請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50218
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsueh-Han Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃雪菡 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:32:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-24 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 史麗珠、林莉華編譯,Jan W. Kuzma著,(2006),基礎生物統計學,台北市:學富文化。
2. 吳珮竹,(2011),性格特質對地方連結之影響,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學研究所,臺北。 3. 林家五,王悅縈、胡宛仙,(2012),真誠領導與仁慈領導對組織公民行為及主管忠誠之差異效果,本土心理學研究,38,205-256。 4. 林裕強、陳美芳、楊庭芳,(2013),探討文化遺產真實性對旅遊忠誠度之影響,區域與社會發展研究,4,317-335。 5. 郭蕙瑜、鄭佳昆、沈立,(2013),運用景觀元素探討生長經驗對延續地方連結之影響,建築學報,86,145-167。 6. 陳瑩育,(2007),舞台化真實性應用於老街觀光意象之研究-以台南新化老街為例,碩士論文,私立逢甲大學,臺中。 7. 黃國富,(2015),在傳統與現代性迻譯之間的媒介實踐:新加坡《叻報》的萌芽與開展(1881∼1911),傳播研究與實踐 ,5(2),155-192。 8. 黃雪菡、鄭佳昆,(2015),景觀典型性對未曾造訪過地方情感連結之影響,第十七屆休閒、遊憩、觀光學術研討會暨國際論壇論文集,國立暨南國際大學。 9. 劉育成、曹家榮,(2013),從「道地」到「對道地的想像」:媒介社會中一種社會自我觀察的可能起點,政治與社會哲學評論,46,37-79。 10. 鄭佳昆、郭蕙瑜,(2014),與未造訪過地點之地方連結發展探討,地理學報,73,29-52。 11. 遲恒昌,(2009),道地?泰國餐廳在台北的食物地理學,文化研究月報,89,1-8。 12. 戴有德、李安娜、呂文博、陳冠仰、楊純瑋,(2014),襲產觀光遊客環境負責任行為前置變數之研究:以真實性, 懷舊情感與場所依戀觀點探討之,戶外遊憩研究,27(4),59-91。 13. 戴有德、林濰榕、陳冠仰,(2010),襲產觀光中的懷舊情感是否需要真實性? 兼論解說之調節角色,戶外遊憩研究,23(3),61-86。 14. 龔彥君、沈立、鄭佳昆,(2011),探討遊客環境認知之真實性差異,第十三屆休閒、遊憩、觀光學術研討會暨國際論壇論文集,世新大學。 15. Assiouras, I., Liapati, G., Kouletsis, G., & Koniordos, M. (2015). The impact of brand authenticity on brand attachment in the food industry. British Food Journal, 117(2), 538-552. 16. Beckley, T. M. (2003). The relative importance of sociocultural and ecological factors in attachment to place. In L. E. Kruger (Ed.), understanding community-forest relation (Vol. PNW-GTR-566, pp. 105-126). Portland, Oregon: U.S.Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 17. Beckley, T. M., Stedman, R. C., Wallace, S. M., & Ambard, M. (2007). Snapshots of what matters most: Using resident-employed photography to articulate attachment to place. Society & Natural Resources, 20(10), 913-929. 18. Berger, P. L. (1973). Sincerity and authenticity in modern society. The Public Interest, 31, 81-90. 19. Blake, K. S. (2002). Colorado Fourteeners and the Nature of Place Identity. Geographical Review, 92(2), 155-179. 20. Boğaç, C. (2009). Place attachment in a foreign settlement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 267-278. 21. Bolan, M. (1997). The mobility experience and neighborhood attachment. Demography, 34(2), 225-237. 22. Bott, S., Cantrill, J. G., & Olin Eugene Myers, J. (2003). Place and the promise of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 100-112. 23. Boynton, L. L. (1986). The effect of tourism on Amish quilting design. Annals of Tourism Research, 13(3), 451-465. 24. Brandenburga, A. M., & Carrollb, M. S. (1995). Your place or mine?:The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society & Natural Resources, 8(5), 381-398. 25. Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2002). An interpretation of special place meanings whitewater recreationists attach to the South Fork of the American River. Tourism Geographies, 4(4), 396-425. 26. Bruner, E. M. (1989). Tourism, creativity, and authenticity. Studies in symbolic interaction, 10(1), 109-114. 27. Bruner, E. M. (1991). Transformation of self in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 18(2), 238-250. 28. Burke, P. J. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 18-29. 29. Castéran, H., & Roederer, C. (2013). Does authenticity really affect behavior? The case of the Strasbourg Christmas Market. Tourism management, 36, 153-163. 30. Cheng, A. S., Kruger, L. E., & Daniels, S. E. (2003). ' Place' as an Integrating Concept in Natural Resource Politics: Propositions for a Social Science Research Agenda. Society &Natural Resources, 16(2), 87-104. 31. Cheng, C. K. (2007). Understanding visual preferences for landscapes: an examination of the relationship between aesthetics and emotional bonding. (Ph. D.), Texas A&M University. 32. Cheng, C. K., & Kuo, H. Y. (2015). Bonding to a new place never visited: Exploring the relationship between landscape elements and place bonding. Tourism management, 46, 546-560. 33. Clark, J. K., & Stein, T. V. (2003). Incorporating the natural landscape within an assessment of community attachment. Forest science, 49(6), 867-876. 34. Cohen, E. (1979). A phenomenology of tourist experiences. Sociology, 13(2), 179-201. 35. Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15(3), 371-386. 36. Cohen, E. (1989). Primitive and remote: Hill tribe trekking in Thailand. Annals of Tourism Research, 16(1), 30-61. 37. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of applied psychology, 78(1), 98. 38. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2011). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval, 10, 7. 39. Cuba, L., & Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community, and region. sociological quarterly, 34(1), 111-131. 40. Culler, J. (1981). Semiotics of tourism. The American Journal of Semiotics, 1(1/2), 127-140. 