請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4788完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林能白 | |
| dc.contributor.author | She-Ling Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 謝淑玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-14T17:47:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-06-30 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-14T17:47:13Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-02-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 英文文獻
Boynton, A. C. and R. W. Zmud (1984), An assessment of critical success factors., Sloan management review 25(4): 17-27. Broens, T. H., et al. (2007), Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study, Journal of telemedicine and telecare 13(6): 303-309. Buck, S. (2009), Nine human factors contributing to the user acceptance of telemedicine applications: a cognitive-emotional approach, Journal of telemedicine and telecare 15(2): 55-58. Cilliers, L. (2010), Critical success factors for telemedicine centres in African countries, University of Fort Hare: 51, 150. Clark, M., et al. (2010), Sustaining innovation in telehealth and telecare, WSD Action Network, King's Fund. Cook, D. J., et al. (2001), 'Administrator and provider perceptions of the factors relating to programme effectiveness in implementing telemedicine to provide end-of-life care, Journal of telemedicine and telecare 7(suppl 2): 17-19. Daniel, D. R. (1961), Management information crisis, Harvard business review 39(5): 111-121. Gaski, J. F., 1984, The theory of power and conflict in channels of distribution, Journal of Marketing, vol. 48, pp.9-29. Haas, P. and J. Sembritzki (2006), The European eHealth Initiative-Objectives and Solutions. ECEH. Hossein Ahmadi, e. a. (2014), Evaluation the factors affecting the implementation of hospital information system (HIS) using AHP, Life Science Journal 11(3): 202-207. Hussain, N. (2014), Ranking Critical Success Factors of Healthcare Management Information Systems using AHP, Joseph, V., et al. (2011), Key challenges in the development and implementation of telehealth projects, Journal of telemedicine and telecare 17(2): 71-77. Judi, H., et al. (2009), Feasibility and critical success factors in implementing telemedicine, Information Technology Journal 8(3): 326-332. Kodukula, S. and M. Nazvia (2011), Evaluation of critical success factors for telemedicine implementation, Evaluation 12(10). Leidecker, J. K. and A. V. Bruno (1984), Identifying and using critical success factors, Long range planning 17(1): 23-32. Liu, C.-F. (2011), Key factors influencing the intention of telecare adoption: An institutional perspective, Telemedicine and e-Health 17(4): 288-293. Obstfelder, A., et al. (2007), Characteristics of successfully implemented telemedical applications, Implement Sci 2(25): 1-11. Organization, W. H. and W. H. Organization (1998). A Health Telematics Policy in Support of WHO'S Health-For-All Strategy for Global Development: Report of the WHO Group Consultation on Health Telematics 11-16 December, Geneva, 1997, World Health Organization. Rockart, J. F. (1978), Chief executives define their own data needs, Harvard business review 57(2): 81-93. Saaty, T. L. (1980), The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation, New York: McGraw. Saaty, T. L. (1999). Decision Making for Leaders. P.A. :RWS Steventon, A., et al. (2012), Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial, BMJ: British Medical Journal 344. Taneja, U. (2013). Critical Success Factors for eHealthcare. eTELEMED 2013, The Fifth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine. Tjosvold, D., 1997, “Conflict within interdependence: Its value for productivity and individuality, in De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert E. (Eds), Using Conflict in Organization, pp.23-37, Sage, London Wade, V. A., et al. (2014), Clinician Acceptance is the Key Factor for Sustainable Telehealth Services, Qualitative health research: 1049732314528809. Zakaria, N., et al. (2010), Managing ICT in healthcare organization: culture, challenges, and issues of technology adoption and implementation, 中文文獻 巫素怡 (2013),遠距照護介入措施對門診, 住院與急診醫療利用的影響,南開科技大學福祉科技與服務管理系所碩士論文 李卓倫, et al. (2013),台灣發展遠距健康照護的現況與挑戰,醫學與健康期刊 2(2): 1-10. 周春珍, et al. (2009),科技始於人性-淺談遠距醫療於老人健康照護之應用, 護理雜誌 56(6): 76-80. 林玉惠, et al. (2013),遠距健康照護介入措施對門診醫療利用之影響-以 [銀髮族 U-Care 計畫] 為例,長期照護雜誌 17(3): 297-314. 林怡欣 (2014),淺談亞太地區遠距健康照護市場機會,工業技術研究院 產業經濟與趨勢研究中心 IEK產業情報網. 徐淑玲 (2012),以遠距醫療為主的慢性阻塞性肺病管理成效之研究,義守大學管理學院碩士論文 張慈映 (2007),遠距照護產業之成功關鍵因素分析, ITIS 智網 陳再晉 (2006),國家資訊通信發展對於遠距醫療機制之建立關係,立法院第6屆第2會期科技及資訊委員會全體委員會議 彭心儀 (2010),由法律角度看寬頻遠距照護,網路通訊國家型科技計畫簡訊第13期. 程永明 and 施柏州 (2006),醫學中心導入 PACS 之關鍵成功因素研究, 績效與策略研究 3(1): 79-99. 褚志鵬 (2009),層級分析法(AHP)理論與實作,東華大學企業管理學系教學 講義 樓美玲, et al. (2005),遠距居家照護之現況、可行性及困境,護理雜誌 52(1): 66-73. 蔡侑錚 (2011),遠距照護服務對醫療費用之影響: 以南投地區系統建置為例,南開學報,第八卷,第一期。 蔡宗宏, et al. (2011),遠距健康照護評估量表之發展與驗證,電子商務學報 13(2): 435-463. 鄧振源、曾國雄 (1989),層級分析法的內涵特性與應用上,中國統計學報,第廿七卷,六,七期,頁5-22. 謝松哲 (2010),機構式遠距照護服務之成本效益分析─ 以北部護理之家為例,臺北醫學大學醫務管理學研究所碩士論文 網路資料 ATA美國遠距醫療協會,available at : http://www.americantelemed.org/about-telemedicine/what-is-telemedicine. Accessed August 10,2014. HRSA美國健康資源與服務管理局,available at: http://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/about/telehealth/telehealth.html. Accessed August 10,2014. TSA英國遠距健康照護協會,available at : http://www.telecare.org.uk/consumer-services/what-is-telecare. Accessed August 10,2014. 衛福部 '遠距健康照護服務入口網,http://mohw.telecare.com.tw/WebPages/Sidebar1/ProjectArea.aspx.引用2014/08/10. 鄭智銘 (2012),遠距健康產業的現狀與未來,http://ewpg.insight.ntu.edu.tw/l2-2356023478355422272765374369603631720581242472998626989303402969429376332872641020358.html. 引用2014/08/10. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4788 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著科技發展及社會結構的變遷,新興的遠距健康照護模式,近年來廣泛受到重視,然而目前執行的績效並不如預期,創新服務的推展非一蹴可及,在不同階段的成功關鍵因素,都必須適時被納入考量。
有感於現階段國內對於遠距健康照護關鍵成功因素之相關研究較為缺乏,且尚無學者利用分析層級程序法(AHP)進行分析,故本研究立意採用分析層級程序法找出遠距健康照護的關鍵成功因素。 本研究係經由相關文獻的探討,及採用AHP問卷調查法,以全台各區從事遠距健康照護的醫療院所之實務專家的觀點,歸納出「遠距健康照護」的關鍵成功因素,並透過不同專家群組樣本的區隔分析,更進一步驗證專家特質,確實影響遠距健康照護關鍵成功因素之結論。 本研究得到以下重要結果: 一、 專家對於遠距健康照護的關鍵成功因素之整體評估結果 遠距健康照護的關鍵成功因素依序為:內部環境構面的1)高階主管的支持與參與推動、2)醫師的配合程度/接受程度、使用者構面的3)使用者認為有助於健康控制、4)醫護人員的關懷電話與追蹤、5)易操作的儀器介面、及外部環境構面的6)穩定的財務及付費機制。 二、 遠距健康照護關鍵成功因素之結論,受專家特質的影響 因專家不同的專長特質,各為規劃(企業/產品導向)或執行(客戶導向),此特質差異所導致的不同觀點立場,影響其遠距健康照護的關鍵成功因素的結論,較偏重於內部環境或使用者構面。 期望本研究結果可作為相關單位在實施或經營「遠距健康照護」時, 擬定應對方針之參考,進而達到最佳資源分配及高績效的目的。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the advance in technology and the social structure, the Innovative Telecare model gains extensive attention in recent years. However, the current performance is not as expected owing to the fact that the deployment of innovative services cannot be achieved in one shot. Critical success factors at different phases need to be factored in appropriately to ensure a smooth implementation.
