請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49606
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 董鈺琪 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Chen Sun | en |
dc.contributor.author | 孫偉宸 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:37:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 呂宗學. 消弭健康不平等的相關政策-歐洲國家經驗. 醫療品質雜誌 2010; 4:20-3.
2. 江東亮. 公共衛生與健康不平等:三個歷史的教訓. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌 2015; 34:1-4. 3. Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet 365:1099-104. 4. Stringhini S, Sabia S, Shipley M, et al. Association of socioeconomic position with health behaviors and mortality. JAMA 2010; 303:1159-66. 5. Winkleby MA, Jatulis DE, Frank E, Fortmann SP. Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Public Health 1992; 82:816-20. 6. Khang YH, Kim HR. Relationship of education, occupation, and income with mortality in a representative longitudinal study of South Korea. European Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 20:217-20. 7. Geyer S, Hemstrom O, Peter R, Vagero D. Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006; 60:804-10. 8. McArthur KS, Quinn TJ, Higgins P, Langhorne P. Post-acute care and secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke. Brit Med J 2011; 342. 9. 廖建彰, 李采娟, 林瑞雄, 宋鴻樟. 2000年台灣腦中風發生率與盛行率的城鄉差異. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌 2006; 25:223-30. 10. Lin HC, Lin YJ, Liu TC, Chen CS, Chiu WT. Urbanization and stroke prevalence in Taiwan: analysis of a nationwide survey. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 2007; 84:604-14. 11. Hu HH, Chu FL, Chiang BN, et al. Prevalence of stroke in Taiwan. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 1989; 20:858-63. 12. Lindmark A, Glader EL, Asplund K, Norrving B, Eriksson M, Riks-Stroke C. Socioeconomic disparities in stroke case fatality--Observations from Riks-Stroke, the Swedish Stroke Register. International Journal of Stroke : Official Journal of the International Stroke Society 2014; 9:429-36. 13. Aslanyan S, Weir CJ, Lees KR, Reid JL, McInnes GT. Effect of area-based deprivation on the severity, subtype, and outcome of ischemic stroke. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2003; 34:2623-8. 14. Marshall IJ, Wang Y, Crichton S, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA. The effects of socioeconomic status on stroke risk and outcomes. The Lancet Neurology 2015; 14:1206-18. 15. 邱弘毅. 腦中風之現況與流行病學特徵. 腦中風會訊 2008; 15:2-4. 16. Lim WK, Lambert SF, Gray LC. Effectiveness of case management and post-acute services in older people after hospital discharge. Med J Aust 2003; 178:262-6. 17. Buntin MB, Colla CH, Deb P, Sood N, Escarce JJ. Medicare Spending and Outcomes after Post-Acute Care for Stroke and Hip Fracture. Medical Care 2010; 48:776-84. 18. Sandel ME, Wang H, Terdiman J, et al. Disparities in stroke rehabilitation: results of a study in an integrated health system in northern California. PM & R : the Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation 2009; 1:29-40. 19. 衛生福利部國民健康署. 醫護人員腦中風教育手冊. Available at : http://www.hpa.gov.tw/bhpnet/Portal/File/ThemeDocFile/20070820110817/%E9%86%AB%E8%AD%B7%E4%BA%BA%E5%93%A1%E8%85%A6%E4%B8%AD%E9%A2%A8%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8A.pdf 20. Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Medicine 2006; 3:e442. 21. Koton S, Schneider AL, Rosamond WD, et al. Stroke incidence and mortality trends in US communities, 1987 to 2011. JAMA 2014; 312:259-68. 22. Andersen KK, Olsen TS, Dehlendorff C, Kammersgaard LP. Hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes compared: stroke severity, mortality, and risk factors. Stroke 2009; 40:2068-72. 23. Strong K, Mathers C, Bonita R. Preventing stroke: saving lives around the world. The Lancet Neurology 2007; 6:182-7. 24. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. The Lancet Neurology 2009; 8:355-69. 25. Thrift AG, Cadilhac DA, Thayabaranathan T, et al. Global stroke statistics. International Journal of Stroke : Official Journal of the International Stroke Society 2014; 9:6-18. 