Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49932Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 洪廣冀(Kuang-Chi Hung) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hsuan Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王友璿 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T12:26:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 西文書目 Anderson, Ben, 2018, “Cultural geography II: The force of representations.” Progress in Human Geography 38(5):691-702. Anderson, Kay and Smith, Susan J., 2001,” Editorial: Emotional geographies.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26(1):7-10. Aroles, Jeremy and McLean, Christine, 2019, “Smoothing, striating and territorializing: The assembling of ‘science in the making.” Ethnography.1-20. Baxandall, Michael, 1972, Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Beaulieu, Anne, 2010,” From co-location to co-presence: Shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge.” Social Studies of Science 40(3):453-470. Becker, Howard, 1982 [1976], Art Worlds. Berkeley California: University of California Press. Bippus, Elke, 2013, “Artistic experiment as research.” Pp.121-134 in Experimental Systems: Future Knowledge in Artistic Research, edited by Michael Schwab. Leuven: Leuven University Press. Borkenhagen, Chad, 2017, “Evidence-based creativity: Working between art and science in the field of fine dining.” Social Studies of Science 47(5):630-654. Broeckmann, Andreas, 2016, Machine Art in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Buren, Daniel and Repensek, Thomas, 1979, “The function of the studio.” October (10): 51-58 Butler, Toby, 2006, “A walk of art: The potential of the sound walk as practice in cultural geography. “Social and Cultural Geography.7(6):889-908. Callon, Michel, 1986,” Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” Pp.19-34 in Power, Action, Belief, edited by John Law. London: Routledge and Kegan. Callon Michel, 1986, “The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The case of the Electric Vehicle.” Pp.19-34 in Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, edited by Michel Callon, John Law, Arie Rip. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Callon, Michel ,1999,” Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. “Pp.67-83 in The Science Studies Reader, edited by Mario Biagioli. New York and London: Routledge. Cant, Sarah and Morris, Nina, 2006,” Geographies of art and the environment.” Social Cultural Geography 7(6):857-861. Carr, Chantel and Gibson, Chris, 2016, “Geographies of making: Rethinking materials and skills for volatile futures.” Progress in Human Geography 40(3):297-315. Carr, Chantel and Gibson,Chris, 2017, “Animating geographies of making: Embodied slow scholarship for participant‐researchers of maker cultures and material work.” Geography Compass 11(6). Crawford, Matthew, 2009, Shop Class as Soul Craft: An Enquiry into the Value of Work. New York: Penguin. Crouch, David, 2003, “Spacing, performing, and becoming: Tangles in the mundane.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 35(11):1945-1960. Daniels, Stephen, 2004, “Landscape and art.” Pp. 430–446 in A Companion to Cultural Geography, edited by James S. Duncan Nuala C. Johnson and Richard H. Schein. Oxford: Blackwell. Danto, Arthur, 1964, “The Artistic Enfranchisement of Real Objects: The Artworld” Journal of Philosophy 61: 571-584. Dickie, Georges, 1969, “Defining Art American.” Philosophical Quarterly 6: 253-6. Dixon, Deborah, 2009,” Creating the semi-living: On politics, aesthetics and the more-than-human.