請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48803完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 湯佩芳(Pei-Fang Tang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Tzu Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張庭慈 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T11:09:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-03-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-03-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-10-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Akintunde A, Buxton DF. Origins and collateralization of corticospinal, corticopontine, corticorubral and corticostriatal tracts: a multiple retrograde fluorescent tracing study. Brain Res. 1992;586:208-218.
Albouy G, Sterpenich V, Balteau E, et al. Both the Hippocampus and Striatum Are Involved in Consolidation of Motor Sequence Memory. Neuron. 2008;58:261-272. Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL. Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci 1986;9: 357–381. Bennett IJ, Madden DJ, Vaidya CJ, Howard JH, Jr., Howard DV. White matter integrity correlates of implicit sequence learning in healthy aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32:2317 e2311-2312. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:206-207. Borich MR, Brown KE, Boyd LA. Motor skill learning is associated with diffusion characteristics of white matter in individuals with chronic stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014;38:151-160. Bosnell RA, Kincses T, Stagg CJ, et al. Motor practice promotes increased activity in brain regions structurally disconnected after subcortical stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:607-616. Bour A, Rasquin S, Boreas A, Limburg M, Verhey F. How predictive is the MMSE for cognitive performance after stroke? Journal of Neurology. 2010;257:630-637. Boyd LA, Edwards JD, Siengsukon CS, Vidoni ED, Wessel BD, Linsdell MA. Motor sequence chunking is impaired by basal ganglia stroke. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92:35-44. Boyd LA, Vidoni ED, Wessel BD. Motor learning after stroke: Is skill acquisition a prerequisite for contralesional neuroplastic change? Neuroscience Letters. 2010;482:21-25. Boyd LA, Winstein CJ. Providing explicit information disrupts implicit motor learning after basal ganglia stroke. Learn Mem. 2004;11:388-396. Boyke J, Driemeyer J, Gaser C, Buchel C, May A. Training-induced brain structure changes in the elderly. J Neurosci. 2008;28:7031-7035. Carey JR, Anderson KM, Kimberley TJ, Lewis SM, Auerbach EJ, Ugurbil K. fMRI analysis of ankle movement tracking training in subject with stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2004;154:281-290. Chan DY, Chan CC, Au DK. Motor relearning programme for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:191-200. D’Elia LF, Satz P, Uchiyama CL, & White T. Color Trails Test. Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. 1996. Dayan E, Cohen L. Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron. 2011;72:443-454. Deng H, Durfee WK, Nuckley DJ, et al. Complex versus simple ankle movement training in stroke using telerehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012;92:197-209. Di Filippo M, Picconi B, Tantucci M, et al. Short-term and long-term plasticity at corticostriatal synapses: implications for learning and memory. Behav Brain Res. 2009;199:108-118. Doyon J, Bellec P, Amsel R, et al. Contributions of the basal ganglia and functionally related brain structures to motor learning. Behav Brain Res. 2009;199:61-75. Doyon J, Benali H. Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005;15:161-167. Doyon J, Penhune V, Ungerleider LG. Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:252-262. Doyon J, Song AW, Karni A, Lalonde F, Adams MM, Ungerleider LG. Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:1017-1022. Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V, Schuierer G, Bogdahn U, May A. Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature. 2004;427:311-312. Driemeyer J, Boyke J, Gaser C, Büchel C, May A. Changes in Gray Matter Induced by Learning?Revisited. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2669. Enzinger C, Dawes H, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Brain activity changes associated with treadmill training after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:2460-2467. Fan YT, Lin KC, Liu HL, Chen YL, Wu CY. Changes in structural integrity are correlated with motor and functional recovery after post-stroke rehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33:835-844. Fields RD. White matter matters. Sci Am. 2008;298:42-49. Floyer-Lea A, Matthews PM. Changing brain networks for visuomotor control with increased movement automaticity. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92:2405-2412. Floyer-Lea A, Matthews PM. Distinguishable brain activation networks for short- and long-term motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:512-518. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31. Gerber P, Schlaffke L, Heba S, Greenlee MW, Schultz T, Schmidt-Wilcke T. Juggling revisited - a voxel-based morphometry study with expert jugglers. NeuroImage. 2014;95:320-325. Ghilardi M, Ghez C, Dhawan V, et al. Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning. Brain Res. 2000;871:127-145. Ghilardi MF, Moisello C, Silvestri G, Ghez C, Krakauer JW. Learning of a sequential motor skill comprises explicit and implicit components that consolidate differently. J Neurophysiol. 2009;101:2218-2229. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:232-240. Hikosaka O, Nakamura K, Sakai K, Nakahara H. Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12:217-222. Hluštík P, Solodkin A, Noll DC, Small SL. Cortical plasticity during three-week motor skill learning. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2004;21:180-191. Hofstetter S, Tavor I, Tzur Moryosef S, Assaf Y. Short-term learning induces white matter plasticity in the fornix. J Neurosci. 2013;33:12844-12850. Jang SH. Diffusion tensor imaging studies on arcuate fasciculus in stroke patients: a review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7. Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF. Using diffusion imaging to study human connectional anatomy. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:75-94. Johansen-Berg H, Scholz J, Stagg CJ. Relevance of structural brain connectivity to learning and recovery from stroke. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010a;4:146. Johansen-Berg H. Behavioural relevance of variation in white matter microstructure. Curr Opin Neurol. 2010b;23:351-358. Johansen-Berg H. The future of functionally-related structural change assessment. NeuroImage. 2012b;62:1293-1298. Kahn AE, Mattar MG, Vettel JM, Wymbs NF, Grafton ST, Bassett DS. Structural Pathways Supporting Swift Acquisition of New Visuo-Motor Skills. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.04033. 2016. Kantak SS, Winstein CJ. Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: a focused review and perspective. Behav Brain Res. 2012;228:219-231. Kim EH, Lee J, Jang SH. Motor outcome prediction using diffusion tensor tractography of the corticospinal tract in large middle cerebral artery territory infarct. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32:583-590. Koch P, Schulz R, Hummel FC. Structural connectivity analyses in motor recovery research after stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2016;3:233-244. Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19:84-90. Kwon YH, Nam KS, Park JW. Identification of cortical activation and white matter architecture according to short-term motor learning in the human brain: functional MRI and diffusion tensor tractography study. Neurosci Lett. 2012;520:11-15. Lakhani B, Borich MR, Jackson JN, et al. Motor Skill Acquisition Promotes Human Brain Myelin Plasticity. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:7526135. Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function. NeuroImage. 2012;61:324-341. Le Bihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:469-480. Lehéricy S, Benali H, Van De Moortele PF, et al. Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:12566-12571. Lehéricy S, Ducros M, Van de Moortele PF, et al. Diffusion tensor fiber tracking shows distinct corticostriatal circuits in humans. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:522-529. Lindenberg R, Zhu LL, Ruber T, Schlaug G. Predicting functional motor potential in chronic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33:1040-1051. Luft A, Buitrago M. Stages of motor skill learning. Mol Neurobiol. 2005;32:205-216. Magill RA. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications: McGraw-Hill; 2004. Maj M, D'Elia L, Satz P, et al. Evaluation of two new neuropsychological tests designed to minimize cultural bias in the assessment of HIV-1 seropositive persons: a WHO study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1993;8:123-135. May A. Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the adult human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:475-482. Meehan SK, Randhawa B, Wessel B, Boyd LA. Implicit sequence-specific motor learning after subcortical stroke is associated with increased prefrontal brain activations: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32:290-303. Müller R-A, Kleinhans N, Pierce K, Kemmotsu N, Courchesne E. Functional MRI of motor sequence acquisition: effects of learning stage and performance. Cogn Brain Res. 2002;14:277-293. Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1641-1647. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, Tank DW. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:9868-9872. Parent A, Hazrati L-N. Functional anatomy of the basal ganglia. I. The cortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical loop. Brain Res Rev. 1995;20:91-127. Penhune VB, Doyon J. Dynamic cortical and subcortical networks in learning and delayed recall of timed motor sequences. J Neurosci. 2002;22:1397-1406. Penhune VB, Steele CJ. Parallel contributions of cerebellar, striatal and M1 mechanisms to motor sequence learning. Behav Brain Res. 2012;226:579-591. Penhune VB. Neural encoding of movement sequences in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17:487-489. Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ. Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36:893-906. Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M, et al. Motor learning principles for rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled study in poststroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:501-508. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed 'Up & Go': a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142-148. Pohl PS, McDowd JM, Filion D, Richards LG, Stiers W. Implicit learning of a motor skill after mild and moderate stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:246-253. Pohl PS, McDowd JM, Filion DL, Richards LG, Stiers W. Implicit learning of a perceptual-motor skill after stroke. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1780-1789. Poldrack RA, Sabb FW, Foerde K, et al. The neural correlates of motor skill automaticity. J Neurosci. 2005;25:5356-5364. Rickard TC, Cai DJ, Rieth CA, Jones J, Ard MC. Sleep does not enhance motor sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008;34:834-842. Riley JD, Le V, Der-Yeghiaian L, et al. Anatomy of stroke injury predicts gains from therapy. Stroke. 2011;42:421-426. Sagi Y, Tavor I, Hofstetter S, Tzur-Moryosef S, Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Assaf Y. Learning in the Fast Lane: New Insights into Neuroplasticity. Neuron.73:1195-1203. Sampaio-Baptista C, Khrapitchev AA, Foxley S, et al. Motor skill learning induces changes in white matter microstructure and myelination. J Neurosci. 2013;33:19499-19503. Schaechter JD, Fricker ZP, Perdue KL, et al. Microstructural status of ipsilesional and contralesional corticospinal tract correlates with motor skill in chronic stroke patients. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:3461-3474. Schmidt RA, Lee T. Motor Learning Defined. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis 5th ed. (pp.327). United States: Human Kinetics. 2011. Scholz J, Klein MC, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H. Training induces changes in white-matter architecture. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:1370-1371. Schreiber J, Sober L, Banta L, et al. Application of motor learning principles with stroke survivors. Occup Ther Health Care. 2001;13:23-44. Schulz R, Koch P, Zimerman M, et al. Parietofrontal motor pathways and their association with motor function after stroke. Brain. 2015;138:1949-1960. Seger CA, Peterson EJ, Cincotta CM, Lopez-Paniagua D, Anderson CW. Dissociating the contributions of independent corticostriatal systems to visual categorization learning through the use of reinforcement learning modeling and Granger causality modeling. NeuroImage. 2010;50:644-656. Soderstrom NC, Bjork RA. Learning versus performance: an integrative review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10:176-199. Song S, Sharma N, Buch ER, Cohen LG. White matter microstructural correlates of superior long-term skill gained implicitly under randomized practice. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22:1671-1677. Sterr A, Dean PJ, Szameitat AJ, Conforto AB, Shen S. Corticospinal tract integrity and lesion volume play different roles in chronic hemiparesis and its improvement through motor practice. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:335-343. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain. 2007;130:170-180. Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ward SH. An update on predicting motor recovery after stroke. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014. Tang PF, Ko YH, Luo ZA, Yeh FC, Chen SH, Tseng WY. Tract-specific and region of interest analysis of corticospinal tract integrity in subcortical ischemic stroke: reliability and correlation with motor function of affected lower extremity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1023-1030. Taubert M, Draganski B, Anwander A, et al. Dynamic properties of human brain structure: learning-related changes in cortical areas and associated fiber connections. J Neurosci. 2010;30:11670-11677. Ungerleider LG, Doyon J, Karni A. Imaging Brain Plasticity during Motor Skill Learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002;78:553-564. Wadden K, Brown K, Maletsky R, Boyd LA. Correlations between brain activity and components of motor learning in middle-aged adults: an fMRI study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7. Walz AD, Doppl K, Kaza E, Roschka S, Platz T, Lotze M. Changes in cortical, cerebellar and basal ganglia representation after comprehensive long term unilateral hand motor training. Behav Brain Res. 2015;278:393-403. Wang S, Young KM. White matter plasticity in adulthood. Neuroscience. 2014;276:148-160. Wedeen VJ, Hagmann P, Tseng WYI, Reese TG, Weisskoff RM. Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1377-1386. Wedeen VJ, Wang RP, Schmahmann JD, et al. Diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging (DSI) tractography of crossing fibers. NeuroImage. 2008;41:1267-1277. Wise SP, Murray EA. Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:271-276. Wymbs NF, Grafton ST. The Human Motor System Supports Sequence-Specific Representations over Multiple Training-Dependent Timescales. Cereb Cortex. 2014. Xu X, Chong E, Hilal S, Ikram MK, Venketasubramanian N, Chen C. Beyond Screening: Can the Mini-Mental State Examination be Used as an Exclusion Tool in a Memory Clinic? Diagnostics (Basel). 2015;5:475-486. Yin HH, Mulcare SP, Hilario MR, et al. Dynamic reorganization of striatal circuits during the acquisition and consolidation of a skill. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:333-341. Yotsumoto Y, Chang LH, Ni R, et al. White matter in the older brain is more plastic than in the younger brain. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5504. Zheng X, Schlaug G. Structural white matter changes in descending motor tracts correlate with improvements in motor impairment after undergoing a treatment course of tDCS and physical therapy. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:229. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48803 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 背景與目的:動作學習的能力在個體一生中學習新技巧與因應生活中環境的變化都相當重要。許多功能性磁振造影的研究發現在不同的視覺動作學習階段,大腦額葉皮質區和紋狀體會有功能性活化,然而,在不同的腳踝追蹤(tracking)任務時,這些動作學習區域的結構性連結,尤其是皮質紋狀體徑(corticostriatal tract)與皮質脊髓徑(corticospinal tract)對動作學習的貢獻卻極少被研究。
方法:21位(年齡:62.2±8.5歲;男:16,女:5)慢性中風病患與26位(年齡:62.0±8.1歲;男:7,女:19)年齡對照健康成人參與腳踝追蹤學習之研究,受試者使用客製化腳踝追蹤評估及訓練裝置進行連續五天之練習,包含重複(repeated sequence)及隨機次序(random sequence)的追蹤,追蹤表現會以方均根誤(root mean squared error,RMSE)計算與呈現,隨後進入學習保留休息2天,以及第一週之保留測試(retention test)。受試者於訓練開始前與一週學習結束後進行臨床評估測驗、腳踝追蹤表現測驗以及腦部擴散頻譜影像(diffusion spectrum imaging,DSI)。本研究以特定神經束之神經徑路追蹤分析(tract-specific tractography analysis)重建大腦雙側之外背側前額葉-尾核徑(dorsolateral prefrontal cortex-caudate tract)、輔助動作皮質區-殼核徑(supplementary motor area-putamen tract)與皮質脊髓徑且此神經束之完整性會量化為普擴散不等向性(generalized fractional anisotropy,GFA)表示。淨相關分析(partial correlation analysis)會用以探究訓練前後對大腦的三條神經束在受試者與一週學習之行為或學習進步上的關係。 結果:無論健康或中風受試者,其腳踝重複與隨機次序追蹤之準確度均隨訓練而進步(p< 0.001),而大腦雙側之三條神經束的完整性在訓練一週後均無顯著改變(p> 0.05)。淨相關分析結果顯示,健康人訓練前之對側皮質脊髓徑完整性(GFAB_CST_contra)與訓練前之動作表現有顯著相關(重複次序(RMSEB_rep): r= 0.423, p= 0.035 ;隨機次序(RMSEB_ran): r= 0.456, p= 0.022);訓練後對側輔助動作皮質區-殼核徑之完整性(GFAW1_SMA_contra)與學習的進步有關(重複次序(∆RMSEB-W1_rep): r= -0.393, p=0.052 ;隨機次序(∆RMSEB-W1_ran): r= -0.411, p=0.041);而在訓練前之對側外背側前額葉-尾核徑完整性與學習的進步無顯著相關(重複次序: r= -0.189, p= 0.386 ;隨機次序: r= -0.157, p= 0.453)。病人組的結果則顯示,訓練前(GFAB_CST_contra)(r= 0.536, p= 0.018)與後(GFAW1_CST_contra)(r= 0.520, p= 0.023)之對側皮質脊髓徑完整性與隨機學習的進步(∆RMSEB-W1_ran)皆有顯著相關。 討論與結論:不論健康人或中風病患在接受一週的腳踝追蹤動作訓練後都有表現上的進步。兩組受試者在腦部結構性之白質神經纖維的完整性在此短期學習後並未有顯著變化,不過特定神經纖維的完整性與學習的表現或進步有密切相關,且健康人與中風病患在學習此視覺動作任務上呈現不同的腦部結構性機轉。輔助動作皮質區-殼核徑與健康人之此動作學習有關,而皮質脊髓徑則在慢性中風病患的此種動作學習扮演較重要的角色。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background and Purpose: Motor learning ability is crucial for individuals to learn new skills in order to adapt to environmental changes throughout the lifespan. Many fMRI studies have found that functional brain activations in different frontal cortical regions and the striatum are relevant to different stages of visuomotor learning. However, little is known about how the structural connectivity between these learning-related regions, in particular, the corticostriatal tracts and the corticospinal tracts, contributes to learning an ankle tracking task.
Methods: Twenty-one patients with chronic stroke (age= 62.2±8.5 yr, male: 16, female: 5) and 26 age-matched healthy adults (age= 62.0±8.1 yr, male: 7, female: 19) participated in this study. Using a custom-built ankle tracking assessment and training device, all participants underwent a short-term ankle tracking learning paradigm for 5 consecutive practice sessions within 5 days, followed by a 2-day retention interval and a Week 1 retention test. Repeated and random sequences were both practiced in the 5 days. Tracking performance was measured by using root mean squared error (RMSE). Clinical assessments, ankle tracking performance, and diffusion spectrum MR image (DSI) of the brain were obtained at Baseline test and Week 1 retention test. Tract-specific tractography analysis were used to reconstruct bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex-caudate (dlPFC-caudate), supplementary motor area-putamen (SMA-putamen), and corticospinal tracts (CSTs). Tract integrity was indexed by using generalized fractional anisotropy (GFA) of DSI. Separate partial correlation analyses were performed to evaluate relationships between white matter tract integrity and tracking performance or improvement after learning. Results: Both healthy and stroke subjects significantly improved tracking accuracy over time, regardless of sequences (p< 0.001 both). Among the investigated white matter tracts, no change in tract integrity was found for each tract from baseline to Week 1 retention test (p> 0.05 of each tract). Separate partial correlations showed that, in the healthy group, GFAB_CST_contra was associated with RMSEB_rep (r= 0.423, p= 0.035) and RMSEB_ran (r= 0.456, p= 0.022); GFAW1_SMA_contra was associated with ∆RMSEB-W1_ran at a significant level (r= -0.411, p= 0.041) and with ∆RMSEB-W1_rep at a marginal level (r=-0.393, p=0.052). However, there were no significant correlations between baseline integrity of the contralateral dlPFC-caudate tract and the performance improvement under repeated (r= -0.189, p= 0.386) and random sequence tracking conditions (r= -0.157, p= 0.453) after short-term learning for healthy subjects. In the stroke group, GFAB_CST_contra was associated with ∆RMSEB-W1_rep (r= 0.536, p= 0.018); GFAW1_CST_contra was associated with ∆RMSEB-W1_ran (r= 0.520, p= 0.023). Discussion and conclusions: Both healthy adults and hemiparetic patients with chronic stroke could learn this ankle tracking task. Although we did not find motor learning-related structural changes of the investigated white matter tracts after such as short-term learning, the integrity of specific white matter tracts were found to be closely linked to performance outcomes or gains. In particular, different structural brain mechanisms were found to be related to learning a novel ankle visuomotor task between healthy adults and patients with chronic stroke. For healthy adults, the SMA-putamen tract was closely associated with ankle tracking learning, whereas in patients with stroke, the CST played an important role in such learning. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T11:09:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03428001-1.pdf: 3711825 bytes, checksum: 94cb014c7eb1f9a9384cdb84676c0299 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
致謝 ii 中文摘要 iv Abstract vi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research background 1 1.2 Purposes 5 1.3 Terms and operational definitions of variables 6 1.3.1 Terms 6 1.3.2 Independent variables 9 1.3.3 Dependent variables 10 1.4 Research questions and hypotheses 11 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 1 2.1 Motor learning 1 2.1.1 Characteristics of motor learning 1 2.1.2 Assessment of motor learning 3 2.2 Neural anatomy and mechanisms of brain plasticity associated with motor learning- evidence from animal studies 4 2.3 Motor learning-induced changes in the brain of healthy adults 6 2.3.1 Evidence of motor learning-associated brain functional plasticity in healthy adults 8 2.3.2 Evidence of motor learning-associated brain structural plasticity in healthy adults 14 2.4 Motor learning-induced changes in the brain of patients with stroke 20 2.4.1 Evidence of motor learning-associated brain functional plasticity in patients with stroke 21 2.4.2 Evidence of motor learning-associated brain structural plasticity in patients with stroke 24 2.4.3 Motor learning and post-stroke rehabilitation 27 2.5 Summary 30 CHAPTER 3: METHODS 32 3.1 Participants 32 3.2 Design and procedures 33 3.3 Instrumentation 34 3.3.1 Clinical assessments 34 3.3.2 MRI 35 3.3.3 Ankle tracking assessment and training device 35 3.4 Ankle sequence tracking learning paradigm 37 3.4 Data acquisition and analysis 38 3.5.1 Clinical assessments 38 3.5.2 MRI 38 3.5.3 Ankle sequence tracking performance measures 42 3.5.4 Recollection test for the awareness of the repeated sequence 43 3.6 Statistical analysis 43 CHAPTER 4: RESULTS 46 4.1 Demographics and clinical assessment results 46 4.2 Ankle tracking performance results 47 4.3 DSI results 47 4.4 Correlations between ankle tracking learning performance and white matter tract integrity 48 CHAPTER 5: DISCUSSION 50 5.1 Performance improvements after short-term ankle tracking learning in patients with chronic stroke and healthy adults 50 5.2 Absence of the structural integrity changes of the investigated white matter tracts in one week 51 5.3 Relationships between human brain microstructures and motor learning 53 5.4 Limitations 57 5.5 Conclusions 58 REFERENCES 60 TABLES 70 Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics of the healthy and stroke subjects 70 Table 2. Characteristics of each stroke subject 71 Table 3. Comparisons of ankle tracking performance, measured by RMSE, between the healthy and stroke groups across baseline and Week 1 retention tests 74 Table 4. Comparisons of the three white matter tract integrity, measured by GFA, between the healthy and stroke groups across baseline and Week 1 retention tests 75 Table 5. Partial correlations between integrity of white matter tracts and RMSE measures for the healthy group 77 Table 6. Partial correlations between integrity of white matter tracts and RMSE measures for the stroke group 78 FIGURES 79 Fig 1. The design for the short-term ankle tracking learning paradigm 79 Fig 2. ROI placement on the GFA maps for reconstructing the dlPFC-caudate tract and SMA-putamen tract 80 Fig 3. Seed and ROI placement on the GFA maps for reconstructing CST 81 Fig 4. Changes of mean tracking error of healthy and stroke subjects from baseline to Week 1 retention test and during skill acquisition phase 82 Fig 5. Representative DSI tractography of the dlPFC-caudate tract, SMA-putamen tract, and CST of a healthy (H23) subject 83 Fig 6. Scatterplots of white matter tract integrity that had significant correlations with ankle tracking performance or changes in performance for the healthy group 84 Fig 7. Scatterplots of white matter tract integrity that had significant correlations with ankle tracking performance or changes in performance for the stroke group 85 Fig 8. Example of brain lesion sites drawn on DSI maps for two stroke subjects 86 APPENDICES 87 Appendix 1. IRB approval 87 Appendix 2. Subject consent form 89 Appendix 3. Healthy subject screen form 95 Appendix 4. Stroke subject screen form 97 Appendix 5. Subject information records for Stroke Patients 99 Appendix 6. Modified Ashworth Scale 104 Appendix 7. Waterloo Footedness Questionnaire-revised 105 Appendix 8. Mini-Mental State Examination 106 Appendix 9. Muscle strength measurements 108 Appendix 10. Fugl-Meyer assessment 109 Appendix 11. Timed 'Up & Go' Test 113 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 腳踝追蹤評估及訓練裝置 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 皮質紋狀體徑 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 擴散頻譜造影 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 腦中風 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 動作學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 腳踝追蹤任務 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 皮質脊髓徑 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | ankle tracking assessment and training device | en |
| dc.subject | stroke | en |
| dc.subject | motor learning | en |
| dc.subject | ankle tracking task | en |
| dc.subject | diffusion spectrum imaging | en |
| dc.subject | corticospinal tract | en |
| dc.subject | corticostriatal tract | en |
| dc.title | 皮質紋狀體徑與皮質脊髓徑於慢性中風病患與健康成人短期腳踝追蹤動作學習之角色:擴散頻譜造影研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Roles of the Corticostriatal Tracts and Corticospinal Tracts in Short-term Ankle Tracking Learning in Patients with Chronic Stroke and Healthy Adults: A Diffusion Spectrum Imaging Study | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾文毅(Wen-Yih Issac Tseng),鄭建興(Jiann-Shing Jeng),謝松蒼(Sung-Tsang Hsieh),李亞芸(Ya-Yun Lee) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 皮質紋狀體徑,皮質脊髓徑,擴散頻譜造影,腦中風,動作學習,腳踝追蹤任務,腳踝追蹤評估及訓練裝置, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | corticostriatal tract,corticospinal tract,diffusion spectrum imaging,stroke,motor learning,ankle tracking task,ankle tracking assessment and training device, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 113 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603698 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-10-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.62 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
