請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48060完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝德宗 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kang-Hao Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李康豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T06:45:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-07-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-06-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
[1] 古永嘉(2009),股票報酬率與周轉率變動關係之探討 - 以電子股為例,國立中興大學企業管理研究所 [2] 李舒禾(2004),台灣股市選股策略獲利能力分析,碩士論文,國立成功大學會計學研究所 [3] 林柏宇(2009),台灣交易資訊與市場表現之互動性研究,碩士論文,國立台灣大學社會科學院經濟學研究所 [4] 林俊成(2010),台灣股市流動性溢酬之實證研究–以金融類股為例,碩士論文, 國立台灣大學社會科學院經濟學研究所 [5] 邱莉婷(2008),系統流動性風險評價模型:台灣股票市場上的應用,碩士論文,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所。 [6] 胡星陽(1998),流動性對台灣股票報酬率的影響,中國財務學刊,第五卷第四期,p.1-19 [7] 詹場與胡星陽(2001),流動性衡量方法之綜合評論,國家科學委員會研究彙刊;人文及社會科學,十一捲三期,p.205-221 [8] 雷雅淇(2000),公司規模、股價、益本比、淨值市價比與股票超常報酬關係之實證研究,碩士論文,國立中央大學企業管理研究所 [9] 鄭燕如(2004),盈餘、股利與股票預期報酬之橫斷面分析,碩士論文,國立中央大學企業管理研究所 英文部分 [1] Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H., 1986, Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread, Jourmal of Finanial Economics 17, p.223-249 [2] Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H., 1989, The effects of Betas, Bid-Ask Spread, Residual Risk, and Size on stock returns, Journal of Finance 44, p.479-486 [3] Amihud, Y., 2002, Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time series effect, Journal of Financial Markets 5, p.31-56 [4] Archarya, V. V., and L. H. Pedersen, 2005, Asset pricing with liquidity risk, Journal of Financial Economics 77, p.375-410 [5] Banz and Rolf W., 1981, The relationship between return and market value of common stocks, Journal of Financial Economics 9, No.1, p.3-18 [6] Basu, S., 1983, The relationship between earnings’ yield, market value and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 12, No.1, p.129-156 [7] Brennan, M. J. and Subrahmanyam, A., 1996, Market microstructure and asset pricing: On the compensation for illiquidity in stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics 41, p.441-464 [8] Campell John Y., Grossman, Sanford J. and Wang, Jiang, 1993, Trading volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, p.905-939 [9] Chan, Louis, K., Narasimhan Jegadeesh, and Josef Lokonishok, 1996, Momentun strategies, Journal of Finance 51, p.1681-1713 [10] Choridia, T. Sarkar, A., Subrahmanyam, A., 2005, An empirical analysis of stock and bond market liquidity, Review of Financial Studies 18, p.85-129 [11] Dater, V. T., N. Y. Naik and R. Radcliffe, 1998, Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative test, Journal of Financial Markets 1, p.205-219 [12] Doron Avramov, Tarun Chordia, and Amit Goyal, 2006, Liquidity and autocorrelation in individual stock returns, Journal of Finance 61, p.2365-2394 [13] Duarte, J. and L. Young, 2009, Why is PIN priced? Journal of Financial Economics 91, p.119-138 [14] Easley, D., S. Hvidkjaer, and M.O’Hara, 2002, Is Information risk a determinant of asset returns? Journal of Finance 57, p.2185-2221 [15] Fama, E. F. and MacBeth, J. D., 1973, Risk, Return, and equilibrium: Empirical test, Journal of Political Economy 81, No.3, p.607-636 [16] Fama, E. F. and French, K. R., 1992, The cross-section of expected stock returns, Journal of Finance 47, p.427-465 [17] Fama, E. F. and French, K. R., 1993, Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics 33, p.3-56 [18] John M. R. Chalmers, Gregory B. Kadlec, 1998, An empirical examination of the amortized spread, Journal of Financial Economics 48, p.159-188 [19] Kuan-Hui Lee, 2011, The world price of liquidity risk, Journal of Financial Economics 99, p136-161. [20] Lubos Pastor, Robert F. Stambaugh, 2003, Liquidity risk and expected stock returns, Journal of Political Economy 111, No.3, p.642-685 [21] Miguel A. Martinez, Belen Nieto, Gonzalo Rubio and Mikel Tapia, 2005, Asset pricing and systematic liquidity risk: An empirical investigation of Spanish stock market, International Review of Economics & Finance 14, p.81-103 [22] Mohanram, P. and S. Rajgopal, 2009, Is information risk (PIN) priced? , Journal of Accounting and Economics 47, issue 3, p.226-243 [23] Reinganum, Marc R. 1981, A new empirical perspective on the CAPM, Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis 16, p.439-462 [24] Rune Dalgaard, 2009, Liquidity and stock returns: Evidence from Denmark, Master’s thesis, Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business school [25] Rosenburg, B., Reid, K. and Lanstein, R., 1985, Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency, Journal of Portfolio Management 11, p.9-17 [26] Ross Levine and Sergio L. Schmukler, 2006, Internationalization and stock market liquidity, Review of Finance 10, p.153-187 [27] Wenjin Kang, Allaudeen Hameed, S. Viswanathan, 2010, Stock market declines and liquidity, Journal of Finance 65, p.257-293 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/48060 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 觀察台灣股市過去歷史走勢可發現其波動性大,代表台灣股市有能力負荷龐大的交易量,市場交易成本低,流動性高。有鑑於此,本文從資產訂價模型角度出發,探討流動性及其餘訂價因子對台灣股市報酬率的影響。
