請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5031完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Huan-Yu Shiu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許桓瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-15T17:51:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-08-26 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-15T17:51:07Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.Amores, M.J., Meneses, M., Pasqualino, J., Anton, A. and Castells, F. (2013) Environmental assessment of urban water cycle on Mediterranean conditions by LCA approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 43(0), 84-92.
2.Barrios, R., Siebel, M., van der Helm, A., Bosklopper, K. and Gijzen, H. (2008) Environmental and financial life cycle impact assessment of drinking water production at Waternet. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(4), 471-476. 3.Bravo, L. and Ferrer, I. (2011 ) Life Cycle Assessment of an intensive sewage treatment plant in Barcelona (Spain) with focus on energy aspects. Water Science & Technology 64, 440–447. 4.Buonocore, E., Franzese, P.P., Mellino, S., Ulgiati, S., Viglia, S. and Zucaro, A. (2009) Energy and LCA evaluation of the present dynamics of investigated case studies. 5.Chen, Z., Ngo, H.H. and Guo, W. (2012) A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes. Science of The Total Environment 426(0), 13-31. 6.Corominas, L., Foley, J., Guest, J.S., Hospido, A., Larsen, H.F., Morera, S. and Shaw, A. (2013) Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: State of the art. Water Research 47(15), 5480-5492. 7.Doka, G., (2009) Wastewater Treatment. Life cycle Inventories on Waste Treatment. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf (Switzerland). 8.Foley, J., de Haas, D., Hartley, K. and Lant, P. (2010) Comprehensive life cycle inventories of alternative wastewater treatment systems. Water Research 44(5), 1654-1666. 9.Gallego, A., Hospido, A., Moreira, M.T. and Feijoo, G. (2008) Environmental performance of wastewater treatment plants for small populations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52(6), 931-940. 10.Heijungs, R., Suh, S. and Kleijn, R. (2005) Numerical Approaches to Life Cycle Interpretation - The case of the Ecoinvent’96 database (10 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(2), 103-112. 11.Hong, J., Hong, J., Otaki, M. and Jolliet, O. (2009) Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan. Waste Management 29(2), 696-703. 12.Hospido, A., Moreira, M. and Feijoo, G. (2008) A comparison of municipal wastewater treatment plants for big centres of population in Galicia (Spain). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(1), 57-64. 13.Hospido, A., Moreira, M., Fernandez-Couto, M. and Feijoo, G. (2004) Environmental performance of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(4), 261-271. 14.Hospido, A., Moreira, T., Martin, M., Rigola, M. and Feijoo, G. (2005) Environmental Evaluation of Different Treatment Processes for Sludge from Urban Wastewater Treatments: Anaerobic Digestion versus Thermal Processes (10 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(5), 336-345. 15.Houillon, G. and Jolliet, O. (2005) Life cycle assessment of processes for the treatment of wastewater urban sludge: energy and global warming analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 13(3), 287-299. 16.Huijbregts, M.J. (1998) Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3(5), 273-280. 17.ISO (2006) ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management-Life cycle assessment Principles and Framework. Standardization, I.O.f. (ed). 18.Kalbar, P.P., Karmakar, S. and Asolekar, S.R. (2013) Assessment of wastewater treatment technologies: life cycle approach. Water and Environment Journal 27(2), 261-268. 19.Leverenz, H.L., Tchobanoglous, G. and Asano, T. (2011 ) Direct potable reuse: a future imperative. Water Reuse and Desalination 10-12. 20.Levine, A.D. and Asano, T. (2004) Peer Reviewed: Recovering Sustainable Water from Wastewater. Environmental Science & Technology 38(11), 201A-208A. 21.Lundin M. (2003) Indicators for Measuring the Sustainability of Urban Water Systems - A Life Cycle Approach. Doctoral Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2-26. 