請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50943
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林惠玲(Hui-Lin Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Pei-Yu Weng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 翁珮瑜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:08:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-04 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-06-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分:
主計處( 2009 ):工商及服務業普查報告(95年工商普查報告),中華民國。 主計處( 2013 ):工商及服務業普查報告(100年工商普查報告),中華民國。 江志民、謝鑫能、蘇志雄、鄭宇庭(2002):台灣地區技術創新調查之前期研究的調查方法與抽樣設計。輔仁管理評論(專刊),9(3),111-140。 吳思華(2002):創造力實踐歷程之研究-子計畫 (十四 ): 體制因素、創意特性與擴散之關連。台北:國立政治大學科技管理研究所 。 陳柏睿(2015):影響廠商創新活動的因素及其績效關係之研究-台灣廠商之實證。國立台灣大學經濟學系碩士論文。 廖健智(2007):國際化與技術創新-台灣製造業與服務業廠商的驗證。國立台灣大學經濟學系碩士論文。 羅梅青、林惠玲(2011):廠商合作研發策略與創新失敗—台灣創新廠商之驗證。中小企業發展季刊,26,107-128。 國科會( 2013 ):台灣地區第三次產業創新活動調查研究,中華民國。 英文部分: Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 725-740. Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996), Differential Potency of Factors Affecting Innovation Performance in Manufacturing and Services Firms in Australia. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13: 35–52. Aw, B. Y., Chen, X., & Roberts, M. J. (2001). Firm-level evidence on productivity differentials and turnover in Taiwanese manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics, 66(1), 51-86. Barnett, H. G. (1953). Innovation: the basis of cultural change. New York. McGraw-Hill. Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries. Technology, globalisation and economic performance, 83137, 83-137. Chang, P. L., & Shih, H. Y. (2004). The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: a comparative analysis. Technovation, 24(7), 529-539. Development Process, Journal Product Innovation Management, 15, pp.304-321. Drucker, P. F. (1986). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. New York: Harper & Row. Ebersberger B., Laursen K., Jani Saarinen J., Salter A. (2005). The Origins of Innovation:An Analysis of the Finnish Innovation Database Geography. 4th European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics (EMAEE). 19-21. Ehie, I. C., & Olibe, K. (2010). The effect of R&D investment on firm value: An examination of US manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 127-135. Gopalakrishnan, S., Bierly, P., & Kessler, E. H. (1999). A reexamination of product and process innovations using a knowledge-based view. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 10(1), 147-166. Guan, J. C., Mok, C. K., Yam, R. C., Chin, K. S., & Pun, K. F. (2006). Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(6), 666-678. Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of production economics,133(2), 662-676. Hsueh, L. M., & Tu, Y. Y. (2004). Innovation and the operational performance of newly established small and medium enterprises in Taiwan. Small Business Economics, 23(2), 99-113. Jefferson, G. H., Huamao, B., Xiaojing, G., & Xiaoyun, Y. (2006). R&D performance in Chinese industry. Economics of innovation and new technology, 15(4-5), 345-366. Liao, S. H., Fei, W. C., & Chen, C. C. (2007). Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 340-359. Liu, X., Hodgkinson, I. R., & Chuang, F. M. (2014). Foreign competition, domestic knowledge base and innovation activities: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Research Policy, 43(2), 414-422. OECD and Eurostat. (2014). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition (Chinese version). Beijing: Ministry of Science and Technology. OECD. (1996). The Knowledge-Based Economy. General Distribution OECD/GD(96)102. OECD. (2015). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2015: Innovation for growth and society. Paris: OECD Publishing. Prajogo, D. I., Laosirihongthong, T., Sohal, A., & Boon-itt, S. (2007). Manufacturing strategies and innovation performance in newly industrialised countries. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(1), 52-68. Robbins, S.P. (2005), Organizational behavior, 11th ed, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc. Robertson, T.S. (1967). The Process of Innovation and the Diffusion of Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 31(1). 14-19 Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations .New York: The Free Press of Glencoe. Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of business Venturing, 26(4), 441-457. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Boston: Harvard University Press. Sher, P. J., & Yang, P. Y. (2005). The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Technovation, 25(1), 33-43. Sun, Y., & Du, D. (2010). Determinants of industrial innovation in China: Evidence from its recent economic census. Technovation, 30(9), 540-550. Tseng, C. Y., Kuo, H. Y., & Chou, S. S. (2008). Configuration of innovation and performance in the service industry: evidence from the Taiwanese hotel industry. The Service Industries Journal, 28(7), 1015-1028. Urabe, K., Child, J., & Kagono, T. (1988). Innovation and management: International comparisons (Vol. 13). Walter de Gruyter. Veryzer, R.W., Jr, (1998), Discontinuous Innovation and the New Product Wagner, J. (2012). International trade and firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics, 148(2), 235-267. Yam, R. C., Lo, W., Tang, E. P., & Lau, A. K. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Research policy, 40(3), 391-402. Yang, C. H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J. R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative?: Evidence from Taiwan.Research Policy, 38(1), 77-85. Yang, X., Zheng, L., & Xiao, H. (2015). The impetus mechanism of sustainable innovation in manufacturing enterprises under globalization. In Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS), 2015 International Conference on (pp. 1-4). IEEE. Yeh-Yun Lin, C., & Yi-Ching Chen, M. (2007). Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan. Management Research News, 30(2), 115-132. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50943 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討台灣製造業與服務業廠商之技術創新投入及其績效。使用SUR model與Profit model作為研究方法,採用兩階段模型進行實證研究。
本研究運用行政院國家科學委員會「台灣地區第三次產業創新活動調查研究」並串聯民國95年與100年之普查資料,第一階段探討廠商創新活動花費之決定因素,再進一步分析利用探討五種技術創新花費類型:「公司內的研發活動」、「委託其他公司或機構研發」、「取得機器、設備與軟體的技術」、「取得外部知識」、「其他技術商品化的支出費用」對於廠商成功推出市場上或公司內部之技術創新之影響程度。最後比較製造業與服務業廠商創新績效差異。 相較於其他文獻僅探討廠商是否進行創新活動,本研究最主要貢獻為運用廠商實際投入創新活動之金額進行分析。實證結果發現:(1)企業規模為產業進行創新活動重要決定因素。(2)廠齡高之企業有較多舊思維及舊技術,進行創新活動並不容易。(3)政府補助對於廠商進行創新活動有正向影響。(4)在相同的條件下,製造業之創新花費大於服務業。(5)服務業創新投入之單位效益優於製造業。(6)台灣之廠商進行創新時,多需向外購買專利與授權,代表企業於過往並無成功累積創新實力。 台灣之製造業與服務業成功進行之技術創新比例皆不高,且創新所需之技術多為仰賴其他單位之研究成果,因此對於進行技術創新尚有許多努力的空間。 因此台灣廠商迫切之問題為須累積產業實力,利用本身之人員、設備及技術進行創新,才是維持企業競爭力的長久之道。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Along with the numerous innovation coming, an adequate assessment of a firm’s innovation activities is imperative. The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms’ innovation activity in Taiwan and make a comparison between manufacture and service industries.
This study is based on the third Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey. The analysis applies a two-stage model for the empirical research, including SUR model and probit model. In this study, the first stage is to find out the determinants of firm’s innovative spending; the further stage discusses the performance of five innovative spending types: R & D activities within the company, commissioned research and development activities of other companies or institutions, making equipment and technology, obtaining external knowledge, and marketing innovation activities. Finally, the study compares the differences between manufacture and service firms. The main contribution of the paper is to assess firms’ innovation performance on the basis of the amounts of innovative spending. The empirical results show that: (1) Enterprise scale is an important determinant of innovative activity. (2)Older enterprises have more difficulty of innovation. (3) Government subsidies promote firms’ innovation activities. (4) Under the same condition, the manufactures’ spending is more than the services’. (5) The services’ innovation performance is better than the manufactures’. (6) Taiwan’s firms did not successfully accumulate their innovative power. According the paper, accumulating industrial strength is the solution for keeping the competitiveness of Taiwan’s enterprises. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:08:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03323033-1.pdf: 2099485 bytes, checksum: 0e24b9206317cf6cb2ad01beb5174449 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii 第壹章、 諸論 1 第一節、 研究背景 1 第二節、 研究動機與目的 2 第三節、 研究方法 3 第四節、 研究架構 4 第貳章、 文獻回顧 5 第一節、 創新的定義 5 第二節、 創新的分類 6 第三節、 影響創新績效因素 8 第四節、 創新調查歷史 9 第參章、 敘述性資料及樣本資料說明 11 第一節、 各國研發活動比較 11 i. 歷年研發經費 11 ii. 廠商創新比例 12 第二節、 台灣廠商研發創新情形 13 i. 四類創新活動情形 13 ii. 歷年研發經費 14 第三節、 樣本與資料來源說明 15 i. 樣本 15 ii. 技術創新研發活動 17 第肆章、 模型設定及變數說明 19 第一節、 模型設定 19 i. 研究對象 19 ii. 研究內容 19 iii. 模型—第一階段 19 iv. 模型—第二階段 22 第二節、 變數說明 24 i. 被解釋變數: 24 ii. 解釋變數: 26 iii. 樣本處理 29 第三節、 變數基本統計資料 30 第伍章、 實證結果分析 32 第一節、 製造業廠商的創新投入與其創新成果之實證分析 32 i. 第一階段模型: 32 ii. 第二階段模型: 38 第二節、 服務業廠商的創新投入與其創新成果之實證分析 48 i. 第一階段模型: 48 ii. 第二階段模型: 52 第三節、 製造業與服務業實證結果比較 62 i. 影響創新花費的因素 62 ii. 創新活動對創新成果的影響 67 第陸章、 結論及建議 71 參考文獻 73 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 廠商創新活動及其績效-臺灣製造業與服務業的比較 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Firms’ Innovation Activity and Performance - Comparison between Manufacture and Service Industries in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳正倉(Jeng-Chang Chen),林世昌(Eric S. Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 台灣地區第三次產業創新活動調查研究,技術創新,創新績效, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | technology innovation,innovation performance measurement,the Third Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey, | en |
dc.relation.page | 77 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600561 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-06-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。