請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50762完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李存修,陳思寬 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hsiang Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張家祥 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:56:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-07-26 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Book Chapter
1. Holman, C. 2011. Gene Patents under Fire: Weighing the Costs and Benefits. In Arezzo, E., and Ghidini, G.(Ed.), Biotechnology and Software Patent Law: A Comparative Review on New Developments: 260-287 (Chapter 10). Cheltenham, UK: Edard Elgar Publishing. Journal Articles 1. Ajunwa, I. 2014. Genetic Testing Meets Big Data: Torts and Contract Law Issues. Ohio State Law Journal, Vol.74: 1225-1262. 2. Contreras, J. 2011. Bermuda’s Legacy: Policy, Patents, and the Design of the Genome Commons. Minnesota Journal of Law Science and Technology, Vol. 12: 61-125. 3. Feldman, R. 2014. Gene Patenting after the U.S. Supreme Court Decision – Does Myriad Matter? Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 26: 16-22. 4. Fox, D. 2009. Prenatal Screening Policy in International Perspective: Lessons from Israel, Cyprus, Taiwan, China and Singapore. Yale Journal of Health Policy Law and Ethics, Vol. 9: 471-482. 5. Karky, R. 2014. Bioinformatics Materials and Issue of Patentability. IIP Bulletin, Vol. 23: 78-83. 6. Madhani, P. 2011. India Bioinformatics: Growth Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Management Thought and Practice, Vol. 3(2): 7-17. . 7. Pila, J. 2003. Bound Futures: Patent Law and Modern Biotechnology. Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, Vol. 9: 326-378. 8. Pisano, G. 2010. The Evolution of Science-Based Business: Innovating How We Innovate. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations, Mgt. Unit Working Paper No. 10-62. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1545806 9. Vishnubhakat, S., and Rai, A. 2015. When Biopharm Meets Software: Bioinformatics at the Patent Office. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 29: 205-241. 10. Zawati, M., Borry P., and Howard, H. 2011. Closure of Population Biobanks and Direct-to Consumer Genetic Testing Companies. Human Genetics, Vol. 130: 425-432. Websites 1. IBM Website (2016) (visited 2016 May 1st) http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_group.php?id=137 2. Infosys Website (2016) (visited 2016 May 1st) https://www.infosys.com/industries/life-sciences/case-studies 3. Exxon Mobil Website (2016) (visited 2016 May 1st) http://careers.exxonmobil.com/openings/Postdoctoral-Fellow---Microbial-Systems-Bioinformatics-5328-24537BR 4. Australian Law Reform Commission issued a report on “Patentability of Genetic Materials and Technologies ” (visited 2016 May 2nd) http://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/6-patentability-genetic-materials-and-technologies/patentable-subject-matterhttp://www.alrc.gov.au/publications/6-patentability-genetic-materials-and-technologies/patentable-subject-matter Other References – SEC Annual Reports (USA) 1. Illumina 2015 Annual Report, SEC Filing Form 10-K, filed 2016 March for the fiscal year ended Jan 3, 2016. 2. Sequenom 2015 Annual Report, SEC Filing Form 10-K, filed 2016 March for the fiscal year ended Dec 31, 2015. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50762 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 美國歐巴馬總統在2015年發表精準醫學起始宣告 (the Precision Medicine Initiative),以促進人類健康及疾病治療。美國此份精準醫學宣告已經加速生化醫學的研究,提供醫師更新的工具丶知識及治療方法; 精準醫學其實就是生物信息科技的應用之一。生物信息產業已經成為當紅且有前途值得投入研發及資金的領域。有人預估生物信息產業的產值在2020年會高達130億美元。
本篇碩士論文先簡短描述生物信息產業的現況,特別就生物資料庫(biobank)丶電腦科技幫助解讀及演譯巨量生物資料丶資訊技術在生物科技的應用及基因檢測產業。本論文接續探討生物信息產業衍生出的法律議題,例如基因是否可取得專利及人類基因資料儲存於生物資料庫或在接受基因檢測之後衍生出的隱私權問題。 最後,本論文藉由研究二家美國生物信息的上市公司Illumina 及Sequenom,試圖擷取生物信息公司成功經營的秘笈,俾便對臺灣的生物信息公司有所助益! | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | President Obama of the USA in 2015 announced the Precision Medicine Initiative to improve human beings’ health and treat disease. The USA Precision Medicine Initiative, which is part of bioinformatics industry, accelerates biomedical discoveries and provides medical doctors with new tools, knowledge and therapies to select much better treatments. Bioinformatics industry has becoming one of the booming and promising new fields for further research, development and investment. And the bioinformatics market is estimated to have revenue at around US$ 13 billion in 2020.
This master thesis will highlight the current bioinformatics market situation briefly, in particular for biobanks, dry lab technologies, the application of information technology in biotechnology, and the genetic testing industry. This master thesis will also tackle the related legal issues of patentability for gene patents and the privacy concerns while storing patients’ genetic information at biobanks or receiving genetic testing. Lastly, by means of case studies of two publicly traded bioinformatics companies - Illumina and Sequenom in the USA, this thesis tries to glean some information and factors, and implication for Taiwanese bioinformatics companies so as to come up with better plans for their bioinformatics business. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:56:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-P02746031-1.pdf: 848704 bytes, checksum: b1fa45ab1f68ac8feaf423f41ac61474 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Content
I. Introduction 1 II. Literature Review4 III. Bioinformatics Technology: Market Overview And Issues7 III.1 A Brief Introduction to Genetics and Bioinformatics7 III.2 Bioinformatics Markets 9 III.3 Human Genome Project (1990-2003) 9 III.4 Biobanks10 III.5 Dry Lab and Wet Lab for Biotechnology with the Help of Bioinformatics12 III.6 Bioinformatics Researches and Application at Non-Biotech or Non-Pharma Firms13 III.7 Genetic Testing in the United States14 IV. The Bioinformatics Related Issues – Intellectual Property Law and Privacy17 IV.1 Intellectual Property: Patents and Other IPs 17 IV.2 Privacy 25 V. Cases Studies 32 V.1 Case Study 1 - Illumina, Inc.32 V.2 Case Study 2 - Sequenom, Inc.46 VI. Strategic Implications for Taiwan’s Bioinformatics Industry 54 VII. Concluding Remarks 57 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 生物科技 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 可專利性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生物信息 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 遺傳 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 基因 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生物科技 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 可專利性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生物信息 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 基因 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 遺傳 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | genetics | en |
| dc.subject | bioinformatics | en |
| dc.subject | patentability | en |
| dc.subject | biotechnology | en |
| dc.subject | genome | en |
| dc.subject | bioinformatics | en |
| dc.subject | patentability | en |
| dc.subject | biotechnology | en |
| dc.subject | genome | en |
| dc.subject | genetics | en |
| dc.title | 生物信息產業之法律與策略問題分析
—個案研究與對台灣之啟示 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Legal and Strategic Issues Involved in the Development of Bioinformatics Industries—Case Studies and Implications for Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳業寧 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 生物信息,可專利性,生物科技,基因,遺傳, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | bioinformatics,patentability,biotechnology,genome,genetics, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 59 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600915 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業管理組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業管理組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 828.81 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
