請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48474
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 柯承恩(Chen-en Ko),黃崇興(Chung-Hsing Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Hua Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃文華 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T06:58:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-02-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-01-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
01.Christensen, Clayton(2005),李芳齡譯,創新者的修練(Seeing what is next?),台北:天下文化出版,2005年1月。 02 Kim, W.C. & Mauborgne, R.(2005), 黃秀媛譯,藍海策略 (Blue Ocean Strategy),台北:天下文化出版,2005年。 03 Kotler, Philip(2007),謝文雀譯,行銷管理(Marketing Management, An Asian Perspective),台北:華泰文化出版,2007年。 04 NCC(2009)綜合企劃處,「匯流政策發展座談會簡報」,國家通訊傳播委員會,2009/11/23,第3頁。(www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/09112/1797_12996_091124_1.ppt) 05.CC(2010),「國家通訊傳播委員會99 至102 年度中程施政計畫(行政院3158次院會通過)」,國家通訊傳播委員會,2010/10 (chinese/news.aspx?site_content_sn=1639&is_history=0) 06. Porter, Michael(2009),李明軒、高登第譯,競爭論(On competition),台北:天下文化出版,2009年7月。 07.中華電信2010年第4季投資人說明會資料, 2010年11月 08中華電信年報,2006年, 2007年, 2008年, 2009年版 09華電信企業社會責任報告書, 2007年, 2008年, 2009年版 10.台灣大哥大年報,2006年, 2007年, 2008年, 2009年版 11.台灣大哥大企業社會責任報告書, 2007年, 2008年, 2009年版 12.台灣大哥大2010年第4季投資人說明會資料, 2010年11月 13.電信法第二條,2007/7/11修正版,國家通訊傳播委員會網站 14.固定通信業務管理規則第二條,國家通訊傳播委員會,2009/9/2修正 15.行動通信業務管理規則第二條,國家通訊傳播委員會,2009/4/3修正 16.王英裕,迎接通訊新時代-數位匯流趨勢下的產業變貌與應用趨勢,工研院,2008/6/30 17.朱南勳,「由Google TV看數位電視產業發展之機會與挑戰」, 財團法人資訊工業策進會產業情報研究所(MIC), 2010/11/10 18.林丁丙,楊士萱,「匯流趨勢下數位電視科技的蛻變」,網路通訊國家型科技計畫簡訊, 2010/5,第15 期第3頁。(www.ncp.org.tw/vanilla/vj-attachment/2010/06/attach55.pdf) 19.葉至誠著,社會科學概論,台北:揚智文化,2000年。 20.鍾倫納著,應用社會科學研究法,香港:商務,1992年。 21.梁燕蕙, “Walled Garden”, 電子時報,2007/11/29 (digitimes.com.tw) 22.戴佳慧,「購物版Foursquare,適地性iPhone購物程式在美國上架」,數位時代網站,2010/8/19 23.鄭緯筌,「十大領域購併賽圈地插旗,押寶未來之星」,數位時代網站,2010/10/1 24.陳品先編譯,「Facebook宣布有史以來動用最多工程師開發的全新通訊系統」,數位時代網站,2010/10/1 25.賴宥蓁,「雅虎不死心,攜手東芝、三星推連網電視」,電子時報,2010/11/4 26.賴宥蓁,「數位客廳大戰,Google TV、Apple TV定位各不同」,電子時報,2010/9/6 27.彭琡靜,「數位匯流發展政策」,網路通訊國家型科技計畫簡訊,2010/5, 第15 期,第1頁。(www.ncp.org.tw/vanilla/index.php?volume=14) 28.單驥,「行政院通過數位匯流方案」,台灣新經濟簡訊,2010/9,第116期,第6頁。 29.神腦年報,2009年版 30.戴文揚,「Google TV高層:無意取代Cable業者」,電子時報,2010/11/04 31.廖婉菁,「不了解消費者心理,Google TV問題多多」,電子時報,2010/11/25 32.梁燕蕙,「美國3大電視網抵制Google TV節目服務」,電子時報,2010/10/22 33.雷佳宜,「Apple TV 要說贏家還太早」,電子時報,2010/9/3 34.雷佳宜,「蘋果App Store策略將改變電視產業獲利模式」,電子時報,2010/9/3 35.郭立偉,「中華電信重提3G上網分級收費」,ZDNet,2010/07/09 36.遠傳電信年報,2009年版 37.電信維基網(2010), “电信价值链的构造形式”, http://www.telewiki.cn 38.湯恩比著,陳曉林譯,歷史研究,台北:遠流出版,1984年 39.科技產業資訊室(Kyle),「2010年第一季智慧型手機成長率高達66.9%」,科技政策研究與資訊中心整理,2010/5/24, (cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/market/eetelecomm_mobile/2010) 英文文獻 01. Anthony, S.D.&Johnson, M.W.&Sinfield,J.V.(2008), “Institutionalizing Innovation”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter 2008, Vol. 49 No.2, pp 45-53 02.Bereday, George Z.F.(1964), “ Comparative method in education”, New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964. 