26. Taiwan Executive Yuan Ministry of Health and Welfare. Cause Of Death Data. Available at: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=5488 27. Han DS, Pan SL, Chen SY, Lie SK, Lien IN, Wang TG. Predictors of long-term survival after stroke in Taiwan. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40:844-9. 28. Hou WH, Ni CH, Li CY, Tsai PS, Lin LF, Shen HN. Stroke Rehabilitation and Risk of Mortality: A Population-Based Cohort Study Stratified by Age and Gender. J Stroke Cerebrovasc 2015; 24:1414-22. 29. Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. International Journal of Health Services : Planning, Administration, Evaluation 1992; 22:429-45. 30. Cox AM, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Socioeconomic status and stroke. The Lancet Neurology 2006; 5:181-8. 31. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet; 372:1661-9. 32. Stafford M, Marmot M. Neighbourhood deprivation and health: does it affect us all equally? International Journal of Epidemiology 2003; 32:357-66. 33. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annual Review of Public Health 1997; 18:341-78. 34. Davey Smith G, Hart C, Hole D, et al. Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1998; 52:153-60. 35. Steenland K, Henley J, Calle E, Thun M. Individual- and area-level socioeconomic status variables as predictors of mortality in a cohort of 179,383 persons. American Journal of Epidemiology 2004; 159:1047-56. 36. Addo J, Ayerbe L, Mohan KM, et al. Socioeconomic status and stroke: an updated review. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2012; 43:1186-91. 37. Kapral MK, Fang J, Chan C, et al. Neighborhood income and stroke care and outcomes. Neurology 2012; 79:1200-7. 38. Thrift AG, Dewey HM, Sturm JW, et al. Greater incidence of both fatal and nonfatal strokes in disadvantaged areas: the Northeast Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2006; 37:877-82. 39. Zhou G, Liu X, Xu G, Liu X, Zhang R, Zhu W. The effect of socioeconomic status on three-year mortality after first-ever ischemic stroke in Nanjing, China. BMC Public Health 2006; 6:227. 40. Kapral MK, Wang H, Mamdani M, Tu JV. Effect of socioeconomic status on treatment and mortality after stroke. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2002; 33:268-73. 41. Arrich J, Lalouschek W, Mullner M. Influence of socioeconomic status on mortality after stroke: retrospective cohort study. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2005; 36:310-4. 42. Saposnik G, Jeerakathil T, Selchen D, et al. Socioeconomic status, hospital volume, and stroke fatality in Canada. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2008; 39:3360-6. 43. Li C, Hedblad B, Rosvall M, Buchwald F, Khan FA, Engstrom G. Stroke incidence, recurrence, and case-fatality in relation to socioeconomic position: a population-based study of middle-aged Swedish men and women. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2008; 39:2191-6. 44. Toivanen S. Income differences in stroke mortality: a 12-year follow-up study of the Swedish working population. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2011; 39:797-804. 45. Jakovljevic D, Sarti C, Sivenius J, et al. Socioeconomic differences in the incidence, mortality and prognosis of intracerebral hemorrhage in Finnish Adult Population. The FINMONICA Stroke Register. Neuroepidemiology 2001; 20:85-90. 46. Peltonen M, Rosen M, Lundberg V, Asplund K. Social patterning of myocardial infarction and stroke in Sweden: incidence and survival. American Journal of Epidemiology 2000; 151:283-92. 47. Heeley EL, Wei JW, Carter K, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in stroke rates and outcome: pooled analysis of stroke incidence studies in Australia and New Zealand. The Medical Journal of Australia 2011; 195:10-4. 48. Jakovljevic D, Sarti C, Sivenius J, et al. Socioeconomic status and ischemic stroke: The FINMONICA Stroke Register. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2001; 32:1492-8. 49. Cesaroni G, Agabiti N, Forastiere F, Perucci CA. Socioeconomic differences in stroke incidence and prognosis under a universal healthcare system. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2009; 40:2812-9. 