41. Dale, A., Ling, C., & Newman, L. (2008). Does place matter? Sustainable community development in three Canadian communities. Ethics Place and Environment, 11(3), 267-281. 42. Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method (Vol. RM-RP-167, pp. 66). Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service. 43. Debenedetti, A., Oppewal, H., & Arsel, Z. (2014). Place attachment in commercial settings: A gift economy perspective. Journal of consumer research, 40(5), 904-923. 44. Droseltis, O., & Vignoles, V. L. (2010). Towards an integrative model of place identification: Dimensionality and predictors of intrapersonal-level place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 23-34. 45. Farnum, J., Hall, T., & Kruger, L. E. (2005). Sense of place in natural resource recreation and tourism: An evaluation and assessment of research findings (Vol. PNW-GTR-660). Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 46. Feldman, R. M. (1990). Settlement-identity: psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society. Environment and Behavior, 22(2), 183-229. 47. Franklin, A. (2003). Tourism: An introduction. In A. Franklin (Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 48. Galliano, S. J., & Loeffler, G. M. (1999). Place assessment: How people define ecosystems. In T. M. Quigley (Ed.), (Vol. PNW-GTR-462, pp. 31). Portland, Oregon: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station. 49. Gaver, W. W., & Mandler, G. (1987). Play it again, Sam: On liking music. Cognition and Emotion, 1(3), 259-282. 50. Giuliani, M. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee & M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 137-170). Burlington, VT: Ashgate. 51. Giuliani, M. V., & Feldman, R. (1993). Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 267-267. 52. Golomb, J., & Copleston, F. C. (1995). In Search of Authenticity: From Kierkegaard to Camus. A History of Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge. Continuum. 53. Grayson, K., & Martinec, R. (2004). Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality and their influence on assessments of authentic market offerings. Journal of consumer research, 31(2), 296-312. 54. Gross, M. J., & Brown, G. (2008). An empirical structural model of tourists and places: Progressing involvement and place attachment into tourism. Tourism management, 29(6), 1141-1151. 55. Hagerhall, C. (2001). Consensus in landscape preference judgements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 83-92. 56. Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2004). Past use history and place bonding among avid trout anglers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2003 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. 57. Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2006). Place bonding for recreation places: Conceptual and empirical development. Leisure studies, 25(1), 17-41. 58. Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 5-29. 59. Herzog, T. R., & Stark, J. L. (2004). Typicality and preference for positively and negatively valued environmental settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 85-92. 60. Hou, J.-S., Lin, C.-H., & Morais, D. B. (2005). Antecedents of attachment to a cultural tourism destination: The case of Hakka and non-Hakka Taiwanese visitors to Pei-Pu, Taiwan. Journal of Travel Research, 44(2), 221-233. 61. Hummon, D. M. (1992). Community attachment. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Human Behavior and Environment (pp. 253-278). New York: Plenum. 62. Jacques, D. (1980). Landscape appraisal: The case for a subjective theory. Journal of environmental management, 10, 107-113. 63. Jones, C. D., Patterson, M. E., & Hammitt, W. E. (2000). Evaluating the construct validity of sense of belonging as a measure of landscape perception. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(4), 383-395. 64. Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 233-248. 65. Kaltenborn, B. P., & Williams, D. R. (2002). The meaning of place: Attachments to Femundsmarka National Park, Norway, among tourists and locals. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 56(3), 189-198. 66. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. 67. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004). Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 213-225. 68. Kyle, G. T., Absher, J. D., & Graefe, A. R. (2003). The moderating role of place attachment on the relationship between attitudes toward fees and spending preferences. Leisure Sciences, 25(1), 33-50. 69. Kyle, G. T., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. (2004). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 439-454. 70. Langbein, L. I., & Felbinger, C. L. (2006). Designing useful surveys for evaluation Public program evaluation: a statistical guide. (pp. 192-217). Armonk, Ny: M. E. Sharpe. 71. Larson, R., Delespaul, P., & deVries, M. (1992). Analyzing experience sampling data: A guidebook for the perplexed. In M. W. d. Vries (Ed.), The experience of psychopathology: Investigating mental disorders in their natural settings (pp. 58-78). New York: Cambridge University Press. 