請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50002完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 董鈺琪(Yu-Chi Tung) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ji-Syuan Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳季軒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:27:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-08-26 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-09 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. WHO. The top 10 causes of death Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/. Accessed December 10, 2015.
2. USCDC. Vital Statistics Data Available Online. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/Vitalstatsonline.htm. Accessed December 10, 2015. 3. 衛生福利部統計處. 民國103年死因統計年報. Available at: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=5488. Accessed 2015/12/10. 4. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015; 131:e29-322. 5. 衛生福利部統計處. 102年國民醫療保健支出統計分析. Available at: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/CHT/DOS/DM1_P.aspx?f_list_no=557&fod_list_no=365&doc_no=48453&rn=1349416290. Accessed 2015/12/11. 6. CMS. Evaluation of the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Reports/downloads/Premier_ExecSum_2010.pdf. Accessed December 18, 2015. 7. 黃三桂. 結穗跨步全民健保十八實紀. 台北: 衛生福利部中央健康保險署, 2013. 8. 行政院衛生福利部. 全民健康保險急診品質提升方案. Available at: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/Resource/webdata/28622_2_7%E4%BF%AE%E6%AD%A3_2014%E5%B9%B4%E7%89%88_ICD-10-CM-PCS_%E5%85%A8%E6%B0%91%E5%81%A5%E5%BA%B7%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%AA%E6%80%A5%E8%A8%BA%E5%93%81%E8%B3%AA%E6%8F%90%E5%8D%87%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88.pdf. Accessed 2015/12/22. 9. Ryan AM. Effects of the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration on Medicare patient mortality and cost. Health Serv Res 2009; 44:821-42. 10. Kruse GB, Polsky D, Stuart EA, Werner RM. The impact of hospital pay-for-performance on hospital and Medicare costs. Health Serv Res 2012; 47:2118-36. 11. Sutton M, Nikolova S, Boaden R, Lester H, McDonald R, Roland M. Reduced mortality with hospital pay for performance in England. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:1821-8. 12. Jha AK, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. The long-term effect of premier pay for performance on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1606-15. 13. Glickman SW, Ou FS, DeLong ER, et al. Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2007; 297:2373-80. 14. Shih T, Nicholas LH, Thumma JR, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Does Pay-for-Performance Improve Surgical Outcomes? An Evaluation of Phase 2 of the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration. ANN SURG 2014; 259:677–81. 15. 行政院衛生署全民健康保險醫療品質委員會. 配合二代健保之論質計酬醫療爭議審議報導. Available at: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/MOHW_Upload/dmc_history/UpFile/LoadFile/%E9%85%8D%E5%90%88%E4%BA%8C%E4%BB%A3%E5%81%A5%E4%BF%9D%E4%B9%8B%E8%AB%96%E8%B3%AA%E8%A8%88%E9%85%AC.pdf. Accessed 2015/12/16. 16. Cashin C, Chi Y-L, Smith P, Borowitz M, Thomson S. Paying for Performance in Health Care Implications for health system performance and accountability. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/271073/Paying-for-Performance-in-Health-Care.pdf. Accessed December 20, 2015. 17. James J. Pay-for-Performance. New payment systems reward doctors and hospitals for improving the quality of care, but studies to date show mixed results. Available at: https://healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief_pdfs/healthpolicybrief_78.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2015. 18. Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, Kohn LT, Tracy McKay, Pike KC. TO ERR IS HUMAN:BUILDING A SAFER HEALTH SYSTEM Available at: https://iom.nationalacademies.org/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/1999/To-Err-is-Human/To%20Err%20is%20Human%201999%20%20report%20brief.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2015. 19. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm : a new health system for the 21st century. Available at: http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2001/Crossing-the-Quality-Chasm/Quality%20Chasm%202001%20%20report%20brief.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2015. 20. 董鈺琪. 建立兒童預防保健之品質指標與支付誘因模式先趨研究計畫. 台中: 行政院衛生署國民健康局, 2010. 21. WHO. The world health report 2000 Health Systems: Improving Performance. Available at: http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/whr00_en.pdf. Accessed December 18 , 2015. 22. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署. 衛生福利部新聞 四點「心」守則 守護心肝寶貝. Available at: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/news/498046749. Accessed 2015/12/17. 23. NIH. What Is a Heart Attack? Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/heartattack. Accessed December 16, 2015. 24. 林世崇、呂炎原、徐漢仲. 心肌梗塞之重新定義與臨床分類. 內科學誌 2013; 24:1-11. 25. Killip T, 3rd, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol 1967; 20:457-64. 26. 衛教室. 急性心肌梗塞. Available at: http://www.health.taichung.gov.tw/public/Attachment/108010/412016175024.pdf. Accessed 2015/12/18. 27. AHA. Understand Your Risk of Heart Attack. Available at: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/HeartAttack/UnderstandYourRiskofHeartAttack/Understand-Your-Risk-of-Heart-Attack_UCM_002040_Article.jsp#.Vj2zL7crJD_. Accessed December 18, 2015. 28. CDC. Conditions that Increase Risk for Heart Disease. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/conditions.htm. Accessed December 17, 2015. 29. 健康教育及菸害防制組. 抽菸會造成心肌梗塞，國人多不知！. Available at: http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/News/News.aspx?no=201310240001. Accessed 2015/12/17. 30. Cabello JB BA, Emparanza JI, Bayliss S, Quinn T. Oxygen therapy for acute myocardial infarction (Review). Available at: http://www.epocrates.com/dacc/1402/OxygenTxForAcuteMICochrane1402.pdf. Accessed December 24, 2015. 31. NIH. How Is a Heart Attack Treated? Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/heartattack/treatment. Accessed December 20, 2015. 32. 施俊哲. 血管支架簡介. Available at: http://tsvs.org/teach_detail.php?id=12. Accessed 2015/12/20. 33. Mayo clinic. Diseases and Conditions Beta blockers. Available at: http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-pressure/in-depth/beta-blockers/art-20044522. Accessed December 21, 2015. 34. Anticoagulation EUROPE. Anticoagulation Therapy. Available at: http://www.anticoagulationeurope.org/conditions/anticoagulation-therapy. Accessed December 22, 2015. 35. Johns Hopkins Medicine. Health Library Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG). Available at: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/healthlibrary/test_procedures/cardiovascular/coronary_artery_bypass_graft_surgery_cabg_92,P07967/. Accessed December 22, 2015. 36. Epstein AJ, Polsky D, Yang FF, Yang L, Groeneveld PW. Coronary Revascularization Trends in the United States, 2001-2008. JAMA 2011; 305:1769-76. 37. CMS. Terms and Conditions between Premier Inc. and CMS of the Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration First Amendment. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/Downloads/HospitalPremierFirstAmendment.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2015. 38. John Kautter, Gregory C. Pope, Musetta Leung, et al. Evaluation of the Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration Final Report. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Demonstration-Projects/DemoProjectsEvalRpts/Downloads/PhysicianGroupPracticeFinalReport.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2015. 39. John Kautter, Gregory C. Pope, Musetta Leung, et al. Evaluation of the Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration Final Report. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Demonstration-Projects/DemoProjectsEvalRpts/Downloads/PhysicianGroupPracticeFinalReport.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2015. 40. CMS. MEDICARE PHYSICIAN GROUP PRACTICE DEMONSTRATION. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Demonstration-Projects/DemoProjectsEvalRpts/downloads/pgp_fact_sheet.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2015. 41. CMS. Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/Hospital_VBPurchasing_Fact_Sheet_ICN907664.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2015. 42. CMS. Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 Results for the CMS Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2015-Fact-sheets-items/2015-10-26.html. Accessed December 25, 2015. 43. Jan Ledward, Alan Horne, Butterworth J. A North West Health System approach to Advancing Quality. Available at: http://digital.nhs.uk/media/10042/Annex-2---AQ-Briefing/pdf/Annex_AQ_briefing.pdf. Accessed December 18, 2015. 44. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署. 全民健康保險急診品質提升方案. Available at: http://www.nhi.gov.tw/Resource/bulletin/6239_1050001438-1.pdf. Accessed 2015/12/19. 45. AHRQ. Overview of Key Readmission Measures and Methods Report. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2012. 46. Hardin JW, Hilbe JM. Generalized estimating equations. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2013. 47. Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther 2002; 27:299-309. 48. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data. Med Care 2005; 43:1130–9. 49. Krumholz HM, Chen J, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Chen Y-T, Marciniak TA. Comparing AMI Mortality Among Hospitals in Patients 65 Years of Age and Older. Circulation 1999; 99:2986-92. 50. Lee KL, Woodlief LH, Topol EJ, et al. Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Results from an international trial of 41,021 patients. GUSTO-I Investigators. Circulation 1995; 91:1659-68. 51. Agresti A. An introduction to categorical data analysis. Available at: https://mregresion.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/agresti-introduction-to-categorical-data.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2016. 52. 連文彬. 心血管疾病診療20世紀(1900年)以來之發展歷史回顧 -國內外情形之綜覽. 台灣醫界雜誌 2011; 54:463. 53. Medicare. 30-day unplanned readmission and death measures. Available at: https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/Data/30-day-measures.html. Accessed June 10, 2016. 54. Seghieri C, Mimmi S, Lenzi J, Fantini MP. 30-day in-hospital mortality after acute myocardial infarction in Tuscany (Italy): an observational study using hospital discharge data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12:170. 55. Krumholz HM, Merrill AR, Schone EM, et al. Patterns of hospital performance in acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30-day mortality and readmission. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009; 2:407-1s3. 56. Horwitz L, Partovian C, Lin Z, et al. Hospital-Wide (All-Condition) 30‐Day Risk-Standardized Readmission Measure. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/downloads/MMSHospital-WideAll-ConditionReadmissionRate.