50. Weir NU, Gunkel A, McDowall M, Dennis MS. Study of the relationship between social deprivation and outcome after stroke. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2005; 36:815-9. 51. Avendano M, Kunst AE, van Lenthe F, et al. Trends in socioeconomic disparities in stroke mortality in six european countries between 1981-1985 and 1991-1995. American Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 161:52-61. 52. Ahacic K, Trygged S, Kareholt I. Income and education as predictors of stroke mortality after the survival of a first stroke. Stroke Research and Treatment 2012; 2012:983145. 53. Langagergaard V, Palnum KH, Mehnert F, et al. Socioeconomic differences in quality of care and clinical outcome after stroke: a nationwide population-based study. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2011; 42:2896-902. 54. Buntin MB, Garten AD, Paddock S, Saliba D, Totten M, Escarce JJ. How much is postacute care use affected by its availability? Health Serv Res 2005; 40:413-34. 55. 吳冠穎, 吳肖琪, 洪燕妮, 吳君誠, 林麗嬋, 胡漢華. 台灣腦中風病人急性後期照護需要之探討. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌 2012; 31:251-62. 56. Buntin MB. Access to postacute rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007; 88:1488-93. 57. Chan L, Sandel ME, Jette AM, et al. Does Postacute Care Site Matter? A Longitudinal Study Assessing Functional Recovery After a Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2013; 94:622-9. 58. 台灣衛生福利部. 全民健康保險提升急性後期照護品質試辦計畫. Available at:http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.aspx?menu=18&menu_id=703&webdata_id=4477 59. Andersen KK, Dalton SO, Steding-Jessen M, Olsen TS. Socioeconomic position and survival after stroke in Denmark 2003 to 2012: nationwide hospital-based study. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2014; 45:3556-60. 60. Brown AF, Liang LJ, Vassar SD, et al. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and mortality after stroke. Neurology 2013; 80:520-7. 61. Villanueva C, Aggarwal B. The Association between Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Clinical Outcomes among Patients 1 Year after Hospitalization for Cardiovascular Disease. Journal of Community Health 2013; 38:690-7. 62. Hakkennes SJ, Brock K, Hill KD. Selection for Inpatient Rehabilitation After Acute Stroke: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2011; 92:2057-70. 63. Freburger JK, Holmes GM, Ku LJ, Cutchin MP, Heatwole-Shank K, Edwards LJ. Disparities in postacute rehabilitation care for stroke: an analysis of the state inpatient databases. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2011; 92:1220-9. 64. Wang H, Sandel ME, Terdiman J, et al. Postacute Care and Ischemic Stroke Mortality: Findings From an Integrated Health Care System in Northern California. Pm&R 2011; 3:686-94. 65. Kind AJ, Smith MA, Frytak JR, Finch MD. Bouncing back: patterns and predictors of complicated transitions 30 days after hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2007; 55:365-73. 66. Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, et al. Hospital-level variation in mortality and rehospitalization for medicare beneficiaries with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 2011; 42:159-66. 67. Chang HY, Bodycombe DP, Huang WF, Weiner JP. Risk-adjusted resource allocation: using Taiwan's National Health Insurance as an example. Asia-Pacific journal of public health / Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health 2015; 27:Np958-71. 68. Chen Y-H, Lee H-C, Lin H-C. Prevalence and risk of atopic disorders among schizophrenia patients: A nationwide population based study. Schizophrenia Research 2009; 108:191-6. 69. Lin C, Hsu H-T, Lin Y-S, Weng S-F. Increased risk of getting sudden sensorineural hearing loss in patients with chronic kidney disease: A population-based cohort study. The Laryngoscope 2013; 123:767-73. 70. 劉介宇, 洪永泰, 莊義利, et al. 台灣地區鄉鎮市區發展類型應用於大型健康調查抽樣設計之研究. 健康管理學刊 2006; 4:1-22. 71. Legg L, Langhorne P, Andersen HE, et al. Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomised trials. Lancet 2004; 363:352-6. 72. Ghose SS, Williams LS, Swindle RW. Depression and other mental health diagnoses after stroke increase inpatient and outpatient medical utilization three years poststroke. Med Care 2005; 43:1259-64. 73. Foley N, Salter K, Teasell R. Specialized Stroke Services: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Three Models of Care. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2007; 23:194-202. 74. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1994; 26:115-9. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49606 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 研究背景:腦血管疾病為我國第三大主要死因,個人收入、早期復健可能與中風照護結果有關。