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34: 411-425. Ellis, Carolyn, Adams, Tony E., and Bochner, Arhtur P., 2011,” Autoethnography: an overview.” Historical Social Research 36(4): 273-290. Gell, Alfred, 1998, Art and Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gillian, Rose, 2015, “Rethinking the geographies of cultural ‘objects’ through digital technologies: Interface, network and friction.” Progress in Human Geography 40(3):334-351. Halsall, Francis, 2016, “Actor-Network aesthetics: The conceptual rhymes of Bruno Latour and contemporary Art.” New Literary History 47(2):439-461. Harman, Graham, 2018, Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Pelican Books. Hawkins, Harriet, 2010, “‘The argument of the eye’? The cultural geographies of installation art.” Cultural Geographies 17(3):321-340. Hawkins, Harriet, 2011, “Dialogues and doings: Sketching the relationships between geography and art.” Geography Compass 5(7):464–478. Hawkins, Harriet, 2012, “Geography and art. An expanding field: Site, the body and practice.” Progress in Human Geography 37(1): 52-71. Hawkins, Harriet, 2019, “Geography’s creative (re)turn: Toward a critical framework.” Progress in Human Geography 43(6):963-984. Hawkins, Harriet and Price, Laura, 2018, “Toward the geographies of making: An introduction.” Pp.1-30 in Geographies of Making, Craft and Creativity, edited by Harriet Hawkins and Laura Price. London: Routledge. Holmes, Helen, 2016, “Transient productions; enduring encounters: The crafting of bodies and friendships in the hair salon.” Pp.127-143. in Geographies of Making, Craft and Creativity, edited by Harriet Hawkins and Laura Price. London: Routledge. Ingold, Tim, 2013, Making: Anthropology, Archeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge. Kwon, Miwon, 2002, One Place After Another: Site-specific Art and Locational Identity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Latour, Bruno, 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Latour, Bruno, 1999, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Latour, Bruno, 2005, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Law, John, 2012 [1987] [1992], “Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion.” Pp.111-134 in The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by Wiebe Bijker, Thomas Hughes and Trevor Pinch. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. MacKenzie, Donald and Judy Wajcman, 1985, The Social Shaping of Technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. McMorran, Chris, 2012, Practicing workplace geographies: Embodied labour as method in human geography. Area 44:489–495. Morris, Nina and Cant, Sarah, 2006, “Engaging with place: artists, site-specificity and the Hebden Bridge Sculpture Trail. “Social Cultural Geography 7(6): 863-888. Norris, Lucy, 2012,” Shoddy Rags and Relief Blankets: Perceptions of textile recycling in north India.” Pp.35-38.in Economies of Recycling: The Global Transformation of Materials, Values and Social Relations, edited by Catherine Alexander and Joshua Reno. London: Zed books. O'Doherty, Brian, 1999, Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space, Expanded Edition. Berkeley: University of California Press. Ocejo, Richard E., 2016, “The science and the art of making.’’ Pp.108-126 in Geographies of Making, Craft and Creativity, edited by Harriet Hawkins and Laura Price. London: Routledge. Pickering, Andrew, 2012,” The Robustness of science and the dance of agency.” Pp.317-327 in Characterizing the Robustness of Science: After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science, edited by Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles and William Wimsatt. Pickering, Andrew, 2016, “Art, science and experiment.” Journal of Fine Art Research 1(1): 1–6. Pile, Steve, 2010, “Emotions and affect in recent human geography.