請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49008完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Chia Su | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蘇瑋佳 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:13:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-09-13 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2016-09-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Aguilera, F., Valenzuela, L. M., ＆ Botequilha-Leitão, A. (2011) Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns: A case study in a Spanish metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(3–4), 226-238.
2. Ahern, J. (1999). Spatial concepts, planning strategies and future scenarios: a framework method for integrating landscape ecology and landscape planning. In J. M. Klopatek & R. H. Gardner (Eds.), Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications (pp. 175-201). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.. 3. Ahern, J. (2013). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1203-1212. 4. Ahern, J., Cilliers, S., & Niemelä, J. (2014). The concept of ecosystem services in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 254-259. 5. Alberti, M., Booth, D., Hill, K., Coburn, B., Avolio, C., Coe, S., & Spirandelli, D. (2007). The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: An empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins, Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(4), 345-361. 6. Amiri, B., & Nakane, K. (2008) Entire catchment and buffer zone approaches to modeling linkage between river water quality and land cover—A case study of Yamaguchi Prefecture, Japan. Chinese Geographical Science, 18(1), 85-92. 7. Amiri, B., & Nakane, K. (2009). Modeling the Linkage Between River Water Quality and Landscape Metrics in the Chugoku District of Japan. Water Resources Management, 23(5), 931-956. 8. Anbumozhi, V., Radhakrishnan, J., & Yamaji, E. (2005). Impact of riparian buffer zones on water quality and associated management considerations. Ecological Engineering, 24(5), 517-523. 9. Asgarian, A., Amiri, B. J., & Sakieh, Y. (2014). Assessing the effect of green cover spatial patterns on urban land surface temperature using landscape metrics approach. Urban Ecosystems, 18(1), 209-222. 10. Baguette, M., & Van Dyck, H. (2007). Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landscape ecology, 22(8), 1117-1129. 11. Banner, E., Stahl, A., & Dodds, W. (2009). Stream Discharge and Riparian Land Use Influence In-Stream Concentrations and Loads of Phosphorus from Central Plains Watersheds. Environmental Management, 44(3), 552-565. 12. Becker, J. C., Rodibaugh, K. J., Labay, B. J., Bonner, T. H., Zhang, Y., & Nowlin, W. H. (2014). Physiographic gradients determine nutrient concentrations more than land use in a Gulf Slope (USA) river system. Freshwater Science, 33(3), 731-744. 13. Bengtsson, J., Nilsson, S. G., Franc, A., Menozzi, P. (2000). Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 132(1), 39-50. 14. Bergman, K.-O., Askling, J., Ekberg, O., Ignell, H., Wahlman, H., & Milberg, P. (2004). Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography, 27(5), 619-628. 15. Billy, C., Birgand, F., Ansart, P., Peschard, J., Sebilo, M., & Tournebize, J. (2013). Factors controlling nitrate concentrations in surface waters of an artificially drained agricultural watershed. Landscape Ecology, 28(4), 665-684. 16. Blair, R. B. (1999). Birds and Butterflies along an Urban Gradient: Sorrogate Taxa for Assessing Biodiversity? Ecological Applications, 9(1), 164-170. 17. Blaschke, T. (2006). The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(3), 198-226. 18. Bohnet, I. C. (2010). Integrating social and ecological knowledge for planning sustainable land- and sea-scapes: experiences from the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Landscape Ecology, 25(8), 1201-1218. 19. Bohnet, I., ＆ Smith, D. M. (2007). Planning future landscapes in the Wet Tropics of Australia: A social–ecological framework. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(1–2), 137-152. 20. Branco, C. W. C., & Senna, P. A. C. (1996). Relations among heterotrophic bacteria, chlorophyll-a, total phytoplankton, total zooplankton and physical and chemical features in the Paranoá reservoir, Brasília, Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 337(1), 171-181. 21. Brooker, L. (2002). The application of focal species knowledge to landscape design in agricultural lands using the ecological neighbourhood as a template. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(4), 185-210. 22. Brown, M. T., & Vivas, M. B. (2005). Landscape development intensity index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 101(1), 289-309. 23. Canterbury, G. E., Martin, T. E., Petit, D. R., Petit, L. J., & Bradford, D. F. (2000). Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring. Conservation Biology, 14(2), 544-558. 24. Carlson, R. E. (1977). A trophic state index for lakes. Limnology and Oceanography, 22(2), 361-369. 25. Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Smith, V. H. (1998). Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications, 8(3), 559-568. 26. Chang, H. (2008). Spatial analysis of water quality trends in the Han River basin, South Korea. Water Research, 42(13), 3285-3304. 27. Chapman, K. A., & Reich, P. B. (2007). Land use and habitat gradients determine bird community diversity and abundance in suburban, rural and reserve landscapes of Minnesota, USA. Biological Conservation, 135(4), 527-541. 28. Chefaoui, R. M. (2014). Landscape metrics as indicators of coastal morphology: A multi-scale approach. Ecological Indicators, 45, 139-147. 29. Chiang, Y.-C., & Chang, C.-Y. (2004). The relationship between patch structure indices and bird diversity (in Traditional Chinese, with English abstrct), Horticulture NCHU, 29(4), 94-110. 30. Chou, W.-S., Lee, T.-C., Lin, J.-Y., & Yu, S. (2007). Phosphorus load reduction goals for Feitsui Reservoir watershed, Taiwan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 131(1), 395-408. 31. Clark, K. H., ＆ Nicholas, K. A. (2013). Introducing urban food forestry: a multifunctional approach to increase food security and provide ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 28(9), 1649-1669. 32. Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2006). Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal. Ecology, 87(1), 125-132. 33. Conway, T. M., & Lathrop, R. G. (2005). Alternative land use regulations and environmental impacts: assessing future land use in an urbanizing watershed. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71(1), 1-15. 34. Corona, P. (1993). Applying biodiversity concepts to plantation forestry in northern Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 24(1), 23-31. 35. Dallimer, M., Rouquette, J. R., Skinner, A. M. J., Armsworth, P. R., Maltby, L. M., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2012). Contrasting patterns in species richness of birds, butterflies and plants along riparian corridors in an urban landscape. Diversity and Distributions, 18(8), 742-753. 36. Davis, J., Debinski, D., & Danielson, B. (2007). Local and landscape effects on the butterfly community in fragmented Midwest USA prairie habitats. Landscape Ecology, 22(9), 1341-1354. 37. De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260-272. 38. Debinski, D. M., Vannimwegen, R. E., & Jakubauskas, M. E. (2006). Quantifying relationships between bird and butterfly community shifts and environmental change. Ecological Applications, 16(1), 380-393. 39. Dodds, W., & Oakes, R. (2006). Controls on nutrients across a prairie stream watershed: land use and riparian cover effects. Environmental Management, 37(5), 634-646. 