請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50835
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李艷榕(Yen-Jung Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ru-Peng Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李汝鵬 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:01:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
Abbott, L., S. Parker, and G. Peters, 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23, 69–87. Archambeault, F., T. Dezoort, and D. Hermanson. 2008. Audit committee incentive compensation and accounting restatements. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (4), 965–992. Baber, W., S. Kang, and L. Liang. 2006. Strong boards, External governance, and accounting restatement. Working paper, George Washington University. Baker, T., D. Collins, and A. Reitenga. 2003. Stock option compensation and earnings management incentives. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 18, 557-582. Bartov, Eli, P. Mohanram, 2004. Private information, earnings manipulations, and executive stock-option exercises. The Accounting Review 79 (4), 889-920. Beasley, S., 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between board of directors’ composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71, 443–65. B dard, J., S. Chtourou, and L. Courteau. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23(2), 13-35. Beneish, M, and M. Vargus. 2002. Insider trading, earnings quality, and accrual mispricing. The Accounting Review 77 (4), 755–791. Bergstresser, Daniel, T. Philippon, 2006. CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics 80, 511–529. Bonner, S., Z. Palmrose, and S. Young. 1998. Fraud type and auditor litigation: an analysis of sec accounting and auditing enforcement releases. The Accounting Review 73, 503-532. Brick, I. E., O. Palmon, and J. K. Wald. 2006. CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance 12 (3), 403 – 23. Brown, L. D., and K. J. Kim. 1991. Timely aggregate analysts’ forecasts as better proxies for market earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2), 382–385. Burns, N. and S. Kedia. 2006. The impact of performance-based compensation on misreporting. Journal of Financial Economics 79 (1), 35–67. Byard, Donal and Y. Li,2005. The Impact of Directors' Option Compensation on Their Independence. Working paper, Baruch College. Callahan, W.T., J.A. Millar, and C. Schulman, 2003. An analysis of the effect of management participation in director selection on the long-term performance of the firm. Journal of Corporate Finance: Contracting, Governance and Organization 9 (2), 169–181. Cheng, Qiang, and T. D. Warfield, 2005. Equity Incentives and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review 80(2), 441–476. Coles JL, N. D. Daniel, and L. Naveen, 2006. Managerial incentives and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics 79, 431-368. Core J., and W. Guay. 1999. The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28, 151-184. Core J., and W. Guay. 2001. Stock option plans for non-executive employees. Journal of Financial Economics 61, 253–287. Coughlan, A., and R. Schmidt, 1985. Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7, 43–66. Cullinan, C. P., D. Hui, and J. Wei. 2010. Is compensating audit committee members with stock options associated with the likelihood of internal control weaknesses? International Journal of Auditing 14 (3), 256-273. Dechow, P. M., and D. J. Skinner, 2000. Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners and regulators. Accounting Horizons 14(2), 235-250. Dechow, Patricia M., R. C. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney, 1995. Detecting earning management. The Accounting review 70 (2), 193-225. DeFond, M. L. and J. Jiambalvo, 1994. Debt covenant effects and the manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17, 145-176. Elson, C. M., 1995. The duty of care, compensation, and stock ownership. University of Cincinnati Law Review 63 (2), 649–711. Fama, Eugene F., and M. C. Jensen, 1983, Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-325. Fich, Eliezer M., Anil Shivdasani, 2005. The Impact of Stock-Option Compensation for Outside Directors on Firm Value. The Journal of Business Vol. 78, No. 6. Francis, J., and J. Krishnan. 1999. Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research 16, 135-165. Frankel, R. M., M. F. Johnson, and K. K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditor fees for no audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement), 71-105. Gong, Guojin, and H. Li, 2007. Outside directors’ equity-based compensation and earnings management. Working paper, Smeal College of Business Penn State University. Guay, W., 1999. The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: an analysis of the magnitude and determinants. Journal of Financial Economics 53, 43–71. Guidry, F., A.J. Leone, and S. Rock, 1999. Earnings-based bonus plans and earnings management by business-unit managers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 26, 85–108. Hall, B., and J. Liebman, 1998. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 653–691. Hall, B.J., and K. Murphy, 2002. Stock options for undiversified executives. Journal of Accounting and Economics 1 (33), 3–42. Hanlon, Michelle, S. Rajgopal, and T. Shevlin, 2003. Are executive stock options associated with future earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 36, 3–43. Harris, Jared, and P. Bromiley, 2007. Incentives to Cheat: The Influence of Executive Compensation and Firm Performance on Financial Misrepresentation. Organization Science 18(3), 350-367. Healy, P. M. and J. M. Wahlen, 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13 (4), 365–83. Healy, P. M., 1985. The impact of bonus schemes on the selection of accounting principles. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (3), 85–107. Hermaln, B.E., and M.S. Weisbach, 1998. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review 88, 96–118. Hill, N. T. and K. T. Stevens, 2001. Structuring Compensation to Achieve Better Financial Results. Strategic Finance, 82 (9), 48-60. Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 28 (3), 383–96. Hribar, Paul, and D. Craig Nichols, 2007. Quality Measures in Tests of Earnings Management. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (5). Jensen, M. C., 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance 48 (3), 831–80. Jensen, M.C., and W. Meckling, 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360. Jensen, Michael C. and R. S. Ruback, 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11, 5-50. Ju, N., H. Leland, and L. Senbet, 2002. Options, option repricing and severance packages in managerial compensation: their effects on corporate risk. Working paper, University of Maryland. Ke, B. 2001. Why do CEOs of publicly traded firms prefer reporting small earning increases and long strings of consecutive earnings increases? Working paper, Pennsylvania State University. Kellogg, R. 1984. Accounting activities, securities prices, and class action lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6, 185-204. Kinney Jr., W. R., and R. D. Martin. 1994. Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit-related adjustment studies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 13 (spring), 151-6. Klein, A., 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics and earnings statement. Journal of Accounting & Economics 33, 375–400. Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 163–197. Lambert, R. A., and D. F. Larcker. 1987. An analysis of the use of accounting and market measures of performance in executive compensation contracts. Journal of Accounting Research 25 (Supplement), 85–129. Levitt, A., 1998. The numbers game. Remarks delivered at the NYU Center for Law and Business, Sep. 28, New York, NY. Low, Angie, 2009. Managerial risk-taking behavior and equity-based compensation. Journal of Financial Economics 92, 470–490. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293–315. Nelson, M.W., J.A. Elliott, and R.L. Tarpley, 2000. Where do companies attempt earnings management, and when do auditors prevent it? Working paper, Cornell University and George Washington University. Patton, A., and J. C. Baker, 1987. Why won’t directors rock the boat? Harvard Business Review 65 (6), 10-12, 16, 18. Ryan, H. E. and R. A. Wiggins. 2004. Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring. Journal of Financial Economics 73 (3), 497–524. Skinner, D. J., and L. Myers. 2000. Earnings momentum and earnings management. Working paper, University of Michigan. Stein, J. C., 1989. Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporation behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (4), 655–669. Vafeas, N., 1999. Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 53: 113–42. Xie, B., W. N. Davidson, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9, 295–316. Yermack, D., 1995. Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively? Journal of Financial Economics 39, 237–269. Yermack, D., 1997. Good timing: CEO stock option awards and company news announcements. Journal of Finance 52, 449–477. Yermack, D., 2004. Remuneration, retention and reputation incentives for outside directors. Journal of Finance 59, 2281-2308. Zong, L., 2004. Emerging trends in board total compensation. Compensation Benefits Review 36 (2), 45-53. 林欣美、郭麗華、蘇迺惠,2008,國際化程度、董事會結構、精練法人監督對盈 餘管理之影響:以台灣資訊電子業爲例,臺大管理論叢 19 (1),157 – 186。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50835 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討董事會成員股權基礎給付之薪酬與盈餘管理的關聯。過去研
