請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50684
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德(Pei-Te Chiueh) | |
dc.contributor.author | Kuan-Yu Liou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉冠妤 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:52:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-14 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-10-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Acreman, M., Dunbar, M., Hannaford, J., Mountford, O., Wood, P., Holmes, N., Cowx, I., Noble, R., Extence, C., Aldrick, J., King, J., Black, A., Crookail, D., 2008. Developing environmental standards for abstractions from UK rivers to implement the EU Water Framework Directive. Hydrolog. Sci. J. 53 (6), 1105-1120.
Alcamo, J., Döll, P., Henrichs, T., Kaspar, F., Lehner, B., Rösch, T., Siebert, S., 2003. Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrolog. Sci. J. 48 (3), 317-337. Allan, J.A., 1998. Virtual water, a strategic resource, global solutions to regional deficits. Groundwater 36 (4), 545-546. Anand, C., Apul, D.S., 2011. Economic and environmental analysis of standard, high efficiency, rainwater flushed and composting toilets. J. Environ. Manag. 92 (3), 419-428. Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R, Srinivasan, R., Williams, J.R., Haney, E.B., Neitsch, S.L., 2012. Input/output documentation version 2012. Texas Water Resources Institute TR-439. http://swat.tamu.edu/documentation/2012-io/ (accessed on 2016.01.22.). Asheesh, M., Ruohonen, K., Al-Otaibi, M., 2003. Water balancing in sharing and evaluating scarcity of water resources in national and international river basins. Tecnologıa De La Intrusion De Agua De Mar En Acuı feros Costeros. 797-805. Bekele, E.G., Knapp, H.V., 2010. Watershed modeling to assessing impacts of potential climate change on water supply availability. Water Resour. Manag. 24 (13), 3299-3320. Berger, M., and Finkbeiner, M., 2010. Water Footprinting: how to address water use in life cycle assessment? Sustainability 2 (4), 919-944. Berger, M., Finkbeiner, M., 2013. Methodological challenges in volumetric and impact‐oriented water footprints. J. Ind. Ecol. 17 (1), 79-89. Berger, M., van der Ent, R., Eisner, S., Bach, V., Finkbeiner, M., 2014. Water accounting and vulnerability evaluation (WAVE): considering atmospheric evaporation recycling and the risk of freshwater deletion in water footprinting. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (8), 4521-4528. Borah, D.K., Bera, M., 2004. Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: Review of applications. Transactions of the ASABE. 47 (3), 789-803. Boulay, A.M., Bulle, C., Bayart, J.B., Deschênes, L., Margni, M., 2011. Regional characterization of freshwater use in LCA: Modeling direct impacts on human health. Environ. Sci. Tech. 45 (20), 8948-8957. Chapagain A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., 2004. Water footprints of nations, Value of Water Research Report Series No. 16, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft. Chaves, H.M.L., Alipaz, S., 2007. An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, environment, life, and policy: The watershed sustainability index. Water Resour. Manag. 21 (5), 883-895. Crettaz, P., Jolliet, O., Cuanillon, J.M., Orlando. S., 1999. Life cycle assessment of drinking water and rain water for toilets flushing. Journal of Water Supply: Research & Technology – Aqua. 48 (3), 73-83. Falkenmark, M., 1989. The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa: Why isn't it being addressed? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 18 (2), 112-118. Falkenmark, M., 1990. Rapid population growth and water scarcity: The predicament of tomorrow's Africa. Popul. Dev. Rev. 16, 81-94. Falkenmark, M., Widstrand, C., 1992. Population and water resources: a delicate balance. Popul. Bull. 47 (3), 1-36. Flato, G., Marotzke, J., Abiodun, B., Braconnot, P., Chou, S.C., Collins, W., Cox, P., Driouech, F., Emori, S., Eyring, V., Forest, C., Gleckler, P., Guilyardi, E., Jakob, C., Kattsov, V., Reason, C., Rummukainen, M., 2013. Evaluation of climate models. In: climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA. 741-866. Gassman, P.W., Reyes, M.R., Green, C.H., Arnold, J. G., 2007. The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions. Transactions of the ASABE 50 (4), 1211–1250. Gerbens-Leenes, P.W., Van Lienden, A.R., Hoekstra, A.Y., Van der Meer, Th.H., 2012. Biofuel scenarios in a water perspective: The global blue and green water footprint of road transport in 2030. Global Environ. Change 22 (3), 764-775. Ghimire, S.R., Johnston, J.M., Ingwersen, W.W., Hawkins, T.R., 2014. Life cycle assessment of domestic and agricultural rainwater harvesting system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (7), 4069-4077. Gleick, P.H., 1996. Basic water requirements for human activities: Meeting basic needs. Water Int. 21 (2), 83-92. Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., Schryver, A.D., Struijs, J., van Zelm, R., 2013. ReCiPe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indictors at the midpoint and the endpoint level. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment, Netherlands, 126pp. Hellweg, S., Milà i Canals, L., 2014. Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science 344 (6188), 1109-1113. Hoekstra, A.Y., Chapagain, A.K., Aldaya, M.M., Mekonnen, M.M., 2011. The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Earthscan. Lodon, Washington, DC, 203pp. Hsu, H.H., Chou, C., Wu, Y.C., Lu, M.M., Chen, C.T., Chen, Y.M., 2011. Climate Change in Taiwan: Scientific Report 2011 (Summary). National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, 67pp. Jenkins, D., Pearson, F., Moore, E., Sun, J.K. en Valentine, R., 1978. Feasibility of rainwater collection systems in California, Contribution No. 173, Californian Water Resources Center, University of California. Jiménez Cisneros, B.E., Oki, T., Arnell, N.W., Benito, G., Cogley, J.G., Döll, P., Jiang, T., Mwakalila, S.S., 2014. Freshwater resources. In: climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA. 229-269. Knisel, W.G., 1980. CREAMS: A field-scale model for chemicals, runoff, and erosion from agricultural management systems. U. S. Department of Agriculture Science and Education Administration, Conservation Research Report No. 26, 643pp. Kroese, D.P, Brereton, T., Taimre, T., Botev, Z.I., 2014. Why the Monte Carlo method is so important today. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 6 (6), 386-392. Leonard, R.A., Knisel, W.G., Still, D.A., 1987. GLEAMS: Groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Transactions of the ASAE. 30 (5), 1403-1418. Levasseur, A., Lesage, P., Margni, M., Deschenes, L., Samson, R., 2010. Considering time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (8), 3169-3174. Ligaray, M., Kim, H., Sthiannopkao, S., Lee, S., Cho, K.H., Kim, J. H, 2015. Assessment on hydrologic response by climate change in the Chao Phraya river basin, Thailand. Water 7 (12), 6892-6909. Liu, T.M., Tung, C.P., Ke, K.Y., Chuang, L.H., Lin, C.Y., 2009. Application and development of a decision-support system for assessing water shortage and allocation with climate change. Paddy and Water Environment 7 (4), 301-311. McNulty, S.G., Sun, G., Myers, J.M., Cohen, E., Caldwell, P., 2010. Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: tradeoffs between ecosystem carbon sequestration and water yield. Watershed Management. Publication in the Proceeding of the Environmental Water Resources Institute Meeting, August 23-27, 2010. Madison, WI. Mekonnen, M.M., Hoekstra, A.Y., 2016. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Sci. Adv. 2 (2), e1500323. Milà i Canals, L., Chenoweth, J., Chapagain, A., Orr, S., Antón, A., Clift, R., 2009. Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part I—inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14 (1), 28-42. Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner,R. L., Harmel, R. D., Veith, T. L., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE. 50 (3), 885–900. Moss, R., Babiker, M., Brinkman, S., Calvo, E., Carter, T., Edmonds, J., Elgizouli, I., Emori, S., Erda, L., Hibbard, K., Jones, R., Kainuma, M., Kelleher, J., Lamarque, J.F., Manning, M., Matthews, B., Meehl, J., Meyer, L., Mitchell, J., Nakicenovic, N., O’Neill, B., Pichs, R., Riahi, K., Rose, S., Runci, P., Stouffer, R., van Vuuren, D., Weyant, J., Wilbanks, T., van Ypersele, J.P., Zurek, M., 2008. Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts, and response strategies. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 132pp. Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10 (3), 282–290. Neitsch S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R., 2011. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation: Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 406, 618pp. http://swatmodel.tamu.edu/documentation/ (accessed 2016.01.22.). Ohlsson, L., 2000. Water conflicts and social resource scarcity. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere 25 (3), 213-220. Perry, C., 2007. Efficient irrigation; inefficient communication; flawed recommendations. Irrigat. Drain. 56 (4), 367-378. Pfister, S., Koehler, A., Hellweg, S., 2009. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (11), 4098-4104. Pickering, N.B., Stedinger, J.R., Haith, D.A., 1988. Weather input for nonpoint source pollution models. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 114 (4), 674–690. Pradhanang, S.M., Mukundan, R., Schneiderman, E.M., Zion, M.S., Anandhi, A., Pierson, D.C., Frei, A., Easton, Z.M., Fuka, D., Steenhuis, T.S., 2013. Streamflow responses to climate change: Analysis of hydrologic indicators in a New York City water supply watershed. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 49 (6), 1308-1326. Raskin, P.D., Mansen, E., Margolis, R.M., 1996. Water and sustainability: Global patterns and long-range problems. Nat. Resour. Forum. 20 (1), 1-15. Raskin, P., Gleick, P., Kirshen, P., Pontius, G., Strzepek, K., 1997. Comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world. Water futures: Assessment of long-range patterns and problems. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 77pp. Rijsberman, F.R., 2006. Water scarcity: Fact or fiction? Agr. Water Manag. 80 (1), 5-22. Savenije, H.H.G., 2000. Water scarcity indicators; the deception of the numbers. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere. 25 (3), 199-204. Schewe, J., Heinke, J., Gerten, D., Haddeland, I., Arnell, N.W., Clark, D.B., Dankers, R., Eisner, S., Fekete, B.M., Colón-González, F.J., 2014. Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit States Am. 111 (9), 3245-3250. Setegn, S.G., Rayner, D., Melesse, A. M., Dargahi, B., Srinivasan, R., 2011. Impact of clilmate change on the hydroclimatology of Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Water Resour. Res. 47 (4), W04511. Shiklomanov, I.A., 1991. The world’s water resources. Proceedings of the international symposium to commemorate 25, 93-126. Shiklomanov, I.A., 1998. World water resources: A new appraisal and assessment for the 21st century. the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 37pp. Smakhtin, V., Revenga, C., Döll, P., 2004. A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity. Water Int. 29 (3), 307-317. Sun, G., McNulty, S.G., Moore Myers, J.A., Cohen, E.C., 2008. Impacts of multiple stresses on water demand and supply across the southeastern United States. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 44 (6), 1441-1457. Tung, C.P., Haith, D.A., 1995. Global warming effects on New York streamflows. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag. 121 (2), 216-225. Tung, C.P., Liu, T.M., Chen, S.W., Ke, K.Y., Li, M.H., 2014. Carrying capacity and sustainability appraisals on regional water supply systems under climate change. Br. J. Environ. Clim. Change 4 (1), 27-44. USDA SCS (Soil Conservation Service), 1972. SCS National Engineering Handbook. Section 4, Hydrology. USDA. Washington, DC. Van der Ent, R.J. and Savenije, H.H.G., 2011. Length and time scales of atmospheric moisture recycling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (5), 1853–1863. Vialle, C., Busset, G., Tanfin, L., Montrejaud-Vignoles, M., Huau, M.C., Sablayrolles C., 2015. Environmental analysis of a domestic rainwater harvesting system: A case study in France. Resour. Conservat. Recycl. 102, 178-184. Vörösmarty, C.J., Douglas, E.M., Green, P.A., Revenga, C., 2005. Geospatial indicators of emerging water stress: An application to Africa. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 34 (3), 230-236. Wada, Y., van Beek, L.P.H., Viviroli, D., Dürr, H.H., Weingartner, R., Bierkens, M.F.P., 2011. Global monthly water stress: 2. Water demand and severity of water stress. Water Resour. Res. 47 (7), W07518. Website of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2016. http://www.ipcc.ch/ (accessed 2016.04.06.). Williams, J.R., Jones, C.A., Dyke, P.T., 1984. A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Transactions of the ASAE. 27 (1), 129–144. 交通部中央氣象局,2016。2015年臺灣氣候分析,取自http://www.cwb.gov.tw/。 行政院環保署,2012。環境影響評估河川水質評估模式技術支援計畫,臺北市。 林佳玉,2014。淡水資源耗用與使用的生命週期衝擊評估方法建立,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。 林子平,2015。土地與氣候變遷情境對流量之影響:以大屯溪流域為例,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系碩士論文。 洪念民,1996。氣候變遷對大安溪水資源營運之影響,國立臺灣大學農業工程學研究所碩士論文。 國立臺灣大學。資訊公開/年報,取自http://www.ntu.edu.tw/about/statistics.html。 國家發展委員會,2014。中華民國人口推計(103 至150 年),取自http://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=84223C65B6F94D72。 童慶斌、劉子明、林嘉佑、曹榮軒與李明旭,2015。氣候變遷水資源風險評估與調適決策之探討。土木水利42 (4),30-45。 經濟部水利署,2005。新店溪青潭自來水水源水質保護區水質水量監測計畫-臺北水源特定區水文觀測現代化建置,臺北市。 經濟部水利署,2009。臺灣地區水資源需求潛勢評估及經理策略檢討,臺北市。 經濟部水利署,2011。自來水事業碳足跡評估與減碳策略之先期研究,臺北市。 經濟部水利署,2013。推動自來水水足跡計畫,臺北市。 經濟部水利署,2014。重大水資源規劃作業計畫(103-108年)。 經濟部水利署,2015a。臺灣水文年報,臺北市。 經濟部水利署,2015b。臺灣地區民國103年蓄水設施水量營運統計報告。 經濟部水利署,2015c。臺灣地區民國103年各標的用水量統計報報。 經濟部水利署,2006。水庫集水區非點源污染傳輸最適用模式之建立與應用(1/2) ,臺北市。 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所,2013。臺灣地區各水資源分區因應氣候變遷水資源管理調適能力綜合研究,臺中市。 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所,2014。氣候變遷下河川環境流量之研訂及推動策略研究(1/2),臺中市。 臺北市政府主計處,2015,統計應用分析報告-臺北自來水生產概況分析。 臺北自來水事業處,2014,臺北自來水事業統計年報,臺北市。 臺北自來水事業處,2015,臺北自來水事業統計年報,臺北市。 臺灣電力公司網站,取自 http://www.taipower.com.tw/index.aspx。 劉子明,2010。氣候變遷對區域水資源衝擊評估整合系統之研究,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所博士論文。 蔣在文,2012。區域性水資源耗用之生命週期衝擊評估,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。 謝昭賢、洪嘉謨,1998。農業經營系統對地下水負荷影響模式。國立中興大學水土保持學報 28 (4),85-100。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50684 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 生命週期衝擊評估方法常以水壓力指標為基礎,評估對淡水資源的衝擊。然而,目前發展的方法在評估未來情境的環境衝擊時,僅預測未來盤查資料的改變,評估模式中的特徵化因子並未依未來情境改變而有所調整;且目前水壓力指標多以年為時間尺度,忽略了水資源在月尺度的變異性。因此,本研究欲修改水壓力指標以符合臺灣地區之水資源時空分佈型態,並建立提高水壓力指標時間與空間解析度之方法,以推估聯合國政府間氣候變遷專家委員會建議之氣候變遷情境下,未來四個時間區段之動態水壓力特徵因子。
