請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50662
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張俊彥 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wan-Yu Chou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 周宛俞 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:51:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2026-07-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 涂金堂(2012)。量表編制與SPSS。台北市:五南。
2. 唐君毅(1994)。中國文化之精神價值。台北:正中書局。 3. 潘朝陽(2005)。心靈、空間、環境:人文主義的地理思想。台北市:五南。 4. 衛生福利部統計處2016)。103年度全民健康保險醫療統計年報。下載日期:2016/01/14。引自:http://www.mohw.gov.tw/CHT/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=5695 5. Ai, D. Z. (1998). Outlines of Feng ShuiThe origin of Chinese architectural anthropology. Taiwan: Garden City Cultural Press. 6. Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley. 7. Atauri, J. A., Bravo, M. A., & Ruiz, A. (2000). Visitors' landscape preferences as a tool for management of recreational use in natural areas: a case study in Sierra de Guadarrama (Madrid, Spain). Landscape Research, 25(1), 49-62. doi:10.1080/014263900113163 8. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27-45. doi:10.1177/1073191105283504 9. Barnes, P. M., Bloom, B., & Nahin, R. L. (2008). Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.methodesurrender.org/docs/art_nhsr_2007.pdf (2015/12/15) 10. Benson, H. (1993). The relaxation response. In D. Goleman & J. Gurin (Eds.), Mind body medicine. How to use your mind for better health (pp. 125-149). New York: OCnsumers Reports Book. 11. Benson, H., & Klipper, M. Z. (2000). The relaxation response. New York: Harper Torch. 12. Bernardi, L., Wdowczyk-Szulc, J., Valenti, C., Castoldi, S., Passino, C., Spadacini, G., & Sleight, P. (2000). Effects of controlled breathing, mental activity and mental stress with or without verbalization on heart rate variability. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 35(6), 1462-1469. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00595-7 13. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M. & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230-241. 14. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848. 15. Callister, R., Suwarno, N. O., & Seals, D. R. (1992). Sympathetic activity is influenced by task difficulty and stress perception during mental challenge in humans. The Journal of Physiology, 454, 373-387. 16. Cannon, W. B. (1939). The wisdom of the body. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 17. Carim-Todd, L., Mitchell, S. H., & Oken, B. S. (2013). Mind–body practices: An alternative, drug-free treatment for smoking cessation? A systematic review of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 132(3), 399-410. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.04.014 18. Chen, J., Saunders, S. C., & Crow, T. R. (1999). Microclimate in forest ecosystem and landscape ecology. BioScience, 49(4), 288-298. 19. Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2011). Mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain: a systematic review of the evidence. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 17(1), 83-93. doi:10.1089/acm.2009.0546 20. Chou, W. Y., Lee, C. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Relationships between urban open spaces and humans' health benefits from an ecological perspective: A study in an urban campus. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 12(2), 255–267. doi:10.1007/s11355-016-0295-5 21. Chrousos, G. P., & Gold, P. W. (1992). The concepts of stress and stress system disorders: overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(9), 1244-1252. 22. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. 23. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15-35). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 24. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row. 25. de la Fuente de Val, G., Atauri, J. A., & de Lucio, J. V. (2006). Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77(4), 393-407. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.003 26. de Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural Environments—Healthy Environments? An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship between Greenspace and Health. Environment and Planning A, 35(10), 1717-1731. doi:10.1068/a35111 27. Dorcasa, A., & Yung, P. (2003). Qigong: Harmonising the breath, the body and the mind. Complementary Therapies in Nursing & Midwifery, 9, 198-202. 28. Dramstad, W. E., Tveit, M. S., Fjellstad, W. J., & Fry, G. L. A. (2006). Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4), 465-474. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006 29. Everly, G. S. & Lating, J. M. (2013). The anatomy and physiology of the human stress response. In G. S. Everly & J. M. Lating (Eds.), A Clinical Guide to the Treatment of the Human Stress Response (pp. 17-51): Springer New York. 30. Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (2010). Evolutionary Influence on Human Landscape Preference. Environment and Behavior, 42(4), 479-493. doi:10.1177/0013916509341244 31. Fisher, B., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Fear in relation to three site features: Prospect, refuge and escape. Environment and Behavior, 24, 35-62. 32. Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Ode, Å., & Velarde, M. D. (2009). The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9(5), 933-947. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.008 33. Gao, D. (1997). Chinese medicine. New York, NY: Thunder's Mouth Press. 34. Gatersleben, B. (2008). Humans and nature; Ten useful findings from environmental psychology research. Counselling Psychology Review, 23(2), 24-34. 35. Gesler, W. M. (2003). Healing places. Oxford, U.K.: Rowman & Littlefield Publischers, Inc. 36. Glacken, C. J. (1982). Reflections on the history of western attitudes to nature. GeoJournal, 26(2), 103-111. doi:10.1007/bf00241203 37. Glacken, C. J. (1999). Reflections on the history of western attitudes to nature. In A. Buttimer & L. Wallin (Eds.), Nature and identity in cross-cultural perspective (Vol. 48, pp. 1-17): Springer Netherlands. 38. Gouveia, M. J., Pais-Ribeiro, J. L., Moreira Marques, M., & Carvalho, C. M. (2012). Validity and reliability of the portuguese version of the dispositional flow scale-2 in exercise. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 21(1), 81-88. 39. Grossman, P., Kappos, L., Gensicke, H., D'Souza, M., Mohr, D. C., Penner, I. K., & Steiner, C. (2010). MS quality of life, depression, and fatigue improve after mindfulness training: a randomized trial. Neurology, 75(13), 1141-1149. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f4d80d 40. Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits. A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 35-43. doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(03)00573-7 41. Gulyasa, A., Ungera, J., & Matzarakisb, A. (2006). Assessment of the microclimatic and human comfort conditions in a complex urban environment: Modelling and measurements. Building and Environment, 41, 1713-1722. 42. Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Weisz, H., & Winiwarter, V. (2004). Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 199-213. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.013 43. Han, K. T. (2007). Responses to Six Major Terrestrial Biomes in Terms of Scenic Beauty, Preference, and Restorativeness. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 529-556. doi:10.1177/0013916506292016 44. Han, K. T., & Sinha, A. (1996). An Empirical Study of Feng-Shui in Landscape. Environments: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 23(3), 36-49. 45. Hartig, T. (1993). Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 25(1–2), 17-36. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(93)90120-3 46. Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109-123. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3 47. Hartig, T., Kaiser, F., & Bowler, P. A. (1997). Further development of a measure of perceived environment restorativeness (Working Paper No.5). Retrieved from 48. Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3-26. 49. Hong, S. K., Song, I. J., & Wu, J. (2007). Fengshui theory in urban landscape planning. Urban Ecosyst, 10, 221-237. 50. Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 17-35. 51. Jacobs, G. D. (2001). The physiology of mind-body interactions: the stress response and the relaxzion response. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 7(Supplement 1), S83-S92. 52. Jeans, D. N. (1974). Changing formulations of the man-environment relationship in Anglo-American geography. Journal of Geography, 73(3), 36-40. doi:10.1080/00221347408985192 53. Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507-542. doi:10.1177/00139160121973115 54. Kaplan, R., & Herbert, E. J. (1987). Cultural and sub-cultural comparisons in preferences for natural settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 281-293. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(87)90040-5 55. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. 56. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. L. (1998). With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature. Washington, DC: Island Press. 57. Kaplan, S. (1983). A model of person-environment compatibility. Environment and Behavior, 15(3), 311-332. doi:10.1177/0013916583153003 58. Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 3-32. doi:10.1177/0013916587191001 59. Kaplan, S. (1988). Perception and landscaper: conceptions and misconceptions. In J. L. Nasar (Ed.), Environmental Aesthetics: theory, research and applications (pp. 45-55). New York: Cambridge University Press. 60. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 61. Kaplan, S. (2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 480-506. doi:10.1177/00139160121973106 62. Kaplan, S., & Peterson, C. (1993). Health and environment: A psychological analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 17-23. 63. Kaufman, A. J., & Lohr, V. I. (2004). Does plant color affect emotional and physiological responses to landscapes? Acta Horticulturae, 639, 229-233. 64. Kearns, R. A., & Gesle, W. M. (1998). Putting health into place: Landscape, identity, and well-being. New York: Syracuse University Press. 65. Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island. Press. 66. Kendall, D. E. (2002). Dao of Chinese medicine: Understanding an ancient healing art. New York: Oxford Univwersity Press. 67. Keng, S.-L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1041-1056. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006 68. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Christian, L., Preston, H., Houts, C. R., Malarkey, W. B., Emery, C. F., & Glaser, R. (2010). Stress, inflammation, and yoga practice. Psychosomatic medicine, 72(2), 113. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181cb9377 69. Korpela, K., & Hartig, T. (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 221-233. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0018 70. Koszycki, D., Benger, M., Shlik, J., & Bradwejn, J. (2007). Randomized trial of a meditation-based stress reduction program and cognitive behavior therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(10), 2518-2526. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.011 71. Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Environment and crime in the Inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33(3), 343-367. doi:10.1177/0013916501333002 72. Kuo, S. (1992). China's pattern of feng shui, its formation, relationship to environment and landscaping. In Q. H. Wang (Ed.), Reseurch of feng shui therory (pp. 26-32). Tanjin: Tanjin University Press. 73. Ledesma, D., & Kumano, H. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and cancer: a meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology, 18(6), 571-579. doi:10.1002/pon.1400 74. Lee, S.-W., Ellis, C. D., Kweon, B.-S., & Hong, S.-K. (2008). Relationship between landscape structure and neighborhood satisfaction in urbanized areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85(1), 60-70. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.013 75. Leitão, A. B., Miller, J., Ahern, J., & McGarigal, K. E. (2005). Measuring landscapes. Washington: Island Press. 76. Lewis, J., & Ritchie, J. (2003). Generalising from qualitative research. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (pp. 263-286). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. 77. Li, X. T., & Zhao, J. (2012). An approach to the nature of qi in TCM - Qi and bioenergy. In H. Kuang (Ed.), Recent Advances in Theories and Practice of Chinese Medicine (pp. 79-108): In Tech. Retrieved from http://www.intechopen.com/books/recent-advances-in-theories-and-practice-of-chinese-medicine/an-approach-to-the-nature-of-qi-in-tcm-qi-and-bioenergy. 78. Liang, S. Y., & Wu, W. C. (1997). Qigong empowerment: A guide to buddhist taoist medical wushu energy cultivation. East Providence, RI: The Way of the Dragon Publishing. 79. Lyons, E. (1983). Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environment and Behavior, 15(4), 487-511. 80. Mak, M. Y., & Ng, S. T. (2005). The art and science of Feng Shui—a study on architects’ perception. Building and Environment, 40(3), 427-434. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.07.016 81. Mak, M. Y., & Ng, S. T. (2008). Feng shui: an alternative framework for complexity in design. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 4(1), 58-72. doi:10.3763/aedm.2008.S307 82. Mak, M. Y., & So, A. T. (2011). Scientific feng shui for the built environment: Fundamentals and case studies. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press. 83. Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. 84. McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure: USDA Forest Service-General. Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. 85. Mealey, L., & Theis, P. (1995). The relationship between mood and preferences among natural landscapes: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(3), 247-256. 86. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 87. Mitchell, R., & Popham, F. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1655-1660. 88. Nasar, J. L., & Fisher, B. (1993). ‘Hot spots’ of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(3), 187-206. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80173-2 89. Nasar, J. L., Fisher, B., & Grannis, M. (1993). Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26(1–4), 161-178. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(93)90014-5 90. Nisbett, R. E. (2004). The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently and Why. New York: The Free Press. 91. Nisbett, R. E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 467-473. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004 92. Norton, W. (2006). Cultural geography : environment, landscape, identities, inequalities (2ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. 93. Ohnishi, S. T., & Ohnishi, T. (2009). Philosophy, psychology, physics and practice of ki. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 6(2), 175-183. 94. Orians, G. H., & Heerwagen, J. H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosrnidcs, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press. 95. Ospina, M. B., Bond, K., Karkhaneh, M., Buscemi, N., Dryden, D. M., Barnes, V., . . . Shannahoff-Khalsa, D. (2008). Clinical trials of meditation practices in health care: characteristics and quality. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 14(10), 1199-1213. doi:10.1089/acm.2008.0307 96. Palmer, J. F. (2004). Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2–3), 201-218. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.010 97. Phillips, L. L. (2005). Examining flow states and motivational perspectives of ashtanga yoga practitioners. (Dissertation), University of Kentucky Retrieved from http://uknowledge.uky.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1339&context=gradschool_diss 98. Purcell, A. T., & Lamb, R. J. (1984). Landscape perception: an examination and empirical investigation of two central issues in the area. Journal of Environmental Management, 19(1), 31-63. 99. Sancier, K. M., & Holman, D. (2004). Multifaceted health benefits of medical Qigong. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 10(1), 163-165. 100. Shih, C. K. (1995). Feng-shui, the Chinese concepts of biological environment : The theories of qi and water. Taipei: Mingwen Shuju. 101. Staats, H., Kieviet, A., & Hartig, T. (2003). Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 147-157. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00112-3 102. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 103. Suh, S. (2005). Theory of materials and energy flow analysis in ecology and economics. Ecological Modelling, 189(3–4), 251-269. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.011 104. Taylor, J. G., Zube, E. H., & Sell, J. L. (1987). Landscape assessment and perception research methods. In R. B. Bechtel & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Methods in Environmental and Behavioral Research (pp. 361-393). New York: Nostrand Reinhold. 105. Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., & Kagawa, T. (2014). The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 1-9. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005 106. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery. Science, 224, 420-421. 107. Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8 108. Ulrich, R. S. (1993.). Biophilia, biophobia and natural landscapes. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. 73-137). Washington DC: Island Press. 109. Ulrich, R. S., & Simons, R. F. (1986). Recovery from stress during exposure to everyday outdoor environments. In J. Wineman, R. Barnes, & C. Zimring (Eds.), The costs of not knowing: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association. Washington, DC.: Environmental Design Research Association. 110. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230. 