請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4802
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳端容(Duan-Rung Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Bo-Han Pan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 潘柏翰 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-14T17:47:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-03-12 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-14T17:47:34Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-02-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王增勇(2003)照顧與控制之間─以“個案管理”在社工場域的論述實踐為例。臺
灣社會研究 51:143-183。 成令方(2002)醫「用」關係的知識與權力。臺灣社會學 3:11-71。 行政院衛生福利部疾病管制署(2009)愛滋病防治工作手冊(第二版)。臺北市:行政院衛生福利部疾病管制署。 ──(2014)愛人愛己 同舟共濟:愛滋病防治專書。臺北市:行政院衛生福利 部疾病管制署。 吳易霖、葉莉莉、張嘉蘋、柯乃熒(2010)以個人知識發展過程探索個案管理師之角色衝突與成長。腫瘤護理雜誌 10:47-55。 吳家珍、林秋菊(2009)動機式會談於護理之應用。護理雜誌 56(2):89-93。 吳嘉苓(2013)訪談法。瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞主編,社會及行為科學研究法(二):質性訪談法,頁33-60。臺北市:臺灣東華。 李宗派(2003)探討個案管理概念與實務過程。社區發展季刊 104:307-322。 李欣純(2010)愛滋病毒感染與梅毒感染之交互作用。愛之關懷 72:26-31。 李素芬(2011)愛滋病個案管理成效分析-以台中榮總為例。臺中:東海大學工 業工程與經營資訊學系碩士論文。 李素芬、林育蕙、潘忠煜(2013)病人對愛滋病個案管理計畫之依循度與生物指標及性行為之相關性。臺灣醫學 17(1):1-8。 邱文賢、吳怡君(2010)愛滋病個案管理師計畫之介紹並以台南市爲例評估其成效。中南盟臨床專刊 3(2):95-98。 邱珠敏(2009)「愛滋病個案管理師計畫」對於HIV感染者性行為、服藥遵從性及健康狀況的影響。臺北:國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。 邱珠敏、丁志音(2010)「愛滋個案管理師計畫」對於個案行為與健康狀況之影 響。臺灣公共衛生雜誌 29(4):299-310。 邱珠敏、黃彥芳、楊靖慧、陳穎慧、林頂(2010)他山之石-由美國愛滋病個案管理制度談台灣“愛滋病個案管理師計畫”。臺灣公共衛生雜誌 29(1):1-7。 施鐘卿(2007)愛滋個案管理模式運用及品質管理。愛之關懷 60:11-17。 柯乃熒(2009)愛滋病個案管理概論。見財團法人護理人員愛滋病防治基金會主編,愛滋病個案管理電子書,第一章。臺北市:財團法人護理人員愛滋病防治基金會。 柯乃熒、李欣純、楊靖慧(2013)愛滋病毒感染者預防衛教諮詢與服藥遵從性。見衛生福利部疾病管制署編,愛滋病檢驗及治療指引(第四版),第十章。臺北市:衛生福利部疾病管制署。 紀秉宗(2009)愛滋病個案管理計畫效果研究。臺北:國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系在職進修碩士論文。 孫娜俐、鄭舒倖、羅雪梅、陳雁君、徐永年(2010)署立桃園醫院愛滋個管師之經驗分享。愛之關懷 73:44-49。 徐森杰(2007)社會服務資源的個案管理模式。愛之關懷 60:18-24。 ──(2009)個案管理全面性評估與收案技巧。見財團法人護理人員愛滋病防治 基金會主編,愛滋病個案管理電子書,第二章。臺北市:財團法人護理人員愛滋病防治基金會。 ──(2012)為臺灣愛滋病個案管理制度把脈──談社會、醫療暨公衛個案管理 模式之展望。社區發展季刊 137:241-249。 張淑卿(2012)護理技術與專業認同:歷史面向的分析。見盧孳豔主編,護理與社會:跨界的對話與創新,頁3-26。新北市:群學。 張曉慧(2012)公衛個管社區愛滋防治的目的與任務。 http://www.tananurse.org.tw/attachments/20120314_114156.pdf 瀏覽日期:2013/10/31。 梁修豪、林錫勳(2013)愛滋病毒感染者之C型肝炎流行病學與治療相關問題。愛之關懷 83:28-36。 畢恆達(2010)教授為什麼沒告訴我-2010全見版。新北市:小畢空間。 莊苹(2009)以個案為中心的危險評估與降低危險行為之策略。見財團法人護理人員愛滋病防治基金會主編,愛滋病個案管理電子書,第六章。臺北市:財團法人護理人員愛滋病防治基金會。 郭嘉琪、金繼春、周汎澔(2012)由後現代主義的中心概念反思護病關係。護理雜誌 59(1):72-76。 陳嬿今、賴怡因、劉曉穎、白芸慧、柯文謙、柯乃熒(2014)進階護理師主導的個案管理模式提升愛滋病照護品質之成效。護理雜誌 61(3):69-78。 陳馨傑(2011)男同志HIV感染者的帶病生涯與自我照顧。臺北:國立陽明大 學衛生福利研究所碩士論文。 彭妮絲(2009)生命關懷視域中之語文教學研究-以隱性知識顯性化為基礎之探究。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類 27:45-66。 游千代、馮明珠、柯乃熒(2013)個案管理之概念分析。護理雜誌 60(4):99-104。 黃道明(2014)列管制度下的醫療治理:「人類免疫缺乏病毒傳染防治及感染者 權益保障條例」與新道德威權。臺灣社會研究季刊 94:107-146。 葉永文(2012)醫病關係:一種信任問題的考察。台灣醫學人文學刊 13(1&2):77-103。 葉美鈴(2011)應用網路通訊軟體於愛滋病個案管理之成效探討。