Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50941
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor許鉅秉(Jiuh-Biing Sheu)
dc.contributor.authorYu-Wei Changen
dc.contributor.author張育瑋zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T13:07:56Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-04
dc.date.copyright2016-07-04
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016-06-30
dc.identifier.citation中文部分
1. 李河錫. (2009). 恐慌性買氣助長零售菜價大漲約一倍. 大紀元.
2. 李禮卉. (2012). 台灣國際貨運承攬業之脆弱度與恢復力評估模式. 國立交通大學交運輸研究所.
3. 邱正皓. (2006). 量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
4. 張鳳翱. (2007). 糧價穩定是物價穩定的基礎. 唯实, 頁 84-86.
5. 黃芳銘. (2004年1月). 結構方程式模型整體適配度評鑑議題之探究.
6. 楊士芳. (2015). 台灣天然災害. 擷取自 台灣天然災害.
7. 廖春梅. (2009). 莫拉克颱風災後農產品穩定供應分析. 行政院農委會.
8. 維基百科. (2015). 自然災害. 維基百科.
9. 維基百科. (2015). 供應鏈管理. 維基百科.
10. 維基百科. (2015). 政府. 維基百科.
11. 藍悅真, & 郭益昌. (2013). 菜價狂飆 台農委會:未來一週回穩. 大紀元.
英文部分
1. AjzenI, & FishbeinM. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading(MA): Addison-Wesley Publisher.
2. AjzenIcek. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior.
3. AndersonC.James, & NarusA.James. (1984). A Model of the Distributor's Perspective of Distributor-Manufacturer Working Relationships. Journal of Marketing.
4. AndersonErin, & WeitzBarton. (1992). The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels. Journal of Marketing Research.
5. AndersonEW, & MittalV. (2000). Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain. Journal of Service research.
6. AndersonJ, & GerbingD. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin.
7. ArrowKenneth J. (1984b). Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, volume 4: the economics of information.
8. BagozziR., & YiY. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science.
9. BaronM.Reuben, & KennyA.David. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological. University of Connecticut.
10. BertrandJoseph. (1883). 'Theorie mathematique de la richesse sociale par Leon Walras: Recherches sur les principes mathematiques de la theorie des richesse par Augustin Cournot. Journal des savant, 頁 499-508.
11. BollenA.Kenneth. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
12. BulowJ.Jeremy, GeanakoplosD.John, & KlempererD.Paul. (1985). Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements. Journal of Political Economy, 頁 488-511.
13. CarminesE.G., & McIverJ.P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. Social measurement: Current issues.
14. ChoiY.T., & HongY. (2002). Unveiling the structure of supply networks: case studies in Honda, Acura, and DaimlerChrysler. Journal of Operations Management.
15. ChristopherM., & PeckH. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management.
16. CoaseR.H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4.
17. ColemanS.James. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology.
18. ColicchiaC., DallariF., & MelaciniM. (2010). Increasing supply chain resilience in a global sourcing context. Production Planning & Control.
19. Fornell Claes , & LarckerF.David. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research.
20. GefenDavid, StraubDetmar, & BoudreauMarie-Claude. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice.
21. HairJ.F. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ [etc.] : Pearson Prentice Hall.
22. Harland, C. (2003). Risk in supply networks. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management 9, pp. 51-62.
23. Harrald R.John . (2006). Agility and Discipline: Critical Success Factors for Disaster Response. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
24. HeckmannIris, ComesTina, & NickelStefan. (2014). A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling. Omega.
25. HolleyD. (1999). Self-interest and beyond. Paragon House.
26. HsuChin-Chun, KannanR.Vijay, TanKeah-Choon, & LeongG. Keong. (2008). Information sharing, buyer-supplier relationships, and firm performance: a multi-region analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
27. HuLi-tze, & BenterPeter M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.
28. JohnFMuth. (1961). Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements.
29. JoreskogK., & SorbomD. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications: SSI.
30. JüttnerU. (2005). Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management.
31. KleindorferR.P., & SaadG.H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management.
32. LeeH.L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review.
33. ManujI., & MentzerJ.T. (2008a). Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
34. ManujI., & MentzerJ.T. (2008b). Globe supply chain risk management. Journal of Business Logistics.
35. March, G. J., & Shapira, Z. (1987, 11). Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking. Management Science.
36. MarnMV, & RosielloRL. (1992). Managing price, gaining profit. Harvard Business Review.
37. McDonaldP.Roderick, & HoRingoMoon-Ho. (2002). Principles and Practice in Reporting Structural. University of Illinois.