72. Lau, R. W. (2010). Revisiting authenticity: A social realist approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(2), 478-498. 73. Lee, J. (2003). Examining the antecedents of loyalty in a forest setting: Relationships among service quality, satisfaction, activity involvement, place attachment, and destination loyalty. (Ph.D Unpublished Dissertation), The Pennsylvania State University. 74. Lewicka, M. (2008). Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 209-231. 75. Lewicka, M. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 35-51. 76. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207-230. 77. Littrell, M. A. (1990). Symbolic significance of textile crafts for tourists. Annals of Tourism Research, 17(2), 228-245. 78. Littrell, M. A., Anderson, L. F., & Brown, P. J. (1993). What makes a craft souvenir authentic? Annals of Tourism Research, 20(1), 197-215. 79. Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment (pp. 1-12). New York: Plenum. 80. Lowenthal, D. (1978). Finding valued landscapes. Progress in Human Geography, 2(3), 373-418. 81. MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589-603. 82. MacCannell, D. (1976). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. California: Univ of California Press. 83. Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. New York: WW Norton 84. Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 67-86. 85. Manzo, L. C., & Devine-Wright, P. (Eds.). (2014). Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Routledge. P.28 86. Mayer, Á. Z. (2011). Place identity and place replication: An Indian ethnic enclave in the UK. Paper presented at the 3rd Global Conference: Strangers, Aliens & Foreigners e A Diversity and Recognition Project, Mansfield College, Oxford, UK. 87. McAndrew, F. T. (1998). The Measurement of rootedness and the prediction of attachment to home-towns in college students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(4), 409-417. 88. McCool, S. F., & Martin, S. R. (1994). Community attachment and attitudes toward tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 32(3), 29-34. 89. Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 504-519. 90. Metro-Roland, M. (2009). Interpreting meaning: An application of Peircean semiotics to tourism. Tourism Geographies, 11(2), 270-279. 91. Milligan, M. J. (1998). Interactional past and potential: The social construction of place attachment. Symbolic interaction, 21(1), 1-33. 92. Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail‐trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17-31. 93. Moore, R. L., & Scott, D. (2003). Place attachment and context: Comparing a park and a trail within. Forest science, 49(6), 877-884. 94. Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 11-22. 95. Ng, C. F. (1998). Canada as a new place: the immigrant’s experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 55-67. 96. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1978). The measurement of meaning. 1957. Urbana: University of Illinois press. 97. Pearce, P. L., & Moscardo, G. M. (1986). The concept of authenticity in tourist experiences. Journal of Sociology, 22(1), 121-132. 98. Peirce, & Sanders, C. (1998). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard Univirsity Press. 99. Peirce, C. S., & Houser, N. (1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2): Indiana University Press. 100. Peron, E., Purcell, A. T., Staats, H., Falchero, S., & Lamb, R. (1998). Models of preference for outdoor scenes some experimental evidence. Environment and Behavior, 30(3), 282-305. 101. Powell, M., & Rishbeth, C. (2012). Flexibility in place and meanings of place by first generation migrants. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 103, 69-84. 102. Prayag, G., & Ryan, C. (2012). Antecedents of tourists’ loyalty to Mauritius The role and influence of destination image, place attachment, personal involvement, and satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research, 51(3), 342-356. 103. Pretty, G. H., Chipuer, H. M., & Bramston, P. (2003). Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 273-287. 104. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57-83. 105. Purcell, A. (1992). Abstract and specific physical attributes and the experience of landscape. Journal of environmental management, 34(3), 159-177. 106. Purcell, A. (1993). Relations between preference and typicality in the experience of paintings. Leonardo, 26(3), 235-241. 107. Purcell, A. T. (1986). Environmental Perception and Affect A Schema Discrepancy Model. Environment and Behavior, 18(1), 3-30. 108. Purcell, A. T., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Experiencing other people's houses: A model of similarities and differences in environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(3), 199-211. 109. Reisinger, Y., & Steiner, C. J. (2006). Reconceptualizing object authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(1), 65-86. 