請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49058
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 童慶斌 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Yu Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林嘉佑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:14:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Adaptation Committee of UNFCCC. (2013). The State of Adaptation under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
2. Barnett, J., Graham, S., Mortreux, C., Fincher, R., Waters, E., & Hurlimann, A. (2014). A local coastal adaptation pathway. Nature Climate Change, 4(12), 1103–1108. http://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2383 3. Baker, B., Diaz, H., Hargrove, W., & Hoffman, F. (2010). Use of the Köppen–Trewartha climate classification to evaluate climatic refugia in statistically derived ecoregions for the People’s Republic of China. Climatic Change, 98(1-2), 113-131. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9622-2 4. Bergdahl, M., Ehling, M., Elvers, E., Földesi, E., Körner, T., Kron, A. ... & Sæb?, H. V. (2007). Handbook on data quality assessment methods and tools. European Commission, EUROSTAT, Wiesbaden. 5. Biesbroek, R., & Swart, R. J. (2014). National adaptation policy processes in European countries-2014 (No. 4, p. 136). European Environment Agency. 6. Bentley, P. J., & Wakefield, J. P. (1998). Finding acceptable solutions in the pareto-optimal range using multiobjective genetic algorithms. In Soft computing in engineering design and manufacturing (pp. 231-240). Springer London. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0427-8_25 7. Burton, I., Smith, J. B., & Tol, R. S. (1998). Handbook on methods for climate change impact assessment and adaptation strategies. UNEP. 8. Collier, M. A., Jeffrey, S. J., Rotstayn, L. D., Wong, K. K., Dravitzki, S. M., Moseneder, C., & Artif, M. (2011). The CSIRO-Mk3. 6.0 Atmosphere-Ocean GCM: participation in CMIP5 and data publication. In International Congress on Modelling and Simulation–MODSIM. 9. ESPACE. (2008). Climate Change Impacts and Spatial Planning Decision Support Guidance. European Spatial Planning Adapting to Climate Change Events, (June), 36. 10. Evans, J. P., Ji, F., Lee, C., Smith, P., Argüeso, D., & Fita, L. (2014). Design of a regional climate modelling projection ensemble experiment–NARCliM. Geoscientific Model Development, 7(2), 621-629. DOI:10.5194/gmd-7-621-2014 11. Gibelin, A. L., & Déqué, M. (2003). Anthropogenic climate change over the Mediterranean region simulated by a global variable resolution model. Climate Dynamics, 20(4), 327-339. DOI: 10.1007/s00382-002-0277-1 12. Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W. E., & ter Maat, J. (2013). Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global environmental change, 23(2), 485-498. 13. Huang, A., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Huang, D., Zhao, Y., Wu, H. (2014). Changes of the annual precipitation over Central Asia in the twenty-first century projected by multimodels of CMIP5. Journal of Climate, 27, 6627-6646. 14. Haith, D. A., Mandel, R., & Wu, R. S. (1992). GWLF, generalized watershed loading functions, version 2.0, user’s manual. Dept. of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Hirota, N., & Takayabu, Y. N. (2013). Reproducibility of precipitation distribution over the tropical oceans in CMIP5 multi-climate models compared to CMIP3. Climate Dynamics, 41(11-12), 2909-2920. 15. Impacts and risks from higher-end scenarios: Strategies for innovative solutions (IMPRESSIONS). (2015). IMPRESSIONS 1st Periodic Report Publishable Summary. Retrieved from: http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/171561_en.html 16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001). Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0015br 17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007-impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Working group II contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press. 18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Towards. New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies: IPCC. Expert Meeting Report. 19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2010). IPCC Workshop on Socio-Economic Scenarios. IPCC Workshop on Socio-Economic Scenarios, Victor’s Residenz-Hotel, Berlin, Germany, 1-3 November 2010, (November), 1–61. 20. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Climate Change 2014–Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Regional Aspects. Cambridge University Press. 21. Jones, R., & Boer, R. (2004). APF Technical Paper 4: Assessing Current Climate Risks, Technical (4), 91–118. 22. Klostermann, J., Sandt, K., Harley, M., Hildén, M., Leiter, T., Minnen, J., ... & Bree, L. (2015). Towards a framework to assess, compare and develop monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation in Europe. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 1-23. 23. Köppen, W. (1936). Das geographische System der Klimate–Handbuch der Klimatologie, Vol. 1, Part C, Gebr. Borntrager Verl., Berlin, 388. 24. Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006). World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 15(3), 259-263. DOI: 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130 25. Kriegler, E., O’Neill, B. C., Hallegatte, S., Kram, T., Lempert, R. J., Moss, R. H., & Wilbanks, T. (2012). The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: a new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environmental Change, 22(4), 807-822. 26. Kullback, S. (1968). Information theory and statistics. Courier Corporation. DOI: 10.1137/1002033 27. Knutti, R., Masson, D., & Gettelman, A. (2013). Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(6), 1194-1199. DOI: 10.1002/grl.50256 28. Kuntti, R., & Sedláček, J. (2013). Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 369-373. 29. Kusunoki, S., & Arakawa, O. (2015). Are CMIP5 Models Better than CMIP3 Models in Simulating Precipitation over East Asia?. Journal of Climate, 28(14), 5601-5621. 30. Kutzbach, J. E. (1967). Empirical eigenvectors of sea-level pressure, surface temperature and precipitation complexes over North America. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 6(5), 791-802. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1967)006<0791:EEOSLP>2.0.CO;2 31. Lee, J.Y., Wang, B. (2014). Future change of global monsoon in the CMIP5. Climate Dynamics, 42, 1, 101-119. 32. Lim, B., Spanger-siegfried, E., Burton, I., Malone, E. L., Huq, S., Spanger-S, & Iegfried, E. (2004). Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change : Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures. Framework. Retrieved from http://www.cambridge.org 33. Liu, T. M., Tung, C. P., Ke, K. Y., Chuang, L. H., & Lin, C. Y. (2009). Application and development of a decision-support system for assessing water shortage and allocation with climate change. Paddy and Water Environment, 7(4), 301-311. 34. Local and Regional Adaptation Partnership (LRAP). (2010). Adapting to Climate Change Guidance notes for NI188, Version 1.8. 35. Lorenz, E. N. (1956). Empirical orthogonal functions and statistical weather prediction. 36. Lutz, A. F., Immerzeel, W. W., Gobiet, A., Pellicciotti, F., and Bierkens, M. F. P., (2013). Comparison of climate change signals in CMIP3 and CMIP5 multi-model ensembles and implications for Central Asian glacier. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3661-3677. 37. Masson, D., & Knutti, R. (2011). Climate model genealogy. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(8), 1-4. DOI: 10.1029/2011GL046864 38. Malmgren, B. A., & Winter, A. (1999). Climate zonation in Puerto Rico based on principal components analysis and an artificial neural network. Journal of Climate, 12(4), 977–985. http://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0977:CZIPRB>2.0.CO;2 39. McMahon, T.A., Peel, M.C., Karoly, D.J. (2015). Assessment of precipitation and temperature data from CMIP3 global climate models for hydrologic simulation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 361-377. 40. Monitoring Mechanism Regulation 525/2013. Official Journal of the European Union L165/13 41. Pearson, K. (1901). LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 2(11), 559-572. DOI: 10.1080/14786440109462720 42. Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions Discussions, 4(2), 439-473. DOI: 10.5194/hessd-4-439-2007 43. Sadiq, N. (2011). Principal Component and Clustering Analyses for Seasonal Classification of Karachi. Pakistan Journal of Meteorology (Pakistan). 44. Schmidli, J., Frei, C., & Vidale, P. L. (2006). Downscaling from GCM precipitation: a benchmark for dynamical and statistical downscaling methods. International journal of climatology, 26(5), 679-689. DOI: 10.1002/joc.1287 45. Seo, K. H., Ok, J., Son, J. H., & Cha, D. H. (2013). Assessing future changes in the East Asian summer monsoon using CMIP5 coupled models. Journal of Climate, 26(19), 7662-7675. 46. Supharatid, S., (2015). Assessment of CMIP3-CMIP5 Climate Models Precipitation Projection and Implication of Flood Vulnerability of Bangkok. American Journal of Climate Change, 4, 140-162. 47. Suppiah, R., Hennessy, K. J., & Whetton, P. H. (2007, December). A comparison of Australian climate change projections based on IPCC TAR and AR4 climate model simulations. In MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand (pp. 518-524). 48. Sun, Q., Miao, C., and Duan, Q., (2015). Comparative analysis of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models for simulating the daily mean, maximum, and minimum temperatures and daily precipitation over China. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 120, 4806–4824. 49. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012). An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(4), 485-498. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1 50. Trewartha, G. T., & Horn, L. H. (1954). An introduction to climate (Vol. 1961). New York: McGraw-Hill. DOI: 10.1126/science.120.3130.1067-a 51. Tryon, R. C. (1939). Cluster analysis: correlation profile and orthometric (factor) analysis for the isolation of unities in mind and personality. Edwards brother, Incorporated, lithoprinters and publishers. 52. Tung, C.-P., Liu, T.-M., Chen, S.-W., Ke, K.-Y., & Li, M.-H. (2014). Carrying Capacity and Sustainability Appraisals on Regional Water Supply Systems under Climate Change. British Journal of Environment & Climate Change, 4(1), 44–61. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=95103189&lang=es&site=ehost-live 53. United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Fccc/Informal/84, 1(3), 270–277. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1992.tb00046.x 54. United Kingdom Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP). (2013). The UKCIP Adaptation Wizard v 4.0. UKCIP, Oxford www.ukcip.org.uk/wizard/ 55. United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Fccc/Informal/84, 1(3), 270–277. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.1992.tb00046.x 56. United States Agency for International Development (USAID). (2014) Data Quality Assessment Checklist. An Additional Help for ADS Chapter 597. 57. Van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., O’Neill, B. C., Ebi, K. L., Riahi, K., Carter, T. R., ... & Winkler, H. (2014). A new scenario framework for climate change research: scenario matrix architecture. Climatic Change, 122(3), 373-386. 58. Ward Jr, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American statistical association, 58(301), 236-244. DOI: 10.2307/2282967 59. Whetton, P.H., K. McInnes, R.N. Jones, K.J. Hennessy, R. Suppiah, C. M. Page, J. Bathols, and P. Durack (2005). Climate change projections for Australia for impact assessment and policy application: A review. CSIRO Technical Paper. 001, Aspendale, Vic., CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, 34p. 60. Wilby, R. L., & Wigley, T. M. L. (1997). Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Progress in Physical Geography, 21(4), 530-548. DOI: 10.1177/030913339702100403 61. Yao, Y., Liang, S., Li, X., Liu, S., Chen, J., Zhang, X., ... & Liu, M. (2016). Assessment and simulation of global terrestrial latent heat flux by synthesis of CMIP5 climate models and surface eddy covariance observations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 223, 151-167. 62. Yokoi, S., Takahashi, C., Yasunaga, K., Shirooka, R. (2012). Multi-model projection of tropical cyclone genesis frequency over the western north Pacific: CMIP5 results. Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere, 8, 137-140. 63. Zhao, Y., Zhang, H. (2015). Impacts of SST warming in tropical Indian Ocean on CMIP5 model-projected summer rainfall changes over Central Asia. Climate Dynamics, 1-16. 64. Zubler, E.M., Fischer, A.M., Fröb F., Liniger, M.A. (2015). Climate change signals of CMIP5 general circulation models over the Alps – impact of model selection. International Journal of Climatology 65. TaiWAP模式網站:http://sdl.ae.ntu.edu.tw/TaiWAP/ 66. 朱容練、朱吟晨、林士堯、劉俊志、陳永明(2015)。2014-2015年乾旱事件概述。國家災害防救科技中心災害防救電子報第124期。 67. 吳明進,陳幼麟(1993)。臺灣的氣候分區。大氣科學,21(1),55~66。 68. 吳約西,張承宗(2002)。乾旱時期頭前溪水源調度策略分析。水資源管理季刊,4(3),11-14。 69. 邱祈榮,梁玉琦,賴彥任,黃名媛(2004)。臺灣地區氣候分區與應用之研究。台灣地理資訊學刊,1,41-62。 70. 科技部(2015)。氣候變遷調適科技整合研究計畫-跨領域脆弱度評估與回復力建構科技發展計畫(第三年)。行政院科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告(編號:MOST 104-2621-M-002 -002-)。 71. 國家發展委員會(2014),國家氣候變遷調適行動計畫。行政院 103 年 5 月 22 日院臺環字第 1030027653 號函核定通過。 72. 莊立昕(2010)。氣候變遷對供水系統承載力評估方法之建立。國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系研究所碩士論文。 73. 連宛渝,童慶斌,何宜昕,戴嘉慧,莊立昕(2013)。建立環流模式推估能力評比方法。農業工程學報,59(1),1-14。 74. 陳韻如,童裕翔,朱容練,陳永明(2015)。CMIP5模式表現量表於流量衝擊評估之應用。104年度農業工程研討會,研討會論文集。 75. 童慶斌、劉子明、林嘉佑、曹榮軒、李明旭(2015)。氣候變遷水資源風險評估與調適決策之探討。土木水利,24(4), 30-45。 76. 黃柏勛(2013)。氣候變遷對水資源系統脆弱度與回復力之影響評估。國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系研究所碩士論文。 77. 經濟部水利署(2009)。2008年∼2012年積極推動節約用水計畫。 78. 經濟部水利署(2016)。中國民國一○四年臺灣水文年報。經濟部水利署編印。 79. 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2007)。強化區域水資源永續利用與因應氣候變遷之調適能力(1/2)。水規所委辦計畫期末報告(編號:MOEAWRA0960132) 80. 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2010)。強化南部水資源分區因應氣候變遷水資源管理調適能力研究(1/2)。水規所委辦計畫期末報告(編號:MOEAWRA0990327) 81. 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2011)。強化南部水資源分區因應氣候變遷水資源管理調適能力研究(2/2)。水規所委辦計畫期末報告(編號:MOEAWRA1000071) 82. 經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2012)。強化北部水資源分區因應氣候變遷水資源管理調適能力研究。水規所委辦計畫期末報告(編號:MOEAWRA1010284)。 83. 經濟部水利署南區水資源局(2009)。頭前溪水資源綜合經營管理之研究。南水局委辦計畫期末報告 84. 經濟部水利署南區水資源局(2015)。高雄地區水資源供需風險及經濟面影響研究。南水局委辦計畫期末報告(編號:102KLEP03) 85. 經濟部水利署網站(2016)。基本水利資訊 --臺灣水資源運用之相關資料。http://www.wra.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=48009&ctNode=7669&comefrom=lp#7669 (最近更新日期:2016-08-05) 86. 萬寶康(1973),台灣分區氣候與天氣之研究(一)。氣象學報,19(4), 1-19。 87. 劉子明(2010)。氣候變遷對區域水資源衝擊整合評估之研究。國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系研究所博士論文。 88. 蔣丙然(1954)。臺灣氣候誌。臺灣研究叢刊,26,220。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49058 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 面對全球氣候變遷所帶來的風險,各國近年來紛紛發展出各自的調適能力建構與分析流程,包括分析問題、評估風險、提出解決方案、檢討與修正等步驟,以系統性的方式逐步分析氣候變遷帶來的風險,並嘗試針對風險來源提出調適策略與行動,將氣候變遷帶來風險降至最低。我國科技部「氣候變遷調適科技整合研究計畫(TaiCCAT)」,曾參考國內外氣候變遷調適行動建構流程,提出TaiCCAT氣候調適六步驟,分別為(1)界定問題與設定目標、(2)評估與分析現況風險、(3)評估與分析未來風險、(4)界定與評估調適選項、(5)規劃與執行調適路徑、(6)監測與修正調適路徑。上述步驟目前已受到部分研究機構與縣市政府採用,做為評估氣候變遷風險以及建構調適能力之參考流程。然而,現行TaiCCAT氣候調適六步驟的整體架構已經建構完成,但在執行細節上仍有許多可進一步強化之空間。本研究以TaiCCAT調適六步驟為核心,首先將以資訊流的方式分析六大步驟的細部流程,以資訊銜接的角度探討六大步驟產出資訊之相互關係,進而提出各步驟的建議改善方向。
本研究針對六大步驟中的第三、第五與第六步驟進行強化,分別建構大氣環流模式之挑選方法、調適路徑建構方法、以及調適監測與修正之建議流程,希望能強化六大步驟之內涵。在第三步驟大氣環流模式之挑選上,本研究結合單一氣象站挑選流程與區域氣象站分區結果,針對台灣地區的氣象站予以分類後劃分為10個氣候分區,並配合單一氣象站之大氣環流模式挑選結果選出各區域適用之環流模式。在第五步驟調適路徑的建構上,計畫評核術(Program Evaluation and Review Technique,簡稱PERT)則被用於建構氣候變遷調適路徑。在第六步驟部分,本研究則提出監測與修正流程。最後,本研究以新竹頭前溪供水系統做為示範案例,將修改過後之TaiCCAT調適六步驟運用於該地區之水資源系統,以探討該方法實際運用於區域水資源風險評估與調適能力建構之可行性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In order to face the challenge of climate change, many counties have developed the climate adaptive capacity building processes. Most adaptive capacity building processes start from problem identification and risk assessment, and then attempt to propose adaptation strategies to cope with climate change uncertainty. However, the monitoring, reporting and evaluation (MRE) process to adaptation strategies is also important under the high uncertainty of climate change. The Taiwan integrated research program on climate change adaptation technology (TaiCCAT), funded by the ministry of science and technology, have reviewed the adaptive processes from different countries, and proposed TaiCCAT six-steps. The TaiCCAT six-steps include (1) Identifying problems and objectives, (2) Assessing current risk, (3) Assessing future risk, (4) Identifying and assessing adaptation options, 5. Planning and implementing adaptation pathway, (6) Monitoring and modifying. The six-steps have been used by several research institutes and city/county governments to assess risk of climate change and build adaptation action plans. The framework of TaiCCAT six-steps have been constructed, but several issues are still left for in-depth discussion. The TaiCCAT six-steps is uses as the core part of this research, and the skill of information flow analysis is applied to analysis the sub-processes of six-steps from the angle of inputs, tools, and outputs of each step. In this study the improvements for six-steps are proposed after the information flow analysis.
In this reaearch, three procedures are established separately to support the original processes of step 3, step 5 and step 6 of TaiCCAT six-steps: 1. GCM selection, 2. adaptation pathway building, 3. monitoring and revising of adaptation pathway. The procedure of GCM selection consists of GCM applicability ranking process for single weather station and the result of climate zonation. The weather stations in Taiwan were classified into 10 climate zones, and GCM suggestion list for each zone was generated according the result of GCM ranking for single weather station. The skill of program evaluation and review technique (PERT) was used to arrange the schedule of adaptation actions, and build adaptation pathway map for step 5. The procedures of adaptive monitoring and revising of adaptation pathway was proposed to monitor and revise implementation of adaptation for step 6. To test the precedures proposed in this study, the Touchien River water supply system is used as the study area to assess climate change risk and build adaptation capacity with TaiCCAT six-steps. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:14:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-D97622003-1.pdf: 6023584 bytes, checksum: e604a8bb0fa6318a0f3406f791380d99 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘 要 III
Abstract V 目 錄 V 表 目 錄 IX 圖 目 錄 XI 第一章 前言 1 1.1 緣起 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 氣候變遷風險定義 7 2.2 國內外氣候變遷調適流程 9 2.3 大氣環流模式評比方法 21 2.4 氣候分類方法 27 2.5 調適監測、報告與修正相關文獻 28 第三章 TaiCCAT氣候調適六步驟之資訊流分析 33 3.1 TaiCCAT氣候調適六步驟資訊流之視覺呈現 34 3.2 氣候調適六步驟資訊流之銜接性探討 50 3.3 TaiCCAT氣候調適六步驟之改善建議 55 3.4 小結 61 第四章 大氣環流模式挑選 63 4.1 大氣環流模式挑選方法 63 4.2 大氣環流模式挑選結果 71 4.3 小結 79 第五章 調適路徑之建立與調適監測修正流程 81 5.1 調適路徑 81 5.2 制定調適監測計畫 91 5.3 制定調適路徑修正計畫 97 第六章 案例分析 101 6.1 界定問題與設定目標 101 6.2 評估與分析現況風險 108 6.3 評估與分析未來風險 112 6.4 界定與評估調適選項 117 6.5 規劃與執行調適路徑 125 6.6 監測與修正調適路徑 133 第七章 結論與建議 137 7.1 結論 137 7.2 建議 139 參考文獻 141 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 因應氣候變遷之供水系統調適能力建構與監測修正調適路徑之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | udy on Climate Change Adaptive Capacity Building of Water Supply System and Monitoring and Revising of Adaptation Pathway | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林裕彬,蘇明道,游保杉,吳瑞賢,李明旭 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 氣候風險,調適能力建構,調適監測,大氣環流模式挑選,調適路徑, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Climate Risk,Adaptive Capacity Building,Adaptive Monitoring,GCM Selection,Adaptation Pathway, | en |
dc.relation.page | 147 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603468 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 5.88 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。