40. Dormann, C. F., Schweiger, O., Augenstein, I., Bailey, D., Billeter, R.,…Zobel, M. (2007). Effects of landscape structure and land-use intensity on similarity of plant and animal communities. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16(6), 774-787. 41. Fabian, Y., Sandau, N., Bruggisser, O. T., Aebi, A., Kehrli, P….Bersier, L. F. (2013). The importance of landscape and spatial structure for hymenopteran‐based food webs in an agro‐ecosystem. Journal of animal ecology, 82(6), 1203-1214. 42. Flick, T., Feagan, S., & Fahrig, L. (2012). Effects of landscape structure on butterfly species richness and abundance in agricultural landscapes in eastern Ontario, Canada. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 156, 123-133. 43. Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and region. New York,NY: Cambridge University Press. 44. Fraterrigo, J., & Downing, J. (2008). The influence of land use on lake nutrients varies with watershed transport capacity. Ecosystems, 11(7), 1021-1034. 45. Fukushima, T., Takahashi, M., Matsushita, B., & Okanishi, Y. (2007). Land use/cover change and its drivers: a case in the watershed of Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 3(1), 21-31. 46. Gagné, S. A., Eigenbrod, F., Bert, D. G., Cunnington, G. M., Olson, L. T., Smith, A. C., & Fahrig, L. (2015). A simple landscape design framework for biodiversity conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 136, 13-27. 47. Gamfeldt, L., Snäll, T., Bagchi, R., Jonsson, M., Gustafsson, L….Philipson, C. D. (2013). Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature communications, 4, 1340. 48. Geneletti, D. (2008). Incorporating biodiversity assets in spatial planning: Methodological proposal and development of a planning support system. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84(3–4), 252-265. 49. Glennon, M. J., & Kretser, H. E. (2013). Size of the ecological effect zone associated with exurban development in the Adirondack Park, NY. Landscape and Urban Planning, 112, 10-17. 50. Greve, A. I. (2012). Linking urban form, land cover pattern, and hydrologic flow regime in the Puget Sound Lowland. Urban Ecosystems, 15(2), 437-450. 51. Groves, C. R., Jensen, D. B., Valutis, L. L., Redford, K. H., Shaffer, M. L.,…Anderson, M. G. (2002). Planning for biodiversity conservation: putting conservation science into practice: A seven-step framework for developing regional plans to conserve biological diversity, based upon principles of conservation biology and ecology, is being used extensively by the nature conservancy to identify priority areas for conservation. BioScience, 52(6), 499-512. 52. Guo, Q., Ma, K., Yang, L., & He, K. (2010). Testing a dynamic complex hypothesis in the analysis of land use impact on lake water quality. Water Resources Management, 24(7), 1313-1332. 53. Hawkins, V., & Selman, P. (2002). Landscape scale planning: exploring alternative land use scenarios. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(4), 211-224. 54. Heiskary, S. A., & Walker, W. W. (1988). Developing phosphorus criteria for minnesota lakes. Lake and Reservoir Management, 4(1), 1 - 9. 55. Horn, W. (1991). The influence of biomass and structure of the crustacean plankton on the water transparency in the Saidenbach storage reservoir. Hydrobiologia, 225(1), 115-120. 56. Hostetler, M., & Holling, C. S. (2000). Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosystems, 4(1), 25-54. 57. Huang, Z., Han, L., Zeng, L., Xiao, W., & Tian, Y. (2015). Effects of land use patterns on stream water quality: a case study of a small-scale watershed in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-13. 58. Hurley, T., & Mazumder, A. (2013). Spatial scale of land-use impacts on riverine drinking source water quality. Water Resources Research, 49(3), 1591-1601. 