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35(1):5-20. Schwab, Michael, 2015,” Experiment! Towards an artistic epistemology. ”Journal of Visual Art Practice 14(2): 120-131. Shiner, Larry, 2001, The Invention of Art: A Cultural History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Sjoholm, Jenny, 2016, ”Ｍaking bodies, making space and making memory in artistic practice.” Pp.31-43 in Geographies of Making, Craft and Creativity, edited by Harriet Hawkins and Laura Price. London: Routledge. Straughan, Elizabeth, 2016, “Entangled corporeality in the making of taxidermy.” Pp.144-157. in Geographies of Making, Craft and Creativity, edited by Harriet Hawkins and Laura Price. London: Routledge. Tanner, Jeremy, 2010,” Michael Baxandall and the sociological interpretation of art.” Cultural Sociology 4(2), 231-256. Yaneva, Albena, 2003,” Chalk steps on the museum floor: The “Pulses” of objects in an art installation. In Actor-Network Theory Research: Four Volume Set, edited by Richie Nimmo. London: Sage Publications. 中文書目 Boris, Groys 著、郭昭蘭、劉文坤譯，2015，《藝術力》。台北：藝術家。（Boris, Groys, 2008, Art Power. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.） Bourdieu, Pierre 著、石武耕、李沅洳、陳羚芝譯，2016，《藝術的法則：文學場域的生成與結構》。台北：典藏藝術家庭。（Bourdieu, Pierre,1992, Les règles de l’art- genèse et structure du champ littéraire. Paris: Éditions Du Seui） Danto, Arthur 著、林雅琪、鄭惠雯譯，2010，《在藝術終結之後：當代藝術與歷史藩籬》。台北：麥田。（Danto, Arthur, 1997, After the end of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.） Egerton, David 著、李尚仁譯，2016，《老科技的全球史》台北：左岸文化。（Egerton, David, 2006, The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900. New York: Oxford University Press.） Latour, Bruno著、伍啟鴻、陳榮泰譯，2016，《巴斯德的實驗室：細菌的戰爭與和平》台北：群學。（Latour, Bruno, 1984, Pasteur: guerre et paix des microbes.）。 Latour, Bruno著、余曉嵐、林文源、許全義譯，2012，《我們從未現代過》台北：群學。（Latour, Bruno, 1993, We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.） Zielinski, Siegfried著、榮震華譯，2006，《媒體考古學》北京：商務新知譯叢。（Zielinski, Siegfried, 2002, Archäologie der Medien: Zur Tiefenzeit des technischen Hörens und Sehens. Berlin :Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.） 王聖閎，2010，〈台灣當代藝術摘要2000-2010（五）：藝術世界、藝術體制理論〉。《藝外雜誌4月專輯：台灣當代藝術摘要2000~2010 (五)》第31期：36-39 辛友仁，2019，〈對展覽及其方法的思考：「邁向一個神秘的現實」的展覽論述/空間/時間〉。《在當代之後：春之當代藝論2017-2018》。台北：典藏藝術家庭。 余瓊宜，2011，〈數位藝術中的新與舊〉。《國立臺北藝術大學美術學報》4:219-234 洪廣冀，2016，〈科技研究中的地理轉向及其在地理學中的迴響〉。《地理學報》83: 23-69。 許嘉猷，2004，〈布爾迪厄論西方純美學與藝術場域的自主化──藝術社會學之凝視〉。《歐美研究》34（3）：357-429。 高千惠，2017，〈資訊年代的新科層藝術社會 ─ 檔案做為藝術，或是訊息做為沉思？〉。《典藏Artouch》。民國106年1月12日，取自https://artouch.com/view/content-1931.html 雷祥麟，2004，〈校訂後記：翻譯拉圖的「轉譯」〉，收錄於台灣科技與社會網絡計畫著，吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟編輯《STS讀本——科技渴望社會》。台北：群學。 賴彥甫，2015，〈展演「C/娘」的音樂文化：台北同志夜店G*Star的Asian Pop與男同志身份的建構〉。《女學學誌》37: 93-134 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49932 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究試圖將當代裝置藝術放在他們的產製空間中審視。借鑑製作地理學（Geographies of Making）與行動者網絡（Actor-Network Theory，簡稱ANT）的理論視野，作者以參與觀察與自我民族誌的方式，深入台北數位藝術中心（Digital Art Center, 簡稱DAC）的多場展覽及展場空間，揭露藝術作品網絡中的人與物在現地組裝的複雜過程。首先，我將描寫一座百廢待舉的藝術場館，透過展覽的方式，將展場打造為一座合格的展示空間，勾勒出展場與藝術作品網絡從無到有的浮現過程。接著，我再以助手的身份，參與第二檔藝術展覽的作品打造過程，聚焦於成形中藝術作品網絡及物的作用，發現到展場平面圖不再只是再現展場空間，而是具有協助藝術家克服展場空間不確定性的能動性。最後，我將以自身為非職業藝術家的參展過程，以自我民族誌的手法書寫藝術作品網絡的產製挫折經驗，強調創作者並不依循一訂的標準的過程組裝作品，而是必須與不同的物「搏感情」，將人類行動者的感受放回討論。最終，我將回到作品本身，描述自己如何在建立作品網絡的過程中，轉譯物的意義，使日常生活物件也成為藝術展品。 綜合上述，我將當代裝置藝術的產製過程分為以下三種層次：從展場空間本身作為一座展覽/作品的網絡，到組裝中的藝術作品網絡中的物與人，再到現地完成的藝術作品網絡。若以ANT取徑觀之，則為網絡的生成、網絡中的人與非人行動者、以及網絡趨向穩定的不穩定過程，在此三條理路中層層遞進。最終對於「何謂藝術？」的大哉問，提出一個地理學的解釋——即他們是個總因展場空間而異動的現地組裝網絡。同時，我將以自身此次的研究與投入藝術展覽的實作過程，回到與製作地理學的對話。在談論藝術生產時，勢必將視線移動至展示空間，發現製作當中的微觀實作——即是透過具體的藝術創作者與助手、創作者與物質、專業者與業餘者之間的互動，逐漸打造出穩定的作品網絡。綜言之，我試著在層層遞進的故事與分析中，揭開隱蔽在藝術白盒子之下的藝術實作。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis scrutinizes contemporary installation art in the places where they are being made. Utilizing “geographies of making” and actor-network theory (ANT), I conduct a participant observation and autoethnographical study in the Digital Art Center, Taipei (DAC) to unveil the complex processes of on-site assembling of “artwork network” by human and non-human actors. First, I document how a neglected art venue transformed itself into a qualified exhibition space, and illustrate how an artwork network was built from scratch. Subsequently, by participating in the creation of artworks for an exhibition, I highlight the functions of emerging artwork networks and materials/objects, while realizing that the exhibition floor plan not only offered a representation of the venue but possessed the agency to help artists overcome uncertainties in the exhibition space. Finally, I adopt an autoethnographical approach to elucidate my frustration as a non-artist participating in the exhibition, and propose that no standard method exists for the assembling of artworks. Rather, this process should be conceptualized as “bonding” (搏感情) between people and things, and therefore the experiences of human actors must be discussed. I conclude by describing how I translate the meanings of things in the construction of artwork networks, and turn objects of everyday life into artworks worthy of exhibitions. Consequently, this thesis argues that the making of contemporary artworks involves three key dimensions: (1) the art venue as an artwork network; (2) various human and non-human actors involved in the networks; and (3) the on-site assembling of artwork networks. Based on these findings, I answer the question “what is contemporary art?” in a geographical way—contemporary artworks are always site-specific networks intimately dependent on exhibition spaces. Moreover, my research both elaborates how geographers can study artworks via “geographies of making” and move the focus from artists’ studios to exhibition spaces. Only when researchers explore the interactions between artists and assistants, creators and materials, experts and amateurs are the microscopic practices within the “white cube” revealed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T12:26:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1108202018285800.pdf: 13304179 bytes, checksum: a82f3d631879dab0e8b3e50b9af96b3d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員核定書 I 謝誌 II 摘要 IV ABSTRACT V 第一章 緒論 1 一 前言 1 二 文獻回顧 6 三 理論架構 11 四 研究方法與章節安排 21 第二章 建立網絡，打造一座藝術場館 26 一 沒有冷氣的數位藝術中心 26 二 「裡面幾乎全都是藝術家！」 28 三 一座標準場館的配備——從閉館整修到成為實驗室？ 34 四 整修！整修！整修！ 36 五 當藝術家正打造他的作品網絡 41 六 小結：未完待續的藝術網絡 45 第三章 複製展示空間，藝術作品逐漸浮現 47 一 前奏：傳統媒材藝術作品的佈展過程 47 二 充滿不確定性的展場空間 48 三 物的能動性：平面圖 50 四 「所以到底怎麼掛？有沒有一張圖可以告訴我？」 58 五 尾聲：新的行動者！從影片、電腦製圖到立體模型 62 六 小結：複製場館空間的藝術家 65 第四章 從「製作中的藝術」到「做」藝術行動 68 一 偶然成為「藝術家」 68 二 我與展櫃、油漆與油漆刷的相遇 70 三 不疾不徐地裝設投影機 81 四 小結：一位地理學生的挫敗製作經驗 88 第五章 回到作品：跨越空間的形變 91 一 創作什麼與如何創作 91 二 （像個藝術家一樣）裝配時間 95 三 我幫怪獸對打機訂了一張單程車票 99 四 轉譯第一步：改變編碼 103 五 轉譯第二步：改變身體姿態 109 六 小結 114 第六章 結論 116 參考書目 121 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 當代藝術 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 行動者網絡理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 展示空間 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 製作地理學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 當代藝術 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 展示空間 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 製作地理學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 行動者網絡理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Actor-Network Theory | en |
| dc.subject | geographies of making | en |
| dc.subject | Actor-Network Theory | en |
| dc.subject | contemporary art | en |
| dc.subject | art gallery | en |
| dc.subject | geographies of making | en |
| dc.subject | contemporary art | en |
| dc.subject | art gallery | en |
| dc.title | 藝術成形中:藝術作品在展場浮現的民族誌 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Art in the Making:An Ethnography of the Emergence of Artworks in an Art Museum | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳瑪悧,郭昭蘭,黃俊銘,李立鈞 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 製作地理學,行動者網絡理論,當代藝術,展示空間, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | geographies of making,Actor-Network Theory,contemporary art,art gallery, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 127 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202002999 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 地理環境資源學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1108202018285800.pdf Restricted Access | 12.99 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.