請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50991
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 江俊毅 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hsing Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王翊馨 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:11:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2026-06-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-06-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] 財團法人資訊工業策進會 (2014)。2013 年台灣數位內容產業年鑑。台灣: 經濟部工業局。
[2] Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3-22. [3] Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 634- 665. [4] Arakji, R. Y., & Lang, K. R. (2007). Digital consumer networks and producer-consumer collaboration: innovation and product development in the video game industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 195- 219. [5] Atuahene‐Gima, K. (1995). An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(4), 275-293. [6] Baba, Y., & Tschang, F. T. (2001). Product development in Japanese TV game software: The case of an innovative game. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(04), 487-515. [7] Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676-707. [8] Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. [9] Bonner, J. M. (2010). Customer interactivity and new product performance: Moderating effects of product newness and product embeddedness. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(3), 485-492. [10] Callele, D., Neufeld, E., & Schneider, K. (2005). Requirements engineering and the creative process in the video game industry. In Requirements Engineering, 2005. Proceedings. 13th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 240-250). IEEE. [11] Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68-82. [12] Cohen, M. A., Eliasberg, J., & Ho, T. H. (1996). New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Science, 42(2), 173-186. [13] Clariana, R. B. (1999). Differential memory effects for immediate and delayed feedback: A delta rule explanation of feedback timing effects. In Association of Educational Communications and Technology Annual Convention, Houston, TX. [14] Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095-1121. [15] Earley, P. C., Northcraft, G. B., Lee, C., & Lituchy, T. R. (1990). Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 87-105. [16] Federoff, M. A. (2002). Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, IN, U.S.A. [17] Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154-177. [18] Fullerton, T., Chen, J., Santiago, K., Nelson, E., Diamante, V., Meyers, A., & DeWeese, J. (2006). That cloud game: dreaming (and doing) innovative game design. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Videogames (pp. 51-59). ACM. [19] Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. [20] Goodman, J. S., Wood, R. E., & Hendrickx, M. (2004). Feedback specificity, exploration, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 248-262. [21] Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308(5722), 697-702. [22] Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. [23] Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. [24] Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. [25] Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 362-375. [26] He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494. [27] Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90-98. [28] Jansen, J. J., Volberda, H. W., & Van Den Bosch, F. A. (2005). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57, 351- 363. [29] Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218. [30] Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254. [31] Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112. [32] March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. [33] McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118-131. [34] Northcraft, G. B., Schmidt, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2011). Feedback and the rationing of time and effort among competing tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1076-1086. [35] Petrillo, F., Pimenta, M., Trindade, F., & Dietrich, C. (2009). What went wrong? A survey of problems in game development. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 7(1), 13. [36] Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance.Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695. [37] Shelley, B. (2001). Guidelines for developing successful games. In Game Developers Conference, San Jose, CA. [38] Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. [39] Stacey, P., & Nandhakumar, J. (2009). A temporal perspective of the computer game development process. Information Systems Journal, 19(5), 479-497. [40] Storz, C. (2008). Dynamics in innovation systems: Evidence from Japan's game software industry. Research Policy, 37(9), 1480-1491. [41] Tschang, F. T. (2005). Videogames as interactive experiential products and their manner of development. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(01), 103- 131. [42] Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221-231. [43] Wong, K. K. K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32. [44] Yoon, E., & Lilien, G. L. (1985). New industrial product performance: The effects of market characteristics and strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2(3), 134-144. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50991 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 數位遊戲開發被歸為創新產業的一環,並要面對多變市場環境的挑戰 (Storz, 2008)。遊戲開發公司必須不間斷地開發創新遊戲來滿足遊戲玩家千變萬化的需求,「遊戲產品的市場配適度」成為遊戲開發公司能否在市場上生存的關鍵。創新又可分類為探勘式創新(Exploration)與開發式創新(Exploitation)兩種創新型態。近期的研究指出,唯有將探勘式創新與開發式創新視為連續線上的兩端來權衡,創新一詞本身才能發揮該有的效益 (Gupta, Smith, & Shalley, 2006)。對競爭激烈的遊戲產業而言,為維持市場表現與分散風險,開發人員亦常採用「懷二心」(Ambidexterity) 開發方式,兼顧探勘與開發兩種創新方法。本研究首先檢視「懷二心」開發方式在遊戲開發的情境脈絡下,對於產品市場配適度的效果。又有視遊戲開發過程中,開發團隊一貫仰賴遊戲測試人員所給予的外部資訊去做產品上的修正,本研究檢視測試人員回饋如何影響「懷二心」創新遊戲產品與市場配適度的關係。研究結果發現,測試人員的及時回饋在與「懷二心」創新能力交互作用下可以為產品配適度帶來正向的影響,然而明確的回饋卻為「懷二心」創新方式與遊戲產品市場表現之間的關係帶來負向調節。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Digital-game industry, a subset of the creative industry, often faces dynamic market environments (Storz, 2008). Game development firms must develop innovative games constantly to satisfy players' ever-changing demands to sustain the “product-market fit” for surviving. To realize the innovation, developers often adopt an ambidextrous approach, both the exploration and exploitation (e.g., Gupta, Smith and, Shalley, 2006). Furthermore, the game development teams often rely on game testers’ feedback to improve the developing games. In the literature, however, a debate about the effect of feedbacks on innovation has occurred. Given the popularity of ambidextrous approach and the use of game testers for feedbacks on digital-game development, unfortunately, no study has been devoted to this issue. Based upon a survey of 119 paired samples on digital-game development projects, the results show that “timely” feedback by game testers positively moderates the relationship between the ambidextrous approach and the final game development performance, while “specific” feedback negatively affects the effectiveness of ambidextrous innovation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:11:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02741076-1.pdf: 2074044 bytes, checksum: fbe3f80faa62f271bf1cc0eacc384384 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1 Introduction<1>
Chapter 2 Literature Review<4> 2.1 Digital Games<4> 2.2 Innovation: Exploration and Exploitation<5> 2.3 External Feedback Intervention<8> 2.4 Game Development Performance<10> Chapter 3 Research Method<12> 3.1 Research Model and Hypotheses<12> 3.1.1 Ambidextrous Innovation and Market Fit Performance<13> 3.1.2 Feedback Timing and Feedback Specificity as Moderators<15> 3.2 Measurement Items Development<18> 3.2.1 Exploration<18> 3.2.2 Exploitation<19> 3.2.3 Ambidextrous Innovation<19> 3.2.4 Feedback Timing<20> 3.2.5 Feedback Specificity<20> 3.2.6 Game Market Fit Performance<20> 3.2.7 Control Variable<21> 3.3 Data Collection<21> Chapter 4 Results<24> 4.1 Measurement Validation<24> 4.1.1 Measurement Reliability<24> 4.1.2 Measurement Validity<26> 4.2 Hypotheses Testing<29> Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusion<36> 5.1 Discussion of the Results<36> 5.2 Implications<40> 5.2.1 Practical Implications<40> 5.2.2 Academic Implications<41> 5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research<42> 5.4 Conclusions<44> APPENDIX<45> REFERENCE<48> | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 測試人員回饋如何影響懷二心創新型態遊戲產品的市場配適 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Moderating Effect of Game Tester’s Feedbacks on the Relationship between Ambidextrous-Innovative Approach and the Digital Game Market Fit | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張伊婷,陳伯彥 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 懷二心創新,遊戲市場配適,回饋及時性,回饋明確性,遊戲開發, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Ambidextrous Innovation,Game Market Fit,Feedback Timing,Feedback Specificity,Game Development, | en |
dc.relation.page | 52 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600497 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-06-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.03 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。