Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 醫學工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48681
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王兆麟
dc.contributor.authorYa-Wen Kuoen
dc.contributor.author郭雅雯zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T07:08:10Z-
dc.date.available2010-11-15
dc.date.copyright2010-11-15
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-11-04
dc.identifier.citation1. Botsford DJ, Esses SI, Ogilvie-Harris DJ. In vivo diurnal variation in intervertebral disc volume and morphology. Spine 1994;19:935-40.
2. van der Veen AJ, Mullender M, Smit TH, et al. Flow-related mechanics of the intervertebral disc: the validity of an in vitro model. Spine 2005;30:E534-9.
3. Allen M, VetMB P, Schoonmaker J, et al. Preclinical Evaluation of a Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) Hydrogel Implant as a Replacement for the Nucleus Pulposus. Spine 2004;29:515.
4. Vresilovic E, Johannessen W, Elliott D. Disc mechanics with trans-endplate partial nucleotomy are not fully restored following cyclic compressive loading and unloaded recovery. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2006;128:823.
5. Meakin JR, Hukins DW. Effect of removing the nucleus pulposus on the deformation of the annulus fibrosus during compression of the intervertebral disc. J Biomech 2000;33:575-80.
6. Costi JJ, Hearn TC, Fazzalari NL. The effect of hydration on the stiffness of intervertebral discs in an ovine model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002;17:446-55.
7. Wang JL, Wu TK, Lin TC, et al. Rest cannot always recover the dynamic properties of fatigue-loaded intervertebral disc. Spine 2008;33:1863-9.
8. Roughley PJ. Biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration: involvement of the extracellular matrix. Spine 2004;29:2691-9.
9. Roberts S. Disc morphology in health and disease. Biochem Soc Trans 2002;30:864-9.
10. Malko JA, Hutton WC, Fajman WA. An in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study of changes in the volume (and fluid content) of the lumbar intervertebral discs during a simulated diurnal load cycle. Spine 1999;24:1015-22.
11. Moore RJ, Vernon-Roberts B, Fraser RD, et al. The origin and fate of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc tissue. Spine 1996;21:2149-55.
12. Tanaka M, Nakahara S, Inoue H. A pathologic study of discs in the elderly. Separation between the cartilaginous endplate and the vertebral body. Spine 1993;18:1456-62.
13. Beggs I, Addison J. Posterior vertebral rim fractures. Br J Radiol 1998;71:567-72.
14. Inoue H. Three-dimensional architecture of lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 1981;6:139-46.
15. Crock HV, Goldwasser M. Anatomic studies of the circulation in the region of the vertebral end-plate in adult Greyhound dogs. Spine 1984;9:702-6.
16. Holm S, Maroudas A, Urban JP, et al. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc: solute transport and metabolism. Connect Tissue Res 1981;8:101-19.
17. Ogata K, Whiteside LA. 1980 Volvo award winner in basic science. Nutritional pathways of the intervertebral disc. An experimental study using hydrogen washout technique. Spine 1981;6:211-6.
18. Benneker LM, Heini PF, Alini M, et al. 2004 Young Investigator Award Winner: vertebral endplate marrow contact channel occlusions and intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2005;30:167-73.
19. Ayotte DC, Ito K, Tepic S. Direction-dependent resistance to flow in the endplate of the intervertebral disc: an ex vivo study. J Orthop Res 2001;19:1073-7.
20. McMillan DW, Garbutt G, Adams MA. Effect of sustained loading on the water content of intervertebral discs: implications for disc metabolism. Ann Rheum Dis 1996;55:880-7.
21. Adams MA, McMillan DW, Green TP, et al. Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 1996;21:434-8.
22. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, et al. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:755-62.
23. Boxberger JI, Orlansky AS, Sen S, et al. Reduced nucleus pulposus glycosaminoglycan content alters intervertebral disc dynamic viscoelastic mechanics. Journal of Biomechanics 2009;42:1941-6.
24. Iatridis JC, Weidenbaum M, Setton LA, et al. Is the nucleus pulposus a solid or a fluid? Mechanical behaviors of the nucleus pulposus of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 1996;21:1174-84.
25. Masuoka K, Michalek AJ, MacLean JJ, et al. Different effects of static versus cyclic compressive loading on rat intervertebral disc height and water loss in vitro. Spine 2007;32:1974-9.
