請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47330完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張佑宗(Yu-Tzung Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hong-Yi Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃弘毅 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:55:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-08-26 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王振寰、錢永祥（1995）〈邁向新國家？民粹威權主義的形成與民主問題〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》，20，17-55。
江宜樺（2001）《自由民主的理路》。台北：聯經。 亞洲民主動態調查：台灣地區調查計畫（2006）。《國立臺灣大學東亞民主研究計畫：亞洲民主動態調查－台灣地區調查計畫》（95R0064-AH02-00）。台北：國立臺灣大學。 周陽山（1993）《自由憲政與民主轉型》。台北：三民書局。 周陽山（2004）《民粹台灣》。台北：時英。 金耀基（1997）《中國政治與文化》。香港：牛津大學出版社。 黃光國（2003）《民粹亡台論》。台北：商周。 張佑宗〈2009〉〈搜尋台灣民粹式民主的群眾基礎〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》，75，89-113。 Albertazzi, Daniele, and McDonnell, Duncan (2007). “Introduction: The Spectre and the Spectre.” In Daniele Albertazzi and Duncan McDonnell (Eds.), Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy (pp. 1-11.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Arditi, Benjamin (2003). “Populism, or, Politics at the edges of Democracy.” Contemporary Politics, 9(1), 17-31. Baker, Wayne E. (2005). America’s Crisis of Values. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Boas, Taylor C. (2005). “Television and Neopopulism in Latin America: Media Effect in Braziland Peru.” Latin America Research Review, 40(2), 27-482. Burgess, Katrina and Levitsky, Steven (2003). “Explaining Populist Party Adaption in Latin America: Environment and Organizational Determinants of Party Change in Argentina,Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela.” Comparative Political Studies, 36(8), 881-911. Canovan, Margaret (1981). Populism. London: Junction. Canovan, Margaret (1999). “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.Political Studies, XLVII, 2-66. Conniff, Michael L. (1999). “Brazil’s Populism Republic and Beyond.” In Michael L. Conniff(Ed.), Populism in Latin America (pp. 43-62). Tuscaloosa and London: The University ofAlabama Press. Diamond, Larry. (2002). “Thinking About Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy, 13(2),21-35. Ellner, Steve (2003). “The Contrasting Variants of the Populism of Hugo Chavez and Alberto Fujimori.” Journal of American Studies, 35(1), 139-162. Erikson , Robert S., Mackuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A. (2002). The Macro Polity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel J. (2008). “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review Political Science, 11, 563–588. Gibson, Edward L. (1997). “The Populism Road to Market Reform: Policy and Elections Coalitions in Mexico and Argentina.” World Politics, 49(3), 339-370. Gibson, James L. (2003). The Legacy of Apartheid: Racial Differences in the Legitimacy of Democratic Institutions and Processes in the New South Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 36(7), 772-800. Horowitz, Joel (1999). “Populism and its Legacies in Argentina.” In Michael L. Conniff (Ed.), Populism in Latin America (pp. 22-42). Tuscaloosa and London: The University of Alabama Press. Huntington, Samuel P. (1997). “After Twenty Years: The Future of Third Wave.” Journal of Democracy, 8(4), 3-12. Inglehart, Ronald (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization : Culture , Economic, and Political Change in 43 Society. Princeton : Princeton University Press. Jagers, Jan, and Walgrave, Stefaan (2007). “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. Knight, Alan (1998). “Populism and Neo-populism in Latin America, especially Mexico,”Journal of American Studies, 30(2), 223-248. Kuenzi, Michelle (2005). “The Role of Nonformal Education in Promoting Democratic Attitudes: Finding From Senegal.” Democratization, 12(2), 223-244. Leaman, David (2004). “Changing Faces of Populism in Latin America: Masks, Makeovers,and Enduring Features.” Latin America Research Review, 39(3), 312-326. Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan (2002). “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51-65. Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation:Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: John HopkinsUniversity Press. Mouzelis, Nicos. (1985). “On the Concept of Populism: Populist and Clientelist Models of Incorporation in Semiperipheral Politics.” Politics & Society, 14(3), 329-348. Mudde, Cas. (2004). “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. Murillo, M. Victoria. (2000). “From Populism to Neoliberalism : Labor Unions and Market Reforms in Latin America.” World Politics, 52(2), 135-174. Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald (2001). “Culture Obstacles to Equal Representation.”Journal of Democracy, 12(3), 126-140. O’Donnell, Guillermo (1994). “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55-69. O’Donnell, Guillermo (1997). “Illusions about Consolidation.” In Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu, and Hung-mao Tien (Eds.), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives (pp. 40-57). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press. O’Donnell, Guillermo (1999). Counterpoints: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. O’Donnell, Guillermo (2003). “Horizontal Accountability: The Legal Institutionalization of Mistrust.” In Scott Mainwaring and Christopher Welna (Eds.), Democratic Accountability in Latin America (pp. 34-54). New York: Oxford University Press. Roberts, Kenneth M. (1995). “Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America : The Peruvian Case. ”World Politics, 48(1), 82-116. Roberts, Kenneth M. (2006). “Populism, Political Conflict, and Grass-Roots Organization in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies, 38(2), 127-148. Rupnik, Jacques (2007). “From Democracy Fatigue to Populist Backlash.” Journal of Democracy, 18(4), 17-25. Schedler, Andreas. (2002). “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36-50. Seligson, Mitchell A. (2007). “The Rise of Populism and the Left in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy, 18(3), 81-95. Seligson, Mitchell, and Booth, John (1996). Election and Democracy in Central America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Shyu, Huo-yan (2006). “Populism in Taiwan: The Rise of Populist-democratic Culture in a Democratizing Society.” Paper presented at the 20th International Political Science Association World Congress, Fukuoka, Japan, July 9-13, 2006. Sing, Ming (2005). “Public Support for Democracy in Hong Kong.” Democratization, 12(2), 244-261. Taggart, Paul (2000). Populism. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Torre, Carlos de la. (2000). Populism Seduction in Latin America: The Ecuadorian Experience. Athens: Center for International Studies, Ohio University Press. Vanden, Harry E. (2003). “Globalization in a Time of Neoliberalism: Politicized Social Movements and the Latin America Response.” Journal of Developing Societies 19(2-3),308-333. Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman, and Kim, Jae-On (1978). Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press. Weyland, Kurt (1999a). “Populism in the Age of Neoliberalism.” In Michael L. Conniff (Ed.), Populism in Latin America(pp. 172-190). Tuscaloosa and London: The University of Alabama Press. Weyland, Kurt (1999b). “Neoliberal Populism in Latin American and East Europe.” Comparative Politics, 31(4), 379-401. Weyland, Kurt (2001). “Clarifying a Contested Concept-Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1-22. Weyland, Kurt (2003). “Neoliberal Populism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: How MuchAffinity.” Third World Quarterly, 24(6), 1095-1115. Welzel, Christian, and Inglehart, Ronald (2008). “The Role of Ordinary People in Democratization.” Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 126-140. Zakaria, Fareed (1997). “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22-43. Zakaria, Fareed (2003). The Future of Freedom. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47330 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 摘要
本論文主要是探討台灣民粹主義的來源及其內涵的學術研究，我們首先要強調的是，民粹主義的學術概念應該是中性的，民粹主義與民粹運動可以對於當代的民主政治產生威脅與強化的兩種效果。從正面而言；民粹主義可以強化與補足民主政治與代議機構的不足；從負面來看，民粹主義會造成當代自由民主與憲政人權的傷害，但過去對於民粹主義的學術討論都僅僅存在於精英層級，而從未有對於民粹群眾基礎的相關討論，但是如果不存在數量龐大的民粹支持者，就算政治菁英企圖發動民粹運動以奪取更多的政治資源相信也有其困難度吧，因此，我們期望透過經驗資料的分析，來找出台灣民眾當中是否擁有數量龐大的民粹群眾基礎。 關鍵字：民粹主義；民粹群眾基礎；政治參與；經驗研究。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract
This thesis mainly discusses the source and the intention of the Taiwan populism. Firstly, we must put emphasis on the academic concept of the populism is median. Populism and populist actions can produce threat and strength effect to modern democracy. From the Positive side , populism can strengthen and improve the loss of democratic politics and parliamentary system ; from the negative side , populism will make the threat to liberal democracy and constitutional human rights. However, the past academic discussions only focus on the political elites. The academic discussions about the mass do not exist. If the populism mass is very few, how can the political elites make the populism actions to increase their political interests? Thus, we want through the Taiwan empirical statistical data to find the populism mass of Taiwan is real or not. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:55:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-P98341011-1.pdf: 938272 bytes, checksum: a3f948f451fb290bd576f647d45e3200 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
摘要…………………………………………………………………………………I Abstract……………………………………………………………………………....II 謝誌…………………………………………………………………………….........III 目錄……………………………………………………………………………........IV 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………VI 表目錄………………………………………………………………………………VII 第一章 導論……………………………………………………………………..1 第一節 研究動機………………………………………………………………….1 第二節 問題意識………………………………………………………………….5 第三節 研究目的………………………………………………………………….6 第二章 相關文獻探討………………………………………………………..7 第一節 從方法論層次出發的民粹主義文獻………………………………………7 第二節 討論民粹主義本質為何的相關文獻………………………………………..9 第三節 從特定政經結構中切入的民粹主義文獻…………………………………12 第四節 經濟民粹主義的相關文獻…………………………………………………15 第五節 從民眾參與與民粹動員角度切入的相關文獻……………………………15 第六節 從探討民主化與自由化程度切入的民粹文獻……………………………17 第三章 研究概念的建構……………………………………………………19 第一節 研究概念的建構…………………………………………………………19 第二節 民主化量表與自由化量表的建構………………………………………22 第三節 台灣民眾政治參與的類型建構及其分析………………………………27 第四節 研究概念的建構有效性檢定……………………………………………28 第五節 資料的選取與取捨..........................................................................................29 第四章 研究概念的交叉分析………………………………………………31 第一節 統計模型自變項的挑選與介紹....................................................................31 第二節 研究概念的統計交叉分析………………………………………………33 第五章 台灣民眾政治參與的統計模型分析...................................................37 第一節 統計模型的依變項與自變項………………………………………………37 第二節 統計迴歸模型之分析………………………………………………………40 第三節 台灣群眾政治參與的類別統計模型分析…………………………………55 第六章 初步結論………………………………………………………………60 第一節民粹的概念在台灣已被汙名化……………………………………………60 第二節 台灣民粹式民主群眾的分析……………………………………………60 第三節 研究假設與研究結果……………………………………………………64 第四節 研究限制與相關建議……………………………………………………66 參考書目………………………………………………………………67 附錄..................................................................................................................................72 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 經驗研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 民粹主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 民粹群眾基礎 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治參與 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Populism | en |
| dc.subject | Empirical analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Political participation | en |
| dc.subject | The populist mass | en |
| dc.title | 台灣民粹主義的來源與內涵:從亞洲民主動態調查2010年台灣區計畫 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Sources and The Intention of The Taiwan Populism
: From The E.A.B. 2010 Taiwan Survey | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃旻華(Ming-Hua Huang),吳親恩(Chini-En Wu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 民粹主義,民粹群眾基礎,政治參與,經驗研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Populism,The populist mass,Political participation,Empirical analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 72 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國家發展研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 916.28 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。