22.Lundie, S., Peters, G.M. and Beavis, P.C. (2004) Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Metropolitan Water Systems Planning. Environmental Science & Technology 38(13), 3465-3473. 23.Lyons, E., Zhang, P., Benn, T., Sharif, F., Li, K., Crittenden, J., Costanza, M. and Chen Y, S. (2009) Life cycle assessment of three water supply systems: importation, reclamation and desalination. Water science and technology: water supply (Print) 9(4), 439-448. 24.Maurice, B., Frischknecht, R., Coelho-Schwirtz, V. and Hungerbuhler, K. (2000) Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production 8(2), 95-108. 25.Meneses, M., Pasqualino, J.C. and Castells, F. (2010) Environmental assessment of urban wastewater reuse: Treatment alternatives and applications. Chemosphere 81(2), 266-272. 26.Mo, W. and Zhang, Q. (2013) Energy–nutrients–water nexus: Integrated resource recovery in municipal wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Environmental Management 127(0), 255-267. 27.Munoz, I., Rodriguez, A., Rosal, R. and Fernandez-Alba, A.R. (2009) Life Cycle Assessment of urban wastewater reuse with ozonation as tertiary treatment: A focus on toxicity-related impacts. Science of The Total Environment 407(4), 1245-1256. 28.Murray, A., Horvath, A. and Nelson, K.L. (2008) Hybrid Life-Cycle Environmental and Cost Inventory of Sewage Sludge Treatment and End-Use Scenarios: A Case Study from China. Environmental Science & Technology 42(9), 3163-3169. 29.Pasqualino, J.C., Meneses, M., Abella, M. and Castells, F. (2009) LCA as a Decision Support Tool for the Environmental Improvement of the Operation of a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant. Environmental Science & Technology 43(9), 3300-3307. 30.Pasqualino, J.C., Meneses, M. and Castells, F. (2011) Life Cycle Assessment of Urban Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse Alternatives. Journal of Industrial Ecology 15(1), 49-63. 31.Remy, C., Lesjean, B. and Waschnewski, J. (2013) Identifying energy and carbon footprint optimization potentials of a sludge treatment line with Life Cycle Assessment. Water Science & Technology 67(1), 63-73. 32.Renou, S., Thomas, J.S., Aoustin, E. and Pons, M.N. (2008) Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(10), 1098-1105. 33.Rodriguez-Garcia, G., Molinos-Senante, M., Hospido, A., Hernandez-Sancho, F., Moreira, M.T. and Feijoo, G. (2011) Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants. Water Research 45(18), 5997-6010. 34.Sala, L. and Serra, M. (2004) Towards sustainability in water recycling. Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research 50(2), 1-8. 35.Stokes, J. and Horvath, A. (2006) Life Cycle Energy Assessment of Alternative Water Supply Systems (9 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(5), 335-343. 36.Suh, Y.-J. and Rousseaux, P. (2002) An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 35(3), 191-200. 37.Tangsubkul, N., Parameshwaran, K., Lundie, S., Fane, A.G. and Waite, T.D. (2006) Environmental life cycle assessment of the microfiltration process. Journal of Membrane Science 284(1–2), 214-226. 38.Zhang, Q.H., Wang, X.C., Xiong, J.Q., Chen, R. and Cao, B. (2010) Application of life cycle assessment for an evaluation of wastewater treatment and reuse project – Case study of Xi’an, China. Bioresource Technology 101(5), 1421-1425. 39.洪明龍(2000)。家庭廚餘與下水污泥共同堆肥之資源化研究。碩士論文，國立台灣大學，台北市。 40.羅時麒(2005)。以系統性機率模式鑑定量化與整合生命週期評估之不確定性。碩士論文，國立臺灣大學，台北市。 41.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2005)。金門地區供水改善規劃。 42.金門縣政府(2006)。金門縣綜合發展計畫暨離島綜合實施方案。 43.金門縣政府(2007)。金門縣第二期離島綜合建設實施方案。 44.行政院農業委員會農糧署(2008)。肥料管理法規彙編。 45.台灣省自來水公司(2008)。屏東所快濾池操作維護作業報告。 46.楊英賢(2008)。生命週期評估與不確定性分析應用於火力電廠與燃料選擇。博士論文，國立成功大學，台南市。 47.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2009a)。廢污水廠放流水再利用潛勢及推動策略。 48.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2009b)。金門地區水再生利用規劃及試辦計畫。 49.黃淑君，張振章(2010)。國內外再生水應用於產業之介紹，永續產業發展，50，69-74。 50.歐陽嶠暉(2011)。下水道工程學(水環境再生工程學)。長松文化興業股份有限公司。 51.經濟部水利署(2011)。自來水事業碳足跡評估與減碳策略之先期研究。 52.經濟部能源局(2011)。100年能源統計手冊。 53.內政部營建署(2011)。污水處理廠節能規劃手冊，光宇工程顧問股份有限公司。 54.金門縣自來水廠(2012)。金門縣自來水廠統計年報。 55.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2012)。淨水廠供水水質改善最適對策評估研究-以金門自來水廠為例。 56.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2013)。金門地區整體供水改善綱要計畫。經濟 57.謝佑昀(2013)。土地利用之生命週期衝擊評估工具開發，碩士論文，國立台灣大學，台北市。 58.行政院環保署(2014)。污泥處理現況檢討及因應策略。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5031 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 污水處理廠是城市水管理的重要基礎，過去多著重於處理效率、操作維護便利及周遭環境影響，相對於能源使用、藥品投入以及廢棄物的產生等其它亦可能會造成環境衝擊之面向較少分析。本研究以金門地區金城污水處理廠作為研究案例，利用生命週期評估方法，將污水廠分為水處理系統及污泥處理系統，量化污水處理廠對環境之衝擊。亦針對金門地區污水與污泥再利用方案進行評估與分析，污水處理系統包含再生水應用於農業、再生水應用於城市；污泥處理系統包含污泥應用於農業、污泥焚化後能源回收以及污泥焚化後灰燼作為建材再利用。
