請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48100
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 傅祖壇 | |
dc.contributor.author | Jia-Ching Juo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 卓佳慶 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T06:46:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-06 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-06-21 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aida, K., Cooper, W.W., Pastor, J.T., Sueyoshi, T., 1998.
Evaluating water supply services in Japan with RAM: A range-adjusted measure of inefficiency. Omega, International Journal of Management Science 26, 207-232. Asaftei, G., 2008. The contribution of product mix versus efficiency and technical change in US banking. Journal of Banking and Finance 32, 2336–2345. Avkiran, N.K., 2009. Opening the black box of efficiency analysis: An illustration with UAE banks, Omega 37, 930- 941. Avkiran, N.K., Tone, K., Tsutsui, M., 2008. Bridging radial and non-radial measures of efficiency in DEA. Ann Oper Res 164: 127–138. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., 1984. Models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 30, 1078–1092. Banker, R. D., Datar, S., Kaplan, R., 1989. Productivity measurement and management accounting. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 4, 528–554. Bennet, T.L., 1920. The theory of measurement of changes in cost of living. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society 83, 455–462. Berger, A.N., 2007. International comparisons of banking efficiency. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 16, 119-144. Berger, A.N., Humphrey, D.B., 1997. Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research 98, 175–212. Berger, A.N., Mester, L.J., 1997. Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking and Finance 21, 895-947. Canhoto, A., Dermine, J., 2003. A note on banking efficiency in Portugal, New vs. old banks. Journal of Banking and Finance 27, 2087-2098. Chambers, R.G., Chung, Y., Färe, R., 1996. Benefit and distance functions. Journal of Economic Theory 70, 407- 419. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., 1962. Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 15, 333-334. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Golany, B., Seiford, L.M., Stutz, J., 1985. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto–Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics 30, 91– 107. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444. Chen, T.Y., 2002. A comparison of chance-constrained DEA and stochastic frontier analysis: Bank efficiency in Taiwan. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 492–500. Chiu, Y.H., Chen, Y.C., 2009. The analysis of Taiwanese bank efficiency: Incorporating both external environment risk and internal risk. Economic Modelling 26, 456–463. Chiu, Y.H., Jan, C., Shen, D.B., Wang, P.C., 2008. Efficiency and capital adequacy in Taiwan banking: BCC and super-DEA estimation, The Service Industries Journal 28, 479–496. Coelli, T.J., Prasada, R.D.S., O’Donnell, C.J., Battese, G.E., 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, second ed. Springer, USA. Das, A., Ghosh, S., 2009. Financial deregulation and profit efficiency: A nonparametric analysis of Indian banks. Journal of Economics and Business 61, 509–528. Diewert, W.E., 2005. Index number theory using differences rather than ratios. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64, 311-360. Drake, L., Hall, M.J.B., Simper, R., 2006. The impact of macroeconomic and regulatory factors on bank efficiency: A non-parametric analysis of Hong Kong’s banking system. Journal of Banking and Finance 30, 1443–1466. Drake, L., Hall, M.J.B., Simper, R., 2009. Bank modelling methodologies: A comparative non-parametric analysis of efficiency in the Japanese banking sector, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 19, 1-15. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., 2005. Comment: Profits and productivity, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Oregon State University, U.S.A. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., 2005. Comment: Profits and productivity, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Oregon State University, U.S.A. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Weber, W.L., 2004. The effect of risk-based capital requirements on profit efficiency in banking. Applied Economics 36, 1731-1743. Fethi, M.D., Pasiouras, F., 2010. Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research 204, 189–198. Fried, H.O., Schmidt, S.S., Yaisawarng, S., 1999. Incorporating the operating environment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis 12, 249–267. Fukuyama, H., Weber, W.L., 2008. Profit inefficiency of Japanese securities firms. Journal of Applied Economics 11, 281-303. Grifell-Tatjé, E., Lovell, C.A.K., 1999. Profits and productivity. Management Science 45, 1177-1193. Grifell-Tatjé, E., Lovell, C.A.K., 2006. Productivity at the post: Its drivers and its distribution. Centre for efficiency and productivity analysis, Working Paper Series 2, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia. Hu, W.C., Lai, M.C., Huang, H.C., 2009. Rating the relative efficiency of financial holding companies in an emerging economy: A multiple DEA approach, Expert Systems with Applications 36, 5592–5599. Koutsomanoli-Filippaki, A., Margaritis, D., Staikouras, C., 2009. Profit efficiency under a directional technology distance function approach. Managerial Finance 35, 276- 296. Kwan, S.H., 2006. The X-efficiency of commercial banks in Hong Kong. Journal of Banking and Finance 30, 1127–1147. Lozano-Vivas, A., Pastor, J.T., Pastor, J.M., 2002. An efficiency comparison of European banking systems operating under different environmental conditions. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 59–77. Manandhar, R., Tang, J. C. S., 2002. The evaluation of bank branch performance using data envelopment analysis. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, 1– 17. Maudos, J., Pastor, J. M., 2003. Cost and profit efficiency in the Spanish banking sector (1985-1996): A non- parametric approach. Applied Financial Economics 13, 1- 12. Mercan, M., Reisman, A., Yalalan, R., Emel, A. B., 2003. The effect scale and mode of ownership on the financial performance of the Turkish banking sector: Results of a DEA-based analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37, 185–203. Miller, D.M., 1984. Profitability equals productivity plus price recovery. Harvard Business Review 62, 145–153. Montgomery, J.K., 1929. Is There a Theoretically Correct Price Index of a Group of Commodities? Rome: Roma L’ Universale Tipogr, Poliglotta. Privately printed paper. Mukherjee, A., Nath, P., Pal, M., 2003. Resource, service quality and performance triad: A framework for measuring efficiency of banking services. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 723–735. Parkan, C., Lam, K., Hang, G., 1997. Operational competitiveness analysis on software development. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48, 892–905. Russell, R.R., 1985. Measures of technical efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory 35, 109–126. Sahoo, B.K., Tone, K., 2009. Radial and non-radial decompositions of profit change: With an application to Indian banking. European Journal of Operational Research 196, 1130-1146. Sathye, M., 2003. Efficiency of banks in a developing economy: The case of India. European Journal of Operational Research 148, 662–671. Shephard, R., 1970. Theory of cost and production functions, Princeton University Press Princeton. Simar, L., Wilson, P. W., 1999. Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research 115, 459–471. Tone, K., 2001. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 130, 498-509. Tortosa-Ausina, E., Armero, C., Conesa, D., Grifell-Tatjé, E., 2010. Bootstrapping profit change: An application to Spanish banks. Computers and Operations Research, doi:10.1016/j.cor.2010.04.017. Vassiloglou, M., Giokas, D., 1990. A study of the relative efficiency of bank branches: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 41, 591–597. Wang, W. K., Huang, H. C., Lai, M. C., 2005. Measuring the relative efficiency of commercial banks: A comparative study on different ownership modes in China. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 7, 219–223. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48100 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在資料包絡分析法(data envelopment analysis, DEA)的架構下,有兩種衡量效率的方法:射線法DEA (radial DEA)與非射線法DEA (non-radial DEA)。射線法係源自於Charnes et al. (1978)的CCR模型,而非射法則以Tone (2001)的差額衡量法(slack-based measure, SBM)為代表。為分析企業利潤變動之來源,Grifell-Tatjé and Lovell ((Grifell-Tatjé, E., Lovell, C.A.K., 1999. Profits and productivity. Management Science 45, 1177-1193)以射線法DEA將其拆解為六種不同的成份, 而Sahoo and Tone (Sahoo, B.K., Tone, K., 2009. Radial and non-radial decompositions of profit change: With an application to Indian banking. European Journal of Operational Research 196, 1130-1146)則以SBM拆解利潤變動之來源,將非射線差額 (non-radial slacks)納入考量。然而,上述兩篇研究在拆解生產力效果的過程中,均未考量要素投入面 。事實上,利潤變動可追溯自收入面(產出面)及成本面(要素投入面)的變動。
因此,本文的兩篇研究將分別使用DEA體系中的方向距離函數法(directional distance function, DDF)及未定向差額衡量法(non-oriented SBM),以萃取較完整的利潤變動來源,前者仍設定在射線法DEA的範疇中。且兩者均以1994-2002年的臺灣銀行業為樣本資料拆解其利潤變動來源,並獲得以下實證結果:第一,當拆解生產力效果時,兩種方法皆可額外萃取出產要素投入面的影響。第二,當使用Grifell-Tatjé and Lovell (1999)的DEA法,以及本文的DDF衡量技術變動效果及營運效率效果對利潤變動的影響方向時,兩者測得的影響方向在所有樣本期間皆相同。第三,.當以DDF進一步拆解生產力效果時可發現:在所有樣本期間產出面對利潤變動的負向影響略高於要素投入面。第四,就未定向SBM所萃取出的額外效果而言,在部分樣本期間,生產力效果的產出面對利潤變動的頁獻高於要素投入面。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the framework of data envelopment analysis (DEA), there are two different measures of efficiency: radial and non-radial. The radial measure originated from the CCR model (Charnes et al., 1978), whereas the non-radial DEA methodology is represented by the slack-based measure (SBM) (Tone, 2001). Regarding the studies on decompositions of profit change, Grifell-Tatjé and Lovell (Grifell-Tatjé, E., Lovell, C.A.K., 1999. Profits and productivity. Management Science 45, 1177-1193) decompose profit change of banks into six exclusive components using the radial DEA framework so as to consider the linkage between productivity change and profit change. Sahoo and Tone (Sahoo, B.K., Tone, K., 2009. Radial and non-radial decompositions of profit change: With an application to Indian banking. European Journal of Operational Research 196, 1130-1146) adopt SBM to decompose profit change of a bank so as to address the concerns of non-radial slacks. However, both the above two studies never consider the input side when decomposing the productivity effect. In fact, the change in operating profit can be traced from the change in revenue (the output side) and the change in cost (the input side).
Therefore, the study will propose two DEA approaches, directional distance function (DDF) and non-oriented SBM, to extract more complete drivers of profit change and illustrate the decompositions with these two approaches. The former is set as a kind of radial DEA framework. Both the two approaches illustrate the decompositions of profit change to Taiwanese banks during the period 1994-2002 and arrive at the following results. First, in the process of decomposing the productivity effect, both of them can extract the additional effect (i.e. the input side) which cannot be found in previous papers. Second, the DEA approach of Grifell-Tatjé and Lovell (1999) analysis (GLA) and DDF of our study exhibit the same direction of contribution by the technical change effect and the operating efficiency effect over the entire period. Third, when we use DDF to decompose the productivity effect, we find that the negative contribution of the output side slightly outweighs that of the input side over the entire period. Fourth, with regard to the additional components extracted by the non-oriented SBM, the study finds that the output side outweighs the input side within the productivity effect during some of our sample periods. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T06:46:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-D94627004-1.pdf: 601099 bytes, checksum: 6b2977827b8abb07e34cd4f679c21a2d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書...........................................i
誌謝......................................................ii 中文摘要.................................................iii Abstract..................................................iv Chapter 1 Introduction.....................................1 1.1 Motivation and objectives............................1 1.2 Analytical structure.................................2 Chapter 2 Directional distance functional decompositions: With an application Taiwanese banking............4 2.1 Introduction.........................................4 2.2 Methodology..........................................7 2.2.1 The production technology........................7 2.2.2 Decomposition of profit change...................9 2.3 Implementing the decomposition of profit change.....16 2.3.1 GLA model.......................................16 2.3.2 The directional distance function approach......18 2.4 Data Description....................................20 2.5 Empirical results...................................22 2.5.1 Decomposition of profit change for all banks..22 2.5.2 Decomposition of profit change with respect to ownership.....................................28 2.6 Conclusions.........................................31 Chapter 3 Non-oriented slack-based decompositions: With an application to Taiwanese banking........33 3.1 Introduction........................................33 3.2 Methodology.........................................36 3.2.1 The production technology.....................36 3.2.2 Decomposition of the change in operating profit........................................37 3.3 Implementing the decomposition of profit change.....42 3.4 Data description....................................45 3.5 Empirical results...................................49 3.5.1 Decomposition of the change in profits for all banks.....................................49 3.5.2 Decomposition of profit change with respect to ownership.....................................53 3.6 Conclusions.........................................60 Chapter 4 General conclusions and suggestions.............61 4.1 General conclusions.................................61 4.2 Suggestions.........................................61 References................................................63 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 利潤拆解方法之研究:應用於臺灣銀行業 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Decompositions of profit change: With an application to Taiwanese banking | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 徐世勳,張靜貞,李文福,邱永和 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 銀行,利潤拆解,資料包絡分析法,方向性距離函數,差額衡量法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | banks,profit change,decomposition,data envelopment analysis,directional distance function,DEA,slacks,SBM, | en |
dc.relation.page | 68 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-06-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 587.01 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。