110. Revilla, G., & Dodd, T. H. (2003). Authenticity perceptions of Talavera pottery. Journal of Travel Research, 42, 94-99. 111. Riley, R. B. (1992). Attachment to the ordinary landscape Place attachment (pp. 13-35): Springer US. 112. Roberts, E. (1996). Place and spirit in public land management. In B. L. Driver (Ed.), Nature and the human spirit: Toward an expanded land management ethic (pp. 61-80). State College, PA: Venture. 113. Rowe, J. S. (1990). Home place:essays on ecology. Edmonton: NeWest. 114. Selwyn, T. (1996). The tourist image: myths and myth making in tourism. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. 115. Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum, 22(3), 347-358. 116. Sharpley, R., & Jepson, D. (2011). Rural tourism: A spiritual experience? Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 52-71. 117. Shumaker, S. A., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). Toward a clarification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place. New York: Praeger. 118. Silver, I. (1993). Marketing authenticity in third world countries. Annals of Tourism Research, 20(2), 302-318. 119. Sime, J. D. (1986). Creating places or designing spaces? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(1), 49-63. 120. Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561-581. 121. Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction?: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society &Natural Resources, 16(8), 671-685. 122. Stedman, R. C. (2006). Understanding place attachment among second home owners. American behavioral scientist, 50(2), 187-205. 123. Steele, F. (1981). The sense of place. Boston: CBI 124. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 441-488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 125. Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1985). Attachment to place: Discriminant validity, and impacts of disorder and diversity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(5), 525-542. 126. Tibbels, S. B. (1990). Contextual fit of residential structures in forested landscapes. (masters), The University of Arizona. 127. Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia:A study of environmental perception. attitudes, and values. New York: Columbia University Press. 128. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 129. Tuan, Y.-F. (1980). Rootedness and sense of place. Landscape, 24, 3-8. 130. Tuan, Y.-F. (1990). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values: Columbia University Press. 131. Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 205-220. 132. Waitt, G. (2000). Consuming heritage: Perceived historical authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(4), 835-862. 133. Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 349-370. 134. White, D. D., Virden, R. J., & Van Riper, C. J. (2008). Effects of place identity, place dependence, and experience-use history on perceptions of recreation impacts in a natural setting. Environmental Management, 42(4), 647-657. 135. Whitfield, T. (1983). Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 221-237. 136. Wiborg, A. (2004). Place, nature and migration: Students' attachment to their rural home places. Sociologia ruralis, 44(4), 416-432. 137. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 29-46. 138. Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. Paper presented at the NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, Texas. 139. Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest science, 49(6), 830-840. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50218 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 地方連結是人基於認知與經驗和環境的連結。人們會透過與地方長時間的互動對特定地點產生連結,也會轉化過去的經驗與新地點快速產生初始連結。與新地點快速產生的情感可能是透過象徵性的景觀誘發產生,而熟悉景觀元素對個體而言具有特殊意義,且能夠喚起先前經驗並將情感由先前相似地點轉移至新的地方。Cheng and Kuo (2015)以影像模擬之方法,將台灣景觀元素模擬上與台灣景觀相似的環境,進一步發現熟悉景觀元素可能為情感快速喚起的可能原因。
但現實中並所有存在熟悉景觀元素之新環境皆可喚起人們對過去其他地方的情感。熟悉景觀元素被配置的環境若與過去經驗不相同時,會造成人們產生不同的景觀典型性及建構真實性感知。景觀典型性與建構真實性皆建構自人們過去對相似地方的經驗,且皆有文獻支持其與地方連結相關。因此本研究這可能是影響熟悉景觀元素轉移情感的原因。而為求對情感的發展機制有更進一步的了解,本研究的目的即探討影響熟悉景觀元素轉移地方情感的因素;了解景觀典型性、建構真實性是否會影響熟悉景觀元素使人們產生情感轉移。 本研究參照 Cheng and Kuo (2015)之研究方法,以稻田、鄉村植物、山脈、紅磚、傳統建築景觀元素代表對台灣人有象徵意義的景觀元素。並以偶遇抽樣方式請自願參與之受測者針對「與台灣相似」及「與台灣不相似」兩類型的國外景觀相片進行影像評估。評估內容為原始相片及合成景觀元素後之相片的地方連結、景觀典型性及建構真實性感受。其中與過去經驗相似之組合來自該研究,而與過去經驗不相似之組合為本研究篩選與模擬之相片。 結果顯示熟悉景觀元素添入與過去經驗相似及不相似的環境有顯著的差異;當熟悉景觀元素添入與過去經驗相似的環境,景觀整體會使人產生較高的景觀典型性、建構真實性、地方連結。而景觀典型性與指示真實性因熟悉景觀元素添入,增加的幅度可能為影響熟悉景觀元素轉移情感的因素。最後本研究之結果將可運用於空間的規劃設計,尤其是在遊憩體驗上。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Place bonding is the affective bond between people and their environment based on cognition and experiences. People may develop place bonding through long-term interactions with the specific location, or transferred place bonding rapidly from previous experience. Familiar landscape elements are meaningful to individuals, which help people to recall their past experiences. By comparing respondents’ reactions to a series of digitally manipulated pictures, Cheng and Kuo (2015) found that familiar landscape elements could be the reason for rapid bonding transformation from place to place.