本研究選用生命週期評估軟體SimaPro 7.1，盤查金城污水處理廠營運數據以及文獻報告，使用軟體內建Ecoinvent資料庫建立盤查清單，經由CML 2 baseline 2000衝擊評估方法量化污水廠之環境衝擊，最後針對研究結果進行敏感度分析及蒙地卡羅計算不確定性。 結果顯示，能源選用對污水廠有最顯著的影響，金城地區使用重油發電，占總衝擊之79%。再生水應用於城市時，雖然需增加三級處理系統，進而增加了55%之環境衝擊，但應用於城市時可減少原淨水處理所產生之環境衝擊，比起無再利用具有50%之環境效益。污泥處理系統方面，目前以掩埋方式處置，處理程序中仍以電力消耗為最主要之衝擊；污泥應用於農業可減少甲烷、一氧化二氮及硫氧化物生成，特別是全球暖化類別，可增加54%之環境效益；污泥經焚化處理所產生之衝擊最高，然而焚化後能源回收再利用，反而可減少86%之環境衝擊；污泥作為建材再利用，也考量焚化程序產生之能源再利用時，是環境衝擊最低的。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Waste water treatment plants are an important foundation for urban water management. While there has been greater emphasis on the efficiency, convenience in operation, maintenance, and overall environmental impacts, energy and chemical input, as well as waste emission also cause significant environmental effects.
Life cycle assessment is used to evaluate the environmental benefits and impacts associated with the treatment of a wastewater treatment plant in Kinmen, Taiwan. The objective of this study is to compare the current treatment process with several other proposed advanced treatment processes. The system boundary of the present LCA includes operation and maintenance phase, sludge treatment and disposal, and water reuse. In this study, life cycle assessment software SimaPro 7.1 and CML 2 baseline 2000 methodology were applied to evaluate functional units of 1 m3 treated water. The results show that energy has the most significant impact on environment, with a total impact of 79%. Recycled water used in agriculture, on the other hand, has the most significant benefits. While tertiary treatment systems will increase environmental impact by 55%, using recycled water in the city also increases environmental benefits by 50%. Similarly, in the sludge treatment system, power consumption is the most significant factor responsible for environmental impacts. Sludge used in agriculture can reduce methane, nitrous oxide and sulfur oxide formation, thereby increasing environmental benefits by 54%. Impact of sludge generated by incineration, as well as energy recycling, can reduce overall environmental impact by 86%. Sludge as a building material is the highest among impact scenarios. Finally, to further reduce the environmental impact arising from sewage treatment plants, energy is chosen as the first priority. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-15T17:51:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01541212-1.pdf: 3543987 bytes, checksum: 6b60c24165f45d44d3b569f1c7a363e1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract II 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究流程與架構 2 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 一般污水處理廠處理程序 5 2.2 污水與污泥再利用 6 2.2.1 污水再利用 6 2.2.2 污泥再利用 9 2.3 生命週期評估 12 2.3.1 生命週期評估方法簡介 12 2.3.2 污水處理之生命週期評估 14 2.3.5生命週期評估之敏感度分析與不確定性分析 23 2.4 研究案例 25 2.4.1 金門地區水資源概況 25 2.4.2 金城污水處理廠簡介 28 第三章 研究方法 31 3.1 生命週期評估方法 31 3.1.1 目標與範疇界定 31 3.1.2 盤查分析 35 3.1.3 衝擊評估方法 49 3.1.4 敏感度分析 52 3.1.5不確定性分析 52 第四章 結果與討論 54 4.1 生命週期評估結果 54 4.2 生命週期評估結果之綜合討論 70 4.3 敏感度分析 74 4.4 不確定性分析 80 第五章 結論與建議 85 參考文獻 88 附錄 95 附錄A 中國大陸農田灌溉水質標準(旱作) 95 附錄B 盤查清單之統計資料 96 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 污水處理廠 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 污水再利用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 污泥再利用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Sludge reuse | en |
| dc.subject | Waste water treatment | en |
| dc.subject | Life cycle assessment | en |
| dc.subject | Water reuse | en |
| dc.title | 都市污水處理廠之生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Life Cycle Assessment of a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 駱尚廉,劉雅瑄,胡景堯 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 污水處理廠,生命週期評估,污水再利用,污泥再利用, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Waste water treatment,Life cycle assessment,Water reuse,Sludge reuse, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 108 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 環境工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf | 3.46 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。