26. Johannessen W, Vresilovic EJ, Wright AC, et al. Intervertebral disc mechanics are restored following cyclic loading and unloaded recovery. Ann Biomed Eng 2004;32:70-6.
27. van der Veen AJ, van Dieen JH, Nadort A, et al. Intervertebral disc recovery after dynamic or static loading in vitro: is there a role for the endplate? J Biomech 2007;40:2230-5.
28. Paajanen H, Erkintalo M, Parkkola R, et al. Age-dependent correlation of low-back pain and lumbar disc regeneration. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997;116:106-7.
29. McFadden KD, Taylor JR. End-plate lesions of the lumbar spine. Spine 1989;14:867-9.
30. Chandraraj S, Briggs CA, Opeskin K. Disc herniations in the young and end-plate vascularity. Clin Anat 1998;11:171-6.
31. Ariga K, Miyamoto S, Nakase T, et al. The relationship between apoptosis of endplate chondrocytes and aging and degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Spine 2001;26:2414-20.
32. Stokes IA, Iatridis JC. Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization. Spine 2004;29:2724-32.
33. Natarajan RN, Ke JH, Andersson GB. A model to study the disc degeneration process. Spine 1994;19:259-65.
34. Adams MA, Roughley PJ. What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine 2006;31:2151-61.
35. Adams MA, Freeman BJ, Morrison HP, et al. Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2000;25:1625-36.
36. Natarajan RN, Williams JR, Andersson GB. Recent advances in analytical modeling of lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 2004;29:2733-41.
37. Paesold G, Nerlich AG, Boos N. Biological treatment strategies for disc degeneration: potentials and shortcomings. Eur Spine J 2007;16:447-68.
38. Yasuma T, Saito S, Kihara K. Schmorl's nodes. Correlation of X-ray and histological findings in postmortem specimens. Acta Pathol Jpn 1988;38:723-33.
39. Bibby SR, Jones DA, Lee RB, et al. The pathophysiology of the intervertebral disc. Joint Bone Spine 2001;68:537-42.
40. Antoniou J, Goudsouzian NM, Heathfield TF, et al. The human lumbar endplate. Evidence of changes in biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, aging, and degeneration. Spine 1996;21:1153-61.
41. Oki S, Matsuda Y, Shibata T, et al. Morphologic differences of the vascular buds in the vertebral endplate: scanning electron microscopic study. Spine 1996;21:174-7.
42. Roberts S, Urban JP, Evans H, et al. Transport properties of the human cartilage endplate in relation to its composition and calcification. Spine 1996;21:415-20.
43. Sahlman J, Inkinen R, Hirvonen T, et al. Premature vertebral endplate ossification and mild disc degeneration in mice after inactivation of one allele belonging to the Col2a1 gene for Type II collagen. Spine 2001;26:2558-65.
44. McNally DS, Shackleford IM, Goodship AE, et al. In vivo stress measurement can predict pain on discography. Spine 1996;21:2580-7.
45. Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P. 'Stress' distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:965-72.
46. Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T. In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine 1999;24:2468-74.
47. Cinotti G, Della Rocca C, Romeo S, et al. Degenerative changes of porcine intervertebral disc induced by vertebral endplate injuries. Spine 2005;30:174-80.
48. Roberts S, Caterson B, Menage J, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and aggrecanase: their role in disorders of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 2000;25:3005-13.
49. Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T. In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:2468-74.
50. Tang SY, Zeenath U, Vashishth D. Effects of non-enzymatic glycation on cancellous bone fragility. Bone 2007;40:1144-51.
51. Wang X, Shen X, Li X, et al. Age-related changes in the collagen network and toughness of bone. Bone 2002;31:1-7.
52. Holm S, Holm AK, Ekstrom L, et al. Experimental disc degeneration due to endplate injury. J Spinal Disord Tech 2004;17:64-71.
53. Kroeber MW, Unglaub F, Wang H, et al. New in vivo animal model to create intervertebral disc degeneration and to investigate the effects of therapeutic strategies to stimulate disc regeneration. Spine 2002;27:2684-90.
54. Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Foster RJ, et al. Degeneration affects the anisotropic and nonlinear behaviors of human anulus fibrosus in compression. J Biomech 1998;31:535-44.