本研究探討重心為2004年至2010年台股,依據市場型態將其分為三個期間:(1) 2004年7月至2007年10月 (2) 2007年11月至2009年1月 (3) 2009年2月至2010年8月。並以台灣電子業、金融業與傳統產業的大型權值股作為研究對象。 研究結果顯示,CAPM在各期均對台灣大型權值股有高解釋力,利用Fama- French三因子模型與虛擬變數分析法,結論如下:(1) 淨值市價影響最為顯著,電子業影響程度最高。(2) 金融業與傳產業beta值影響隨市場型態改變,電子業影響均為負,但大多係數不顯著,是以本研究無法具體判斷beta值之影響。(3)周轉率影響則與理論不同,實證結果指出其對報酬率之影響均為正向,金融業影響幅度居冠,且多頭市場時反應較大。(4) 空頭市場時各類型大型權值股周轉率明顯提高,推論原因為台灣大型股政府持股比率高,空頭時為了穩定大盤而進場大量交易。 最後,我們利用pastor與Stambaugh的方法進行產業間流動性風險之實證,發現除了在第一期有顯著的產業間流動性風險溢酬外,其餘期間均不顯著。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Through historical trend of Taiwan stock market, we observe the volatility is obviously greater than other countries. It means Taiwan assets market can load tremendous trading volumes. In other words, the trading cost is low and the liquidity is high. As a result of this phenomenon, this thesis investigates the effects of liquidity and other asset pricing factors in Taiwan.
This research focuses on the performance of TAIEX from 2004 to 2010. According to different market types, we divide our data into three periods: (1) Jul, 2004 to Oct, 2007 (2) Nov, 2007 to Jan, 2009 (3) Feb, 2009 to Aug, 2010. Our main research objects are valued stock in electronic, financial and traditional industries. The empirical study indicates that CAPM has high explanatory power to valued stocks in Taiwan. We use Fama-French model and pooling regression as well. The results are: (1) Book-to-market ratio has highest explanatory power, especially in electronic industry. (2) The influence of beta coefficient on financial and traditional industries changes with market types, and the effect is insignificantly negative to electronic industry. (3) Opposite to most studies, turnover rate has a positive impact on excess returns, particularly in bull market. The biggest effect occurred in financial industry. (4) The turnover rate of all the stock enhance clearly in bear market. The reason might be that government will enter the stock market to maintain TAIEX as a big valued stock holder. It causes the tremendous trading volume when market is declining. Last, we follow Pastor and Stambaugh method to examine whether liquidity risk premium exists among industries. The evidence shows that it exists only in Jul, 2004 to Oct, 2007, and it is insignificant in other periods. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T06:45:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98323007-1.pdf: 1169942 bytes, checksum: 327defdb111a60d9655aee9fa1739ad3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員會審定書 i 謝詞 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目錄 vi 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 ix 第一章 導論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 流動性研究發展 6 2.2 其餘基本面資產訂價因子 7 2.3 其餘系統面因素 8 第三章 研究方法 10 3.1 流動性指標 11 3.2 Fama-MacBeth橫斷面迴歸 12 3.3 Pastor-Stambaugh研究方法 13 第四章 資料來源與處理 16 4.1 變數定義 16 4.2 敘述統計量 18 第五章 實證結果分析 22 5.1 CAPM模型實證結果 22 5.2 Fama-MacBeth橫斷面分析 25 5.3 虛擬變數分析 27 5.4 系統面流動性風險 32 第六章 結論 37 6.1 總結 37 6.2 未來研究建議 38 參考文獻 39 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | Pastor與Stambaugh模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | CAPM | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Pooling regression | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 流動性風險 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Fama-French三因子模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 台灣股市 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 權值股 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Liquidity risk | en |
| dc.subject | Pastor and Stambaugh model | en |
| dc.subject | Pooling regression | en |
| dc.subject | factors mode | en |
| dc.subject | Fama-French three | en |
| dc.subject | CAPM | en |
| dc.subject | Valued stocks | en |
| dc.subject | Taiwan stock market | en |
| dc.title | 台灣股市資產訂價模型與流動性溢酬之實證研究-以三大產業權值股為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Empirical Study of Asset Pricing Models and Liquidity Premium in Taiwan Stock Market- The Case of Valued Stock in Three Big Industries | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林惠玲,李顯峰 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 流動性風險,台灣股市,權值股,CAPM,Fama-French三因子模型,Pooling regression,Pastor與Stambaugh模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Liquidity risk,Taiwan stock market,Valued stocks,CAPM,Fama-French three,factors mode,Pooling regression,Pastor and Stambaugh model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 42 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-06-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
