灣經濟研究院三所。大立文創企業股份有限公司。 楊雅婷、許怡欣 (2013)。點銀成金─打造樂齡銀髮黃金生活的魔法事業。台商國際傳媒。 臺灣工業研究院 (2014) 。臺灣產業科技前瞻研究計畫─2025前瞻趨勢與觀測。 顧淑馨譯 (2004)。消費者王朝:與顧客共創價值。C.K. 普哈拉、凡卡.雷馬斯瓦米原著,天下雜誌訂閱出版社新書快訊。 英文文獻 Adrian F, Payne KS, Pennie F (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academic Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96. Allen CK, Robert MS (2005). Evolution of recent economic-demographic modeling: A synthesis. Journal of Population Economics,18(2), 275-300. Asian Development Bank (2011). Asian Development Outlook 2011 Update:Preparing for Demographic Transition. Bernard C, Robert S (2008). Marketing solutions in accordance with the S-D logic: Co-creating value with customer network actors. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 270–277 Bloom DE, David C, Günther F (2010). Implications of population ageing for economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26(4), 583-612 Prahalad CK, Venkat R (2004). Co-Creation Experiences: The Next Practice in Value Creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14. Ching YC (2010). Meeting the challenges of eldercare in Taiwan's aging society. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics, 1(1), 2-4 Christoph Z, Raphael A (2006). Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms. Organization science, 18(2), 181-199. Christoph Z, Raphael A (2008). The Fit between Product Market Strategy and Business Model: Implications for Firm Performance. Strategic management journal, 29(1), 1-26. Christoph Z, Raphael A (2009). Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective. Long range planning, 43(2), 216-226. Christoph Z, Raphael A, Lorenzo (2011). The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019-1042 Cornelia S, Werner P (2011). Japan’s silver market: Creating a new industry under uncertainty. Frankfurt Working Papers on East Asia. Herstatt C, Kohlbacher F, Bauer P (2011). ' Silver' product design: Product innovation for older people. Working Papers / Technologie-und Innovations management, Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg. Cutler TW, Palmieri J, Khalsa M, Stebbins M (2007). Evaluation of the relationship between a chronic disease care management program and California pay-for-performance diabetes care cholesterol measures in one medical group. Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy,13(7), 578-88. Charles WLH, Gareth RJ (1998). Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach. Houghton Mifflin Company. David JT (2010). Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 172-194. Earl RB (1989). The Practice of Social Research, Wadsworth Publishing Company. ERIA (2011). Why Does Population Aging Matter So Much for Asia? Population Aging, Economic Security and Economic Growth in Asia. Retrieved from http://www.eria.org/publications/discussion_papers/why-does-population-aging-matter-so-much-for-asia-population-aging-economic-security-and-economic-gr.html Findsen B, Formosa M (2012). Lifelong learning in later life: A handbook on older adult learning. Sense Publisher. Henry C, Richard S (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin‐off companies. Industrial and corporate change, 11(3), 529-555. Henry C (2010). Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 354-363. Heinz (1982). The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning,15(2), 54–66. Hietalahti M, Tolvanen A, Kokko K (2015). Values and Personal Life Investment in Middle-Age: Measures and Relations. Journal of Adult Development, 22(4), 206-220. Hiroyuki M (2008). The Business of Aging: 10 Successful Strategies for a Diverse Market. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Michael M, Minet S, Jeffrey A (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726– 735. James FF (1983). The Compression of Morbidity. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly,61(3), 397–419. Jim S, Paul PM (2008). The Emergence of Service Science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and operations management, 17(3), 238-246. Joan M (2002). Why Business Models Matter, Harvard Business Review John W, Robert LK (1997) Successful Aging. The Cerontological Society of America the Chronologist, 37(4), 433-440. Karl AS (2013). Achieving the integrated and smart health and wellbeing paradigm: A call for policy research and action on governance and business models. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(4), e29-e37 Kanika M, O'Cass A (2013) Empowering senior citizens via third places: research driven model development of seniors' empowerment and social engagement in social places. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(2), 141-154. Kohlbacher K, Herstatt C (2008). User Innovators in the Silver Market: An Empirical Study among Camping Tourists. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Osterwalder A (2004). The Business Model Ontology A Proposition in a Design Science Approach, Diplômé postgrade en Informatique et Organisation (DPIO), de l'Ecole des HEC de l'Université de Lausanne. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Tucci CL (2005). Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems,16(1). Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John & Wiley & Sons. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2012). Designing Business Models and Similar Strategic Objects: The Contribution of IS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(5), 237. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A, Papadakos T (2014). Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want. John & Wiley & Sons. Paul PM, Jim S (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academic Marketing Science, 36(1), 18-20. Philip K (1976). Marketing Management, Analysis, Planning and Control. Prentice Hall. Porter ME (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Free Press. Porter ME (1985). The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press. Prahalad CK, Venkat R (2004). The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value with Customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Raphael A, Christoph Z (2001). Value Creation in E-Business. Strategic management journal, 22(6), 493-520. Robert KY (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, SAGE Publications Robert WS (1990). Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods. The British Accounting Review, 22(3), 259-281. Stock RD, Reece D, Cesario L (2004). Developing a comprehensive interdisciplinary senior healthcare practice. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52(12), 2128-2133. Scherer FM, Ross D (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for entrepreneurial leadership historical research reference in entrepreneurship. Shin HC, Pei CW, Chih KY (2014). Business concepts of systemic service innovations in e-Healthcare. Technovation, 34(9), 513-524 Stephen LK (2011). Lean. Business Model and Implementation of a Geriatric Fracture Center, Clinics in Geriatric Medicine,30(2),191–205. Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (2013) SHARE Project. Retrieved from http://www.share-project.org The Regents of the University of Michigan. Health and Retirement Study. Retrieved from http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2011). It's all B2B… and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181-187. United Nations Statistics Division (2001). Classification of Individual Consumption According to Purpose, COICOP. Venkat R, Francis G (2010). The Power of Co-Creation: Build It with Them to Boost Productivity, Growth, and Profits. Simon & Schuster Free Press. Venkat R, Kerimcan O (2014). The Co-Creation Paradigm. Stanford University Press. Vladimir Z (2010). Co-Creation: Toward a Taxonomy and an Integrated Research Perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce,15(1), 11–48. Wayne DH, Rajesh C, Matilda D, Manfred K, Siddharth SS (2011). Consumer Co-creation in New Product Development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283-296 Wiles JL, Leibing A, Guberman N, Reeve J, Allen RE (2011). The meaning of “ageing in place” to older people. The gerontologist. Shepherd WG (1979). The economics of industrial organization. Business & Economics, Front Cover. Prentice-Hall. World Health Organization (2002), Active Ageing : A Policy Framework, A contribution of the World Health Organization to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing, Madrid, Spain, April. World Health Organization (2007). Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide, WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Long X, Liao W, Jiang C, Liang D, Qiu B, Zhang L (2012). Healthy aging: an automatic analysis of global and regional morphological alterations of human brain. Academic radiology, 19(7), 785-793. Youjae Y, Taeshik G (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1279-1284 網路資料 2020東京http://tokyo2020.jp,2015 日本總務省統計局http://www.stat.go.jp/info/wadai/index.htm,2015 中華人民共和國國務院《中國老齡事業的發展》來源新華網,http://www.scio.gov.cn/xwbjs/index.htm,2015 行政院主計總處http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1。2015 新加坡樂齡活動聯會Singapore Action Group of Elders,http://www.sage.sg,2015 Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (2013) SHARE Project http://www.share-project.org,2015 The Regents of the University of Michigan.Health and Retirement Study http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu,2015 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51267 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 人口快速邁向高齡化已成為全球趨勢,臺灣即將正式邁入高齡社會。高齡人口增加將帶來經濟活動與社會發展的全面性質變,各式需求帶動高齡產業發展。世界各國高齡議題探討蔚為風潮,但同時兼顧產業端與顧客端,以及探討其間互動共同創造價值之重要區塊研究卻付之闕如。在產業面向上,本研究檢視全臺立意取樣之33家高齡個案事業,採用個案研究與深度訪談之質性研究法,以經營模式與共創價值理論架構進行分析,探討個案機構經營模式於關鍵資源、關鍵活動及通路與顧客關係之推演,以及於價值主張中如何創造價值共創契機,並據以探討臺灣高齡事業經營模式與供需價值共創模式。在顧客面向上,本研究立意挑選進行共創價值設計之機構事業之顧客35名,採用質性研究法,進行共創活動滿意度深度訪談,並對全國隨機抽樣1,392位高齡族群進行問卷調查,採用量性研究法,探討臺灣高齡族群之價值共創態度意向,提供產業端掌握高齡族群對共創活動之意向,做為未來產業推動共創價值參考。
綜觀本研究之研究背景與動機,歸納本研究之主要研究目的如下: 一、探討高齡事業經營模式分析 二、探討高齡事業共創價值設計分析 三、探討高齡族群價值共創設計滿意度分析 四、探討高齡族群價值共創態度意向分析 本研究結果發現高齡事業經營模式與共創價值設計可分為四模式,包括實體機構群居照顧模式之實驗場域活動參與、居家社區服務輸送模式之田野蹲點觀察對話、社群電商實驗場域模式之體驗場域社群經營及可攜移動智能科技模式賦能學習聚眾行動。依據共創價值核心原則,經營模式共創設計四種型態包括實驗心態以擴大體驗空間,協助個人獲得價值新體驗、互動內容以擴大互動範疇,增加事業機構策略資本與營收、參與平臺以擴大參與平臺連結,降低供需雙方的成本與風險及網絡關係以擴大生態系統利益關係人聯繫,降低事業機構風險與成本,高齡事業經營模式及共創設計多朝四模式兼有服務類型,本體業態基礎主軸重心及各關鍵成功要素配置比例不同。 高齡族群多具良善互動特質、會將滿意服務回饋互動推薦分享給親朋好友家人,容忍包容方面對產品或服務較嚴謹要求,若對產品或服務提供不如預期時,容忍度相對較低,供需互動點實體服務著力全齡友善通用設計,跨業複合式促進生態系統互動,資通訊增進網絡科技人工智慧與健康資料加值,建構虛實整合一站式服務最佳完整解決方案以達成供需互動點達成創造增益與解決痛苦的配適最大值。 透過以上高齡事業經營模式和共創價值設計以及高齡族群共創價值設計滿意度和價值共創態度意向分析,深入瞭解臺灣高齡產業發展趨勢、高齡事業於供給與需求共創價值設計及結果,期待藉由探析過程,從中探掘產業商機與發展創新服務模式,為高齡族群生活帶來更好的品質。並將產業供給、顧客需求及價值共創過程方面之研究結果,提供欲發展高齡事業經營管理與尋求共創價值提高事業價值主張之事業體,以及投入高齡事業發展領域產官學研各界參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the rapid development of global population ageing, the increase in elderly population and the change in population structure have great impacts on the senior industry. The speedy growth of the industry and the discovery of great business opportunities are driven by the various needs that the elderlies face in everyday living. Population ageing is a global issue that affects almost every country. Mostageing researches focused on demand side and studies related to supply side wererelatively scarce. Today’s development in Internet has made information spread much faster, allowing the elderlies and their caregivers to more easily access information, or even actively participate in value co-creation in the services provided.
This study’s analytic structure is based on the mixed research method with qualitative and quantitative research, aiming to investigate with the business patterns of middle-aged and elderly industry in Taiwan, and to analyze the business models and value co-creation platform design with 33 quality middle-aged and elderly enterprises. Furthurmore, to analyze the attitude intention with co-creation value for middle-aged and elderly People in Taiwan ane try to realize the value co-creation platform design with qualify middle-aged and elderly enterprises through viewpoints with 1,392 middle-aged and elderly people. The purpose of this study is to help with the discovery of business opportunities and innovative service models and co-creation value design to improve the quality of life for the elderly population.As elderly needs and challenges are regarded asunprecedented experience, the relevant ministries and organizations are still learningand proposing new and innovative service models. We advocate societies which alloweverybody to understand the needs of the elderly sector, provide creative products andservice models, develop new market opportunities, and further replicate the successfulexperience in Taiwan to other regions. This study divided the business models adopted by the sampled enterprises into four categories: residential care and co-residence model, home care and living in place model, community e-business experience model, and virtual and physical portable device model. We constructed a conceptual model that comprehensively describes essential aspects of value co-creation, and categorized the value co-creation designs into four types applying for different business models including interaction in experience spaces co-creation design, on-site interacting co-creation design, social networking platform co-creation design, and empowering customers’ co-creation design. As most of the target customers were assembles of small markets, the successful enterprises often provided compound services, instead of only a single service. Depending on the core business of each enterprise, the proportions of models adopted differed. One feature of senior enterprises is that the services provided are elderly-centered. With business models intended for virtual and physical integrations, the industry offered total solutions for the elderlies and their caregivers. Through investigating successful cases of senior enterprises, this study intends to discover the opportunities for businesses and develop innovative service models, aiming to support the growth of the senior industry and provide better ageing environment and assistance. Through value co-creation platform design, the senior enterprises have converted the originally passive roles of the elderly and caregivers into active participants in the value co-creation process. The new paradigm of co-creation presents huge opportunity for senior enterprises. Through value co-creation design, the senior enterprises have converted the originally passive roles of the elderly and caregivers into active ones, helped them become participants of the value co-creation process, and promoted innovative development during the interactive process in services. Value co-creation has led enterprises reveal customers’ experiences and met their needs, increases markets and profits, and also build a new paradigm to put customer experience at the center of the senior enterprises’ designs. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:28:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-D99848007-1.pdf: 7155419 bytes, checksum: 15c8ffa12ed08db35b3f18bec3ed8a04 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
論文口試委員會審定書 I 誌謝 II 中文摘要 III Abstract V 目錄 VII 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XI 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 3 第三節 研究目的與重要性 5 第貳章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 高齡領域與產業發展現況 7 一、高齡族群與高齡事業之定義與範疇 8 二、國際組織重要政策與亞洲國家發展高齡產業之現況與趨勢 13 三、本研究高齡族群與高齡事業定義與範疇引用 18 第二節 經營模式 19 第三節 共創價值與價值共創態度意向 29 第參章 研究材料與方法 37 第一節 研究範疇 37 第二節 研究對象 39 一、產業端:經營模式及共創價值設計研究個案機構與訪談對象 40 二、顧客端:訪談對象—探詢對於共創價值設計之滿意度 42 三、顧客端:訪談對象—探詢對於共創價值設計之態度意向 42 第三節 研究架構 47 一、經營模式分析架構 47 二、共創價值分析架構 48 三、價值共創態度意向研究架構 49 第四節 研究流程 50 第五節 研究設計與方法 51 一、高齡事業經營模式與共創價值設計分析 52 二、高齡族群對共創價值設計滿意度之深入訪談 54 三、高齡族群對共創價值態度意向分析 55 第肆章 研究結果 59 第一節 產業供給端:高齡事業經營模式分析 59 一、實體機構群居照顧模式 62 二、居家社區服務輸送模式 63 三、門市電商體驗銷售模式 64 四、可攜移動智能科技模式 65 第二節 產業供給端:高齡事業共創價值設計分析 70 一、實體機構群居照顧模式共創價值設計 71 二、居家社區服務輸送模式共創價值設計 72 三、門市電商體驗銷售模式共創價值設計 72 四、可攜移動智能科技模式共創價值設計 73 五、產業供給與顧客需求供需共創價值設計核心準則 74 六、產業供給與顧客需求供需共創價值結構分析 78 第三節 顧客需求端:高齡事業共創價值設計滿意度分析 82 一、個案機構共創價值活動內容 84 二、共創價值活動過程 86 三、共創價值活動結果滿意度分析 94 四、共創價值活動建議 101 第四節 顧客需求端:高齡族群價值共創態度意向分析 104 第伍章 討論 110 第一節 高齡事業經營模式設計討論與未來發展建議 110 一、經營模式設計:關鍵資源導向,推演關鍵活動與通路推廣 110 二、虛實整合:資通訊科技與實體場域體驗空間搭橋連結 111 三、顧客關係:客服互動內容與關鍵合作夥伴網絡生態系統 111 第二節 高齡事業共創價值設計討論與未來發展建議 113 一、共創價值設計:以目標族群與顧客關係成就價值主張 113 二、被動到主動:賦能學習聚眾行動助益供需互動點上配適最佳化 113 第三節 共創價值設計顧客滿意度分析討論與未來發展建議 114 一、親自參與產品研發及服務體驗:資源整合力求完整性規劃執行 114 二、賦能動員學習化被動為主動:服務消費到創造自身工作就業機會 114 三、資通訊科技導入系統管理:重拾尊嚴自信與提升整體生活品質 115 第四節 高齡族群顧客價值共創態度意向分析 115 第陸章 結論與建議 117 參考文獻 120 中文文獻 120 英文文獻 122 網路資料 126 附錄 127 附錄一、2000-2014年全球文獻計量分析 127 一、經營模式 127 二、共創價值與價值共創態度意向 145 附錄二、高齡事業經營模式與共創價值設計訪談大綱 160 附錄三、共創價值設計態度意向分析問卷面訪調查執行流程 161 附錄四、訪員訓練計畫 163 附錄五、高齡事業共創價值設計滿意度分析訪談大綱 164 附錄六、共創價值設計態度意向分析問卷變項操作型定義 165 附錄七、高齡族群共創價值設計態度意向分析問卷 168 附錄八、高齡事業範疇與產業整體面向及核心需求綜效模式 170 一、典範移轉:以高齡長者為中心,虛實整合的最佳完整解決方案 170 二、全齡友善通用設計跨業整合模式:一站購足的複合式服務提供 171 三、中高齡族群、高齡族群與其照顧者多元生活和代行與代間需求 174 四、高齡事業經營模式與共創設計考量城鄉差異,提供適配服務模式 174 五、善因行銷產業特質,關注高齡商機、照顧難題以至追求幸福快樂 175 六、臺灣高齡產業主體規模小,可推展中國和亞洲與全球跨境服務 176 附錄九、顧客需求端之態度意向分析問卷調查結果整理 177 一、價值共創態度意向之描述性分析與迴歸分析 177 二、價值共創態度意向因素分析 212 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 價值共創意向態度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高齡事業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高齡產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 中高齡族群 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高齡族群 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經營模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共創價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高齡事業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高齡產業 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 中高齡族群 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高齡族群 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 經營模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 共創價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 價值共創意向態度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | value co-creation attitude | en |
| dc.subject | middle-aged | en |
| dc.subject | elderly people | en |
| dc.subject | business model | en |
| dc.subject | co-creation value | en |
| dc.subject | senior enterprise | en |
| dc.subject | senior enterprise | en |
| dc.subject | elderly industry | en |
| dc.subject | middle-aged | en |
| dc.subject | elderly people | en |
| dc.subject | business model | en |
| dc.subject | co-creation value | en |
| dc.subject | value co-creation attitude | en |
| dc.subject | elderly industry | en |
| dc.title | 高齡事業發展共創價值之可行性探討─經營模式、共創價值設計與顧客態度意向分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Feasibility Evaluation for Co-creation Value in Senior Enterprises: Analysis on Business Model, Co-creation Value Design and Customer Participation Attitudes | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蘇喜(Shyi Su),許怡欣(Yi-Hsin Elsa Hsu),張耀懋(Yao-Mao Chang),陳雅美(Ya-Mei Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 高齡事業,高齡產業,中高齡族群,高齡族群,經營模式,共創價值,價值共創意向態度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | senior enterprise,elderly industry,middle-aged,elderly people,business model,co-creation value,value co-creation attitude, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 225 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-02-05 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 6.99 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