55. Best BA, Guilak F, Setton LA, et al. Compressive mechanical properties of the human anulus fibrosus and their relationship to biochemical composition. Spine 1994;19:212-21.
56. Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC, et al. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. Eur Spine J 2006;15:913-22.
57. Bothmann M, Kast E, Boldt GJ, et al. Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration. Neurosurg Rev 2007.
58. Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, et al. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine 2007;32:685-90.
59. Cunningham BW, McAfee PC, Geisler FH, et al. Distribution of in vivo and in vitro range of motion following 1-level arthroplasty with the CHARITE artificial disc compared with fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2008;8:7-12.
60. Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Zweig T, et al. Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 2008;17:1635-50.
61. Liu F, Cheng J, Komistek RD, et al. In vivo evaluation of dynamic characteristics of the normal, fused, and disc replacement cervical spines. Spine 2007;32:2578-84.
62. Halloran DO, Grad S, Stoddart M, et al. An injectable cross-linked scaffold for nucleus pulposus regeneration. Biomaterials 2008;29:438-47.
63. Allen MJ, Schoonmaker JE, Bauer TW, et al. Preclinical evaluation of a poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel implant as a replacement for the nucleus pulposus. Spine 2004;29:515-23.
64. Boelen EJ, van Hooy-Corstjens CS, Bulstra SK, et al. Intrinsically radiopaque hydrogels for nucleus pulposus replacement. Biomaterials 2005;26:6674-83.
65. Leone G, Torricelli P, Chiumiento A, et al. Amidic alginate hydrogel for nucleus pulposus replacement. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;84:391-401.
66. Wilke HJ, Heuer F, Neidlinger-Wilke C, et al. Is a collagen scaffold for a tissue engineered nucleus replacement capable of restoring disc height and stability in an animal model? Eur Spine J 2006;15 Suppl 3:S433-8.
67. Cloyd JM, Malhotra NR, Weng L, et al. Material properties in unconfined compression of human nucleus pulposus, injectable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels and tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1892-8.
68. Masuda K, An HS. Prevention of disc degeneration with growth factors. Eur Spine J 2006;15 Suppl 3:S422-32.
69. Le Maitre CL, Hoyland JA, Freemont AJ. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist delivered directly and by gene therapy inhibits matrix degradation in the intact degenerate human intervertebral disc: an in situ zymographic and gene therapy study. Arthritis Res Ther 2007;9:R83.
70. Le Maitre CL, Pockert A, Buttle DJ, et al. Matrix synthesis and degradation in human intervertebral disc degeneration. Biochem Soc Trans 2007;35:652-5.
71. Le Maitre CL, Freemont AJ, Hoyland JA. The role of interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis of human intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther 2005;7:R732-45.
72. Mow VC, Kuei SC, Lai WM, et al. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. J Biomech Eng 1980;102:73-84.
73. Yao H, Gu WY. Physical signals and solute transport in human intervertebral disc during compressive stress relaxation: 3D finite element analysis. Biorheology 2006;43:323-35.
74. Gu WY, Yao H, Vega AL, et al. Diffusivity of ions in agarose gels and intervertebral disc: effect of porosity. Ann Biomed Eng 2004;32:1710-7.
75. Heneghan P, Riches PE. Determination of the strain-dependent hydraulic permeability of the compressed bovine nucleus pulposus. J Biomech 2008;41:903-6.
76. Perie D, Iatridis JC, Demers CN, et al. Assessment of compressive modulus, hydraulic permeability and matrix content of trypsin-treated nucleus pulposus using quantitative MRI. J Biomech 2006;39:1392-400.
77. Perie D, Korda D, Iatridis JC. Confined compression experiments on bovine nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus: sensitivity of the experiment in the determination of compressive modulus and hydraulic permeability. J Biomech 2005;38:2164-71.
78. Yao H, Justiz MA, Flagler D, et al. Effects of swelling pressure and hydraulic permeability on dynamic compressive behavior of lumbar annulus fibrosus. Ann Biomed Eng 2002;30:1234-41.
79. Johannessen W, Elliott DM. Effects of degeneration on the biphasic material properties of human nucleus pulposus in confined compression. Spine 2005;30:E724-9.