59. Hwang, S.-J., Lee, S.-W., Son, J.-Y., Park, G.-A., & Kim, S.-J. (2007). Moderating effects of the geometry of reservoirs on the relation between urban land use and water quality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(4), 175-183. 60. Ikin, K., Knight, E., Lindenmayer, D. B., Fischer, J., & Manning, A. D. (2012). Linking bird species traits to vegetation characteristics in a future urban development zone: implications for urban planning. Urban Ecosystems, 15(4), 961-977. 61. Jew, E. K. K., Loos, J., Dougill, A. J., Sallu, S. M., & Benton, T. G. (2015). Butterfly communities in miombo woodland: Biodiversity declines with increasing woodland utilisation. Biological Conservation, 192, 436-444. 62. Jones, K. B., Neale, A. C., Nash, M. S., Van Remortel, R. D., Wickham, J. D., Riitters, K. H., & O'neill, R. V. (2001). Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the united states mid-atlantic region. Landscape Ecology, 16(4), 301-312. 63. Jones, K. B., Zurlini, G., Kienast, F., Petrosillo, I., Edwards, T., Wade, T. G., Li, B.-L., & Zaccarelli, N. (2013). Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge, Landscape ecology. 28(6), 1175-1192. 64. Jones, K. L., Poole, G. C., Meyer, J. L., Bumback, W., & Kramer, E. A. (2006). Quantifying Expected Ecological Response to Natural Resource Legislation: a Case Study of Riparian Buffers, Aquatic Habitat, and Trout Populations. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 15-40. 65. Kato, S., & Ahern, J. (2011). The concept of threshold and its potential application to landscape planning. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 7(2), 275-282. 66. Kim, K.-H., & Pauleit, S. (2009). Woodland changes and their impacts on the Landscape structure in South Korea, Kwangju city region. Landscape Research, 34(3), 257-277. 67. Kondolf, G. M., & Podolak, K. (2014). Space and time scales in human-landscape systems. Environmental Management, 53(1), 76-87. 68. Kong, F., Yin, H., Nakagoshi, N., & Zong, Y. (2010). Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: Identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(1–2), 16-27. 69. Kromroy, K., Ward, K., Castillo, P., & Juzwik, J. (2007). Relationships between urbanization and the oak resource of the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan area from 1991 to 1998. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(4), 375-385. 70. Kumar, S., Simonson, S. E., & Stohlgren, T. J. (2009). Effects of spatial heterogeneity on butterfly species richness in Rocky Mountain National Park, CO, USA. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18(3), 739-763. 71. Lechner, A. M., Langford, W. T., Jones, S. D., Bekessy, S. A., & Gordon, A. (2012). Investigating species–environment relationships at multiple scales: Differentiating between intrinsic scale and the modifiable areal unit problem, Ecological Complexity, 11, 91-102. 72. Lee, B.-Y., Park, S.-J., Paule, M. C., Jun, W., & Lee, C.-H. (2012). Effects of impervious cover on the surface water quality and aquatic ecosystem of the Kyeongan Stream in South Korea. Water Environment Research, 84(8), 635-645. 73. Lee, M.-B., & Carroll, J. P. (2015). Avian diversity in pine forests along an urban–rural/agriculture-wildland gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 18(3), 685-700. 74. Lee, S.-W., Hwang, S.-J., Lee, S.-B., Hwang, H.-S., & Sung, H.-C. (2009). Landscape ecological approach to the relationships of land use patterns in watersheds to water quality characteristics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92(2), 80-89. 75. Leitão, A. B., Miller, J., Ahern, J., & Mcgarigal, K. (2012). Measuring landscapes: A planner's handbook. DC: Island press. 76. Lóczy, D., & Süto, L. (2011). Human activity and geomorphology. The Sage Handbook of geomorphology. Sage Publications, London, 260-278. 