03. Bovel, David (2000), “From supply chain to value net” , Journal of Business Strategy, 21:4 (Jul./Aug 2000) Vol 21, Issue 4, pp24-28 04.Brandenburger, A. & Nalebuff,B(1996) Co-opetition, New York: Doubleday, 1996 05.Chesbrough,H&Rosenbloom,R.S.(2002). 'The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies.' Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3): PP 529-555 06.Chesbrough,H. (2007), “Why companies should have open business model”, MIT Sloan management Review, Winter 2007, pp 22~28 07.Christensen,C & Raynor, M (2003),“ The Innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth,” Harvard Business School Press, Dec. 2003 08. Christensen, Clayton(2008),“ Reinventing Your Business Model,” Harvard Business Review, Dec. 2008, p.5 09.Desouza, K.C.& Dombrowski,C.(2009), “Crafting organizational innovation processes”, Innovation management, policy & practice, Apr 2009, Vol. 11, Issue 1, p7 10.Grivolas, Julien(2010) “HSPA will continue to evolve despite LTE momentum”, straighttalk Telecoms Q4 2010, pp26-29 11.Gronroos, Christian(1997), “ Value-driven relational marketing: from products to resources and competencies”, Journal of Marketing management, 1997, Vol 13, p412 12.Hamel,G.(2000) “Leading the Revolution” Harvard Business School Press, August 2000-11-26, 13.Hertog,P.& Jong.G..(2007), “ Randstad’s business model of innovation: Results from an exploratory study in the temporary staffing industry”, Innovation management, policy & practice, Oct-Dec 2007, Vol. 9 Issue 3-4, pp 358-359 14.Kim, W.C.& Mauborgne, R.(1997), “Value Innovation: The strategic logic of high growth”, Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, 1997, pp 15.McCarthy, C.(2005),”Value chain for mobile operators”, Ovum, July 2005 16.Magretta, Joan(2002), “ Why Business models matter”, Harvard Business review, May 2002, pp86-92 17.Meeker, Mary (2010) “Ten Questions Internet Execs Should Ask & Answer”, Web 2.0 Summit – San Francisco, November 16, 2010, www.morganstanley.com 18.Mulling, J& Komisar,R.(2010), “A business plan? Or a journey to plan B?”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2010, pp3-4 19.OECD and Eurostat (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition, OECD, Paris, www.oecd.org/sti/oslomanual. 20.Osterwalder, A.&PigneurY.(2010), “Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers,” Wiley (July 13, 2010) , pp 16-17 21.Pagani, Margherita(2003), Multimedia and interactive digital TV: Managing the opportunities created by digital convergence, IRM Press, 2003, 22.Philpott,M.,Bonte, J.,Davies,C.&Zoller, E.(2005),” Ovum broadband value chain”, Ovum,7 October 2005 23.Robertson, David.(2009) “How to use the innovation matrix to challenge your innovation teams”, Innovation Governance website (www.innovationgovernance.net/innovationmatrix.htm) 24.Rothaermel,F.T&Hess,A.M.(2010), “Innovation strategy combined”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2010, pp13-14 25.Sawhney, M.,Wolcott,R.C.&Arroniz,I.(2006)“The 12 Different Ways for Companies to Innovate”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring 2006, Vol. 47, pp75-81 26.Schutt, R. K. (2006). Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research. London: SAGE Publications. 27.Shafer, S.M.,Smith, H. J.&Linder, J.C.(2005), “The power of business models”, Business Horizon (2005) 48, p199~207 28.Tanner, J.C.(2010) “Apps on fire”, Telecom Asia, Nov 22, 2010, www.telecomasia.net 29.Wang, Charice(2010), “Taiwan Country Regulation Overview”, Ovum, Jan 29, 2010 30.Yin, Robert K.(1994), “Case Study Research”, SAGE Publications, Jan, 1, 1994 31.Zoller,E.&Little,M.(2010), “The digital content economy: a supply-side view” Ovum, 5 July 32.Google website, www.Google.com. 33.Gartner, “iPhone sales double in 2009 as Apple claims thirdl pace in smartphone sales,” Macrumors, 2010/2/23, (http://www.macrumors.com/2010/02/23/) 34. Knowledge@Wharton, “Innovation: Creating Long-term Value in New Business Models and Technology”, Wharton, Feb 27, 2006, (http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/) 35.Telecomcircle(http://www.telecomcircle.com/2009/04/mvno-demystified/), April 16,2009 36.Wikipedia website, www.wikipedia.org 37.Ovum(2009), “Telecom in 2020- executive summary” Ovum, Dec 24,2009 38.Ovum(2010), “SFR multi-screen strategy,” “Verizon,” “Telstra,”Ovum, Jan 15,2010 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48474 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 當愈來愈多消費者拿起iPhone下載App Store的應用服務時,電信業者發現他們除了吃到飽的數據月租費外,無法從中獲利。當愈來愈多消費者透過Yahoo!和Google的聯網電視收看更多隨選影片同時享受更多網路上的服務時,有線電視業者發現他們落伍了。當台灣的兩大電信業者(中華電信與台灣大哥大)不約而同的宣佈邁向數位匯流的領導者時,他們發現競爭對手不再只是彼此,而為了滿足消費者的需要,他們必須改變傳統的價值創新與經營模式。
本研究應用價值鏈、價值創新、價值網與經營模式等理論,蒐集過去五年台灣兩大電信業者的新聞報導資料與公開的企業檔案,以及近期國外網際網路業者的創新事件報導為基礎,探討數位匯流趨勢下電信業者的價值創新與經營模式。第四章對產業和業者的市場、財務與組織做簡單的介紹。第五章則運用價值鏈將價值創新分為七個類型,以過去五年的新聞報導資料,分析創新內涵的變化與對應的經營模式,最後歸納出創新與經營模式的關聯性。第六章運用價值網的架構,參考近半年網際網路業者的創新,提出數位匯流的消費者需求、價值網與經營模式的分析架構。 綜合上述,本研究除了對電信業者重點的結論與建議外,同時也對產官學界提出幾點建議,並列出有待深入研究的議題,供有興趣的先進進一步的研究探討。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | When more consumers pay and download the application or contents from app store using iPhones, the Telcos (telecommunication operators) know they lose profit opportunity in the application or content business except all-you-can-eat data access revenue. When more consumers use the internet connected TV (e.g. Yahoo! and Google TV) to watch video on demand and surf on net at the same time, the cable TV service operators know they are out-of-date. When the big two Telcos (Chunghwa Telecom and Taiwan Mobile) simultaneously announce to be the leader in digital convergence field in 2007, they know they don’t just compete each other in telecom industry but they face many global competitors from other industries. And these competitors are also their alliance partners. So they have to take a totally different thinking way to create value innovation and build up business models.
The thesis refers to the theories like industry value chain, value innovation, value net and business model. And it collects the news-clippings and public information of the big two Telcos dated from 2006/1/1 to 2010/11/30, and it also collects recent research reports or articles regarding the innovation of global internet players in digital convergent arena. Based on the theories and the collected data. The body of the analysis is from Chapter 4 to 6. In Chapter 4, it gives an overview and summary of the telecommunication industry and big two Telcos. It includes the market status, financial status, efforts for digital convergence and organization changes for each telco. In Chapter 5, the thesis defines seven types of innovation based on the industry value chain. They are content /application, solution, roaming, tariff, network system, device and channel. Based on the news of the big two Telcos in past five years, I summarize the value innovation changes, the business model components related to each innovation, and the matrix of seven innovation type mapping to nine business model components. In Chapter 6, the thesis starts from the traditional value net and then goes to the sophisticated value net for digital convergence players. In order to create the highest value for customers and itself in the sophisticated net, each player should think how to compete and cooperate with other players at the same time. The thesis gives an analysis framework in end of the chapter. In Chapter 7, I summarize the conclusions that echo to the questiones and analysis in the previous chapters. To sum up, I come out a matrix of value innovation mapping business model and a value net analysis framework. The former one provides Telcos a framework for value innovation in intra-industry value chain. The latter one provides Telcos a framework for value innovation in cross-industry value net by both competition and cooperation. Anyway, the thesis is just a starting point for value innovation and business model study in digital convergence, so some topics are recommended for reference or further study in the end of the thesis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T06:58:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-P97748001-1.pdf: 1656690 bytes, checksum: 42632a28743df7174bfa2c1d91890a7d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
口試委員審定書 ii 誌謝 iii 中文摘要 iv 英文摘要 v 目 錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 xi 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節、研究背景及動機 1 第二節、研究目的與問題 2 第三節、研究流程 3 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節、價值、價值鏈與價值網 5 第二節、價值創新 9 第三節、經營模式 13 第四節、數位匯流 17 第三章 研究方法 24 第一節、研究方法論概述 24 第二節、研究設計及架構 26 第三節、資料蒐集與分析 29 第四節、研究限制 31 第四章 電信產業與兩大業者概況 32 第一節、電信產業的發展概況 32 第二節、兩大業者的動態比較 38 第三節、兩大業者的組織創新 43 第四節、兩大電信業者在數位匯流的創新 45 第五章 近五年兩業者的創新與經營模式(價值鏈分析) 48 第一節、近五年兩業者價值創新的分類統計 48 第二節、近五年各種價值創新內涵的變化 54 第三節、近五年創新對應的經營模式 68 第四節、近五年價值創新與經營模式的關聯性 80 第六章 發展中的價值創新與經營模式(價值網分析) 82 第一節、數位匯流的價值網 82 第二節、網際網路業者進入行動產業的創新 86 第三節、網際網路業者進入電視產業的創新 88 第四節、其他網際網路與電信業者的創新 93 第五節、電信業者未來的創新思考架構 98 第七章 結論與建議 102 第一節、研究結論 102 第二節、研究建議 104 第三節、未來研究議題 105 參考文獻 107 附錄 111 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 電信業者的價值創新與經營模式:台灣大哥大與中華電信比較研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Value Innovation and Business Model of Telecom Operators:
Comparison of Taiwan Mobile and Chunghwa Telecom | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳國泰 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 價值創新,價值網,經營模式,數位匯流,中華電信,台灣大哥大,電信業者, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Value Innovation,Business Model,Digital Convergence,Value Net,Taiwan Mobile,Chunghwa Telecom,Telecommunication Operators, | en |
dc.relation.page | 111 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-01-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學組 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.62 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。