80. Soltz MA, Ateshian GA. Experimental verification and theoretical prediction of cartilage interstitial fluid pressurization at an impermeable contact interface in confined compression. J Biomech 1998;31:927-34.
81. Beckstein JC, Sen S, Schaer TP, et al. Comparison of animal discs used in disc research to human lumbar disc: axial compression mechanics and glycosaminoglycan content. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:E166-73.
82. Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15:411-5.
83. Keller TS, Spengler DM, Hansson TH. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. I. Creep analysis during static compressive loading. J Orthop Res 1987;5:467-78.
84. Ateshian GA, Warden WH, Kim JJ, et al. Finite deformation biphasic material properties of bovine articular cartilage from confined compression experiments. J Biomech 1997;30:1157-64.
85. Bursac PM, Obitz TW, Eisenberg SR, et al. Confined and unconfined stress relaxation of cartilage: appropriateness of a transversely isotropic analysis. J Biomech 1999;32:1125-30.
86. Martinez JB, Oloyede VO, Broom ND. Biomechanics of load-bearing of the intervertebral disc: an experimental and finite element model. Med Eng Phys 1997;19:145-56.
87. Urban JP, Smith S, Fairbank JC. Nutrition of the intervertebral disc. Spine 2004;29:2700-9.
88. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V, et al. Thoracic human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1991;16:888-901.
89. Heneghan P, Riches PE. The strain-dependent osmotic pressure and stiffness of the bovine nucleus pulposus apportioned into ionic and non-ionic contributors. J Biomech 2008;41:2411-6.
90. Travascio F, Jackson AR, Brown MD, et al. Relationship between solute transport properties and tissue morphology in human annulus fibrosus. J Orthop Res 2009;27:1625-30.
91. Jackson AR, Travascio F, Gu WY. Effect of mechanical loading on electrical conductivity in human intervertebral disk. J Biomech Eng 2009;131:054505.
92. Aladin DM, Cheung KM, Ngan AH, et al. Nanostructure of collagen fibrils in human nucleus pulposus and its correlation with macroscale tissue mechanics. J Orthop Res 2009.
93. Gu WY, Yao H, Huang CY, et al. New insight into deformation-dependent hydraulic permeability of gels and cartilage, and dynamic behavior of agarose gels in confined compression. J Biomech 2003;36:593-8.
94. Duance VC, Crean JK, Sims TJ, et al. Changes in collagen cross-linking in degenerative disc disease and scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998;23:2545-51.
95. Riches PE, Dhillon N, Lotz J, et al. The internal mechanics of the intervertebral disc under cyclic loading. J Biomech 2002;35:1263-71.
96. McLain RF, Yerby SA, Moseley TA. Comparative morphometry of L4 vertebrae: comparison of large animal models for the human lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:E200-6.
97. Iatridis JC, MaClean JJ, Ryan DA. Mechanical damage to the intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus subjected to tensile loading. Journal of Biomechanics 2005;38:557-65.
98. Wang DL, Jiang SD, Dai LY. Biologic response of the intervertebral disc to static and dynamic compression in vitro. Spine 2007;32:2521-8.
99. Vernengo J, Fussell GW, Smith NG, et al. Synthesis and Characterization of Injectable Bioadhesive Hydrogels for Nucleus Pulposus Replacement and Repair of the Damaged Intervertebral Disc. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B-Applied Biomaterials 2010;93B:309-17.
100. Li CQ, Huang B, Luo G, et al. Construction of collagen II/hyaluronate/chondroitin-6-sulfate tri-copolymer scaffold for nucleus pulposus tissue engineering and preliminary analysis of its physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010;21:741-51.
101. Goldberg VM, Buckwalter JA. Hyaluronans in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence for disease-modifying activity. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2005;13:216-24.
102. Phiphobmongkol V, Sudhasaneya V. The effectiveness and safety of intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate (500-730 kDa) in the treatment of patients with painful knee osteoarthritis. J Med Assoc Thai 2009;92:1287-94.
103. Pfeiffer M, Boudriot U, Pfeiffer D, et al. Intradiscal application of hyaluronic acid in the non-human primate lumbar spine: radiological results. Eur Spine J 2003;12:76-83.
104. Nesti LJ, Li WJ, Shanti RM, et al. Intervertebral disc tissue engineering using a novel hyaluronic acid-nanofibrous scaffold (HANFS) amalgam. Tissue Engineering Part A 2008;14:1527-37.
105. Ganey T, Hutton WC, Moseley T, et al. Intervertebral disc repair using adipose tissue-derived stem and regenerative cells: experiments in a canine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2297-304.
106. Ko CS, Huang JP, Huang CW, et al. Type II collagen-chondroitin sulfate-hyaluronan scaffold cross-linked by genipin for cartilage tissue engineering. J Biosci Bioeng 2009;107:177-82.
107. Sung HW, Chang WH, Ma CY, et al. Crosslinking of biological tissues using genipin and/or carbodiimide. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2003;64A:427-38.
108. Chuang SY, Odono RM, Hedman TP. Effects of exogenous crosslinking on in vitro tensile and compressive moduli of lumbar intervertebral discs. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2007;22:14-20.
109. Chuang S, Lin L, Tsai Y, et al. Exogenous crosslinking recovers the functional integrity of intervertebral disc secondary to a stab injury. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2009.
110. Hsu LCK, Y W; Chen, S; Chuang, S Y; Wang, J L. Crosslinking Reagent Increases Fluid Flow Resistance of Degenerated Endplate. Transactions of 56th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. New Orleans, 2010.
111. Hedman TP, Saito H, Vo C, et al. Exogenous cross-linking increases the stability of spinal motion segments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E480-5.
112. Yerramalli CS, Chou AI, Miller GJ, et al. The effect of nucleus pulposus crosslinking and glycosaminoglycan degradation on disc mechanical function. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2007;6:13-20.
113. Yang S-M, Jaw-Lin Wang DS. Effect of Nucleus Pulposus Denaturation and Exogenous Crosslinking on the Dynamic Properties of Intervertebral Disc. 2005/10/18 ed, 2009.
114. Roberts S, Menage J, Sivan S, et al. Bovine explant model of degeneration of the intervertebral disc. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:24.
115. Kuo YW, Wang JL. Rheology of intervertebral disc: an ex vivo study on the effect of loading history, loading magnitude, fatigue loading, and disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:E743-52.
116. Mwale F, Demers CN, Michalek AJ, et al. Evaluation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical and mechanical properties of trypsin-treated intervertebral discs under physiological compression loading. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:563-73.
117. Causa F, Manto L, Borzacchiello A, et al. Spatial and structural dependence of mechanical properties of porcine intervertebral disc. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:1277-80.
118. Bron JL, Koenderink GH, Everts V, et al. Rheological characterization of the nucleus pulposus and dense collagen scaffolds intended for functional replacement. J Orthop Res 2009;27:620-6.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48681-
dc.description.abstract椎間盤為人體內負責承重與吸收衝擊的主要器官,椎間盤退化疾病將不可避免地降低患者生活品質,是人口高齡化社會所必須正視的醫療問題。椎間盤的功能表現取決於其固體結構機械性質以及液體流動機制,可由靜態流變性質與動態力學性質加以評估。深入了解影響椎間盤靜態流變性質與動態力學性質的各種機制,將有助於增進前瞻性退化性椎間盤治療方法的效益。本研究的第一部份,探討不同負載條件以及退化程度對椎間盤靜態流變性質的影響,探討的流變參數分別代表椎間盤於靜態負載時,整體勁度與內部液體流動性。實驗結果顯示:於潛變期間,椎間盤勁度增加,液體流動性降低;於鬆弛期間,椎間盤勁度降低,液體流動性不變;當負載力量增加,椎間盤勁度上升而液體流動性下降;疲勞負載時間越長,椎間盤勁度不變,但液體流動性降低;隨著退化程度增加,椎間盤勁度升高,液體流動性降低。本研究結果另可推論椎間盤勁度與含水量為負向相關,液體滲透度與椎間盤孔隙度為正向相關。
本研究的第二部份以胰蛋白脢降解椎間核模擬退化初期的椎間盤,比較黏性補充劑(玻尿酸)與胜肽交聯劑(梔子素)對於回復退化椎間盤的細部結構性質與整體動態力學性質的效益,並分析椎間盤細部結構性質對整體動態力學性質的影響程度。實驗中所探討的椎間盤細部結構性質包含椎間核含水量、椎間核黏彈性、椎間環結構完整性;椎間盤動態力學性質包含椎間盤受衝擊負載時,整體勁度與能量緩衝性。結果顯示:玻尿酸可回復退化椎間核的含水量,提升退化椎間盤於疲勞負載後的能量緩衝性;梔子素可回復退化椎間核的含水量,提升退化椎間核的彈性、聚合剥離的椎間環纖維,回復退化椎間盤於疲勞負載後的能量緩衝性。玻尿酸與梔子素皆無法改變退化椎間核的黏性與椎間盤於疲勞負載後的勁度。與玻尿酸相較之下,梔子素較能回復退化性椎間盤的結構性質與生物力學功能,但梔子素會將水分限制於椎間核內,使水分無法隨疲勞負載而外流,並改變椎間盤動態性質在疲勞負載下的變化趨勢,因此梔子素本身在回復退化性椎間盤生物力學功能上的可行性並不高。在椎間盤細部結構性質與整體動態力學性質的迴歸分析上,結果顯示椎間核彈性對椎間盤疲勞負載前的勁度有較大的相關性,椎間核黏性對椎間盤疲勞負載後的能量緩衝性有較大的相關性。
本論文推測椎間盤流變性質受負載條件與退化程度而改變的機制在於含水量與椎間盤內部孔徑的變化,當退化產生時,椎間盤勁度升高且內部水分的流通性降低。黏性補充劑與胜肽交聯劑皆無法完全回復退化椎間盤的生物力學功能,因此在未來的研究裡,仍需繼續尋找合適的生物性相容材料,以應用於退化性椎間盤疾病的治療策略上。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe major biomechanical functions of intervertebral disc are to resist the external load and to dissipate the shock energy imposed on the human body during daily activities. The disc functions depend on the internal fluid dynamics and compositional integrity of disc matrix. The clarifications of effect of loading conditions and degenerations on the biomechanical functions of disc will improve the treatment efficacy for the degenerated disc diseases. Two biomechanical models, i.e., rheological model and the dynamic model, have been used to simulate the disc medium term and short term behaviors. The rheological model is traditionally described by a linear biphasic theory model, and the dynamic model is described by a 1-D spring and dashpot model. The rheological and dynamic properties derived from the both models can indicate the disc stiffness and internal fluid flow capability of disc matrix and different time scale.
The first part of this dissertation studied the effect of loading history, loading magnitude, fatigue loading and degeneration on the disc rheology. The results showed that the disc stiffness increased and the fluid flow capability decreased during the creep loading, the disc stiffness decreased and the fluid flow capability unchanged during the relaxation loading. The disc stiffness increased and the fluid flow capability decreased with the loading magnitude. After the fatigue loading time, the disc stiffness unchanged but the fluid flow capability decreased. The degeneration increased the disc stiffness but decreased the fluid flow capability. The results suggested that the disc stiffness was negatively related to the disc hydration level, and the fluid flow capability was positively related to the matrix pore size.
In the second part of this study, the recovery efficiency of viscosupplement (i.e., hyaluronic acid) and crosslinker (i.e., genipin) on the degenerated disc was evaluated by changes of the water content and viscoelasticity of nucleus pulposus, structural integrity of the anular fibrosus, and dynamic properties of the whole disc responding to the fatigue loading. The results revealed that the intervention of hyaluronic acid and genipin could recover the water content of the degenerated nucleus pulposus after rest, but block the water outflow during the fatigue loading. The genipin could slightly increase the elasticity of the degenerated nucleus pulposus and condense the delaminated anular fibrosus. Neither the intervention of hyaluronic acid nor the genipin recovered the viscoelasticity of the degenerated nucleus pulposus. The intervention of hyaluronic acid and genipin could recover the disc stiffness and energy dissipation capability of the degenerated disc. However, these effects are degraded by the fatigue loading. The results indicated that the crosslinker could better recover the structural and mechanical properties of the degenerated disc than the viscosupplement does. However, the susceptibility to the fatigue loading casts the doubt on the feasibility of crosslinker to treat the degenerated disc diseases.