Landscape typicality and Constructive authenticity are the feelings that constructed from previous experience. When familiar landscape elements appear in exotic environments, the feeling of landscape typicality and constructive authenticity may be different, which have been suggested to be associated with place bonding. Therefore, the study suggested that landscape typicality and constructive authenticity may influence people’s place bonding that is induced by the familiar landscape elements. To explore this mechanisms of place bonding transformation, the study aimed to discover whether landscape typicality and constructive authenticity might affect the transformation of place bonding. A series photo-based surveys were conducted for the purpose of this study, with a similar procedure as the previous study. Rice field, plants, mountain, red bricks and traditional building represented meaningful Taiwanese landscape elements. These landscape elements were synthesized into foreign landscape pictures which are similar & different from Taiwanese landscapes. Subjects were asked to provide their feeling of landscape typicality, constructive authenticity and place bonding toward the landscapes in the picture before and after synthesizing. The result turned out that, people’s feeling to different environments are significantly different. Those synthesized landscapes that were close to previous experience, may induce higher levels of landscape typicality, constructive authenticity and place bonding. In additional, the feeling of landscape typicality or indexical authenticity were positively related to the increase of place bonding also. The current study illustrated that the typicality and authenticity of a landscape might be the reasons for inducing place bonding in the familiar landscapes. The current findings might be a reference to environment planning and design, especially in recreation experience management. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:32:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03628314-1.pdf: 3980401 bytes, checksum: bb0d17a5f00d6465f819164368c9939f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
誌謝 II 中文摘要 III ABSTRACT V 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究緣起 1 第二節、 研究目的與內容 2 第三節、 研究流程 3 第二章、 文獻探討 4 第一節、 地方情感 4 一、 研究進展 4 二、 地方連結 5 三、 景觀元素與情感轉移 11 第二節、 影響情感轉移之因素 13 一、 景觀典型性 13 二、 建構真實性 15 第三節、 小結 19 第三章、 研究方法 21 第一節、 研究問題 21 第二節、 研究設計與操作 22 第三節、 研究工具 23 一、 問卷相片 23 二、 問項內容 30 三、 實驗流程 33 四、 資料處理與分析方法 35 第四章、 研究結果 36 第一節、 受測者資料分析結果 36 第二節、 量表之信度分析 37 第三節、 地方連結與地方情感轉移 38 第四節、 景觀典型性與地方情感轉移 42 第五節、 建構真實性與地方連結 44 第六節、 景觀典型性與建構真實性之關係 47 第五章、 結論與建議 49 第一節、 研究結論 49 一、 景觀典型性與地方連結 49 二、 建構真實性與地方連結 50 第二節、 討論與後續建議 51 一、 影響熟悉景觀元素轉移情感之其他因素 51 二、 景觀典型性與建構真實性的關係 52 三、 真實性與景觀環境 53 第三節、 研究限制 54 第四節、 研究應用 54 參考文獻 56 附錄1 65 問卷說明 65 基本資料頁面 66 圖片呈現頁面 66 問項填寫頁面 67 附錄2 68 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 景觀元素轉移地方情感之影響因素探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring the Factors of Inducing Place Bonding with
Landscape Elements | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 歐聖榮,林晏州,張俊彥,陳惠美 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 地方連結,景觀元素,景觀典型性,建構真實性, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Place bonding,Landscape element,Landscape Typicality,Constructive Authenticity, | en |
dc.relation.page | 70 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601723 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.89 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。