臺北:臺北醫學大學醫學資訊研究所碩士論文。 劉姵伶、黃彥芳、賴安琪、陳昶勳(2013)探討各國愛滋接觸者追蹤執行策略之運用與效益。疫情報導 29(23):353-360。 蔣欣欣(2008)情緒與護病關係。護理雜誌 55(1):20-23。 鄭維瑄(2013)社會個案工作的專業關係。見曾華源主編,社會個案工作,頁 108-141。臺北市:洪葉文化。 蕭秋彬(2006)設計簡易、安全又高效之愛滋病毒藥物配方。見洪健清、張上淳、國立台灣大學醫學院附設醫院愛滋病防治中心主編,愛滋病學(第二版),頁247-265。臺北市:健康文化。 韓佩軒、呂宗學(2004)由個案管理到疾病管理到健康管理:社區護理如何因應?。榮總護理 21(2):145-152。 藍佩嘉(2008)跨國灰姑娘:當東南亞幫傭遇上台灣新富家庭。臺北市:行人。 Amado, A. N., McAnally, P. L., & Linz, M. H. (1989) History and effectiveness of case management in the United States. Pp. 1-20 in Case management:historical, current, and future perspectives, edited by Mary Hubbard Linz, Patricia L. McAnally, & Colleen Wieck. Cambridge: Brookline Books. Ballew, J. R. & Mink G.著、王玠等合譯(1998)個案管理。臺北市:心理。 Belcher, M., & Jones, L. K. (2009) Graduate nurses experiences of developing trust in the nurse-patient relationship. Contemporary Nurse 31(2): 142-152. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1997) HIV prevention case management: literature review and current practice. Atlanta, USA: Department of Health and Human Services. Cohen, M. S., Chen, Y. Q., McCauley, M., Gamble, T., Hosseinipour, M. C., Kumarasamy, N., ... & Fleming, T. R. (2011) Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. New England Journal of Medicine 365(6): 493-505. Dearing, K. S. (2004) Getting it, together: How the nurse patient relationship influences treatment compliance for patients with schizophrenia. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 18(5): 155-163. Gamez, G. G. (2009) The nurse-patient relationship as a caring relationship. Nursing Science Quarterly 22(2): 126-127. Gasiorowicz, M., Llanas, M. R., DiFranceisco, W., Benotsch, E. G., Brondino, M. J., Catz, S. L., ... & Vergeront, J. M. (2005) Reductions in transmission risk behaviors in HIV–Positive clients receiving prevention case management services: findings from a community demonstration project. AIDS Education & Prevention 17(Supplement A): 40-52. Gilks, C. F., Crowley, S., Ekpini, R., Gove, S., Perriens, J., Souteyrand, Y., ... & De Cock, K. (2006) The WHO public-health approach to antiretroviral treatment against HIV in resource-limited settings. The Lancet 368(9534): 505-510. Gotz, H. M., van Doornum, G., Niesters, H. G., den Hollander, J. G., Thio, H. B., & de Zwart, O. (2005) A cluster of acute hepatitis C virus infection among men who have sex with men-results from contact tracing and public health implications. AIDS 19(9): 969-974. Granich, R., Crowley, S., Vitoria, M., Smyth, C., Kahn, J. G., Bennett, R., ... & Williams, B. (2010) Highly active antiretroviral treatment as prevention of HIV transmission: review of scientific evidence and update. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 5(4): 298. Halldorsdottir, S. (2008) The dynamics of the nurse–patient relationship: introduction of a synthesized theory from the patient’s perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 22(4): 643-652. Hammer, S. M. (2011) Antiretroviral treatment as prevention. New England Journal of Medicine 365(6): 561-562. Herbst, J. H., Kay, L. S., Passin, W. F., Lyles, C. M., Crepaz, N., & Marin, B. V. (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral interventions to reduce HIV risk behaviors of Hispanics in the United States and Puerto Rico. AIDS and Behavior 11(1): 25-47. Herbst, J. H., Sherba, R. T., Crepaz, N., DeLuca, J. B., Zohrabyan, L., Stall, R. D., ... & HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis Team. (2005) A meta-analytic review of HIV behavioral interventions for reducing sexual risk behavior of men who have sex with men. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 39(2): 228-241. Huang, Y. F.(黃彥芳), Nelson, K. E., Lin, Y. T., Yang, C. H.(楊靖慧), Chang, F. Y.(張峰義), & Lew-Ting, C. Y.(丁志音) (2013) Syphilis among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Taiwan: its association with HIV prevalence, awareness of HIV status, and use of antiretroviral therapy. AIDS and behavior 17(4): 1406-1414. Huber, D. L. (2002) The diversity of case management models. Lippincott’s Case Management 7(6): 212-220. Leach, Matthew J. (2005) Rapport: A key to treatment success. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 11(4): 262-265. Lew‐Ting, C. Y.(丁志音), & Chen, L. H(陳怡欣). (2008) The surrogate marker and its discontents: pluralism in immunity maintenance among HIV‐infected persons in Taiwan. Sociology of Health & Illness 30(7): 1039-1054. Morse, J. M. (1991) Negotiating commitment and involvement in the nurse‐patient relationship. Journal of Advanced Nursing 16(4): 455-468. Munro, S., Lewin, S., Swart, T., & Volmink, J. (2007) A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS?. BMC Public Health 7(1): 104. Nettleton, S. (2013) The Sociology of health and illness, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity. Noar, S. M. (2008) Behavioral interventions to reduce HIV-related sexual risk behavior: review and synthesis of meta-analytic evidence. AIDS and Behavior 12(3): 335-353. Norfolk, T., Birdi, K., & Walsh, D. (2007) The role of empathy in establishing rapport in the consultation: a new model. Medical Education 41(7): 690-697. Patton, M. Q. (2002) Designing qualitative studies. Pp. 209-257 in Qualitative research and evaluation methods, third edition. Edited by Michael Quinn Patton. London: Sage Publication. Powell, S. K著、李豫芸等譯(2005)個案管理。臺北市:五南。 Rier, D. A., & Indyk, D. (2006) Flexible rigidity: supporting HIV treatment adherence in a rapidly-changing treatment environment. Social Work in Health Care 42(3-4): 133-150. Rutherford, G. W., & Woo, J. M. (1988) Contact tracing and the control of human immunodeficiency virus infection. JAMA 259(24): 3609-3610. Stevenson, F., & Scambler, G. (2005) The relationship between medicine and the public: the challenge of concordance. Health 9(1): 5-21. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M.著、徐宗國譯(1997)質性研究概論。臺北市: 巨流。 Wilson, D. P. (2012) HIV treatment as prevention: natural experiments highlight limits of antiretroviral treatment as HIV prevention. PLoS Medicine 9(7): e1001231. Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R. J., Mikhail, I., Lang, D. L., McCree, D. H., Davies, S. L., ... & Saag, M. (2004) A randomized controlled trial to reduce HIV transmission risk behaviors and sexually transmitted diseases among women living with HIV: The WiLLOW Program. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 37: S58-S67. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4802 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:政府自1997年免費提供三合一高效能抗反轉錄病毒療法(highly active antiretroviral therapy,簡稱HAART,俗稱雞尾酒療法)讓愛滋病毒感染者(以下簡稱感染者)服用後,感染者在規律服藥的情形下,其平均餘命逐年增加,生活型態也與其他慢性病患者無異。近年來感染者面臨多樣且複雜的照顧與資源需求,也期望降低愛滋病毒合併梅毒或C型肝炎的傳染率,感染者的生活就成了公共衛生部門亟需關切與介入的對象。臺灣衛生福利部疾病管制署(以下簡稱疾管署)自2007年起實施愛滋病個案管理計畫(以下簡稱個管計畫),目前已有不少學術研究從結果面(如感染者的生理或健康狀態)來評估此計畫的成效。在此同時我們亦不能忽略個管師作為計畫中的能動者(agent)對感染者的影響。個管師如何從一開始與感染者建立關係,到後續輔導感染者的自我健康管理,都與個管師的技巧以及雙方間的專業關係息息相關。
目的:從微觀互動的層次來探索個管師與感染者互動時的策略或技巧,與既有行為理論中的哪些面向有所呼應。其次,了解雙方間關係的維繫除了理解專業關係如何影響感染者,也可知道該維繫怎麼樣的專業關係才有助於感染者的健康。 方法:本研究為針對個管計畫中個管師與感染者互動情形的探索型研究。我採取深度訪談法來收集研究資料,以滾雪球抽樣(snowball sampling)訪談了13位任職於北部地區愛滋病指定醫院或地方衛生局的愛滋病個管師,與10位居住在臺灣北部地區的感染者。訪談內容由研究者將錄音檔內容聽寫轉錄成逐字稿後,依據Strauss和Corbin(1997)提出的開放性譯碼(open coding)原則來分析資料。 結果:研究主要發現有:(1)個管師(特別是醫療院所)會運用大量的會談技巧來與感染者建立專業關係,初期建立專業關係時主要透過「噓寒問暖」、「開放式問句」、「反映式傾聽」與「建立框架」來獲取感染者的信任,並營造讓感染者願意訴說的環境。(2)在協助感染者行為改變與服用雞尾酒療法方面,個管師多著眼於強化感染者的認知。針對前者採取「利己觀」的立場,並以感染者的免疫或是疾病負擔作為訴求;服用雞尾酒療法則接近既有行為理論中的行為(學習)理論,藉由創造或形塑感染者的前因(antecedent)來讓感染者規律服藥(3)個管師與感染者間的專業關係會因為疾病的性質、藥物的發明等因素,使得專業關係的性質在時、空間、權力關係,以及信任程度面向較為彈性。(4)個管師與感染者間的專業關係會受到信任程度的影響而朝向親近或疏遠化發展。 結論:不論是哪一場域的個管師與感染者互動時都會運用大量的會談技巧,然而不同場域間的技巧純熟度有別,建議未來在個管師任職前應提供相關訓練。個管師在協助感染者提升服藥順從時的策略較為接近行為學習理論,不過感染者身體對藥物的感受或想法仍較少在共同討論藥物時獲得重視。雙方間的專業關係在性質與規範上會隨著互動情形與信任程度而彈性變化,特別是關係疏遠化時彰顯了個管師在個管計畫中的位置與重要性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Since the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART, also known as ART: antiretroviral therapy) was introduced and freely provided for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH) by the government in 1997. People who take HAART on a regular basis have prolonged their life expectancy, and their lifestyles are similar to patients with other chronic diseases accordingly. Multiple and complex needs of care and resources of PLWH have been concerned and intervened by public health sector, along with the expectation of reducing transmission rates of HIV along with syphilis or hepatitis C virus.
The HIV Case Management Program (HIVCMP) has been launched by Centers for Disease Control in Taiwan since January 2007, many research has been done to assess effects of this program’s outcomes (such as physical or health status of PLWHs). Simultaneously, we cannot neglect HIV case managers as important agents in the program and their influence on PLWHs. How HIV case managers establish contact with and assist PLWHs’ self-care management is closely related to HIV case managers' skills and professional relationship. Objectives: This study is to explore strategies or skills when HIV case managers interact with PLWHs, and to examine behavior theories corresponding to these strategies. Furthermore, understanding how HIV case managers establish contact with PLWHs helps us to comprehend how professional relationship influences PLWHs, and what kind of professional relationship is beneficial for PLWHs’ health. Methods: This study was an exploratory study focusing on situations where HIV case managers and PLWHs interact. Data were collected by in-depth interviews. By means of snowball sampling, 13 case managers working in AIDS assigned hospitals and local health bureaus and 10 PLWHs living in Northern Taiwan were selected and interviewed. The sound-recording interview data were transcribed into verbatim draft and followed by open coding principle proposed by Strauss and Corbin (1997) to analyze data. Results: The main findings of this study as follows: (1) HIV case managers (especially those who work in AIDS assigned hospitals) use a great amount of interview skills to establish professional relationship with PLWHs. The skills of “social conversation”, “open question”, “reflexive listening “, and “providing framework” are used to at the initial stage to earn PLWHs’ trust and create an environment where PLWHs are willing to make self-disclosure. (2) HIV case managers concentrate on strengthening PLWHs’ cognition when assisting PLWHs’ behavior change and use of HAART. In assisting PLWHs’ behavior change, case managers adopt an egoistic-oriented standpoint, along with PLWHs’ immunity or disease burden as argument. HIV case managers create or form PLWHs’ antecedents to help them take HAART, which is similar to behavioral learning perspectives. (3) Due to the characteristics of HIV, the invention and effects of HAART, the professional relationship between HIV case managers and PLWHs is flexible in time, space, power relationship and degree of trust. (4) The professional relationship between HIV case managers and PLWHs becomes more intimate or remote depending on degree of trust in their professional relationship. Conclusion: HIV case managers use a great amount of interview skills in every field. However, the proficiency of skills varies within case managers in different field. Therefore, this research suggests that providing related training before working as a HIV case manager is crucial. The strategies that case managers use when assisting PLWHs’ use of HAART is similar to behavioral learning theory. However, the experience and ideas of PLWHs who take HAART receive less attention when case managers and PLWHs discuss about HAART. The property and norms of professional relationship between HIV case managers and PLWHs vary with interaction and degree of trust between them. When the professional relationship is remote, the importance and role of HIV case managers in the program is especially significant. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-14T17:47:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01848003-1.pdf: 2285470 bytes, checksum: a90f82e8c62adb2f7840d5f039ab2e6a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 導論 1
第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 個案管理:定義與發展 6 第二節 愛滋病個案管理計畫 9 第三節 個案工作技巧 13 第一項 建立專業關係 13 第二項 專業關係的發展 14 第三項 治療作為預防 15 第一款 服藥順從性 17 第二款 行為介入的策略 18 第四節 衛生教育 21 第五節 個案管理作為一種社會控制 23 第三章 研究設計 25 第一節 研究方法與抽樣 25 第二節 研究倫理 28 第三節 研究分析 31 第四章 研究結果 32 第一節 研究參與者一覽 32 第二節 個管計畫概述 36 第三節 三階段中的互動與專業關係 41 第一項 建立關係期 41 第二項 計畫執行期 46 第一款 衛生教育 46 第二款 雞尾酒療法 51 第三款 接觸者追蹤管理 65 第四節 專業關係 71 第一項 專業關係的變化 71 第一款 時間面向 72 第二款 空間面向 74 第三款 權力關係面向 76 第四款 信任程度面向 78 第五章 研究討論 85 第一節 治療作為預防理念下的個管計畫 85 第二節 個管師的會談技巧 87 第三節 協商雞尾酒療法 90 第四節 接觸者追蹤管理對專業關係的影響 94 第五節 與感染者的專業關係 96 第六章 結論與建議 99 第一節 結論 99 第二節 研究限制 101 第三節 建議 103 第七章 參考文獻 104 附錄一 研究參與者招募文宣(感染者) 112 附錄二 研究參與者招募文宣(個管師) 113 附錄三 研究訪談大綱(感染者) 114 附錄四 研究訪談大綱(個管師) 115 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 愛滋病個案管理師管理技巧及其與感染者關係初探-以輔導感染者自我健康為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring How HIV/AIDS Case Managers Manage Clients and Their Professional Relationship:Take Guiding Clients’ Self-Care as an Example | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柯乃熒(Nai-Ying Ko),鍾道詮(Dau-Chuan Chung) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 愛滋病個案管理計畫,專業關係,個案管理師,會談技巧, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | HIV case management program (HIVCMP),professional relationship,HIV case manager,interview skill, | en |
dc.relation.page | 116 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-02-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf | 2.23 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。