In conclusion, this dissertation proves that the disc mechanical functions are affected by the loading conditions and degeneration due to the change of disc hydration level and matrix pore size. The disc stiffness increased and the internal fluid flow capability decreased with degeneration. Neither the viscosupplement nor the crosslinker is feasible to reverse the full aspects of disc degenerative changes. New materials for treating degenerated disc should be studied in the future.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T07:08:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-D94548018-1.pdf: 1918991 bytes, checksum: 3a1e2ba49b39b91c3373017d7567d97c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
中文摘要 iv
Abstract vi
圖目錄 xi
表目錄 xiii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 椎間盤的結構及組成 1
1.2 椎間盤的生物力學 4
1.3 椎間盤退化的病理現象 6
1.4 退化性椎間盤的前瞻性治療 7
1.5研究目的 9
1.6 論文架構 9
第二章 椎間盤靜態流變性質 11
2.1 前言 11
2.2 流變數學模型 12
2.3 流變實驗 15
2.3.1試樣準備 15
2.3.2 負載型態對椎間盤流變性質的變化 18
2.3.3負載大小對椎間盤流變性質的影響 19
2.3.4疲勞負載時間及休息對椎間盤流變性質的影響 20
2.3.5小面關節及退化程度對椎間盤流變性質的影響 20
2.4 實驗結果 21
2.4.1 椎間盤流變性質於不同負載形式與負載期間的變化 22
2.4.2 椎間盤流變性質於不同潛變力量下的變化 24
2.4.3 疲勞負載及休息對椎間盤流變性質的影響 25
2.4.4小面關節及退化程度對椎間盤流變性質的影響 26
2.5 討論 27
第三章 黏性補充劑與胜肽交聯劑應用於退化性椎間盤治療的可行性 36
3.1 前言 36
3.2 實驗方法 41
3.2.1 黏性補充劑與胜肽交聯劑回復椎間核水分的效益 41
3.2.2黏性補充劑與胜肽交聯劑回復椎間核黏彈性的效益 43
3.2.3胜肽交聯劑對降解椎間環結構的回復效果 45
3.2.4 椎間環微破壞與椎間核降解對椎間盤動態性質的影響 47
3.2.5 黏性補充劑與胜肽交聯劑回復降解椎間盤動態性質的效益 50
3.2.6 椎間盤細部結構性質對整體動態力學性質的影響程度 52
3.3 實驗結果 54
3.3.1黏性補充劑與胜肽交聯劑回復椎間核水分的效益 54
3.3.2黏性補充劑與胜肽交聯劑回復椎間核黏彈性的效益 55
3.3.3胜肽交聯劑對降解椎間環結構的回復效果 57
3.3.5椎間環微損傷與椎間核降解對椎間盤動態性質的影響 59
3.3.5 黏性補充劑與胜肽交聯劑回復退化椎間盤動態性質的效能比較 61
3.3.6椎間盤細部結構性質對整體動態力學性質的影響程度 62
3.4 討論 64
3.5 結論 70
第四章 結論與未來展望 71
4.1 結論 71
4.2 未來展望 72
參考文獻 73
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject脊椎生物力學zh_TW
dc.subject動態力學zh_TW
dc.subject流變學zh_TW
dc.subject梔子素zh_TW
dc.subject椎間盤退化zh_TW
dc.subject玻尿酸zh_TW
dc.subjectGenipinen
dc.subjectHyaluronic aciden
dc.subjectDegenerated disc diseasesen
dc.subjectDamping coefficienten
dc.subjectStiffnessen
dc.subjectDisc rheologyen
dc.subjectSpine biomechanicsen
dc.title黏性補充劑與胜肽交聯劑回復退化性椎間盤生物力學功能之可行性研究zh_TW
dc.titleFeasibility Analysis of Viscosupplement and Crosslinker in Recovering the Biomechanical Functions of Degenerated Intervertebral Discen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear99-1
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林晉,楊曙華,徐善慧,趙振綱,林峰輝,曾永輝
dc.subject.keyword椎間盤退化,脊椎生物力學,流變學,動態力學,梔子素,玻尿酸,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordDegenerated disc diseases,Spine biomechanics,Disc rheology,Stiffness,Damping coefficient,Genipin,Hyaluronic acid,en
dc.relation.page82
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2010-11-04
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept醫學工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:醫學工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.87 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved