Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業管理組
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48088
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李吉仁(Ji-Ren Lee)
dc.contributor.authorWen-Ho Tsaien
dc.contributor.author蔡文河zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T06:45:57Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-06
dc.date.copyright2011-07-06
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.submitted2011-06-22
dc.identifier.citation中文部分:
朱文儀、陳建男、黃豪臣譯,民國96年。“管理策略”,華泰文化。譯自Hill, Charles W.L. & Jones, Gareth R., 2005,“Strategic Management Theory:An Integrated Approach”.
李明譯,民國83年。“成長力:持續獲利的策略”,天下文化。譯自Charan, Ram, 1994.“Profitable Growth Is Everyone’s Business”.
李芳齡譯,民國94年。“成長的賭局”,天下文化。譯自Campbell, Andrew & Park, Robert, 2003,“The Growth Gamble”.
洪世民譯,民國98年。“精微化成長:世界級企業的獲利策略”, 財信。譯自Viguerie, P., Smit, S., & Baghai, M., 2007.“The Granularity of Growth – Making Choices that Drive Enduring Company Performance”.
湯明哲,民國92年。“策略精論”,天下文化,台北,p247。
溫蒂雅譯,民國86年。“第二曲線:企業永續成長的未來學”,商業周刊。譯自Morrison, Ian, 1997.“The Second Curve – Managing the Velocity of Change”.
謝凱宇、林舒柔譯,李吉仁審訂,民國94年。“現代策略管理”,p135。譯自Grant, Robert M., 1991, “Contemperary Strategy Analysis”.
英文部分:
Barney, J. B., 1991. “Company Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
Bettis, R. A., & Weeks, D., 1987. 'Financial Returns and Strategic Interaction:The Case of Instant Photography”, Strategic Management Journal, 8(6):549-563.
Campbell, Andrew & Park, Robert, 2003.“The Growth Gamble”, London:Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Charan, Ram, 1994.“Profitable Growth Is Everyone’s Business:10 Tools You Can Use Monday Morning”, New York, NY:Crown Business.
Chen, M. J., 1988.“Competitive Strategic Interaction:A Study of Competitive Actions and Responses”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
Grant, Robert M., 1991. 'Contemperary Strategy Analysis”, Oxford:Blackwell Publishing, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Govindarajan, Vijay & Trible, Chris, 2005. “Building Breakthrough Businesses within Established Organizations”, Harvard Business Review On Point Article, May:5-6.
Hill, Charles W.L. & Jones, Gareth R., 2005. “Strategic Management Theory:An Integrated Approach”, Boston, MA:Houghton Mufflin Company.
Kim, W. Chan & Mauborgne, R, 1997. “Value Innovation: The Strategic Logic of High Growth”, Harvard Business Review, January & February: 102-115.
Laurie, Donald L., Doz, Yves L. & Sheer, Claude P., 2007. “Creating New Growth Platforms”, Harvard Business Review, 84(5): 80-90.
MacMillan, I., McCaffery, M. L. & Vanwijk, G., 1985. “Competitor’s Responses to Easily Imitated New Products:Exploring Commercial Banking Product Introductions, Stragetic Management Journal, 6(1):75-86.
Morrison, Ian, 1997.“The Second Curve – Managing the Velocity of Change”, Raphael Sagalyn, Inc.
Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S., 1982. “An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change”, Cambridge, UK: Belknap Press.
Peters, T.J. & R.H. Waterman, 1982. 'In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies”, New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Porter, M. E., 1980.“Competitive Strategy:Techniques for Analyzing Indsutries and Competition”, New York, NY: Free Press.
Porter, M. E., 1985. “Competitive Advantage:Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, New York, NY:Free Press.
Rumelt, R. P., 1974.“Structure and Economic Performance”, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press (1982).
Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Chen, M. J. & Gannon, M. J., 1989. 'Predictors of Competitive Strategic Actions:Theory and Preliminary Evidence, Journal of Business Research, 18:245-258.
Smith, K. G., Grimm, C. M., Gannon, M. J. and Chen, M. J., 1991.“Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses, and Performance in The U.S. Domestic Airline Industry, Academy of Management Journal, 34(1):60-85.
Viguerie, P., Smit, S., & Baghai, M., 2007.“The Granularity of Growth – Making Choices that Drive Enduring Company Performance”, McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Zook, Chris & Allen, James., 2010. “Profit from the Core : A Return to Growth In Turbulent Times”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Business School Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48088-
dc.description.abstract自從1970年代以來,受惠於家電與電子資訊產業的相繼興起,台灣電子資訊公司得以透過專業代工的模式,在國際舞台上逐步崛起,並漸漸扮演不可或缺的角色。然而,電子資訊產業的快速技術變化與競爭強度,常使得中小型電子公司能否持續成長,成為經營的挑戰,也是有趣的研究議題。有鑒於此,本研究以台灣電子中小型上市公司為研究主體,探討這些中小型企業在2000年至2009年期間,面臨經濟環境起伏的成長軌跡。我們將五年定義為一個景氣觀察期,以營收成長與股東權益報酬率為參數,建立樣本公司的成長績效矩陣,並根據這些公司的成長軌跡建立企業成長類型。接著,我們以立意取樣的方法,針對數種典型的成長軌跡與其在產業價值鏈上的位置,選取12家廠商進行進一步深入的個案研究,並據此歸納中小型企業成長模式的若干命題。
本研究發現台灣中小型電子公司受限於本身的資源與能力,在營運績效方面,獲利成長顯然比營收成長來得高,企業在面對競爭時,如果採取低價策略來增加市佔率,爭取營收成長而忽略獲利,終究將導致惡性循環,面臨經營上的困境。同時,我們發現無論位處產業鏈的上中下游,中小型電子企業通常需要驅動二或三種成長動能,方能持續產生兼具獲利性的成長績效,然採取多角化的併購策略的績效並不佳。對半導體廠商而言,水平多元業務與產品組合的擴張,是其重要的成長模式;對位處產業鏈中間的經銷通路商而言,需以高資產周轉率來支撐獲利,併購與財務槓桿的操作,是維持成長的重要方法;最後,對電資通製造廠商而言,市場滲透與業務組合的擴張,是重要的成長措施。本研究並據此提出對企業成長實務與後續研究的建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBenefited from the growth of home appliance industry and the emergence of personal computer industry, Taiwan's electronics and information technology (IT) companies have expereinced phenonomenon growth based on original equipment manufacturing (OEM) business model under global division of labor and vertical specialization. As a result, Taiwanese IT companies have played an indispensable role in the global supply chain. However, constant technology change and competitive intensity also led to a high change over for the small and medium size enterprises (SMEs). How to manage sustainable growth becomes a critical issue for these SMEs and hence an interesting research issue for the present thesis. To investigate the typologies and evolution of different growth models of these SMEs in the IT sector, we conducted a two-stage empirical examination based on selected listed SMEs from the Taiwan Stock Exchange Market during the year of 2000 and 2009, in which time period we further divide it into two five-year periods for comparative investigation. To evaluate these SMEs' performance in these two time periods, we first undertook compound annual revenue growth rate and return on equity as two critical performance indices, under which the growth performance matrix were established and differential growth trajectories were revealed. We then selected 12 companies for further case studies based on their value chain positions and radical changes of performance between two time periods.This research highlights several key observations. First, with resource and capability constraints, SMEs in the IT sector maintain their bottom-line growth higher than top-line growth. Those who pursue only top-line growth by low price strategy eventually would fail in the ball game. Second, we also found that those high performers usually maintain two to three growth engines to support their continuous growth, regardless of their value chain position. Neverthless, the performance of diversified mergers was commonly unsatisfactory. Third, one of the critical growth model for semiconductor manufacturers is to expand their product portfolio and to provide multi-dimentionsal services. But, for channel distributors, achieving high asset turnover is the key to sustainable profit. Therefore, using M&As and financial leverage strategies play an important role to uphold the growth trend of these companies. This is quite different compared with the manufacturing companies whose important growth strategies are through market penetration and expansion of product portfolio. With all these observations, our paper provides suggestions for SMEs to nurture a sustainable growth model and recommendations for further research in this important area.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T06:45:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-100-P98746012-1.pdf: 1590962 bytes, checksum: 64e4e46283e17d4114661fc3f9dee7d6 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒 論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究問題 3
第三節、研究目的 4
第四節、論文架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節、企業資源能力與策略 6
第二節、企業競爭優勢與績效 8
第三節、企業的成長 11
第四節、企業的第二成長曲線 15
第三章 研究方法 24
第一節、研究架構 24
第二節、研究流程與分析方法 24
第三節、研究限制 31
第四章 企業成長績效分析 32
第一節、企業成長績效矩陣分析 32
第二節、巨人成長型企業 35
第三節、高度績效型企業 37
第四節、低度回饋型企業 39
第五節、面臨挑戰型企業 40
第六節、本章小結 42
第五章 成長策略之個案探討 44
第一節、維持在成長巨人型 44
第二節、成長巨人型掉入面臨挑戰型 66
第三節、面臨挑戰型登上成長巨人型 83
第四節、停留在面臨挑戰型 103
第五節、個案歸納分析 124
第六章 結論與建議 135
第一節、研究結論 135
第二節、研究建議 136
參考文獻 139
附錄(一) CAGR總表 143
附錄(二) 平均股東權益報酬率總表 147
附錄(三) 企業成長績效矩陣總表 150
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title台灣中小型電子公司持續成長模式的研究zh_TW
dc.titleAn Empirical Examination on the Sustainable Growth Model of Small & Medium Size Electronics Companies In Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear99-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林舒柔(S. J. Lin),陳俊忠(Chun-Chung Chen)
dc.subject.keyword資源與能力,成長績效矩陣,成長策略,成長動能,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordResources & Capabilities,Growth Performance Matrix,Growth Strategy,Growth Momentum,en
dc.relation.page153
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2011-06-23
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業管理組zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:國際企業管理組

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-100-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
1.55 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved