Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 社會工作學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48921
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳慧菁(Hui-Ching Wu)
dc.contributor.authorChia-Ting Leeen
dc.contributor.author李嘉庭zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T11:11:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-16
dc.date.copyright2020-08-24
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-08-16
dc.identifier.citation王伯頎、劉育偉(2016)。女性非法藥物濫用及其戒治歷程之實證研究。藥物濫用防制,1(2),27-61。
白鎮福(2014)。治療性社區海洛英施用者復歸社會歷程之研究-以修復式正義為觀點。台北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文,台北。
安辰赫(2003)。治療社區中男性藥癮者復原歷程之改變因子研究。國立臺北師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文:臺北。
朱淑怡(2007)。康復之家精障者的復元內涵探討。國立台灣大學社會工作所碩士論文,臺北。
行政院(2017)。新世代反毒策略。取自:https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/47bbd6cf-5762-4a63-a308-b810e84712ce
吳舜堂、陳欽雨(2017)。高齡長者社會支持、社會參與與活躍老化關係之研究。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,5(4),331-352。
呂淑妤(2008)。女性與藥物濫用。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,11,189-209。
宋麗玉(2005)。精神障礙者之復健與復元—一個積極正向的觀點。中華心理衛生學刊,18(4),1-29。
李宗憲、林明傑(2018)。女性藥癮者中途之家─蛻變驛園的經驗與成效。青少年藥物濫用預防與輔導研討會,嘉義中正大學。
李易蓁、林瑞欽(2011)。伴侶親密關係對女性成癮行為發展之影響分析。玄奘社會科學學報,9,89-112。
李錦彪、蔡欣玲(2017)。台灣精神衛生護理的展望─復元觀點之再思。護理雜誌,64(3),5-11。
林健陽、陳玉書(2010)。我國女性犯罪原因與矯治處遇相關課題之研究。法務部委託之研究報告。臺北:法務部。
林健陽、陳玉書、張智雄、柯雨瑞、呂豐足(2007)。我國當前毒品戒治政策之省思與建議。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,10,283-321。
林儹紘(2008)。監獄超額收容問題在長期監禁政策下之省思。法務通訊,2397,3-4。
法務部(2012)。100年犯罪狀況及其分析。取自:https://www.tpi.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=341424 ctNode=35595 mp=302
法務部(2017)。105年犯罪狀況及其分析。取自:https://www.tpi.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=488316 ctNode=35595 mp=302
胡幼慧、姚美華 (1996)。一些質性方法上的思考。臺北:巨流。
胡萃玲(1997)。藥癮復元者的藥癮歷程及相關要素之分析研究─以晨曦會研究參與者為例。國立師範大學教育心理學系碩士論文,臺北。
秦文鎮、蔡曉雯(2017)。是健康問題還是司法問題─毒品成癮治療之理論與實務。臺灣醫界,60(7),35-42。
財團法人台灣更生保護協會(2018)。安置處所介紹。取自:http://www.after-care.org.tw/cht/index.php?code=list ids=29#.W7TqcmgzZnI
財團法人台灣更生保護會(2015)。預約人生下半場。臺北:健行。
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂-首航初探之旅。高雄:麗文文化。
高薰方、林盈助與王向葵(2001)。質性研究設計:一種互動取向的方法。新北:心理出版社。
張春興(1991)。現代心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。
晨曦會(2018)。認識晨曦會。取自:http://www.dawn.org.tw/Introduction.asp
許春金(2010)。犯罪學。臺北:三民。
陳玉書、林健陽(2012)。女性毒品施用及其處遇之研究。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文及,15,214-242。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北:五南。
陳紫鳳(2003)。藥物濫用女性生命歷程發展探討。國立南華大學生死學研究所碩士論文,嘉義。
陳碧珍(2011)。宗教戒毒歷程生命轉換與家人關係復和的研究。犯罪學期刊,14,1-40。
游月星(2013)。酒癮者參與匿名團體AA的改變研究。中正大學犯罪防治學系學位論文:嘉義。
湯宜朗(1997)。藥物依賴者的居住式康復治療─治療集體。成癮的臨床與治療。北京:人民衛生出版社。
黃淑美(2004)。臺灣毒癮男女:性別角色與生命歷程之社會建構觀點。未出版碩士論文,私立東吳大學社會學研究所,臺北。
楊士隆、李思賢等(2012)。藥物濫用、毒品與防治。臺北:五南。
楊士隆、黃世龍(2009)。建構毒品施用者修復社會功能的社區資源網絡之研究。法務部委託之研究報告(編號:HU970617)。臺北:法務部。
楊士隆、劉子瑄(2016)。藥物濫用預防模式與國際預防準則之探討。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集,16,86-108。
萬文隆(2004)。深度訪談在質性研究中的應用。生活科技教育學堪,37(4),17-23。
齊仲文(2010)。藥物濫用危險因子之探討(臺中地區戒治所受戒治人為研究對象)。中山醫學大學醫學研究所學位論文,臺中。
劉美君(2013)。女性更生人社會復歸歷程之研究。朝陽科技大學社會工作系碩士論文,臺中。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。新北:心理出版社。
蔡田木、賴擁連(2014)。女性之藥物用原因、預防與處遇對策之研究。法務部委託之研究報告(編號:PG10304-0085)。臺北:法務部。
蔡佩真(2015)。靈性與戒癮:基督教戒毒村海洛因戒癮者的靈性之旅。東吳社會工作學報,28,109-137。
蔡震邦(2011)。是復發?還是復原?─藥癮治療的新思維。輔導季刊,47(3),52-64。
衛生福利部(2016)。103年全國物質使用調查結果報告。臺北:衛生福利部。
衛生福利部(2016)。2025衛生福利政策白皮書。取自:https://legacy.gitbook.com/book/oliviawu/2025-whbook/details
鄭鈞穎(2017)。女性毒品施用再犯者生命歷程之研究。國立臺北大學犯罪研究所碩士論文,臺北。
賴思璇(2017)。女性藥癮者戒治康復生命歷程-以晨曦會為例。銘傳大學社會與安全管理學系碩士論文,台北。
薛瑞元(2007)。發展本土戒治醫療專業處遇方案─社區追蹤治療模式與社區藥癮復健治療模式之比較。研考雙月刊,31(6),49-59。
簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)。社會工作研究法。臺北:巨流。
Alcoholics Anonymous (2018). AA Privacy Statement. Retrieved from:https://www.aa.org/
Allem, H., Carlson, E., Parks, E., &Seiter, R.(1978). Halfway House.National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts.
Anthony, W.(1993). Recovery from mental illness:The guiding vision of the mental health service system in 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal,16(4),1-10.
Apte, R.(1968). Halfway Houses. Londan:Her Majesty's Stationary Office. Retrieved from:https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/halfway-houses-occassional-papers-on-social-administration-number-27/author/r-z-apte/
Best, D., Beckwith, M., Haslam, C., Haslam, S.A., Jetten, J., Mawson, E., Lubman, D.I.(2016). Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition:the social identity model of recovery. Addiction Research Theory,24(2),111-123.
Betty Ford Institute(2007). Defining and Measuring “Recovery”. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,33,221–228.
Brown, S., Victor, B., Hicks, L., Tracy, E.M.(2017). Recovery support mediates the relationship between parental warmth and quality of life among women with substance use disorders. Quality of Life Research,26,1327-1335.
Brownell, K., Marlatt, G., Lichenstein, E. Wilson, G. (1986). Understanding and preventing relapse. American Psychologist, 41, 765-82.
Brunelle, N., Bertrand, K., Landry, M., Flores-Aranda, J., Patenaude, C, Brochu, S.(2015). Recovery from substance use:Drug-dependent people’s experiences with sources that motivate them to change.Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy ,22(3),301-307.
Bunt,G., Muehlbach, B., &Moed, C.O.(2008). The Therapeutic Community: an international perspective.Substance Abuse, 29(3),7-81.
Cloud, W., Granfield, R.(2008). Conceptualizing recovery capital:expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use Misuse,43,1971-1986.
Cometa, M., Morrison, J., &Ziskoven,M.(1979).Halfway to where? A Critique of research on psychiatric halfway houses. journal of community psychology,7,23-27.
CRC Health(2018). The 5 Stages Of Addiction Recovery. Retrieved from:https://www.crchealth.com/find-a-treatment-center/washington-treatment-information/5-stages-addiction-recovery/
Criminal Justice System Components and Corresponding Illinois TASC Programs By Heap, Lurigio, Rodriguez, Lyons, Brookes, 2009, Addiction Science Clinical Practice, 5(1), p33.
Davidson, L., Tondora, J., O’Connel, M., Staeheli, M.(2004). Recovery in serious mental illness:Paradigm shift or shibboleth. Program for Recovery and Community Health of Yale University and the Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. Retrieved from:http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-08810-001
De Leon, G.(1990). The therapeutic community and behavior science. The international Journal of the Addictions,25,1537-1557.
De Leon, G.(1995). Residential therapeutic communities in the mainstream:Diversity and issues. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs,27,3-15.
De Leon, G.(2018). Halfway House - Drug and Alcohol Rehab Programs. Retrieved from:https://www.drug-abuse.org/FL/Ponce-De-Leon/Halfway-House.htm
Deegan, P.(1998).Recovery:The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal,11(4),11-19.
Dye, M., Ducharme, L., Johnson, A., Knudsen, H., &Roman, M.(2009). Modified Therapeutic Communities and Adherence to Traditional Elements. J Psychoactive Drugs,41(3), 275–283.
Encyclopedia of Substance Abuse Prevention, Treatment, Recovery. LA:SAGE Publications.
Farrell, M., Marsden, J., Ali, R., Ling, W. (2002). Methamphetamine: Drug use and psychoses becomes a major public health issue in the Asia Pacific region. Addiction, 97(7), 771–772.
Fisher, G.L.,Roget, N.A.(2009).
Frankel, B.(1989). Transforming Identities:Context, Power and Ideology in a therapeutic community. New York:Peter Lang.
Granfield, R., Cloud, W.(1999). Coming clean:Overcoming addiction without treatment.NY:New York University Press.
Grant, J. (2007). Rural women’s stories of recovery from addiction. Addiction Research and Theory, 15(5), 521–541.
Gueta, K., Addad, M.(2014). A house of cards:The long-tern recovery experiences of former drug-dependence Israeli women. Women’s Studies International Forum,48,18-28.
Hitchcock, H., Stainback, R.,& Roque, G.(1995). Effects of halfway house placement on retention of patients in substance abuse aftercare. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse,21(3),379-390.
Jacobson, N. (2001). Experiencing recovery: A dimensional analysis of recovery narratives. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24(3), 248-256.
James, L.(2012). Understanding the process of recovery from Heroin addiction:Initiating and maintaining factors. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of D.Clin.Psy. at Cardiff University, and the South Wales Doctoral Course in Clinical Psychology:Cardiff.
Kang, S.K., Kim, H.J.,&Shin, S.(2018). A Qualitative case study on recovery and personal growth in korean drugs addicts. Journal of social services research,44,279-290.
Kooyman, M.(1993). The therapeutic community for Addicts. Amsterdam, Lisse, and Berwyn,PA:Swets&Zeitlinger.
Laudet AB, Savage R, Mahmood D.(2002). Pathways to long-term recovery: a preliminary investigation. J Psychoactive Drugs,34(3),305–11.
Laudet, A.B., White, W.L.(2008). Recovery Capital as Prospective Predictor of Sustained Recovery, Life satisfaction and Stress among former poly-substance users. Substance Use Misuse,43(1),27-54
Leverentz, A.(2010). People, Places, and Things:How female ex-prisoners negotiate their neighborhood context. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,39(6),647-681.
Lim, M., Reminton, G., Lee, J.(2017). Personal Recovery in Serious Mental Illness: Making Sense of the Concept. Ann Acad Med Singapore,46,29-31.
Matsakis, A.(1996). I can’t get over it:A handbook for Trauma Survivors. Oakland:New Harbinger.
McIntosh, J., McKeganeyb, N.(2002). Addicts' narratives of recovery from drug use: constructing a non-addict identity. Social Science Medicine, 50,1501-1510.
Mello, C., Pechansky, F., Inciardi, A.,&Surratt, L.(1997)Participant observation of a therapeutic community model for offenders in drug treatment. Journal of Drug Issues;27 (2),299-314.
Milkman, H. B., Wanberg, K. W., Gagliardi, B. A. (2008). Criminal conduct and substance abuse treatment for women in correctional settings. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nakken, C.(2000).Reclaim your family from addiction:How couples and family recover love and meaning. Retrieved from:https://www.hazelden.org/HAZ_MEDIA/1192_reclaimyourfamilyfromaddiction
Neale, J., Nettleton, S., Pickering, L.(2014). Gender sameness and difference in recovery from heroin dependence:A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Drugs Policy,25,3-12.
NIDA(2015). National Institute on Drug Abuse to discuss results of 2015 Monitoring the Future survey. Retrieved from:https://www.drugabuse.gov/news-events/news-releases/2015/12/national-institute-drug-abuse-to-discuss-results-2015-monitoring-future-survey
NIDA(2015). Therapeutic Communities. Retrieved from:https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/therapeutic-communities/what-are-therapeutic-communities
Nielsen, L., Scarpitti, R.(1997). Changing the behavior of substance abuse:Factors influencing the effectiveness of therapeutic community. Journal of Drug Issues,27(2),279-298.others experience the re-entry phase of therapeutic community treatment: a
Piat, M., Sabetti, J., Bloom, D.(2010). The transformation of mental health services to a recovery-orientated system of care:Canadian decision maker perspectives. Int J Soc Psychiatry,56(2),168-177.
Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., Norcross, J.C., (1992). In search of how people change: applications to addictive behaviours. American Psychologist 47 (9), 1102-1114.
SAMHSA (2007). Services research outcomes study . Retrieved from:http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/Sros/sros8021.htm
SAMHSA(2009). Substance Abuse Treatment: Addressing the Specific Needs of Women. Retrieved from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22514859
SAMHSA(2011). SAMHSA announces a working definition of “recovery” from mental disorders and substance use disorders. Retrieved from:https://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/press-announcements/201112220300
SAMHSA(2017). RESULTS FROM THE 2016 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH: DETAILED TABLES. Retrieved from:https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-DetTabs-2016/NSDUH-DetTabs-2016.pdf
Schiff, A. C. (2004). Recovery and mental illness: Analysis and personal reflections. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(3), 212-218.
Shinkfield , A. J. , Graffam, J. (2007).Community Reintegration of ex-prisoners : Type and degree of change in variables influencing successful reintegration. International of Journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology,53(1), 29-42.
Simpson, D.D. (2004). A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27, 99–121.
Soyez. V,, Broekaert, E.(2003). How do substance abusers and their significant
Spaniol, L., Wewiorski, N., Gagne, C., Anthony, W. A. (2002). The process of recovery from schizophrenia. International Review of Psychiatry, 14(4), 327-336.
Spaniol, L., Wewiorski, N., Gagne, C., Anthony, W. A. (2002). The process of recovery from schizophrenia. International Review of Psychiatry, 14(4), 327-336.
Sullivan, D.C.,Siegel, L.,& Clear, T. (1974). The halfway house movement, ten years later: Reappraisal of correctional innovation. Crime and Corrections,16,188-197.
The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel(2007).What is Recovery? A working definition from Betty Ford Institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment ,33. 221–228.
Till, U.(2007). The values of recovery within mental health nursing. Mental health practice,11(3),32-36.
Turner, J., Wallcraft, J(2002). The recovery vision for mental health services and research: A British perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25(3), 245-254.
UKDPC(2008). The UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group:A vision of recovery. Retrieved from:http://www.ukdpc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Policy%20report%20-%20A%20vision%20of%20recovery_%20UKDPC%20recovery%20consensus%20group.pdf
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2002).Contemporary Drug Abuse Treatment- A Review of the Evidence Base。Retrieved from:http://www.ndc.hrb.ie/attached/1681-1586.pdf
UNODC(2017). World Drug Report 2017. Retrieved from:https://www.unodc.org/wdr2017/index.html
Valentine, P. (2011). Peer-based recovery support services within a recovery community organization: The CCAR experience. In J. F. Kelly W. L. White (Eds.), Addiction Recovery Management (pp. 259-279). New York: Humana Press.