77. Machemer, P. L., Simmons, C., & Walker, R. T. (2006). Refining landscape change models through outlier analysis in the Muskegon watershed of Michigan. Landscape Research, 31(3), 277-294. 78. Marzluff, J., Bowman, R., & Donnelly, R. (2012). Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. 79. Mcgarigal, K., & Cushman, S. A. (2002). Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications, 12(2), 335-345. 80. Mckenzie, P., Cooper, A., Mccann, T., & Rogers, D. (2011). The ecological impact of rural building on habitats in an agricultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(3), 262-268. 81. Miettinen, I., Vartiainen, T., & Martikainen, P. (1997). Phosphorus and bacterial growth in drinking water. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63(8), 3242-3245. 82. Mörtberg, U., & Wallentinus, H.-G. (2000). Red-listed forest bird species in an urban environment—assessment of green space corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50(4), 215-226. 83. Nagendra, H. (2002). Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Applied Geography, 22(2), 175-186. 84. Nassauer, J. I., & Opdam, P. (2008). Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape ecology, 23(6), 633-644. 85. Nielsen, A., Trolle, D., S?ndergaard, M., Lauridsen, T. L., Bjerring, R., Olesen, J. E., & Jeppesen, E. (2012). Watershed land use effects on lake water quality in Denmark, Ecological Applications, 22(4), 1187-1200. 86. O'connell, T. J., Jackson, L. E., & Brooks, R. P. (2000). Bird Guilds as Indicators of Ecological Condition in the Central Appalachians. Ecological Applications, 10(6), 1706-1721. 87. Oteros-Rozas, E., Martín-López, B., Daw, T. M., Bohensky, E. L., Butler, J. R. A…….Vilardy, S. P. (2015). Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies. Ecology and Society, 20(4). 88. Ou, Y., Wang, X., Wang, L., & Rousseau, A. N. (2016). Landscape influences on water quality in riparian buffer zone of drinking water source area, Northern China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(2), 1-13. 89. Pasari, J. R., Levi, T., Zavaleta, E. S., & Tilman, D. (2013). Several scales of biodiversity affect ecosystem multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(25), 10219-10222. 90. Pearson, L. J., Park, S., Harman, B., ＆ Heyenga, S. (2010). Sustainable land use scenario framework: Framework and outcomes from peri-urban South-East Queensland, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 96(2), 88-97. 91. Pennington, D. N., & Blair, R. B. (2011). Habitat selection of breeding riparian birds in an urban environment: untangling the relative importance of biophysical elements and spatial scale, Diversity and Distributions, 17(3), 506-518. 92. Pino, J., Rodà, F., Ribas, J., & Pons, X. (2000). Landscape structure and bird species richness: implications for conservation in rural areas between natural parks, Landscape and Urban Planning, 49(1-2), 35-48. 93. Platt, R. V., & Schoennagel, T. (2009). An object-oriented approach to assessing changes in tree cover in the Colorado Front Range 1938-1999. Forest Ecology and Management, 258(7), 1342-1349. 94. Renetzeder, C., Schindler, S., Peterseil, J., Prinz, M. A., Mücher, S., & Wrbka, T. (2010). Can we measure ecological sustainability? Landscape pattern as an indicator for naturalness and land use intensity at regional, national and European level. Ecological Indicators, 10(1), 39-48. 95. Reyers, B., O’farrell, P. J., Nel, J. L., ＆ Wilson, K. (2012). Expanding the conservation toolbox: conservation planning of multifunctional landscapes, Landscape Ecology. 27(8), 1121-1134. 96. Robinson, N., Kadlec, T., Bowers, M. D., & Guralnick, R. P. (2014). Integrating species traits and habitat characteristics into models of butterfly diversity in a fragmented ecosystem, Ecological Modelling, 281, 15-25. 97. Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N., & Fownes, S. (2000). Alpine parnassius butterfly dispersal: Effects of landscape and population size. Ecology, 81(6), 1642-1653. 98. Savard, J.-P. L., Clergeau, P., & Mennechez, G. (2000). Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(3–4), 131-142. 99. Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.-L., Sheil, D.,…Boedhihartono, A. K., Day, M., Garcia, C., Van Oosten, C., Buck, L. E. (2013). Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(21), 8349-8356. 100. Scheiner, S. M., Cox, S. B., Willig, M., Mittelbach, G. G., Osenberg, C., & Kaspari, M. (2000). Species richness, species–area curves and Simpson’s paradox. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2, 791-802. 101. Schneider, C., & Fry, G. (2005). Estimating the consequences of land-use changes on butterfly diversity in a marginal agricultural landscape in Sweden. Journal for Nature Conservation, 13(4), 247-256. 102. Scolozzi, R., & Geneletti, D. (2012). A multi-scale qualitative approach to assess the impact of urbanization on natural habitats and their connectivity. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 36, 9-22. 103. Scott, J. A. (1975). Flight patterns among eleven species of Diurnal Lepidoptera. Ecology, 56(6), 1367-1377. 104. Sliva, L., & Williams, D. D. (2001). Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality. Water Research, 35(14), 3462-3472. 105. Smith, A. C., Fahrig, L., & Francis, C. M. (2011). Landscape size affects the relative importance of habitat amount, habitat fragmentation, and matrix quality on forest birds. Ecography, 34(1), 103-113. 106. Smith, V. (2003). Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems a global problem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 10(2), 126-139. 107. Stagoll, K., Manning, A. D., Knight, E., Fischer, J., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2010). Using bird–habitat relationships to inform urban planning. Landscape and urban planning, 98(1), 13-25. 108. Strohbach, M. W., Lerman, S. B., & Warren, P. S. (2013). Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston. Landscape and Urban Planning, 114, 69-79. 109. Su, W.-C., Ahern, J. F., ＆ Chang, C.-Y. (2016). Why should we pay attention to “inconsistent” land uses? A viewpoint on water quality, Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 12(2), 247-254. 110. Sun, H., Forsythe, W., & Waters, N. (2007). Modeling urban land use change and urban sprawl: calgary, Alberta, Canada. Networks and Spatial Economics, 7(4), 353-376. 111. Sutcliffe, O. L., Bakkestuen, V., Fry, G., & Stabbetorp, O. E. (2003). Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: methodology and application to butterfly movement. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(1), 15-31. 112. Sweeney, B. W., & Newbold, J. D. (2014). Streamside forest buffer width needed to protect stream water quality, habitat, and organisms: a literature review. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 50(3), 560-584. 113. Sylaios, G., Stamatis, N., Kallianiotis, A., & Vidoris, P. (2005). Monitoring water quality and assessment of land-based nutrient loadings and cycling in Kavala Gulf. Water Resources Management, 19(6), 713-735. 114. Taylor, J. J., Lepczyk, C. A., & Brown, D. G. (2015). Patch and matrix level influences on forest birds at the rural–urban interface, Landscape Ecology, 1-16. 115. Tress, B., Tress, G., & Fry, G. (2005). Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1–2), 177-191. 116. United Nation (2011). On World Water Day, UN calls for greater investment in providing clean water for all. In UN Daily News (pp. 1). New York , NY: UN News Center. 117. Vačkář, D., Chobot, K., & Orlitová, E. (2012). Spatial relationship between human population density, land use intensity and biodiversity in the Czech Republic. Landscape ecology, 27(9), 1279-1290. 118. Van Sickle, J., & Johnson, C. B. (2008). Parametric distance weighting of landscape influence on streams. Landscape Ecology, 23(4), 427-438. 119. Verberk, W. C. E. P., Van Duinen, G. A., Brock, A. M. T., Leuven, R. S. E. W., Siepel, H.,…Esselink, H. (2006). Importance of landscape heterogeneity for the conservation of aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in bog landscapes. Journal for Nature Conservation, 14(2), 78-90. 120. Vos, W., & Meekes, H. (1999). Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 46(1–3), 3-14. 121. Wagner, H. H., & Fortin, M.-J. (2005). Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology, 86(8), 1975-1987. 122. Weinthal, E., & Vangosh, A. (2011). Water and conflict. In R. Parker, M. Sommer, (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Global Public Health (pp. 265-272). London, England: Taylor & Francis Group. 123. Wu, H., Bolte, J. P., Hulse, D., ＆ Johnson, B. R. (2015a). A scenario-based approach to integrating flow-ecology research with watershed development planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 144, 74-89. 124. Wu, J. (2004). Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecology, 19(2), 125-138. 125. Wu, J., Stewart, T. W., Thompson, J. R., Kolka, R. K., & Franz, K. J. (2015b). Watershed features and stream water quality: Gaining insight through path analysis in a Midwest urban landscape, U.S.A. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143, 219-229. 126. Xu, J.-F., Yin, W., Ai, L., Xin, X.-K., & Shi, Z.-H. (2016). Spatiotemporal patterns of non-point source nitrogen loss in an agricultural catchment. Water Science and Engineering, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2016.03.003. 127. Yu, F., Fang, G., & Ru, X. (2009). Eutrophication, health risk assessment and spatial analysis of water quality in Gucheng Lake, China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 59(8), 1741-1748. 128. 內政部營建署（2000）。全國非都市土地分區資料庫。取自http://www.cpami.gov.tw/ 129. 水土保持法（1995年12月17日）。 130. 水污染防治法（2015年2月4日）。 131. 行政院環境保護署（2010）。環境品質資料倉儲系統統。取自http://edw.epa.gov.tw/topicWater.aspx 132. 政府政策環境影響評估作業辦法（2006年4月7日）。 133. 國家公園法（2010年12月8日）。 134. 張宜婷（2008）。由跨尺度景觀結構探討鳥類和蝴蝶多樣性（未出版之碩士論文），國立臺灣大學，臺北市。 135. 都市計畫法（2015年12月30日）。 136. 森林法（2015年7月1日）。 137. 發展觀光條例（2015年2月4日）。 138. 經濟部水利署（2008）。水文水資源資料管理供應系統。取自http://gweb.wra.gov.tw/wrweb/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/49008 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 景觀生態學在規劃實務上的應用，除了例如建置綠帶、連結棲地等景觀元素的配置之外，在規劃空間分區方面，亦應納入景觀生態學的空間概念，以符合物種、物質或能量循環所需的條件，包括土地使用變化的動態性、不同物種的空間需求等。為了在全國或區域中採取具有永續性及一致性的規劃手法，以確保整體景觀的自然運作，在景觀實務上，是否能夠提出較具共通性的空間分區劃設與操作原則？為了提出具有共通性的空間分區劃設與操作原則，有必要要針對環境生態的各種面向進行研究，而不同研究結果的相互參照及不同計畫的相互比較，均有賴共通的量化指標作為基礎，故本研究聚焦於水質及生物多樣性，透過實證研究，探討景觀規劃功能分區範圍劃設與操作如何落實景觀生態學的基本概念，包含以下具體目標：驗證土地使用變化對水質的影響、驗證空間尺度與生物多樣性的相關性。
第1部分的研究結果發現，在集水區範圍中，土地使用現況和水質測值並無顯著相關性，而水庫周邊緩衝帶及上游河岸的森林面積比例和水庫中總磷、葉綠素a濃度都有顯著負相關，農業面積比例則和總磷、葉綠素a濃度都有顯著正相關，這些結果證實了農業使用對水質的影響。在水庫周邊緩衝帶中，森林分區作為都市使用的面積比例亦與葉綠素a濃度成顯著。第2部分的研究結果則發現適合描述北臺灣淺山鄉村地區中鳥類多樣性的特定空間尺度，例如幅度165公尺及粒度5公尺，幅度165公尺約當小型鳥種在營巢地附近活動的範圍，但若要描述蝴蝶多樣性，不易擇定單一空間尺度，主要原因可能在於不同種蝴蝶之差異過大。 在土地使用變化方面，本研究強調自然地形或生態所形成的分區，以自然界線－如稜線或流域等－作為分區劃定原則，特別是以環境永續性為目標，期能透過規劃或管理改善環境品質時，應考量景觀中各個組成分能否發揮完整生態機能，據以劃定分區範圍；在空間尺度方面，本研究結果有助建立跨物種、跨環境項目之調查分析尺度，即使分列不同細部計畫或管理措施，亦應以能夠相容之尺度為基礎，亦可透過本研究作業模式驗證之不同空間尺度是否相容，例如試探性尺度之建立與比較，期能建立更完整之空間單元，充分回應計畫中的空間課題。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | People change the landscape process when they change landscape elements and structures. In order to ensure the flow and circulation in the environment, there should be suitable spatial analysis to satisfy the spatial requirement of species and other environmental quality. This dissertation focused on zoning in landscape planning and aimd to explore the effect of land use changes and spatial scales.
