請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50446
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許瑋元(Wei-Yuan Hsu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Szu-Tung Lai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 賴思彤 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:41:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-03 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
KKBOX (2014)。KKBOX 獲新加坡政府投資公司 (GIC) 1.04 億美元資金。取自https://www.kkbox.com/about/zh-tw/news/detail/1327 TechOrange (2015)。 聯發科投資 1.6 億當後盾,EZTABLE 還得安內攘外才能逆風高飛。取自http://buzzorange.com/techorange/2015/01/15/eatable-raised-new-fund/ TWNIC財團法人台灣網路資訊中心 (2015)。台灣寬頻網路使用調查。取自http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20140820e.pdf Yahoo!奇摩新聞(2012)。GOMAJI推線上預約系統。取自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/gomaji%E6%8E%A8%E7%B7%9A%E4%B8%8A%E9%A0%90%E7%B4%84%E7%B3%BB%E7%B5%B1.html 吳碧娥(2015)。看EZTABLE如何靠三階段募資「訂」出年營收5億元的奇蹟!北美智權報。取自http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Industry_Economy/publish-390.htm 呂愛麗(2012)。易訂網〉放大格局,為自己創造就業機會。遠見雜誌,第314期。取自http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_20530_1.html 林欣婕(2015)。愛評網 千萬營收全靠一張「券」。天下雜誌,第565期。取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5063982 林青青(2015)。打造餐廳的商務艙—專訪EZTABLE創辦人陳翰林。有物報告。取自https://yowureport.com/25753/ 胡幼慧主編(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例篇。台北市: 巨流。 袁方主編(2002)。社會研究方法。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 郭芝榕(2016)。EZTABLE獲日本一休網站領投2.87億,目標3到5年在那斯達克上市!數位時代。取自http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/39696 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的硏究。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 陳威如、余卓軒(2013)。平台革命。台北市:商周出版。 曾靉(2016)。全台會員數達120萬,EZTABLE推首間實體門市搶線下商機。數位時代。取自http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/39344 萬文隆(2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育月刊 ,三十七卷第四期。 劉致昕(2011)。七年級菜鳥 說動五星級飯店合作。商業周刊,第1244期。取自http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/KIndepArticle.aspx?ID=19187&pnumber=1 盧沛樺(2015)。EZTABLE轉身金融業。天下雜誌,網路版限定。取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5071681 羅之盈(2011)。【Meet】易訂網EZTABLE─訂到賺錢好位置。數位時代。取自http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/20412 英文部分 Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2001). Internet business models and strategies: Text and cases. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic management journal, 22(6/7), 493. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691. Bhargava, H. K., & Vidyanand Choudhary, R. K. (2000). Pricing and product design: Intermediary strategies in an electronic market. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(1), 37-56. Bonazzi, F., & Zilber, M. A. (2014). Innovation and business model: A case study about integration of innovation funnel and business model Canvas. Review of Business Management, 16(53), 616-637. Chen, J., Zhang, C., & Xu, Y. (2009). The role of mutual trust in building members' loyalty to a C2C platform provider. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14(1), 147-171. Cherif, E., & Grant, D. (2014). Analysis of e-business models in real estate. Electronic Commerce Research, 14(1), 25-50. CNN Money (2015) Uber is now the most valuable startup in the world. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/31/technology/uber-50-billion-valuation/ Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage. Dubosson‐Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). E‐business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(1), 5-23. Economides, N., & Katsamakas, E. (2005). Linux vs. Windows: A comparison of application and platform innovation incentives for open source and proprietary software platforms. NYU, Law and Economics Research Paper, (05-21), 05-07. Edelman, B. (2015). How to Launch Your Digital Platform. Harvard Business Review. Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard business review, 84(10), 92. Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 1270-1285. Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2005). The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms (No. w11603). National Bureau of Economic Research. Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2007). Catalyst code: the strategies behind the world's most dynamic companies. Harvard Business School Press. Gartner (2015) Gartner Survey of More Than 2,900 CIOs Reveals Shift Toward Platform Thinking. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3143018 Geneva (2014). ITU releases 2014 ICT figures Mobile-broadband penetration approaching 32 per cent Three billion Internet users by end of this year. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2014/23.aspx Greiner, M. E., & Wang, H. (2010). Building consumer-to-consumer trust in e-finance marketplaces: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(2), 105-136. Hagiu, A. (2006). Multi-sided platforms: From microfoundations to design and expansion strategies. Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper, (09-115). Hagiu, A. (2007). Merchant or two-sided platform?. Review of Network Economics, 6(2). Hamel, G. (2000). Leading the Revolution. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, MA, USA, 343-354. IDC (2014) IDC Predictions 2015: Accelerating Innovation—and Growth—on the 3rd Platform. Retrieved from http://www.sap.com/bin/sapcom/en_us/downloadasset.2014-12-dec-19-22.idc-predictions-2015-accelerating-innovation--and-growth--on-the-3rd-platform-pdf.bypassReg.html Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard business review, 86(12), 57-68. Kim, K., & Tse, E. (2011). Dynamic competition strategy for online knowledge-sharing platforms. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(1), 41-76. Koh, T. K., & Fichman, M. (2014). Multi-Homing Users’ Preferences for Two-Sided Exchange Networks. Mis Quarterly, 38(4), 977-996. Konczal, E. F. (1975). Models are for managers, not mathematicians. Journal of Systems Management, 26(165), 12-15. Lee, E., & Lee, B. (2012). Herding behavior in online P2P lending: An empirical investigation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 495-503. Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1994). Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 133-150. Lu, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, B. (2010). From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(4), 346-360. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2004). E-Business Strategies and Internet Business Models: How the Internet Adds Value. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 161-173. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86-92. McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2000). The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 284). Harvard Business Press. MIT Sloan (2013) Why platforms beat products every time. Retrieved from http://executive.mit.edu/blogpost/why-platforms-beat-products-every-time#.VwFE_KR942x Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons. Pagani, M., & Mirabello, A. (2011). The influence of personal and social-interactive engagement in social TV web sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 41-68. Parker, G., & Alstyne, M. V. (2008). Managing platform ecosystems. ICIS 2008 Proceedings, 53. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods . SAGE Publications, inc. Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information systems research, 15(1), 37-59. Pedersen, E. R. G., & Netter, S. (2015). Collaborative consumption: Business model opportunities and barriers for fashion libraries. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 19(3), 25 Pelaez, A., Yu, M. Y., & Lang, K. R. (2013). Social buying: the effects of group size and communication on buyer performance. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(2), 127-157. Permatasari, A., & Dhewanto, W. (2013). Business model innovation towards competitive advantage: Case study in indonesian cosmetics and herbal health companies. Information Management and Business Review, 5(8), 385-393. Rochet, J. C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two‐sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990-1029. Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., & Linder, J. C. (2005). The power of business models. Business horizons, 48(3), 199-207. Stefan, S., & Richard, B. (2014). Case study: Analysis of business models and their innovations. Advances in Management, 7(6), 39-53. Tan, B., Pan, S. L., Lu, X., & Huang, L. (2015). The Role of IS Capabilities in the Development of Multi-Sided Platforms: The Digital Ecosystem Strategy of Alibaba. com. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(4), 248. Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic markets, 8(2), 3-8. Weill, P., & Vitale, M. (2001). Place to space: Migrating to eBusiness Models. Harvard Business Press. Yum, H., Lee, B., & Chae, M. (2012). From the wisdom of crowds to my own judgment in microfinance through online peer-to-peer lending platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 469-483. Zhu, F., & Iansiti, M. (2007). Dynamics of platform competition: Exploring the role of installed base, platform quality and consumer expectations. Division of Research, Harvard Business School. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50446 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來由於資訊科技的發達,人們的生活與網路的關係越來越緊密。企業紛紛發展出不同的網路平台商業模式,提供消費者創新的服務體驗。網路平台具有快速複製、大量傳播與大幅降低經營成本的特性,加上平台本身的網路效應,使得網路平台迅速擴張,不僅讓企業獲取大量的利潤,也對許多傳統產業造成威脅。因此,如何設計網路平台的商業模式,幫助企業在變化快速的環境中維持公司的競爭優勢,對於新創公司或是傳統產業而言,都是相當重要的議題。
過往平台相關的文獻包含概念性論述、使用者層面以及生態系統層面。使用者層面的研究主要在探討顧客願意使用網路平台的意圖與行為;生態系統層面的文獻則大多在探討訂價策略的制定與平台生態圈的管理。這些文獻並沒有對網路平台的商業模式進行探討。因此本研究以台灣知名的線上餐廳訂位平台EZTABLE作為實例,透過訪談與次級資料蒐集進行個案分析,深入探討網路平台的創新商業模式。 研究結果發現,商業模式要素中的價值主張、目標客群、關鍵合作夥伴是網路平台能否成功的關鍵。由於不同地區之間的文化差異,不論是新創公司或力圖轉型的傳統企業,都應該實際觀察當地的需求與環境特性,事先進行商業模式的規劃,以了解企業營運的獲利來源,並且配合外在環境的改變做出適當的調整。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With the rapid development of information technology, Internet has already become a part of our daily life. Many enterprises develop platform-based business models to provide innovative customers service experience. Internet platforms have the feature of reproducing and transmitting easily, and also have lower operating costs compared to physical platforms. Besides, the network effect makes the platform expand rapidly, which helps enterprises gain lots of revenue. At the same time, Internet platforms also pose a threat to traditional industries. Therefore, it is an important issue to understand how to design platform-based business models.
Prior studies on platforms focused on three dimensions: conceptual studies, user behavior and ecosystem. There were very limited studies analyzing business models of Internet platforms. Hence, this research aims to conduct a case study on one Taiwan famous online restaurant-reservation platform EZTABLE, to investigate its innovative platform-based business model. The empirical results indicate that value propositions, customer segments, and key partnerships are key success factors of Internet platforms. Because of the cultural difference, a business model may succeed in some countries but fail in others. Thus, enterprises should observe and plan carefully in advance to organize resources effectively and adjust quickly with the change of environment. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:41:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03725001-1.pdf: 1732113 bytes, checksum: 5b19eb7a4cf0542130c19c1b0a3d1eab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 v 表目錄 v 第一章 導論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 2 第三節 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 平台介紹 5 第二節 平台相關文獻 7 第三章 研究架構 18 第一節 商業模式 18 第二節 商業模式圖之應用 26 第四章 研究方法 29 第一節 質性研究 29 第二節 個案研究法 31 第三節 研究對象 32 第五章 訪談分析 36 第一節 受訪對象描述 36 第二節 商業模式圖分析 36 第六章 討論與研究意涵 48 第一節 討論 48 第二節 研究貢獻 53 第三節 後續研究建議 55 參考文獻 56 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 網路平台之創新商業模式─以EZTABLE為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Innovative Platform-based Business Model-A Case Study of EZTABLE | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 孔令傑,張欣綠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 網路平台,商業模式,商業模式圖,平台策略, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Internet platform,business model,business model canvas,platform strategy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 61 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601408 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.69 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。