究發現高階經理人因股權基礎給付薪酬所形成的權益誘因,會提高公司盈餘管理 之情況;權益誘因若作用於獨立董事身上,則會與盈餘管理程度呈反向關係。配 合董事會結構的強化,本研究不僅將董事樣本劃分為審計委員會成員、薪酬委員 會成員、以及其他董事會成員三個群組,更將衡量董事之權益誘因分別以權益薪 酬總金額和權益薪酬占總薪酬之比例代理,且以裁決性應計數衡量公司盈餘管理 程度,結果顯示審計委員會、其他董事會成員、以及以權益薪酬比例衡量之薪酬 委員會,其權益誘因與下年度盈餘管理程度呈反向關係。本文再進一步將權益薪 酬拆分成選擇權型與股票型,發現僅選擇權型在三個群組樣本內皆與盈餘管理程 度呈負向相關,而股票型薪酬與盈餘管理之負相關只存在於審計委員會。最後, 再將選擇權型與股票型薪酬各劃分成獨立董事與內部董事兩組,發現獨立董事之 選擇權型薪酬在各群組皆與盈餘管理程度有負向相關,股票型僅在審計及薪酬委 員會身上與盈餘管理程度有負向相關。本研究之穩健性測試係將兼任審計與薪酬 委員會的董事成員剔除,藉以消彌其對本研究回歸式之影響,結果顯示回歸式的 結論與原來的差異不大。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, I examine how directors’ equity-based compensation affects earnings management by decomposing directors into audit committee, compensation committee, and other members of the board, who are not in the audit or compensation committees. Initially, I respectively test the relationship between income-increasing earnings management, measuring by discretionary accruals, and equity incentives of the three directors’ groups. The result suggests that there is a significant negative relation between income-increasing earnings management and equity incentives of three sample groups measured by ratio of equity compensation to total compensation. However, when equity compensation amount measure is used, the relation only exists in audit committee and other members of the board.
Next, I decompose the equity-based compensation into options and stocks. A negative relation is found between options compensation of three sample groups and income-increasing earnings management. On the other hand, the unfavorable effect on the relation between stock compensation and income-increasing earnings management only exists in audit committee. Lastly, I separate compensation into independent and inside directors, finding that inside directors do not maintain the unfavorable effect on the relation between compensation and income-increasing earnings management. Regarding independent directors, the option compensation of three sample groups are negatively associated with income-increasing earnings management. Nevertheless, as for the stock compensation, the unfavorable effect is observed only in audit and compensation committee. As a robustness test, I eliminate the impact of overlapping membership on audit and compensation committees. The results are unaffected by the elimination of overlapping membership on audit and compensation committees. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:01:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02722034-1.pdf: 1682935 bytes, checksum: 498d9260776e10c7058d91a82bdb9597 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
誌謝...................................................... i 中文摘要.................................................. ii 英文摘要.................................................. iii 目錄...................................................... iv 表目錄.................................................... v 第一章 緒論 ..............................................1 第一節 研究背景 .......................................1 第二節 研究動機與目的 .................................5 第三節 研究架構 .......................................7 第二章 文獻探討 ..........................................8 第三章 研究方法 .........................................18 第一節 研究假說 ......................................18 第二節 變數定義與衡量方法 ............................24 第三節 實證模型 ......................................37 第四節 研究樣本及資料來源 ............................39 第四章 實證研究結果與分析 ...............................42 第一節 敘述性統計與相關性分析 ........................42 第二節 回歸結果分析 ..................................49 第三節 穩健性測試 ....................................55 第五章 結論 .............................................65 第一節 研究結論 ......................................65 第二節 研究限制 ......................................67 第三節 研究建議 ......................................68 參考文獻..................................................69 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 審計與薪酬委員會及其他董事會成員權益薪酬與盈餘管理之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Other Directors’ Equity-Based Compensation on Earnings Management | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹凌菁(LING-JING ZHAN),廖芝嫻(ZHI-XIAN LIAO) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 權益薪酬,盈餘管理,審計委員會,薪酬委員會, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Equity-Based Compensation,Earnings Management,Audit Committee,Compensation Committee., | en |
dc.relation.page | 74 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600779 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.64 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。