本研究改良德國學者Berger et al.(2014)所提出之Water Accounting and Vulnerability Evaluation(WAVE)模式中的水壓力評價方式─水消耗指標(Water Depletion Index, WDI),為使指標能夠適當表現臺灣位於亞熱帶季風氣候區乾濕季分明的水文型態,本研究以Soil and Water Assessment Tool(SWAT)水文模式模擬集水區可用水量之月資料,將以年為尺度的WDI改以月尺度展現(WDImon);同時,也將全球性水資源模擬之網格資料提升至以集水區為空間尺度,並選用地區性資料,以期指標能呈現在集水區內取用水所造成的地區性水壓力。氣候變遷情境部分則使用TaiWAP模式模擬未來溫度及雨量之改變,進而推估未來動態的水消耗指標。且將本研究所建立之動態水消耗指標用於分析研究大樓沖廁用水,以評估雨水回收系統對於氣候變遷調適之效益。 本研究的研究範圍為新店溪青潭水質水量保護區,結果顯示在臺灣大臺北地區,以年為尺度之WDI為0.723,然而WDImon最大值0.984出現在4月,而最小值0.249出現在10月,以月為尺度更能展現臺灣乾濕季的變異性。在氣候變遷情境下的WDImon,2021-2040年時間區段須面對較大的水壓力,而一年中的低點出現在8月或9月,1月及4月份則需面對較大的水壓力。在評估雨水回收系統之結果顯示,若增建雨水回收系統每個月能省下直接及間接用水量140.8立方公尺,且不同月份沖廁用水對淡水消耗的衝擊不同,若將省下的水量提供給其他用水需求便能減輕缺水時所面對的水壓力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Many countries all over the world are already under enormous water stress, and climate change will exacerbate the situation in many areas. The Water Depletion Index (WDI) is one of many water stress indicators used to estimate the impacts of water consumption. Most studies estimate available water with global-scale models; however, water resource management should be a local issue. Also, yearly timescales may hide the variety of precipitation from month to month. Therefore, this study aims to improve the temporal and spatial resolution of WDI in a regional watershed in Taiwan with a hydrological model. Additionally, this study developed a dynamic WDI under climate change scenarios as laid out in IPCC AR5. A case study for assessing benefits in water stress was conducted for substituting use of potable water for toilet flushing with rainwater. The results show that WDI varied greatly throughout the year, thus annual WDI may be a misleading measure for water management. Under climate change scenarios, there are decreasing trends in water stress in Taiwan due to decreasing population in the future. The case study showed that the rainwater harvesting system had significant advantages over using potable water according to the LCA study, due to saving available water and water treatment energy reductions. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:52:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03541204-1.pdf: 4955434 bytes, checksum: 0c00e75bf24609b62eb8c6a9cca470c5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
謝誌 i 摘要 iii ABSTRACT v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 xi 表目錄 xv 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 1.2 研究架構與流程 2 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 淡水資源耗用之生命週期評估方法 5 2.1.1 目標與範疇界定(Goal and Scope Definition) 6 2.1.2 盤查評估(Life Cycle Inventory, LCI) 6 2.1.3 生命週期衝擊評估(Life Cycle Impact Assessment, LCIA) 7 2.1.4 結果闡述(Interpretation) 20 2.2 水文模式及氣候變遷情境模擬工具 20 2.2.1 氣候變遷與水文模擬 21 2.2.2 SWAT水文模式介紹 21 2.2.3 氣候變遷情境 21 2.3雨水回收系統與生命週期評估 23 2.4 臺灣的水資源現況 26 第三章 研究方法 27 3.1生命週期衝擊評估法 27 3.1.1 水消耗指標 27 3.1.2 月尺度水消耗指標 27 3.1.3 未來情境的水消耗指標 30 3.2 SWAT水文模式流量模擬 31 3.2.1 SWAT模式 32 3.2.2 臺北自來水事業處 33 3.2.3 新店溪青潭水源水質水量保護區 33 3.2.4 SWAT模式模擬流程 35 3.2.5 圖層及資料蒐集 36 3.2.6 率定驗證方法 39 3.2.7 氣候變遷情境 40 3.2.8 GCM模式選擇 40 3.2.9 TaiWAP模式 40 3.3 研究案例 41 3.3.1 研究案例背景說明 41 3.3.2 目標與範疇界定 43 3.3.3 盤查分析 46 3.3.4 不確定性分析 51 第四章 結果與討論 53 4.1 SWAT模式流量模擬 53 4.1.1 率定與驗證 53 4.1.2 氣候變遷情境 57 4.1.3 未來流量模擬 62 4.1.4 小結與討論 64 4.2 水壓力指標結果 64 4.2.1 區域水消耗指標結果 64 4.2.2 未來情境之水消耗指標結果 65 4.2.3 小結與討論 68 4.3 研究案例之生命週期評估結果 71 4.3.1 能源使用 71 4.3.2 各情境耗水量 72 4.3.3 淡水消耗衝擊評估結果 74 4.3.4 不確定性分析 77 4.3.5 小結與討論 80 第五章 結論與建議 81 5.1 結論 81 5.2 建議 84 參考文獻 86 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 建立生命週期評估之動態水壓力指標以預估氣候變遷情境之水資源耗用衝擊 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Developing LCA Dynamic Water Stress Indicator for Predicting Water Consumption Impact under Climate Change Scenarios | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 馬鴻文(Hwong-Wen Ma),童慶斌(Ching-Pin Tung),簡士濠(Shih-Hao Jien) | |
dc.subject.keyword | Water Accounting and Vulnerability Evaluation(WAVE)模式,水消耗指標,Soil and Water Assessment Tool(SWAT)模式,特徵因子,雨水回收系統, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Water Accounting and Vulnerability Evaluation (WAVE),Water Depletion Index (WDI),Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT),Characterization Factor,Rainwater Harvesting System, | en |
dc.relation.page | 95 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201600889 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.84 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。