38. NavarroPeter. (1983). Union Bargaining Power in the Coal Industry, 1945-1981. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 頁 214-229.
39. NunnallyJC. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. OkeA., & GopalakrishmanM. (2009). Managing disruptions in supply chains: A case study of a retail supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics.
41. PeckH. (2006). Reconciling supply chain vulnerability, risk and supply chain management.
42. PonomarovS.Y., & HolcombM.C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management.
43. PorterE.M. (1985). The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance.
44. RaoS., & GoldsbyT.J. (2009). Supply chain risks: a review and typology. International Journal of Logistics Management.
45. RitchieB., & MarshallD. (1993). Business Risk Management. London: Chapman & Hall.
46. RodiguesSanchezVasco, StantchevDamian, NaimMohamed, & WhiteingAnthony. (2008). Establishing a transport operation focused uncertainty model for the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
47. Shamir Noam. (2013). Cartel Formation through Strategic Information Leakage in a Distribution Channel. Tel Aviv University.
48. SheffiY., & RiceB.J. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. Mit Sloan Management Review.
49. SheuJiuh-Biing. (2016). Supplier hoarding, government intervention, and timing for post-disaster crop supply chain recovery. Transportation Research Part E 90(June), 頁 134-160.
50. ShroutE.Patrick, & BolgerNiall. (2002). Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New York University.
51. SilverEA, PykeDF, & PetersonR. (1998). Inventory management and production planning and scheduling.
52. SpekmanE.R., & DavisW.E. (2004). Risky business: expanding the discussion on risk and the extended enterprise. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
53. Sunil, C., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. Mit Sloan Management Review.
54. SvenssonG. (2000). A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
55. Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). International Journal of Production Economics. The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks.
56. Tang, S. C. (2005, 11 3). Perspectives in Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review.
57. TangC.S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications.
58. Vorst, & Beulens. (2002). Identifying sources of uncertainty to generate supply chain redesign strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
59. WagnerS.M., & BodeC. (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics.
60. WagnerS.M., & NeshatN. (2010). Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory. International Journal of Production Economics.
61. WhitinM.T. (1955). Inventory Control and Price Theory. Management Science, 頁 61-68.
62. WilliamJ.L., & HazerJ.T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A re-analysis using latent variable structural equation methods. ournal of Applied Psychology.
63. YukoNakagawa, & RajibShaw. (2004年3月). Social Capital:A Missing Link to Disaster Recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50941-
dc.description.abstract農產品易受環境與天氣變化影響,在地震、颱風發生頻繁的台灣尤其嚴重。農產品屬於民生必需品,容易因天然災害發生而產生農損,造成市場上的供不應求,進一步造成物價不穩定。此時供應商的行為對於農產品市場尤為重要。
  本研究探討廠商對囤貨的態度、對短期獲益的預期和廠商接收到的供應鏈氣氛、社會規範及政府力量援助對於廠商囤貨的意圖是否具有顯著的關連性。本研究以各個農產品供應商為訪問對象進行問卷發放,並於回收後應用敘述性統計、信效度分析、結構方程模式分析等方法,以檢驗研究之原假說模型,最後在檢驗結果不佳的情況下提出新的假說模型並進行檢驗。
  依照分析的結果,本研究共獲得七點結論,分別為:
一、「供應商對通路關係品質的感受」會正向影響「供應商對囤貨的意圖」。表示當通路關係品質越好,廠商囤貨的意圖就越高。
二、「政府力量援助」不會影響「供應商對囤貨的態度」。
三、「政府力量援助」會正向影響「供應商對未來短期獲益的預期」。表示當政府援助的程度越高,供應商對於未來獲利的預期也越高。
四、「供應商對未來短期獲益的預期」會正向影響「供應商對囤貨的態度」。表示供應商認為短期獲益越高越會增強對於囤貨的態度。
五、「供應商對囤貨的態度」會正向影響「供應商對囤貨的意圖」。表示供應商對囤貨的態度越正向,越能增強供應商對囤貨的意圖。
六、「供應商對未來短期獲益的預期」能完全中介「政府力量援助」對「供應商對囤貨的態度」的影響。表示政府援助的影響完全透過供應商對短期獲益的預期來間接影響供應商囤貨態度。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe products of agriculture are strongly influenced by environment and climate change, especially in Taiwan with lots of natural disasters like Typhoon and Earthquake. The agriculture product is life’s necessity, once the natural disaster takes place and causing lots damage, the balance between Supply and Demand will be broken. In this situation, the reaction of supplier is important for supply chain recovery.