Studies in this dissertation compared the relation between environmental conditions and environmental quality in different spatial units. In the study about spatial locations, the study sites were located in 14 main reservoir watersheds in Taiwan. The correlations were examined in whole watersheds, reservoir buffer zones and tributary riparian corridors. The results indicated that there were not significant relation between land uses and eutrophication in whole watersheds. In reservoir buffer zones and tributary riparian corridors, LCT agriculture had a significantly positive relation to the concentrations of TP and chl-a. Only in reservoir buffer zones, LUD forest as urban had a significantly positive relation to the concentrations of chl-a. In the study about spatial scales, the study sites were located in a typical rural area in Taiwan. twentyone sampling plots were selected along a suburban-hillside gradient. Based on each plot, sample areas were delimited with five radius (extents): 100 m, 130 m, 165 m, 200 m, and 250 m. The digitalization of land cover types applied four resolutions (grain sizes): 0.5 m, 5 m, 10 m, and 30 m. Thus, there were totally 20 sets of spatial scales. The relation between land uses and bird/butterfly biodiversity was examined. In order to provide practical recommendations for planning and management, study two also examined the predictive powers (to birds/butterflies biodiversity) of specific land cover types. The results indicated that the scale of extent 165 m and grain size 0.5/5 m is appropriate to perform the relation between land use and bird biodiversity. There was not a significantly appropriate scale for butterflies. However, correlation between birds and butterflies supported the usage of a common spatial scale. This dissertation emphasized the natural zoning based on physical geography, such as ridgelines and basins. The zoning and planning should consider the ecological function of each landscape elements. Besides, the delimitation of spatial scales should take into account of multi-species and conserve complete ecology. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:13:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-D95628011-1.pdf: 4882415 bytes, checksum: 23ba9cad8f56f4a14b89c861c9218251 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 I
摘要 II Abstract III 第一章 前言 1 第一節 研究問題 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 文獻回顧 2 第四節 研究架構 14 第二章 水庫集水區管理分區(研究1) 16 第一節 集水區土地使用對水質之影響 16 第二節 研究方法與材料 19 第三節 土地使用變化對水質影響分析結果 25 第四節 討論與結論 28 第五節 研究1參考文獻 29 第三章 景觀生態調查分析尺度(研究2) 33 第一節 景觀結構對物種多樣性關係之影響 33 第二節 研究方法與材料 34 第三節 物種調查及分析結果 40 第四節 討論與結論 44 第五節 研究2參考文獻 45 第四章 綜合討論 49 第一節 土地使用型態對水質之影響 49 第二節 鄉村地區空間尺度與生物多樣性的相關性 50 第三節 景觀分區劃設與操作 52 第五章 結論與建議 56 第一節 重要發現與貢獻 56 第二節 未來研究建議 57 第三節 實務工作建議 57 參考文獻 60 附錄1 各水庫集水區範圍圖 67 附錄2 各水庫集水區土地使用型態及土地使用差異面積比例 81 附錄3 參考文獻原文摘錄 84 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 優養化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 鳥類 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生物多樣性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 蝴蝶 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 水質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 集水區 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Biodiversity | en |
| dc.subject | Water quality | en |
| dc.subject | Watershed | en |
| dc.subject | Eutrophication | en |
| dc.subject | Birds | en |
| dc.subject | Butterflies | en |
| dc.title | 土地使用變化及空間尺度對分區劃設與操作之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Influence of Land Use Change and Spatial Scale on Zoning and Planning Operation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林信輝,林晏州,歐聖榮,黃志弘,陳惠美 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 水質,集水區,優養化,鳥類,蝴蝶,生物多樣性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Water quality,Watershed,Eutrophication,Birds,Butterflies,Biodiversity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 97 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603218 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.77 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。