Responding to the relatively rare studies on critical success factors of Telecare applications in Taiwan, and no relevant Telecare study using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for analysis, this study intends to discover the critical success factors of Telecare by using AHP methodology. With references to the related literature and use of AHP questionnaire, this study conducts survey with Telecare practitioners of Taiwan's medical institutions to determinate the critical success factors of Telecare. In addition, through analyzing segmentation of different expert groups, this study further validates that the competency features of experts do affect the conclusions of the critical success factors of Telecare. This study derived the following key findings: First, according to the overall research, there are six critical success factors of Telecare, in order of significance, Internal environment perspective: 1 “Support from top management”, 2 “Acceptance and cooperation from physicians”, User perspective 3 “Attribution to personal health by user perception”, 4 “Follow-up phone tracking from healthcare professionals”, 5 “Instruments with user-friendly interfaces”, and external environment perspective 6 “Stable financing and payment mechanisms”. Second, the expert characteristics do affect the conclusions of the critical success factors of Telecare. Experts have their own competency characteristics, either “planning” ('Business / product-oriented) or implementation (customer-oriented), resulting in different effect upon the conclusions of the critical success factors, with varying focus on internal environment or user perspective. Expected results of this study can be referred by interested organizations as business blueprint in the implementation or operation of Telecare services to achieve high performance and optimal resource allocation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-14T17:47:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01847051-1.pdf: 1681791 bytes, checksum: 1a26b1ee52981946bdf72bfbea9a188b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 遠距健康照護的定義 5 第二節 國內遠距健康照護現況 6 第三節 關鍵成功因素的定義 10 第四節 遠距健康照護的關鍵成功因素 10 第五節 關鍵成功因素的確認及分析方法 19 第六節 文獻回顧總結 21 第三章 研究方法 22 第一節 研究架構與假設 22 第二節 研究變項與操作型定義 24 第三節 問卷設計與調查 30 第四節 資料處理與分析方法 33 第四章 資料分析與研究結果 35 第一節 問卷基本資料描述性統計分析 35 第二節 全體專家之因素 36 第三節 規劃群組之因素 41 第四節 執行群組之因素 46 第五節 全體與各群組專家之研究結果比較 51 第五章 結論與建議 59 第一節 研究結論 59 第二節 研究建議 66 第三節 研究限制 69 參考文獻 70 附錄 74 附錄一、分析層級程序法 (AHP) 之應用分析 74 附錄二、專家效度評分表 83 附錄三、問卷 89 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 分析層級程序法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 遠距健康照護 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 關鍵成功因素 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 專家特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | remote health care | en |
| dc.subject | Analytic Hierarchy Process | en |
| dc.subject | competency feature | en |
| dc.subject | key success factors | en |
| dc.title | 遠距健康照護關鍵成功因素:專家特質之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on Telecare Key Success Factors
-The Effect of competency feature | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 董鈺琪,高偉峰 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 遠距健康照護,關鍵成功因素,專家特質,分析層級程序法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | remote health care,key success factors,competency feature,Analytic Hierarchy Process, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 93 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-02-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 公共衛生碩士學位學程 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf | 1.64 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