111. Um, J. S. (2012). Feng-shui theory and practice investigated by spatial regression modeling. In B. M. Alam (Ed.), Application of geographic information systems (pp. 65-82): In Tech. Retrieved from http://www.intechopen.com/books/application-of-geographic-information-systems/feng-shui-theory-and-practice-investigated-by-spatial-regression-modeling. doi:10.5772/47925 112. Uuemaa, E., Mander, Ü., & Marja, R. (2013). Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review. Ecological Indicators, 28, 100-106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.018 113. van Den Berg, A. E., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 79-96. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x 114. van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 135-146. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1 115. West, J., Otte, C., Geher, K., Johnson, J., & Mohr, D. C. (2004). Effects of Hatha yoga and African dance on perceived stress, affect, and salivary cortisol. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 28(2), 114-118. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2802_6 116. West, M. A. (1980). Meditation and the EEG. Psychological Medicine, 10, 369-375. 117. Williams, K. J. H., & Cary, J. (2002). Landscape preferences, ecological quality, and biodiversity protection. Environment and Behavior, 34(2), 257-274. doi:10.1177/0013916502034002006 118. Windhorst, E., & Williams, A. (2015). Growing up, naturally: The mental health legacy of early nature affiliation. Ecopsychology, 7(3), 115-125. 119. Wolsko, C., & Lindberg, K. (2013). Experiencing connection with nature: the matrix of psychological well-being, mindfulness, and outdoor recreation. Ecopsychology, 5(2), 80-91. doi:10.1089/eco.2013.0008 120. Yang, B.-E., & Brown, T. J. (1992). A cross-cultural comparison of preferences for landscape styles and landscape elements. Environment and Behavior, 24, 471-507. 121. Yang, B.-E., & Kaplan, R. (1990). The perception of landscape style: a cross-cultural comparison. Landscape and Urban Planning, 19(3), 251-262. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(90)90024-V 122. Yoon, H. K. (1980). The image of nature in geomancy. GeoJournal, 4(4), 341-348. doi:10.1007/bf00219581 123. Yoon, H. K. (2003). A preliminary attempt to give a birdseye view on the nature of traditional Eastern (Asian) and Western (European) environmental ideas. In E. Ehlers & C. F. Gethmann (Eds.), Environment Across Cultures (pp. 123-142). Springer-Verlag: Berlin & Heidelberg. 124. Yoshinobu, S. (2007). Taoism, medicine and qi in China and Japan. Osaka: Kansai University Press. 125. Yu, K. (1995). Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and Western design experts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32(2), 107-126. 126. Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9(1), 1-33. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50662 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 東西方文化看待人與環境的關係並不盡相同,東方環境觀偏向一元論,認為人與自然屬於一個整體,追求彼此之間的和諧與融合;西方的環境觀點則為二元論,認為人與自然是有明顯界線的兩個對立主體。東西方文化兩種不同的環境觀,不只衍生出各自看待環境的態度與使用自然資源的方式,也可能影響了兩種文化中感知景觀的模式和所從事的活動。
身心運動源自於東方文化傳統思想,著重意念與身體的互動,以及人與環境的和諧,與西方注重身體技能和挑戰環境的休閒運動有所不同。本研究欲以心身運動觀點來探討支持性環境,以瞭解東方文化中健康景觀特徵和景觀知覺。研究分為兩個階段進行,先驗證心身運動的環境需求和景觀特徵,接著進一步分析心身運動支持性環境的景觀知覺模式,以瞭解東方文化的環境知覺觀點。 第一階段研究以量性景觀分析方法探討心身運動支持性環境特徵。結果顯示心身運動者與非心身運動者的環境評估有顯著差異。而在不同土地覆蓋元素中,人工地盤與水體的面積;草地、樹林植栽和水體的塊區分散程度;以及草地、樹林植栽、人工地盤和水體的塊區形狀,皆與心身運動者的環境體驗呈現顯著的相關性。其中,不規則分散分布的草地塊區和樹林植栽、大面積而連續的自然形式水體,皆有助於心身運動者獲得較佳的心流體驗和其他環境體驗。這皆顯示心身運動者偏好較自然、較生態的環境景觀,而這可能與心身運動強調與自然相容合的東方哲學基礎有關。然而,人工地盤卻呈現較特殊的結果,其總面積對心身運動者的心身運動體驗表現有正面的影響,但對恢復性效益和景觀偏好則呈現顯著的負相關。這部分則需進一步的研究以釐清人工鋪面或結構物對心身運動者的影響。 第二階段研究針對資深心身運動者進行深度訪談,分析結果指出心身運動支持性環境所涉及的知覺層面涵蓋不同感官與個人生心理反應,顯示心身運動支持性環境是一種全面性但又相對個人化的知覺模式。本研究從訪談內容中萃取出七項環境知覺因子,分別為:「安全性」、「合一性」、「干擾度」、「生命力」、「循環性」、「時間性」和「象徵意涵」。其中,「安全性」、「合一性」、「干擾度」和「生命力」的部分觀點,雖與西方景觀知覺理論有相似之處,但仍多以東方文化的一元論環境觀為主。而「循環性」、「時間性」與「象徵意涵」等三項因子則是完全的東方文化觀點;「循環性」大多受到風水理論的影響;「時間性」則是呼應了儒家思想強調自然在日夜節期中的變動性,「象徵意涵」則與所有東方哲學和民俗觀點有關。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Eastern and Western cultures hold different perspectives about the relationship between man and nature. Eastern ideas are based on monism which believes man and nature should be regarded as one entity and admire the unity between environment and humanity. In contrast, Western ideas in general are based on the dualism of man and nature which are seen as inherently discrete and against each other. The distinct environmental thoughts in Eastern and Western cultures may cause the difference in environmental perceptions and leisure exercises that benefit health.
Unlike the Western recreational sports focus on physical skills and environmental challenges, mind-body excerises, derived from traditional Eastern thoughts, emphasize on the interaction between mind and body as well as the harmony between human and environment. The current research tries to understand the landscape perceptions in Eastern culture by investigating mind-body exercise supportive environment. There are two studies in this research, not only examining the environmental requirements and landscape characteristics for mind-body exercises, but also analyizing the landscape percption paradigm of mind-body exercises surpportive environment. The research highlights how these traditional thoughts affect mind-body practitioners’ environmental perception. The differences and similarities between Eastern and Western perspectives of landscape percpetions are also discussed. Study 1 examines the explanatory power of monism mind-body exercise in the context of dualism western environmental theories. The results reveal that mind-body practitioners have higher requirements for their exercise environments. Landscape types, especially water-view landscape, would influence mind-body practitioners’ exercise effects. The results also show that practitioners’ environmental experiences are correlated with selected landscape metrics of different land cover types. Fragmented grass and tree patches and large continued water patches have hence positive effects on mind-body practitioners. It reveals that mind-body practitioners prefer more ecological and more natural landscape. However, there is an unexpected result on artificial structure land cover type. The area of artificial structure shows positive relationship with mind-body experience, but has negative correlation to restorativeness and landscape preference. Further studies are needed to clarify the influence of artificial structure. Study 2 approaches Eastern landscape perceptions through qualitative depth interviews with mind-body practitioners. The results extract 7 environmental qualities from interviews: ‘Safety’, ‘Oneness’, ‘Disturbance’, ‘Vitality’, ‘Circulation’, ‘Temporality’, and ‘Symbolic meaning’. Even though some viewpoints of ‘Safety’, ‘Oneness’, ‘Disturbance’ and ‘Vitality’ are similar to Western environmental perception theories, most of these qualities follows Eastern monism environmental thoughts. Particularly, ‘Circulation’, ‘Temporality’, and ‘Symbolic meaning’ are completely based on Eastern ideas. ‘Circulation’ is influenced by Feng Shui theories. ‘Temporality’ responds to the seasonal variability of nature in Confucianism. ‘Symbolic meaning’ is related to all of Eastern philosophies and traditional beliefs | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:51:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-D97628012-1.pdf: 3709825 bytes, checksum: 1cdd8b0b8c7fbdfceaad124fcaf9b5b3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌 謝 iii 摘 要 v Abstract vii 目 錄 ix 圖目錄 xi 表目錄 xiii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節、研究主題與研究目的 5 第三節 研究流程 8 第二章 文獻回顧 11 第一節 東西方文化中人與環境的關係 11 第二節 心身運動(MIND-BODY EXERCISE) 17 第三節 景觀知覺理論 24 第四節 景觀知覺模式 29 第三章 心身運動支持性環境之景觀特徵 33 第一節 前言 33 第二節 研究問題與研究架構 34 第三節 心身運動支持性環境景觀特徵研究方法 36 第四節 心身運動支持性環境景觀特徵研究成果 53 第五節 心身運動支持性環境景觀特徵研究討論 60 第四章 心身運動支持性環境之景觀知覺因子 65 第一節 前言 65 第二節 研究方法 66 第三節 資料分析方法 70 第四節 心身運動者之景觀知覺模式建構 77 第五節 研究討論 92 第五章 結論與建議 97 第一節 結論 97 第二節 建議 102 引用文獻 105 附錄一 非心身運動者研究問卷 113 附錄二 心身運動者研究問卷 117 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 從心身運動觀點探討支持性環境的景觀知覺 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Landscape Perceptions of Supportive Environment From the Perspectives of Mind-Body Exercise | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 侯錦雄,林晏州,張祖亮,歐聖榮,李素馨 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 心身運動,景觀特徵,景觀知覺,支持性環境, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Mind-body exercise,Landscape characteristics,Landscape perceptions,Supportive environment, | en |
dc.relation.page | 121 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601116 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.62 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。