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2015. 57. Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Mattera JA, et al. An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2006; 113:1683-92. 58. Ryan AM. Effects of the Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration on Medicare Patient Mortality and Cost. Health Serv Res 2009; 443:821-42. 59. Ryan A, Sutton M, Doran T. Does Winning a Pay-for-Performance Bonus Improve Subsequent Quality Performance? Evidence from the Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration. Health Serv Res 2014; 49:568-87. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/50002 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究背景：心臟疾病為台灣2014年十大死因第二名，為引導醫療服務提供者提供整體性醫療照護，論質計酬逐漸受到重視。台灣於2012年5月實施全民健康保險急診品質提升方案，期望藉財務獎勵提升急診急性心肌梗塞病患照護品質。目前國內針對該方案研究較少，且尚未探討對於急診急性心肌梗塞且接受介入性心導管治療病患的醫療費用與照護結果之影響。
研究目的：探討全民健康保險急診品質提升方案對於急診急性心肌梗塞且接受介入性心導管治療病患醫療費用與照護結果之影響。 研究方法：本研究利用全民健康保險研究資料庫2005年承保抽樣百萬歸人檔進行次級資料分析，擷取2008年至2013年第三季期間資料，以急診急性心肌梗塞接受介入性心導管治療病患做為研究對象。使用分段廣義估計方程式(Generalized estimating equations, GEE)，探討全民健康保險急診品質提升方案對於急診急性心肌梗塞且接受介入性心導管治療病患醫療費用與照護結果之影響。 研究結果：全民健康保險急診品質提升方案實施後，急診急性心肌梗塞且接受介入性心導管治療病患住院期間醫療費用、30天死亡及30天再入院表現均無顯著差異。 結論：全民健康保險急診品質提升方案對於急診急性心肌梗塞且接受介入性心導管治療病患醫療費用及照護結果於研究期間可能影響不顯著。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background：Heart disease was ranked second in the top ten leading causes of death in Taiwan in 2014. To encourage medical service providers in providing holistic medical care, hospital administrators have increasingly emphasized pay for performance. Taiwan implemented a project in May 2012, aiming to elevate the quality of emergency department (ED) care covered by the National Health Insurance. Specifically, financial incentives were formulated in an attempt to enhance ED quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Currently, few studies have examined the project, and no study has explored the project’s influence on the medical costs and care outcomes of patients with AMI who have received percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).
Objective：To research the impact of the P4P program in the ED on costs and outcomes of PCI. Method：This study used the 2005 claim data of the National Health Insurance Research Database of 1 million beneficiaries for secondary data analyses. The data of patients with AMI who have received PCI between 2008 and the third quarter of 2013 were retrieved. A segmented generalized estimating equation was used to investigate the influence of the project aimed at enhancing ED care quality on the medical costs and care outcomes of patients with AMI who have received PCI. Results：There are no significant improvements in hospitalization cost, 30-day mortality and all cause 30-day readmission after implementing P4P program in the ED. Conclusion：There are no significant improvements after the implementation of P4P program in the ED on costs and outcomes of PCI. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:27:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03848025-1.pdf: 1728072 bytes, checksum: 3f3075f995ac4c2ab46f0e71ba94a3dc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 iv 表目錄 vi 圖目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究重要性 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 論質計酬介紹 5 第二節 急性心肌梗塞簡介 10 第三節 急性心肌梗塞相關論質計酬介紹 17 第四節 論質計酬照護成效實證研究 31 第五節 總結 42 第三章 研究方法與設計 43 第一節 研究設計 43 第二節 研究架構 44 第三節 研究假說 45 第四節 資料來源與研究對象 46 第五節 研究變項操作型定義 49 第六節 資料處理流程 52 第七節 統計方法 53 第四章 研究結果 55 第一節 描述性分析結果 55 第二節 雙變項分析結果 62 第三節 多變項分析結果 74 第五章 討論 77 第一節 研究方法討論 77 第二節 研究結果討論 80 第三節 研究限制 84 第六章 結論與建議 85 第一節 結論 85 第二節 建議 86 參考文獻 87 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 論質計酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 財務誘因 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 急性心肌梗塞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 醫療費用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 急性心肌梗塞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 照護結果 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 醫療費用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 財務誘因 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 論質計酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 照護結果 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | health care outcomes | en |
| dc.subject | Pay-for-performance | en |
| dc.subject | incentives in health care | en |
| dc.subject | acute myocardial infarction | en |
| dc.subject | health care costs | en |
| dc.subject | health care outcomes | en |
| dc.subject | Pay-for-performance | en |
| dc.subject | incentives in health care | en |
| dc.subject | acute myocardial infarction | en |
| dc.subject | health care costs | en |
| dc.title | 探討急診論質計酬對於介入性心導管治療費用與結果之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Impact of Pay for Performance in the Emergency Department on Costs and Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊銘欽(Ming-Chin Yang),賴超倫(Chao-Lun Lai) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 論質計酬,財務誘因,急性心肌梗塞,醫療費用,照護結果, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Pay-for-performance,incentives in health care,acute myocardial infarction,health care costs,health care outcomes, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 92 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602188 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-09 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.69 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。