研究目的;探討個人收入、中風出院後早期復健與照護結果之關係。 研究方法:本研究使用全民健康保險研究資料庫百萬抽樣承保歸人檔進行分析,以2009年至2011年台灣急性缺血性腦中風出院病人為研究對象,照護結果變項包括一年內再住院及一年內死亡。統計方法以Cox比例風險模式,分析個人收入、出院後早期復健與照護結果之間的相關性,並且控制病患及區域特性。 研究結果:研究樣本數為4150人,個人收入較高,有較低的一年內死亡與再住院的風險,中風出院後早期復健上,有接受早期復健的中風病人,一年內死亡風險較低。針對出院後接受早期復健的病患,於門診復健者,相較於住院復健者,有較低的一年內再住院與死亡風險,除此,在基層診所復健者,相較於醫院復健者,有較高的一年再住院風險。 研究結論:個人收入低、出院後未接受早期復建,與出院後照護結果差有關,再者,於門診復健相較住院復健者,有較佳的照護結果,以及在醫院復健相較診所復健者,有較低的1年再住院風險。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background:Cerebrovascular disease is the third most common cause of death in Taiwan. Personal income and early rehabilitation may be related to the stroke care outcome.
Objectives:The objective of this study was to understand the relationship between individual income, early rehabilitation and outcomes after stroke. Method:This study analyzed samples of 1 million beneficiaries of the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database, a data subset of the National Health Insurance Research Database, to investigate discharged patients that experienced an acute ischemic stroke in 2009–2011. The variables affecting the stroke care outcomes included the risks of readmission within 1 year and death within 1 year. Through the Cox proportional hazards model, the correlations among personal income, early rehabilitation, and treatment outcome were determined. The control variables were the patient and local characteristics. Result:The patients with high personal income exhibited low risks of readmission or death within 1 year. The patients receiving early rehabilitation exhibited low risks of death within 1 year. Moreover, the patients receiving outpatient rehabilitation exhibited lower risks of readmission and death within 1 year than did those receiving inpatient rehabilitation, and the patients receiving rehabilitation in primary care clinics demonstrated higher risks of readmission within 1 year than did those receiving rehabilitation in hospitals. Conclusion: The patients with low personal income and without receiving early rehabilitation have poor outcomes after stroke. Moreover, the patients receiving outpatient rehabilitation are better than receiving inpatient rehabilitation, and the patients receiving rehabilitation in hospitals demonstrated lower risks of readmission within 1 year than did those receiving rehabilitation in primary care clinics. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:37:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03848031-1.pdf: 1534672 bytes, checksum: d221af3fd90642dcb4f731b4d8cf4e01 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 前言 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究重要性 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 中風現況 5 第二節 個人與區域之健康不平等 7 第三節 中風急性後期照護 13 第四節 社經地位與照護結果關係實證研究 16 第五節 中風與急性後期照護層級實證研究 28 第三章 研究方法與設計 36 第一節 研究設計 36 第二節 研究假說 37 第三節 研究架構 38 第四節 資料來源 40 第五節 研究變項與操作型定義 41 第六節 資料處理流程 45 第七節 統計分析方法 46 第四章 研究結果 47 第一節 描述性統計 47 第二節 雙變項分析 54 第三節 一年內再住院之多變項分析 70 第四節 一年內死亡之多變項分析 77 第五章 討論 83 第一節 研究方法討論 83 第二節 研究結果討論 85 第三節 研究限制 90 第六章 結論與建議 91 第一節 結論 91 第二節 建議 92 參考文獻 94 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 個人收入、早期復健與缺血性腦中風病人照護結果之相關性 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Associations of Individual Income and Early Rehabilitation with Outcomes for Patients with Ischemic Stroke | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭建興,鍾國彪 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 缺血性腦中風,復健,照護結果, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | ischemic stroke,rehabilitation,outcomes of care, | en |
dc.relation.page | 99 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602860 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.5 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。