Warren, K., Hiance, D., Doogan, N., De Leon, G., &Phillips, G.(2013). Verbal feedback in therapeutic communities: pull-ups and reciprocated pull-ups as predictors of graduation. J Subst Abuse Treat,44,361–368.
White. W(2007). Addiction recovery: its definition and conceptual boundaries. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,33(3),229-241.
Whitwell, D.(1999). The myth of recovery from mental illness. Psychiatric Bulletin 23(10):621-622.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48921-
dc.description.abstract物質成癮是一個複雜的疾病總稱,其中「藥癮」更對各國社會治安、政策走向帶來極大難題。新興毒品的快速崛起帶來一種不同的濫用趨勢,加劇各國政府在防毒、緝毒上的困難,亦導致民間普遍對於公部門的防毒策略產生不信任。據此聯合國毒品犯罪部門建議在毒品處遇策略上應以穩定復歸社會為目標,並促進個體在健康、家庭、社區、工作等面向上功能及關係的蛻變。顯然過往以「醫療」為主體的服務典範已無法回應成癮者、其家庭、社區等各層面之多元需求與問題,因此「復元」的觀點便是在這樣的氛圍中逐漸受到重視,是強調各發揮其內、外在的資源與優勢來面對毒品及生活上的種種問題已促使個人的全人成長。此外,隨著「性別」意識的抬頭,「性別」亦成為政策與學術上的重要議題,檢視我國當前之毒品防制之討論仍以男性為主軸,對女性之相關政策、處遇策略與執行成效評估上鮮少加入性別議題的分析。因此本研究期望藉由女性藥癮者之主觀論述,以期達到以下之目的:
一、 梳理女性藥癮者由中途之家至復歸社會歷程的經驗與詮釋。
二、 探討女性藥癮者之復元面向,並分析相關影響因素。
三、 探究中途之家對女性藥癮者之意義。
四、 提供女性藥癮者相關政策、處遇之建議。
本研究設計上採質性研究方法,以深度訪談的方式,輔以訪談大綱與基本資訊問卷收集資料,並於2018年12月至2019年5月間藉由更生保護會宜蘭分會、花蓮主愛之家推薦合適之對象,最後共邀請5位符合資格者參與本研究,探討女性藥癮者復元歷程中的整體樣貌。
本研究有三個主要發現,首先復元是始於關鍵情境的觸發,是研究參與者經歷各種挫敗或評估後而有的相關行動與動機;再者女性藥癮者由中途之家至復歸社會之歷程中,所展現之復元面向來自四個層面,分別為:(1)個人層面:內在力量、外在功能;(2)人際關係:人際網絡、家庭關係、互動技巧;(3)社會參與:社會連結與融入、公民角色;(4)生活品質:生活意義、自我充實、自我現;最後,復元歷程中的影響因子則可分為(1)個人因素;(2)人際互動因素;(3)系統因素,各類別亦有其影響途徑,為研究參與者帶來不同的助力與阻力。
本研究結論為(1)復元是個人持續的、非線性的動態發展歷程;(2)由中途之家至復歸社會之歷程中,依序呈現調適期、個人功能重建期、社會功能重建期、過渡期、功能再造期;(3)中途之家之於女性藥癮者的復元歷程扮演多元的角色,是家、是社會的縮影、是銜接社會的橋樑亦是復元的催化劑。並依此研究結論提出對公部門、實務工作與未來研究之建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractSubstance addiction is a general term for a complex disease, among which 'drug addiction' has brought great problems to the social security and policy trends of various countries. The rapid rise of emerging drugs has brought about a different trend of abuse, aggravating the difficulties of governments in anti-drug and anti-drugs, and has also led to widespread distrust of the public sector's anti-drug strategies among the people. Based on this, the UNODC recommends that drug treating strategies should aim at stabilizing the return to society, and promote the transformation of individual functions and relationships in health, family, community, and work. Obviously, the past service model with 'medical' has been unable to respond to the diverse needs and problems of addicts, their families, and communities. Therefore, the view of 'recovery' is gradually being emphasized in such an atmosphere. Each exerting its internal and external resources and advantages to face the various problems of drugs and life has promoted the whole person growth of the individual. In addition, with the rise of 'gender' awareness, 'gender' has also become an important policy and academic issue. Reviewing the current discussion of drug control in Taiwan is still focused on men, and related policies, treatment strategies and implementation of women Analysis of gender issues is rarely included in effectiveness evaluation. Therefore, this study hopes to achieve the following goals through the subjective discussion of female drug addicts:
1. Review the experience and interpretation of the process of female drug addicts from halfway house to community return.
2. Discuss the recovery aspect of female drug addicts and analyze related influencing factors.
3. Explore the significance of the Halfway House for female drug addicts.
4. Provide advices on policies and treatment of female drug addicts.
The design of this study adopts qualitative research methods, in-depth interviews, supplemented by interview outlines and basic information questionnaires to collect data, and from December 2018 to May 2019 through the Yilan Affter-Care Association and the Hualien Agape House recommends suitable objects, and finally invites 5 qualified persons to participate in this study to explore the overall appearance of female drug addicts in their recovery process.
There are three main findings in this study. First, recovery begins with the triggering of key situations, which are related actions and motivations that the Research participants experience after various frustrations or evaluations; second, the journey of female drug addicts from a halfway house to a return to community In this chapter, the recovery aspects shown in this chapter come from four levels, namely: (1) personal level: inner strength, outer function; (2) interpersonal relationship: interpersonal network, family relationship, interactive skills; (3) social participation: society Connection and integration, civic role; (4) quality of life: meaning of life, self-fulfillment, self-reality; finally, the influencing factors in the recovery process can be divided into (1) personal factors; (2) interpersonal interaction factors; (3) System factors, each category also has its own way of influence, which brings different help and resistance to research participants.
The conclusions of this study are (1) Recovery is a continued, non-linear and dynamic development process for individuals; (2) From a halfway house to reintegration into the community, the adjustment period, personal function reconstruction period, social function reconstruction period, Transition period and functional reconstruction period; (3) The recovery process of the halfway house for female drug addicts plays multiple roles. It is a home, a microcosm of society, a bridge connecting society and a catalyst for recovery. And based on this research conclusion, put forward suggestions for public sector, practical work and future research.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:11:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-1308202008405700.pdf: 2125538 bytes, checksum: 083ef2d4e41280e26f654c41fd54b71e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2020
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書......................i
謝誌................................ii
中文摘要............................iii
英文摘要.............................v
第一章 緒論.........................1
 第一節 研究背景....................1
 第二節 研究動機....................4
 第三節 研究目的與提問...............5
第二章 文獻探討......................7
 第一節 治療性社區的發展與內涵........7
 第二節 復元觀點....................18
第三章 研究方法......................33
 第一節 研究方法....................33
 第二節 研究設計....................34
 第三節 研究倫理....................39
 第四節 研究參與者之復元經歷.........40
第四章 研究發現......................46
 第一節 問題意識....................46
 第二節 中途之家的復元經歷與詮釋.....51
 第三節 社會復歸的復元經歷與詮釋.....75
 第四節 復元內涵的探討..............90
第五章 研究討論與結論................93
 第一節 研究結果與討論..............93
 第二節 研究結論...................106
 第三節 研究建議與限制.............110
參考文獻............................115
 中文文獻..........................115
 英文文獻..........................119
附件................................127
 附件一 訪談大綱...................127
 附件二 訪談同意書.................128
 附件三 訪談日誌...................129
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject藥癮處遇zh_TW
dc.subject女性藥癮者zh_TW
dc.subject中途之家zh_TW
dc.subject復元觀點zh_TW
dc.subjecthalfway houseen
dc.subjectrehabilitative viewsen
dc.subjecttreatment of drug addictionen
dc.subjectfemale drug addictsen
dc.title初探女性藥癮者之復元歷程─以中途之家至復歸社會者為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe recovery process of female drug addicts─take those from Halfway house Back to community as examplesen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear108-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee蔡佩真(Pei-Jen Tsai),賴擁連(Yung-Lian Lai)
dc.subject.keyword女性藥癮者,中途之家,復元觀點,藥癮處遇,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordfemale drug addicts,halfway house,rehabilitative views,treatment of drug addiction,en
dc.relation.page129
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202003196
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2020-08-17
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept社會工作學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:社會工作學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-1308202008405700.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.08 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved