請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50840
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 簡國龍(Kuo-Liong Chien) | |
dc.contributor.author | Nai-Wen Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭乃雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:01:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] 衛生福利部統計處. 103年度死因統計. 2015.
[2] Rho RW, Page RL. The Automated External Defibrillator. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2007;18:896-9. [3] Valenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Cretin S, Spaite DW, Larsen MP. Estimating effectiveness of cardiac arrest interventions: a logistic regression survival model. Circulation. 1997;96:3308-13. [4] Weaver WD, Cobb LA, Hallstrom AP, Fahrenbruch C, Copass MK, Ray R. Factors influencing survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1986;7:752-7. [5] Page RL, Joglar JA, Kowal RC, Zagrodzky JD, Nelson LL, Ramaswamy K, et al. Use of automated external defibrillators by a U.S. airline. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;343:1210-6. [6] Valenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Nichol G, Clark LL, Spaite DW, Hardman RG. Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;343:1206-9. [7] Caffrey SL, Willoughby PJ, Pepe PE, Becker LB. Public use of automated external defibrillators. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347:1242-7. [8] Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, Weisfeldt M, Travers A, Christenson J, McBurnie MA, et al. Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351:637-46. [9] Kitamura T, Iwami T, Kawamura T, Nagao K, Tanaka H, Hiraide A. Nationwide public-access defibrillation in Japan. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;362:994-1004. [10] Eisenburger P, Sterz F, Haugk M, Scheinecker W, Holzer M, Koreny M, et al. Cardiac arrest in public locations--an independent predictor for better outcome? Resuscitation. 2006;70:395-403. [11] 馬惠明. 公共場所設置自動體外心臟電擊去顫器計畫年度研究報告. 台北市: 社團法人台灣急診醫學會; 2012. [12] 立法院第8屆第2會期第7次會議議案關係文書. 緊急醫療救護法部分條文修正草案說明. 台北市2012. p. 288. [13] 衛生福利部公共場所AED急救資訊網. AED檢索. 2014. [14] AED日本振興協會. AED管理士會. 2015. [15] Gilchrist S, Schieb L, Mukhtar Q, Valderrama A, Zhang G, Yoon P, et al. A summary of public access defibrillation laws, United States, 2010. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2012;9:E71. [16] Lubin J, Chung SS, Williams K. An assessment of public attitudes toward automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation. 2004;62:43-7. [17] Schober P, van Dehn FB, Bierens JJ, Loer SA, Schwarte LA. Public access defibrillation: time to access the public. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2011;58:240-7. [18] Kozlowski D, Klosiewicz T, Kowalczyk A, Kowalczyk AK, Kozluk E, Dudziak M, et al. The knowledge of public access to defibrillation in selected cities in Poland. Archives of Medical Science. 2013;9:27-33. [19] 龔美文. 臺北市某車行員工心肺復甦術行為意圖及其相關因素探討: 臺灣師範大學; 2013. [20] 黃沛銓. 民眾對於施行心肺復甦術、使用公眾電擊器與好撒瑪麗亞人法的知識、態度與意願. 台北市: 國立臺灣大學; 2013. [21] 藺寶珍, 王瑞霞, 許貂琳. 某醫專學生對事故傷害急救的知識與態度及其相關因素. 醫護科技學刊. 2002;4:146-60. [22] 蔡佩芬. 全民CPR之學習成效及相關因素. 台中市: 中國醫藥大學; 2005. [23] Groh WJ, Lowe MR, Overgaard AD, Neal JM, Fishburn WC, Zipes DP. Attitudes of law enforcement officers regarding automated external defibrillators. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2002;9:751-3. [24] Groh WJ, Birnbaum A, Barry A, Anton A, Mann NC, Peberdy MA, et al. Characteristics of volunteers responding to emergencies in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial. Resuscitation. 2007;72:193-9. [25] Patsaki A, Pantazopoulos I, Dontas I, Passali C, Papadimitriou L, Xanthos T. Evaluation of Greek high school teachers' knowledge in basic life support, automated external defibrillation, and foreign body airway obstruction: implications for nursing interventions. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 2012;38:176-81. [26] 許菁芬, 賴香如. 台北市國小高年級學生心肺復甦術知識、態度、行爲意圖與教育需求研究. 健康促進與衛生教育學報. 2007:127-47. [27] 林秀碧, 賴怜蜜, 林佳蓉, 高慧娟. 台灣南部地區托兒中心教保人員對學齡前兒童事故傷害之急救知識、態度與課程需求分析研究. 學校衛生. 2000:1-23. [28] 李倩淑, 陳政友. 基隆市國中學生急救知識、態度、自我效能及行爲意向之探討. 學校衛生. 2009:69-89. [29] Schwartz NE. Nutritional knowledge, attitudes, and practices of high school graduates. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1975;66:28-31. [30] Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co; 1975. [31] 林水波、張世賢. 公共政策. 台北市: 五南; 1991. [32] 王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧. 教育測驗與評量:教室學習觀點. 台北: 五南; 1999. [33] DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. CA: SAGE Publications; 1998. [34] Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health. 2006;29:489-97. [35] Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing research. Philadelphia: A. Davis; 1991. [36] 邱皓政. 量化研究與統計分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例解析. 台北市: 五南; 2010. [37] 黃芳銘. 結構方程模式-理論與應用(五版四刷). 台北市: 五南; 2014. [38] Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit Testing structural equation models. CA: Sage; 1993. p. 136-62. [39] 吳明隆. 結構方程模式:AMOS的操作與應用. 台北市: 五南; 2009. [40] Ballesteros-Pena S, Fernandez-Aedo I, Perez-Urdiales I, Garcia-Azpiazu Z, Unanue-Arza S. Knowledge and attitudes of citizens in the Basque Country (Spain) towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automatic external defibrillators. Med Intensiva. 2016;40:75-83. [41] Brooks B, Chan S, Lander P, Adamson R, Hodgetts GA, Deakin CD. Public knowledge and confidence in the use of public access defibrillation. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2015;101:967-71. [42] Mpotos N, Vekeman E, Monsieurs K, Derese A, Valcke M. Knowledge and willingness to teach cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A survey amongst 4273 teachers. Resuscitation. 2013;84:496-500. [43] Taniguchi T, Omi W, Inaba H. Attitudes toward automated external defibrillator use in Japan. Resuscitation. 2008;79:288-91. [44] Ong ME, Quah JL, Ho AF, Yap S, Edwin N, Ng YY, et al. National population based survey on the prevalence of first aid, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skills in Singapore. Resuscitation. 2013;84:1633-6. [45] 李碧玉, 李美靜, 李翠芬, 柯任桂, 莊昭華, 黃世惠. 健康促進與護理. 新北市: 啟英; 2011. [46] Naidoo J, wills J. Foundations for Health Promotion 3rd edition UK: Elsevier Limited; 2009. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50840 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究背景與目的:台灣在2013年法規公告設置有自動體外心臟電擊去顫器(AED)之公共場所須指派「AED管理員」,負責AED的資訊登錄、日常管理維護、使用後通報等作業,並須定期接受CPR+AED急救訓練及管理員訓練,但目前未有相關研究針對AED管理員進行探討。本研究目的為瞭解我國AED管理員對於公共場所設置自動體外心臟電擊去顫器之相關知識、態度、施救意願與政策執行意願,並探討其相關影響因素。
研究方法:本橫斷式研究針對已在「公共場所AED急救資訊網」登錄註冊的AED管理員為對象,利用所登錄之電子信箱寄發自行編製之結構式問卷進行調查。問卷內容包含基本資料、公共場所設置自動體外心臟電擊去顫器之相關知識(包含急救知識與法規政策知識)、態度、意願(包含施救意願與政策執行意願),共42題。 研究結果:共回收1405份有效問卷(回覆率37%)。受訪者有83.4%參加過AED管理員訓練課程,工作場所制定有緊急醫療事件應變流程者占84.6%。相較於法規政策知識(92%),受訪者對於急救知識的答對率較低(83%)。91.6%願意對陌生人施行CPR或使用AED急救,僅68.7%願意擔任AED管理員執行相關政策。影響施救意願或政策執行意願的主因皆為「害怕承擔施救過失造成的法律責任」。急救知識越佳者,對於態度反應越正向(β=0.55±0.12,p<0.001),進而有較佳的施救意願(OR=1.35,95%CI=1.27~1.43,p<0.001)。針對政策執行意願之相關影響因子迴歸模型,工作場所制定有緊急應變流程者,其政策執行意願為未制定者的2.19倍(95% CI=1.50~3.20,p<0.001)。 結論:工作場所制定有緊急醫療事件應變流程的受訪者,對於CPR+AED的知識、態度、意願皆越佳。在管理員相關課程中加強急救知識,並鼓勵定期參與及更新相關急救課程資訊,對於態度與意願皆有顯著影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: In Taiwan, certain public locations are required by law to install public automatic external defibrillators (AED) since 2013. Each public AED site should designate a manager to oversee AED registration/maintenance, education, and incident report. This study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitude, and willingness of AED managers toward CPR+AED.
Methods: This cross-sectional study is launched by emailing those AED managers who registered in the 'Taiwan Public AED Registry' website with structured questionnaire. This instrument includes demographics; as well as knowledge, attitude and willingness toward CPR+AED practices and policies. Results: Overall 3810 managers were contacted and 1405 (37%) responded. A total of 83.4% participants completed manager course and 84.6% public places had site emergency plan. Knowledge on regulation and policy (92%) was higher than CPR+AED (83%). Willingness to perform CPR+AED (91.6%) was high, but to perform manager duty was less (68.7%). Fear of legal liability is the main reason for not willingness to perform CPR+AED or perform manager duty. The better knowledge on CPR+AED contributed to more positive attitude(β=0.55±0.12,p<0.001),thus enhanced higher willingness to perform CPR+AED(OR=1.35,95%CI=1.27~1.43,p<0.001). In working places with site emergency plan, the willing to perform manager duty is 2.19 times to those without it(95% CI=1.50~3.20,p<0.001). Conclusion: Site emergency plan for cardiac arrests is associated with better knowledge, attitude, and willingness among AED managers in Taiwan, who play pivotal roles in program success. More frequent and updated training, especially on CPR+AED as well as AED laws, could translate into better attitude and willingness. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:01:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R01847024-1.pdf: 3075979 bytes, checksum: 809367593ea55c6e3a6369a381b9f024 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
中文摘要 II ABSTRACT IV 目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 圖目錄 IX 實習單位簡介 1 (一)實習單位 1 (二)單位簡介 1 (三)機構與實習目標之關聯 2 (四)實習工作與內容 3 第一章 研究背景與文獻探討 5 1.1 公共場所設置自動體外心臟電擊去顫器之重要性 5 1.2 台灣公共場所AED管理員的起源及相關法規政策 8 1.3 心肺復甦術及自動體外心臟電擊去顫器之知識、態度與意願 9 1.4 心肺復甦術及自動體外心臟電擊去顫器之知識、態度與意願間的相關性及影響因素 12 1.5 「知識、態度、行為」模式 14 1.6 研究缺口 15 第二章 研究目的與研究假說 17 2.1 研究目的 17 2.2 研究假說 17 第三章 研究方法 18 3.1 研究架構 18 3.2研究對象與實施方法 18 3.3 研究工具 19 3.4 研究工具信度與效度 19 3.5 資料處理及統計分析 22 3.6 研究倫理考量 24 第四章 研究結果 25 4.1 AED管理員基本資料之分布情形 25 4.2 AED管理員在知識、態度及意願上之描述性分析 25 4.3 基本資料在「知識」上之差異情形 26 4.4 基本資料在「態度」上之差異情形 27 4.5 基本資料在「意願」上之差異情形 27 4.6 知識、態度、意願之相關性 27 4.7 知識對態度之影響情形 28 4.8 影響「施救意願」的相關因子分析 28 4.8 影響「政策執行意願」的相關因子分析 29 4.9 知識、態度、意願之結構方程模式 30 第五章 討論 31 5.1 研究摘述 31 5.2 研究主要發現並與過去研究比較 32 5.3 研究優點與限制 41 第六章 結論與建議 43 6.1 結論 43 6.2 建議 44 參考文獻 46 附錄一、公共場所設置自動體外心臟電擊去顫器相關法規 95 附錄二、公共場所AED管理員調查問卷 98 附錄三、研究問卷各題組所含題目 103 附錄四、公共場所AED管理員調查問卷-專家效度評定問卷結果 105 附錄五、國立臺灣大學醫學院附設醫院研究倫理委員會審核通過證明 113 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 公共場所AED管理員對於心肺復甦術及自動體外心臟電擊去顫器之知識、態度與意願 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Knowledge, Attitude and Willingness toward Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automatic External Defibrillators (AED) among Public AED Program Managers in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 馬惠明(Huei-Ming Ma) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 季瑋珠(Wei-Chu Chie),杜裕康(Yu-Kang Tu),林志豪(Chih-Hao Lin) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 自動體外心臟電擊去顫器,AED管理員,工作場所緊急事件應變流程, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | automatic external defibrillator (AED),AED manager,Site emergency plan, | en |
dc.relation.page | 114 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600559 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-11 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。