請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51045完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 許文馨 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ju Sung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 宋怡儒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:24:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-07-06 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-06-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aboody, D., Barth, M. E., & Kasznik, R. (2006). Do firms understate stock option-based compensation expense disclosed under SFAS 123?. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(4), 429-461.
Altamuro, J., & Zhang, H. (2013). The financial reporting of fair value based on managerial inputs versus market inputs: Evidence from mortgage servicing rights. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(3), 833–858 An, H., & Zhang, T. (2013). Stock price synchronicity, crash risk, and institutional investors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 21, 1-15. Bae, K. H. (2006). Corporate Governance and Conditional Skewness in the World's Stock Markets. The Journal of Business, 79(6), 2999-3028. Bagna, E., Di Martino, G., & Rossi, D. (2014). An Anatomy of the Level 3 Fair Value Hierarchy Discount. Available at SSRN 2367405. Baik, B., Farber, D. B., & Petroni, K. (2009). Analysts' incentives and street earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1), 45-69. Barth, M. E. (1994). Fair value accounting: Evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks. Accounting Review, 1-25. Bartov, E., Mohanram, P., & Nissim, D. (2007). Managerial discretion and the economic determinants of the disclosed volatility parameter for valuing ESOs.Review of Accounting studies, 12(1), 155-179. Beatty, A., & Harris, D. G. (1999). The effects of taxes, agency costs and information asymmetry on earnings management: A comparison of public and private firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 4(3-4), 299-326. Beaver, W., & Venkatachalam, M. (2003). Differential pricing of components of bank loan fair values. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 18(1), 41-68. Benston, G. J. (2006). Fair-value accounting: A cautionary tale from Enron. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(4), 465-484. Bleck, A. & Liu, X. Market Transparency and the Accounting Regime. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 229-256, May 2007. Botosan, C., Carrizosa, R., & Huffman, A. (2011). Factors influencing banks’ use of level 3 valuation inputs during the financial crisis. Unpublished working paper. www.business.utah.edu/sites/default/files/documents/school-of-accounting/huffmanpaper.pdf. Callen, J. L., & Fang, X. (2015). Religion and stock price crash risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(1-2), 169-195. Carroll, T. J., Linsmeier, T. J., & Petroni, K. R. (2003). The reliability of fair value versus historical cost information: Evidence from closed-end mutual funds.Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 18(1), 1-24. Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 345-381. Chong, G., Huang, H., Zhang, Y. (2012) 'Do US commercial banks use FAS 157 to manage earnings?”, International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp.78-93 Chordia, T., Roll, R., Subrahmanyam, A., 2008. Liquidity and market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics 87, 249–268. Chung, S. G., Goh, B. W., Ng, J., & Yong, K. O. (2015). Voluntary fair value disclosures beyond SFAS 157’s three-level estimates. Available at SSRN 1335848. Cohen, L. J., Cornett, M. M., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2014). Bank earnings management and tail risk during the financial crisis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46(1), 171-197 Danbolt, J., & Rees, W. (2008). An experiment in fair value accounting: UK investment vehicles. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 271-303. DeFond, M. L., Hung, M., Li, S., & Li, Y. (2014). Does mandatory IFRS adoption affect crash risk? The Accounting Review, 90(1), 265-299. Did an accounting rule fuel a financial crisis? (2008, July 1). The New York Times. Available at: dealbook.nytimes.com/2008/07/01/blaming-the-bean-counters/ Dimson, E. (1979). Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(2), 197-226. Earley, C. E., Hoffman, V. B., & Joe, J. R. (2014). Auditors’ Role in Level 2 versus Level 3 Fair-Value Classification Judgments. Available at SSRN 2119720. Elbannan, M. A., & Elbannan, M. A. (2015). Information content of SFAS 157 fair value reporting. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation,25, 31-45. Ettredge, M. L., Xu Y., and Yi, H. S. (2014) Fair Value Measurements and Audit Fees: Evidence from the Banking Industry. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory: August 2014, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 33-58. Fahnestock, R., Bostwick, E. (2011). ‘An analysis of the fair value controversy’. Journal of Finance and Accountancy. 8, ProQuest, 1-12, Accounting & Tax Periodicals Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 2006. Fair Value Measurements. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157. Norwalk, CT: FASB. Goh, B. W., Li, D., Ng, J., Yong, K. O. (2015) Market pricing of banks’ fair value assets reported under SFAS 157 since the 2008 financial crisis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy: Vol.34, Issue 2, pp.129–145 Haggard, K. S., Martin, X. and Pereira, R. (2008), Does Voluntary Disclosure Improve Stock Price Informativeness? Financial Management, 37: 747–768 Hirst, D., Koonce, L., & Venkataraman, S. (2007). How disaggregation enhances the credibility of management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(4), 811-837. Huang, H. W., Dao, M., Fornaro, J. M. (2016) Corporate governance, SFAS 157 and cost of equity capital: evidence from US financial institutions. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 46, Issue 1, pp 141-177 Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R 2, and crash risk. Journal of financial Economics, 94(1), 67-86. Iselin, M. and Nicoletti, A., (2015) The Effects of SFAS 157 Disclosures on Investment Decisions. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2697056 Jin, L. and Myers, S.C., (2006). R 2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), pp.257-292. Kim, C., Wang, K., and Zhang, L.(2015) Readability of 10-K Reports and Stock Price Crash Risk. 2014 Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA) Annual Conference. Kim, J. B., & Zhang, L. (2015). Accounting Conservatism and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm‐level Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), pp.412-441. Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, pp.1-13. Kim, J. B., Li Y., and Zhang, L. (2011a). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 100 (3): 639–662. Kim, J. B., Li, Y., and Zhang L. (2011b). CFOs versus CEOs: Equity incentives and crashes. Journal of Financial Economics 101 (3): 713–730. Kolev, K. S., (2008) Do Investors Perceive Marking-to-Model as Marking-to-Myth? Early Evidence from FAS 157 Disclosure. Working Paper. Landsman, W. R. (2007). Is fair value accounting information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research. Accounting and Business Research, 37(sup1), 19-30. Laux, C., & Leuz, C. (2009). The crisis of fair-value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate. Accounting, organizations and society, 34(6), 826-834. Laux, C., & Leuz, C. (2010). Did Fair-Value Accounting Contribute to the Financial Crisis?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 93-118 Lin, Y. M., You, S. J., & Huang, M. S. (2012). Information asymmetry and liquidity risk. International Review of Business Research Papers, 8(1), 112-131. Lu, H.Y., and Mande V. (2014) Does disaggregation of fair value information increase the value relevance of the fair value hierarchy? Research in Accounting Regulation: April 2014, Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 90–97 Maines, L. A. and Wahlen, J. M. (2006). The Nature of Accounting Information Reliability: Inferences from Archival and Experimental Research. Accounting Horizons: December 2006, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 399-425. Martin, R. D., Rich, J. S., & Wilks, T. J. (2006). Auditing fair value measurements: A synthesis of relevant research. Accounting Horizons, 20(3), 287-303. Riedl, E. J. and Serafeim, G. (2011). Information Risk and Fair Values: An Examination of Equity Betas. Journal of Accounting Research, 49: 1083–1122. Ryan, S. G. (2008). Accounting in and for the subprime crisis. The accounting review, 83(6), 1605-1638. Skoda, M., & Gabrhel, I. (2015). Fair Value Accounting after Times of Financial Crisis. International Business Management, 9(5), 676-684. Spinogatti, R., and McGrail, R. (2008, December 1). Mark-To-Market Accounting: Villain of the financial crisis? The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, pp.12. Available at: http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com Song, C. J., Thomas, W. B., and Yi, H (2010) Value Relevance of FAS No. 157 Fair Value Hierarchy Information and the Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms. The Accounting Review: July 2010, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 1375-1410. Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of accounting and economics, 32(1), 97-180. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51045 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 美國財務會計準則委員會為了回應市場參與者對美國財務會計準則157號公報「公允價值衡量」揭露不完善之批評，陸續發布了會計準則更新(Accounting Standards Updates)第2010-06號與第2011-04號，改善了公允價值衡量之相關揭露，其中更特別著重在第三等級金融工具的揭露。透過會計準則更新，以期完善公允價值衡量相關揭露並提升財務報表透明度。本研究利用美國銀行業為樣本，探討前述準則更新所增強之揭露是否能有效減少公司股票崩盤風險。實證結果發現：在會計準則更新後，對於降低公司股票崩盤有明顯的效果。而在額外測試中也發現針對第三等級金融工具交易活動之揭露，相較於交易量低的公司，交易量高的公司在2010年以後股票崩盤風險有明顯下降的現象，這發現支持會計準則更新第2010-06號降低了股票崩盤的風險主要原因是因為提升第三等級金融工具的交易量揭露之品質。此外，另一額外測試亦發現本身治理較好的公司，管理階層隱藏壞消息的傾向較低，因此會計準則更新所要求增加的揭露對於減少管理人隱藏壞消息的意圖的程度較有限，因而其帶來之降低崩盤風險的效果亦較不明顯。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In response to the harsh public criticism of the inadequate disclosures mandated by SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, the FASB issued ASU (Accounting Standards Updates) 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, and ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP (the Updates hereafter), in an effort to further increase the reporting transparency, especially for Level 3 measurements. Using annual reports of banking firms, I examine whether the increased fair value disclosures by the Updates can effectively decrease “crash risk”, defined as the frequency of extreme negative stock returns. In support of the hypothesis, I find that firms, especially for those with Level 3 estimates, experience a decrease in crash risk after the Updates. In the additional test, I find evidence that firms with high Level 3 transaction volume experience a decrease in crash risk after the amendment to disclosures of Level 3 activity by the Updates. This suggests that the enhanced disclosures about transactions of Level 3 measurements can effectively reduce stock price crashes. Moreover, I find evidence that managers operating in firms with strong corporate governance show a lower tendency to conceal bad news, leading to lower stock price crash risk. Therefore, the impact of the Updates on bad news hoarding, thus crash risk, is limited. Taken together, my results are consistent with increased transparency from the Updates reducing crash risk among U.S. banking firms. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:24:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03722001-1.pdf: 1258112 bytes, checksum: d25ae4df33a3c2e38ab872c65bace9d8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要.....i
Abstract.....ii Index.....iii List of Figure.....v List of Table.....vi 1. Introduction......1 2. Accounting Standards.....7 2.1 Fair Value Measurements.....8 2.2 ASU 2010-06－Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.....12 2.3 ASU 2011-04—Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.....14 3. Literature Review.....16 3.1 Literature Review on Fair Value Hierarchy.....16 3.1.1 Value Relevance of Fair Value Hierarchy.....16 3.1.2 Cost of Capital of Fair Value Hierarchy.....17 3.1.3 Corporate Governance and Managerial Behaviors of Fair Value Hierarchy.....18 3.1.4 Audit Quality of Fair Value Hierarchy.....19 3.2 Literature Review on Crash Risk.....20 3.2.1 Transparency, Earnings Managements, Readability and Crash risk.....20 3.2.2 Accounting Regime and Crash Risk.....22 3.2.3 Internal and External Monitoring and Crash Risk.....22 3.2.4 Firm’s Policy, Earnings Management and Crash Risk.....23 4.Hypothesis Developments.....24 5.Sample Selection and Research Design.....27 5.1 Measuring Crash Risk.....27 5.2 Research Model for H1.....28 5.3 Research Model for H2.....30 5.4 Sample Selection.....31 5.5 Descriptive Statistics.....32 6.Empirical Results.....33 6.1 Results for H1.....33 6.2 Results for H2.....34 7. Additional Test.....34 7.1 Compare High-volume and low-volume of Level 3 transactions.....34 7.2 The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Relation between the Updates implementation and crash risk.....36 8. Conclusions.....38 Appendix 1: Variable Definitions.....40 Appendix 2: Introduction of the Standard and the Updates.....42 Reference.....45 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 公允價值第三等級揭露與股票崩盤風險 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Level 3 Fair Value Disclosures and Crash Risk | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 梁嘉紋,詹凌菁 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 公允價值等級,美國財務會計準則157號,股票崩盤風險,會計準則更新第2010-06號,會計準則更新第2011-04號, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Fair value hierarchy,SFAS No.157,Crash risk,ASU No.2010-06,ASU No.2011-04, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 58 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600395 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-06-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.23 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。