 The purpose of this study is to investigate how do “Supplier expectation of short-term benefits”, “Supplier attitude toward stockpiling”, “Supplier perception of channel relationship quality” and “Government aiding” affect “Supplier intention to hoard”.
 In this study, the author interviewed the agriculture product suppliers with the questionnaire. After receiving all the questionnaire, the statistics of statements, reliability, effectiveness would be applied to test the assumption of the study.
 According to the results of the statistics, there are 7 conclusions as the following:
1.“Supplier perception of channel relationship quality” would positively influence “Supplier intention to hoard”. Which means when suppliers receive better channel relationship quality, they would have stronger intention to hoard.
2.“Government aiding” has no direct influence on “Supplier attitude toward stockpiling”.
3.“Government aiding” has positive influence on “Supplier expectation of short-term benefits”. In other words, if government highly aids the market, supplier would expect more benefits in future.
4.“Supplier expectation of short-term benefits” would positively affect “Supplier attitude toward stockpiling”. That is to say, if suppliers expect they would get more benefits in short term, they will be in more positive attitude toward stockpiling.
5.“Supplier attitude toward stockpiling” would positively affect “Supplier intention to hoard”. That is to say, the positive stockpiling attitude would strengthen the intention to hoard.
6.“Government aiding” has complete indirect influence on “Supplier attitude toward stockpiling” via the mediator, “Supplier expectation of short-term benefits”
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:07:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-105-R03741033-1.pdf: 3206395 bytes, checksum: 4dc269c09955319f747f3aa5a048c3ef (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 v
圖目錄 ix
第1章 緒論 1
第1節 研究背景 1
第2節 研究動機 4
第3節 研究目的 5
第4節 研究範疇與對象 5
第5節 論文架構 6
第2章 文獻探討 7
第1節 天然災害 7
第2節 供應鏈管理 11
第3節 供應鏈風險管理 12
第4節 供應鏈關係管理 18
第5節 社會資本 19
第6節 供應鏈恢復力 19
第7節 行為理論 26
第8節 政府力量 28
第3章 研究架構與研究方法 30
第1節 研究架構 30
第2節 研究假設 30
第3節 研究變項設計 34
第4節 問卷設計 38
第5節 資料蒐集方法 39
第6節 資料分析方法 40
第4章 資料分析與發現 45
第1節 敘述性統計分析 45
第2節 問卷信度與效度分析 50
第3節 結構方程模式分析 64
第4節 模型假設調整與結構方程模式分析 69
第5章 結論與建議 74
第1節 實證結果與討論 74
第2節 管理意涵 81
第3節 研究發現及限制與後續建議 83
參考文獻 86
附錄 92
壹、問卷 92
貳、新模型假說建立 96
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject意圖zh_TW
dc.subject態度zh_TW
dc.subject天然災害zh_TW
dc.subject供應商zh_TW
dc.subject囤貨zh_TW
dc.subject農產品zh_TW
dc.subject農產品zh_TW
dc.subject囤貨zh_TW
dc.subject供應商zh_TW
dc.subject天然災害zh_TW
dc.subject態度zh_TW
dc.subject意圖zh_TW
dc.subject政府援助zh_TW
dc.subject政府援助zh_TW
dc.subject通路關係zh_TW
dc.subject通路關係zh_TW
dc.subjectChannel Relationshipen
dc.subjectAgriculture Producten
dc.subjecthoardingen
dc.subjectStockpilingen
dc.subjectNatural Disasteren
dc.subjectAttitudeen
dc.subjectIntentionen
dc.subjectGovernment Aidingen
dc.subjectChannel Relationshipen
dc.subjectAgriculture Producten
dc.subjecthoardingen
dc.subjectStockpilingen
dc.subjectNatural Disasteren
dc.subjectAttitudeen
dc.subjectIntentionen
dc.subjectGovernment Aidingen
dc.title天災後農產品供應商囤貨態度與政府援助對供應商囤貨意願之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe influences of supplier attitude toward stockpiling and government aiding to supplier intention to hoard after natural disaster.en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear104-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳穆臻(Mu-Chen Chen),盧宗成(Chung-Cheng Lu)
dc.subject.keyword農產品,囤貨,供應商,天然災害,態度,意圖,政府援助,通路關係,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordAgriculture Product,hoarding,Stockpiling,Natural Disaster,Attitude,Intention,Government Aiding,Channel Relationship,en
dc.relation.page99
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201600587
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2016-06-30
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:商學研究所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-105-1.pdf
  Restricted Access
3.13 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved