請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49841完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 魏志平(Chih-Ping Wei) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Min-Luen Sun | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 孫敏倫 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:51:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Afuah, A. (2000). How much do your co-opetitiors' capabilities mater in the face of technology change? Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp. 387-404.
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative science quarterly, 45(3), pp. 425-455. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), pp. 197-220. Ali-Yrkkö, J., Hyytinen, A., & Pajarinen, M. (2005). Does patenting increase the probability of being acquired? Evidence from cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Applied Financial Economics, 15(14), pp. 1007-1017. Anand, B. N., & Khanna, T. (2000). Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic management journal, 21(3), pp. 295-315. Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. The Journal of Marketing, pp. 42-58. Arikan, T.A. (2009). Interfirm knowledge exchanges and the knowledge creation capability of clusters. Academy of Management Review, 34, pp. 658-676. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99-120. Basole, C.R., Park, H., & Barnett, C.B. (2015). Coopetition and convergence in the ICT ecosystem. Telecommunications Policy, 39(7), pp. 537-552. Baum, J.A., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B.S. (2000). Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic management journal, 21(3), pp. 267-294. Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. (2004). Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization science, 15(3), pp. 259-275. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33, pp. 1477-1492. Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). 'Coopetition' in business networks - to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), pp. 411-426. Berchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), pp. 117-127. Bleeke, J., & Ernst, D. (1991). The way to win in cross-border alliances. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), pp. 127-135. Brandenburger, A., Nalebuff, B. J., & Maulana, A. (1996). Co-opetition. London: HarperCollinsBusiness. Breitzman, A., Thomas, P., & Cheney, M. (2002). Technological powerhouse or diluted competence: techniques for assessing mergers via patent analysis. R&D Management, 32(1), pp. 1-10. Burgers, W. P., Hill, C. W., & Kim, W. C. (1993). A theory of global strategic alliances: The case of the global auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6), pp. 419-432. Cairo, R. (2006). Co-opetition and Strategic Business Alliances in Telecommunications: The Cases of BT, Deutsch Telekom and Telefonica Espana. The Business Review, 5(2), pp. 147-154. Carayannis, E.G., & Alexander, J. . (1999). Winning by co-opeting in strategic government-university-industry R&D partnerships: the power of complex, dynamic knowledge networks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2), pp. 197-210. Chin, K. S., Chan, B. L., & Lam, P. K. (2008). Identifying and prioritizing critical sucess factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(4), pp. 437-454. Deeds, D. L., & Hill, C. W. (1996). Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: an empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), pp. 41-55. Dittrich, K., & Duysters, G. (2007). Networking as a means to strategy change: the case of open innovation in mobile telephony. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34, pp. 510-521. Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An exmination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, pp. 35-51. Duysters, G., Kok, G., & Vaandrager, M. (1999). Crafting successful strategic technology partnerships. R&D Management, 29, pp. 343-351. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and source of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), pp. 660-679. Emden, Z. R., Calantone, J., & Droge, C. (2006). Collaborating for new product developement: selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), pp. 330-341. Fritsch, M., & Kauffeld-Monz, M. (2010). The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), pp. 21-38. Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2), pp. 230-246. Garrette, B., Castaner, X., & Dussauge, P. (2009). Horizontal alliances as an alternative to autonomous production: Product expansion mode choice in the worldwide aircraft industry 1945–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 30, pp. 885-894. Glaister, K. W. (1996). UK-Western European Strategic Alliances: Motives and Selection Criteria. Journal of Euromarketing, 5(4), pp. 5-35. Gnyawali, D. R., & He, J. (2006). Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: an empirical examination. Journal of Management, 32(4), pp. 507-530. Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. R. (2009). Co‐opetition and technological innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 3(47), pp. 308-320. Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. R. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitiors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), pp. 650-663. Gomes-Casseres, B., Hagedoorn, J., & Jaffe, A. B. (2006). Do alliances promote knowledge flows? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), pp. 5-33. Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1995). A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995(1), pp. 17-21. Grimpe, C., & Hussinger, K. (2008). Pre-empting technology competition through firm acquisitions. Economics Letters, 100(2), pp. 189-191. Gueguen, G. (2009). Coopetition in business ecosystems in the information technology sector: the example of intelligent mobile terminals. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8, pp. 135-153. Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do inter-organizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), pp. 135-153. Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Inter-organizational modes of cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 371-385. HallH. B. , & ZiedonisH. R. . (2001年Spring月). The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979-1995. Journal of Economics, 1(32), pp. 101-128. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, pp. 83-103. Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review, 67(1), pp. 133-139. Harrigan, K. R. (1986). Managing for joint venture success. Simon and Schuster. Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly, pp. 9-30. Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F.T. (2005). The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), pp. 332-345. James, A. D. , Georghiou, L. , & Metcalfe, J. S. . (1998). Integrating technology into merger and acquisition decision making. Technovation, 18(8), pp. 563-591. Jorde, T. M., & Teece, D. J. (1989). Competition and cooperation: Striking the right balance. California Management Review, 31(3), p. 25. Kay, L., Newman, N. , Youtie, J. , Porter, L. A. , & RafolsI. . (2014). Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), pp. 2432-2443. Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Hanlon, S. C. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: a syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), pp. 110-141. Leydesdorff, L. , Kushnir, D. , & Rafols, I. . (2012). Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC). Scientometrics, 98(3), pp. 1583-1599. Lynn, G. S., & Akgun, A. E. (1998). Innovation strategies under uncertainty: a contingency approach for new product development. Engineering Management Journal, 10(3), pp. 11-18. Mariti, P., & Smiley, R. H. (1983). Co-opetitive agreements and the organization of industry. The Journal of industrial economics, pp. 437-451. Mione, A. (2009). When entrepreneurship requires coopetition: the need for standards in the creation of the market. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8, pp. 92-109. Mody, A. (1993). Learning through alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 20(2), pp. 151-170. Mowery, D. C. (1988). International collaborative ventures in US manufacturing. Ballinger Publishing Company. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 77-91. Nalebuff, B. J., Brandenburger, A., & Maulana, A. (1996). Co-opetition. London: HarperCollinsBusiness. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). The Schumpeterian tradeof revisited. The American Economic Review, pp. 114-132. Nemeha, A. , & Yamibc, S. . (2016). The Determinants of the Emergence of Coopetition Strategy in R&D. International Studies of Management & Organization, 2(46), pp. 159-178. Nieto, M.J., & Santamaria, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6), pp. 367-377. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology. Community Organization Science, 15(1), pp. 5-21. Oxley, E. J. , & Sampson, C. R. . (2004). The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 25(9), pp. 723-749. Park, B. J. R., Srivastava, M.K., & Gnyawali, D. (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), pp. 210-221. Pasiouras, F. , & Gaganis, C. . (2007). Financial characteristics of banks involved in acquisitions: Evidence from Asia. Applied Financial Economics, 4(17), pp. 329-341. Phelps, C. C. (2003). Technological exploration: A longitudinal study of the role of recombinatory search and social capital in alliance networks. UMI Diss. Services. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), pp. 116-144. Quintana-Garcia, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24(12), pp. 927-938. Rice, J., & Galvin, P. (2006). Alliance patterns during industry life cycle cmergence: the case of Ericsson and Nokia. Technovation, 26, pp. 384-395. Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy-when is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), pp. 307-324. Sampson, R. C. (2007). R&D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), pp. 364-386. Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, S., Cavusgil, T., & Aulakh, P. S. (2001). The Influence of Complementarity, Compatibility, and Relationship Capital on Alliance Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(4), pp. 358-373. Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), pp. 1113-1126. Schilling, M. A. . (2015). Technology shocks, technological collaboration, and innovation outcomes. Organization Science, 26(3), pp. 668-686. Schoenecker, T., & Swanson, L. (2002). Indicators of firm technological capability: validity and performance implications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), pp. 36-44. Sidiropoulos, A., Dimitrios, K., & Yannis, M. (2007). Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics, 72(2), pp. 253-280. Soh, P. H. (2003). The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implicaiton for new product performance. J. Bus. Venturing, 18, pp. 727-744. Stuart, T. E. (2000). Inter-organizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), pp. 791-811. Teece, D. J. (1992). Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(1), pp. 1-25. Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), pp. 193-224. Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research policy, 31(6), pp. 947-967. Tsai, K. H. (2009). Collaborative networks and producct innovation performance: toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy, 38(5), pp. 765-778. Tsakanos, A. , Georgopoulos, A. , & Siriopoulos, C. . (2007). Predicting Greek mergers and acquisitions: a new approach. International Journal of Financial Services Management, 4(2), pp. 289-303. Yang, C. S. , Wei, C. P. , & Chiang, Y. H. . (2014). Exploiting Technological Indicators for Effective Technology Merger and Acquisition (M&A) Predictions. Decision Sciences, 45(1), pp. 147-174. Zineldin, M. (2004). Co-opetition: The Organization of the Future. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 22, pp. 780-789. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49841 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 競合策略佔一般企業聯盟的20%，且有85%以上的競合策略發生在高科技產業之中，如資訊科技產業、軟體產業、製藥產業，足見競合策略在近代商業環境中的重要性。許多研究指出，競合策略對企業的創新績效表現有正向影響 (Belderbos, Carree, & Lokshin, 2004; Quintana-Garcia & Benavides-Velasco, 2004)。選擇一個正確且合適的競合對象，無疑是競合策略成功的第一步，進而能為公司帶來良好的創新表現。然而，目前預測企業間聯盟關係的研究，多以經濟指標或網絡指標為主 (Tsakanos, Georgopoulos, & Siriopoulos, 2007; Schilling & Phelps, 2007)。即使部分研究考量了科技指標，大部分研究皆使用量化的方法為主（例如問卷或訪談），而非資料探勘的方式。例如，Hall與Ziedonis（2001）便是以結構化的問卷和後續的訪查來研究公司的專利行為。基於競合策略在現代商業環境的重要性，加上許多研究指出科技指標對創新績效表現有強烈相關性，我們開發了一個自動預測系統，用以預測企業在實施競合策略後的創新績效表現。我們分析1990年1月到2015年12月在高科技產業中參與競合策略的企業，並定義多個科技指標、財務指標與網絡指標，開發出與結果的相關係數達0.863的預測模型。研究指出，科技指標的確對預測競合策略的創新績效非常有效，且我們發現，科技指標搭配網絡指標能夠有更好的預測效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | There are about 20% coopetition in all alliances and more than 85% of companies who did coopetition is belong to high-tech industry. It shows coopetition plays an important role for contemporary business, especially in high-tech industries. Many researches show that coopetition brings positive effect on innovativeness (Belderbos, Carree and Lokshin, 2004; Quintana-Garcia and Benavides-Velasco, 2004). The appropriate selection of coopetition targets for a given bidder company constitutes a critical first step for an effective coopetition activity. Yet existing studies employ financial and network indicators when constructing inter-firm relationship prediction models (Tsakanos, Georgopoulos, & Siriopoulos, 2007; Schilling & Phelps, 2007). Even though some considered technological indicators, most of them performed qualitative researches (e.g., questionnaire and interviews) rather than quantitative research. For example, Hall & Ziedonis (2001) estimated the patenting behavior by structure questions and a follow-up survey. Due to the importance of coopetition and many researches show the effect of technological indicators on innovation performance, our study developed an automated prediction model for predicting the innovation performance resulting from a coopetition. Our evaluation results, on the basis of the coopetition cases between January 1990 to December 2015 that involve companies in high-tech industries (i.e., ICT, software and pharmaceutical industries). With defined technological, financial and network indicators, we developed an innovation performance prediction model with 0.863 correlation coefficient. We proved that the technological variables are effective for this prediction task, and we investigated the incorporation of network variables successfully improve the prediction effectiveness. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:51:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R02725026-1.pdf: 948909 bytes, checksum: b864fc48992dbf859ace924eb6d40e1d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Motivations and Objectives 3 1.3 Research Structure 6 Chapter 2 Literature Review 9 2.1 Definition and Theoretical Frameworks for Coopetition 9 2.2 Importance and Risks of Coopetition for Technological Innovation 11 2.3 Factors Affecting Innovation Performance Brought by an Inter-firm Relationship (Alliance, M&A, Coopetition) 15 2.3.1 Technological Characteristics 15 2.3.2 Financial Characteristics 19 2.3.3 Network Characteristics 20 Chapter 3 Method 23 3.1 Overall Design 23 3.2 Variables 25 3.2.1 Dependent Variable 25 3.2.2 Financial Related Independent Variables 27 3.2.3 Network Related Independent Variables 29 3.2.4 Technological Related Independent Variables 33 3.3 Inductive Learning Algorithms 44 Chapter 4 Empirical Evaluation 48 4.1 Data Collection 48 4.1.1 Initial Dataset 48 4.1.2 Coopetition Cases 50 4.2 Evaluation Results 53 4.2.1 Experiment 1: How is the Prediction Effectiveness with Technological Variables 54 4.2.2 Experiment 2: Effectiveness of Technological Variables Combining with Other Variables 56 4.2.3 Experiment 3: Effectiveness in Different Windows 58 Chapter 5 Conclusion and Future Research 63 5.1 Conclusion 63 5.2 Future Research 65 References 66 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 財務指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網絡指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 科技指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 預測模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 創新績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資料探勘 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 競合策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Technological Indicators | en |
| dc.subject | Financial Indicators | en |
| dc.subject | Data Mining | en |
| dc.subject | Prediction Model | en |
| dc.subject | Coopetition | en |
| dc.subject | Innovation Performance | en |
| dc.subject | Network Indicators | en |
| dc.title | 運用資料探勘技術預測企業競合策略之創新績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Data Mining Approach for Predicting Firm Innovation Performance after Coopetition | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳彥良,楊錦生,吳怡瑾 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 競合策略,資料探勘,創新績效,預測模型,科技指標,網絡指標,財務指標, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Coopetition,Prediction Model,Innovation Performance,Data Mining,Technological Indicators,Network Indicators,Financial Indicators, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 76 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601701 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 926.67 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。