請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47000
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林彥蓉 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsiang-Ting Chien | en |
dc.contributor.author | 簡祥庭 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:44:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 鄧耀宗。台灣稻作發展之演變及背景。台灣稻作發展史。鄧耀宗主編。台灣省農林廳發行 8-19
黃真生。1979。水稻品種台農67號之育成。中華農業研究28: 57~66 邢永忠、徐才國、華金平、談移芳、孫新立。2001。水稻株高和抽穗期基因的定位和分離。植物學報43: 721-726 張瑪利、羅正宗、劉景平。2006。日長對水稻栽培種抽穗及農藝性狀之影響。作物、環境與生物資訊 3: 147-158 陳正昇。2009。以分子輔助選種導入hd1、Hd6和ehd1抽穗期基因至水稻越光品種。國立台灣大學農藝系碩士論文 陳正昇、陳榮坤、金漢煊、林彥蓉。2010。以分子輔助選種導入hd1、Hd6和Ehd1抽穗期基因至水稻越光品種。作物,環境與生物資訊 7: 1-20。 陳守泓、姚明輝、申擁。2005。氣候變遷對台灣地區糧食安全之衝擊與因應對策。全球變遷通訊雜幟46: 7~13 Alpert K., Grandillo S., Tanksley S. 1995. fw 2.2: a major QTL controlling fruit weight is common to both red-and green-fruited tomato species. Theor Appl Genet 91: 994-1000. Amante-Bordeos A., Sitch L., Nelson R., Dalmacio R., Oliva N., Aswidinnoor H., Leung H. 1992. Transfer of bacterial blight and blast resistance from the tetraploid wild rice Oryza minuta to cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Theor Appl Genet 84: 345-354. Ammiraju JS., Lu F., Sanyal A., Yu Y., Song X., Jiang N., Pontaroli AC., Rambo T., Currie J., Collura K., Talag J., Fan C., Goicoechea JL., Zuccolo A., Chen J., Bennetzen JL., Chen M., Jackson S., Wing RA. 2008. Dynamic evolution of Oryza genomes is revealed by comparative genomic analysis of a genus-wide vertical data set. Plant Cell 20: 3191-3209. Ando T., Yamamoto T., Shimizu T., Ma X., Shomura A., Takeuchi Y., Lin S., Yano M. 2008. Genetic dissection and pyramiding of quantitative traits for panicle architecture by using chromosomal segment substitution lines in rice. Theor Appl Genet 116: 881-890. Andres G., Silvio C., Olga G., Cesar M., Fernando C., Gustavo P., Joe T., Mathias L. 2010. Identification of a rice stripe necrosis virus resistance locus and yield component QTLs using Oryza sativa × O. glaberrima introgression lines. BMC Plant Biol 10: 6-17. Ausin I., Alonso-Blanco C., Martinez-Zapater J. 2005 Environmental regulation of flowering. Int J Dev Biol 49: 689-705. Bentolila S., Guitton C., Bouvet N., Sailland A., Nykaza S., Freyssinet G. 1991. Iden-tification of an RFLP marker tightly linked to the Ht1 gene in maize. Theor Appl Genet 82: 393-398. Brar DS. and Khush GS. 1997. Alien introgression in rice. Plant Mol Biol 35: 35-47. Bouchez A. 2002 Marker-assisted introgression of favorable alleles at quantitative trait loci between maize elite lines. Genetics 162: 1945-1959. Brondani C., Rangel P., Brondani R., Ferreira M. 2002. QTL mapping and introgression of yield-related traits from Oryza glumaepatula to cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 104: 1192-1203. Brar D. 2005. Broadening the gene pool of rice through introgression from wild species. Rice is Life: scientific perspectives for the 21st century:pp157-160. Chang TT., Li CC., Vergara BS. 1969 Component analysis of duration from seeding to heading in rice by the basic vegetative phase and the photoperiod-sensitive phase. Euphytica 18: 79-91. Chambers SR., Hunter N., Louis EJ., Borts RH. 1996. The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss. Mol Cell Biol 16: 6110-6120. Chen S., Lin XH., Xu CG., Zhang Q. 2000 Improvement of bacterial blight resistance of 'Minghui 63', an elite restorer line of hybrid rice, by molecular marker-assisted selection. Crop Sci 40: 239-244. Chen S., Xu CG., Lin HX., Zhang Q. 2001 Improving bacterial blight resistance of '6078', an elite restorer line of hybrid rice, by molecular marker-assisted selection. Plant breed 120: 133-138. Chen H. and Wang S. 2008. Molecular regulation of sink-source transition in rice leaf sheaths during the heading period. Acta Physiol Plant 30:639-649. Chen SY., Lin YT., Lin CW., Chen WY., Yang CH., Ku HM. 2010. Transferability of rice SSR markers to bamboo. Euphytica:1-11. Clauss M., Cobban H., Mitchell-Olds T. 2002. Cross-species microsatellite markers for elucidating population genetic structure in Arabidopsis and Arabis (Brassicaeae) . Mol Ecol 11: 591-601. Colmer T., Flowers T., Munns R. 2006. Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot 57: 1059-1078. Collard B., Mackill D. 2008. Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philos Transs R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:557-572. Collard B., Vera Cruz C., McNally K., Virk P., Mackill D. 2008. Rice molecular breeding laboratories in the genomics era: current status and future considerations. Int J Plant Genomic: 524847. Darvasi A., Weinreb A., Minke V., Weller J., Soller M. 1993. Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics 134: 943-951. Dilday R. 1990. Contribution of ancestral lines in the development of new cultivars of rice. Crop Sci 30: 905-911. Doi K., Iwata N., Yoshimura A. 1997. The construction of chromosome substitution lines of African rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud.) in the background of japonica rice (O. sativa L.). Rice Genet Newsl 14:39-41. Doi K., Yoshimura A., Iwata N. 1998. RFLP mapping and QTL analysis of heading date and pollen sterility using backcross populations between Oryza sativa L. and Oryza glaberrima Steud. Breeding Sci 48: 395-404. Doi K., Izawa T., Fuse T. 2004 Ehd1, a B-type response reg uLator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Genes Dev 18: 926-936. Duvick D. 1977. Major United States crops in 1976. Ann New York Acad Sci 287:86-96. Eshed Y., Zamir D. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147-1162. Feltus F., Wan J., Schulze S., Estill J., Jiang N., Paterson A. 2004. An SNP resource for rice genetics and breeding based on subspecies indica and japonica genome alignments. Genome Res 14:1812-1819. Feng Q., Huang T., Zhao Q., Zhu J., Lin Z., Han B. 2009. Analysis of collinear regions of Oryza AA and CC genomes. J Genet Genomics 36: 667-677. Fujino K. 2003 Photoperiod sensitivity gene controlling heading date in rice cultivars in the northernmost region of Japan. Euphytica 131: 97-103. Garner WA. and Allard HA. 1920. Effect of the relative length of day and night and the factors of the environment upon growth and reproduction in plants. Jour Agr Res 18:553-606. Gao LZ., Schaal BA., Zhang CH., Jia JZ., Dong YS. 2002. Assessment of population genetic structure in common wild rice Oryza rufipogon Griff. using microsatellite and allozyme markers. Theor Appl Genet 106: 173-180. Gao LZ., Zhang CH., Jia JZ. 2005. Cross-species transferability of rice microsatellites in its wild relatives and the potential for conservation genetic studies. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52: 931-940. Ge S., Sang T., Lu BR., Hong DY. 1999. Phylogeny of rice genomes with emphasis on origins of allotetraploid species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 14400-14405. Greenup A., Peacock W., Dennis E., Trevaskis B. 2009. The molecular biology of seasonal flowering-responses in Arabidopsis and the cereals. Ann Bot 103: 1165-1172. Gupta P., Balyan H., Edwards K., Isaac P., Korzun V., Roder M., Gautier M., Joudrier P., Schlatter A., Dubcovsky J. 2002. Genetic mapping of 66 new microsatellite (SSR) loci in bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 105: 413-422. Harlan J. and De Wet J. 1971. Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20:509-517. Hayama R., Yokoi S., Tamaki S., Yano M., Shimamoto K. 2003. Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice. Nature 422: 719-722. Hayama R., Agashe B., L uLey E., King R., Coupland G. 2007. A circadian rhythm set by dusk determines the expression of FT homologs and the short-day photoperiodic flowering response in Pharbitis. The Plant Cell 19: 2988. Huang Z., He G., Shu L., Li X., Zhang Q. 2001. Identification and mapping of two brown planthopper resistance genes in rice. Theor Appl Genet 102: 929-934. Ichitani K., Inoue H., Nishida H., Okumoto Y., Tanisaka T. 2002. Interactive effects of two heading-time loci, Se1 and Ef1, on pre-flowering developmental phases in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica 126: 227-234. Inoue H., Nishida H., Okumoto Y., Tanisaka T. 1998. Identification of an early heading time gene found in the Taiwanese rice cultivar Taichung 65. Breeding Sci. 48: 103-108. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project. 2005. The map-based of the rice genome. Nature 436:793-800. Ishikawa T, Akita S, Li Q. 1993. Relationship between contents of non-structural carbohydrates before panicle initiation stage and grain yield in rice (Oryza sa-tiva L.). Jpn J Crop Sci 62:130–131 Izawa T., Takahashi Y., Yano M. 2003. Comparative biology comes into bloom: genomic and genetic comparison of flowering pathways in rice and Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 113-120. Izawa T. 2007. Adaptation of flowering-time by natural and artificial selection in Arabidopsis and rice. J Exp Bot 58: 3099-4097. Izawa T. 2008. Photoperiodic flowering in rice. H-Y Hirano et al. (eds.), Rice Biol-ogy in the Genomics Era. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry 62. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 163-176. Izawa T. 2010. Photoperiodic control of flowering in the short-day plant Oryza sativa, in: R. J. Nelson, et al. (Eds.), Photoperiodism The Biological Calendar, Oxford. pp. 38-58. Jena K. and Khush G. 1990. Introgression of genes from Oryza officinalis Well ex Watt to cultivated rice, O. sativa L. Theor Appl Genet 80: 737-745. Kardailsky I., Shukla V., Ahn J., Dagenais N., Christensen S., Nguyen J., Chory J., Harrison M., Weigel D. 1999. Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. Science 286: 1962-1965. Khush G. 1997. Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice. Plant Mol Biol 35: 25-34. Khush G. 2005. What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol Biol 59: 1-6. Kim H., San Miguel P., Nelson W., Collura K., Wissotski M., Walling JG., Kim JP., Jackson SA., Soderlund C., Wing RA. 2007. Comparative physical mapping between Oryza sativa (AA genome type) and O. punctata (BB genome type). Genetics 176: 379-390. Kim H, Hurwitz B., Yu Y., Collura K., Gill N., SanMiguel P., Mullikin JC., Maher C., Nelson W., Wissotski M., Braidotti M., Kudrna D., Goicoechea JL., Stein L., Ware D., Jackson SA., Soderlund C., Wing RA. 2008. Construction, alignment and analysis of twelve framework physical maps that represent the ten genome types of the genus Oryza. Genome Biol 9: R45. Kinoshita T. 1998. Report of the committee on gene symbolization, nomenclature and linkage groups. II. Linkage mapping using mutant genes in rice. Rice Genet. Newsl 15: 13-74. Kinoshita T. 1995. Report of the committee on gene symbolization, nomenclature and linkage groups. Rice Genet Newsl 12: 9-153. Kojima S., Takahashi Y., Kobayashi Y., Monna L., Sasaki T., Araki T., Yano M. 2002. Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 43: 1096-1105. Kuleung C., Baenziger P., Dweikat I. 2004. Transferability of SSR markers among wheat, rye, and triticale. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1147-1150. Li G., Hu W., Qin R., Jin H., Tan G., Zhu L., He G. 2008. Simple sequence repeat analyses of interspecific hybrids and MAALs of Oryza officinalis and Oryza sativa. Genetica 134: 169-180. Lin MS. 1991a. Genetic base of Japonica rice varieties released in Taiwan. Euphytica 56: 43-46. Lin MS. 1991b. Field uniformity of the Japonica rice region of Taiwan as estimated by relative genetic contribution. Theor Appl Genet 83: 115-118. Lin XH., Zhang DP., Xie YF., Gao HP., Zhang Q. 1996. Identifying and mapping a new gene for bacterial blight resistance in rice based on RFLP markers. Phytopathol 86: 1156-1159. Lin SY., Sasaki T., Yano M. 1998. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed dormancy and heading date in rice, Oryza sativa L., using backcross inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 96: 997-1003. Lin HX., Yamamoto T., Sasaki T., Yano M. 2000. Characterization and detection of epistatic interactions of 3 QTLs, Hd1, Hd2, and Hd3, controlling heading date in rice using nearly isogenic lines. Theor Appl Genet 101; 1021-1028. Lin HX., Liang ZW., Sasaki T., Yano M. 2003. Fine mapping and characterization of quantitative trait loci Hd4 and Hd5 controlling heading date in rice. Breeding Sci 53: 51-59. Lin HX., Ashikari M., Yamanouchi U., Sasaki T., Yano M. 2002. Identification and characterization of a quantitative trait locus, Hd9, controlling heading date in rice. Breeding Sci 52: 35-41. Liu S. and Anderson JA. 2003 Marker assisted evaluation of Fusarium head blight resistant wheat germplasm. Crop Sci 43: 760-766. Li Z., Pinson SRM., Stansel JW., Park WD. 1995. Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for heading date and plant height in cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 91: 374-381. Londo JP., Chiang YC., Hung KH., Chiang TY., Schaal BA. 2006. Phylogeography of Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon, reveals multiple independent domestications of cultivated rice, Oryza sativa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103: 9578-9583. Lu J. and Chang T. 1980. Rice in its temporal and spatial perspectives, In: B. S. Luh (Ed.), Rice: Production and utilization. pp. 1-74. Luan W., Chen H., Fu Y., Si H., Peng W., Song S., Liu W., Hu G., Sun Z., Xie D. 2009. The effect of the crosstalk between photoperiod and temperature on the heading-date in rice. PloS One 4: e5891. Lu F., Ammiraju JS., Sanyal A., Zhang S., Song R., Chen J., Li G., Sui Y., Song X., Cheng Z., de Oliveira AC., Bennetzen JL., Jackson SA., Wing RA., Chen M. 2009. Comparative sequence analysis of MONOCULM1- orthologous regions in 14 Oryza genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106: 2071-2076. Martin G., Frary A., Wu T., Bro mMonschenkel S., Chunwongse J., Earle E., Tanksley S. 1994. A member of the tomato Pto gene family confers sensitivity to fenthion res uLting in rapid cell death. Plant Cell 6: 1543-1552. Matsubara K., Kono I., Hori K., Nonoue Y., Ono N., Shomura A., Mizubayashi T., Yamamoto S., Yamanouchi U., Shirasawa K. 2008. Novel QTLs for photoperiodic flowering revealed by using reciprocal backcross inbred lines from crosses between japonica rice cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 117: 935-945. McCouch S., Kochert G., Yu Z., Wang Z., Khush G., Coffman W., Tanksley S. 1988. Molecular mapping of rice chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 76:815-829. Michaels S., Amasino R. 1999. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell 11: 949-956. Morinaga T. 1937. On the microsporogenesis of the various interspecific hybrids of Oryza. A preliminary note. Jpn J Genet 13: 245. Morishima H. and Oka H. 1960. The pattern of interspecific variation in the genus Oryza: its quantitative representation by statistical methods. Evolution 14: 153-165. Moore G., Devos K., Wang Z., Gale M. 1995. Gramineouses, line up and form a circle. Curr Biol 5 737-739. Moncada P., Martinez C., Borrero J., Chatel M., Gauch Jr H., Guimaraes E., Tohme J., McCouch S. 2001. Quantitative trait loci for yield and yield components in an Oryza sativa x Oryza rufipogon BC2F2 population evaluated in an upland environment. Theor Appl Genet 102: 41-52. Monna L., Lin H., Kojima S., Sasaki T., Yano M. 2002. Genetic dissection of a genomic region for a quantitative trait locus, Hd3, into two loci, Hd3a and Hd3b, controlling heading date in rice. Theor Appl Genet 104: 772-778. Nakagahra M., Okuno K., Vaughan D. 1997. Rice genetic resources: history, conservation, investigative characterization and use in Japan. Plant Mol Biol 35: 69-77. Nishida H., Okumoto Y., Nakagawa H., Ichitani K., Inoue H., Tanisaka T. 2001. Analysis of tester lines for rice (Oryza sativa L.) heading-time genes using reciprocal photoperiodic transfer treatments. Ann of Bot 88: 527-536. Nowak-Imialek M., Kues W., Rudolph C., Schlegelberger B., Taylor U., Carnwath J., Niemann H. 2010. Preferential loss of porcine chromosomes in reprogra mmed interspecies cell hybrids. Cell Reprogram. 12: 55-65. Ochiai K., Uemura S., Shimizu A., Okumoto Y., Matoh T. 2008. Boron toxicity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) . I. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of tolerance to boron toxicity. Theor Appl Genet 117: 125-133. Ogiso E., Takahashi Y., Sasaki T., Yano M., Izawa T. 2010. The role of casein kinase II in flowering time regulation has diversified during evolution. Plant Physiol. 152: 808-820. Olson M., Hood L., Cantor C., Botstein D. 1989. A common language for physical mapping of the human genome. Science 245: 1434-1435. Pan Q., Liu Y., Budai-Hadrian O., Sela M., Carmel-Goren L., Zamir D., Fluhr R. 2000. Comparative genetics of nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and Arabidopsis. Genetics 55: 309-322. Peakall R., Gilmore S., Keys W., Morgante M., Rafalski A. 1998. Cross-species amplification of soybean (Glycine max) simple sequence repeats (SSRs) within the genus and other legume genera: implications for the transferability of SSRs in plants. Mol Biol Evol 15: 1275-1287. Peng S., Huang J., Sheehy JE., Laza RC., Visperas RM., Zhong X., Centeno GS., Khush GS., Cassman KG. 2004. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101: 9971-9975. Prada D. 2009. Molecular population genetics and agronomic alleles in seed banks: searching for a needle in a haystack? J Exp Bot 60: 2541-2552. Poonyarit M., Mackill D., Vergara B. 1989. Genetics of photoperiod sensitivity and critical daylength in rice. Crop Sci 29:647. Putterill J., Robson F., Lee K., Simon R., Coupland G. 1995. The CONSTANS gene of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and encodes a protein showing similarities to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell 80: 847-857. Rangel PN., Brondani RP., Rangel PH., Brondani C. 2008. Agronomic and molecular characterization of introgression lines from the interspecific cross Oryza sativa (BG90-2) × Oryza glumaepatula (RS-16). Genet Mol Res 7: 184-195. Renganayaki K., Fritz AK., Sadasivam S., Pammi S., Harrington SE., McCouch SR., Kumar SM., Reddy AS. 2002. Mapping and progress toward map-based cloning of brown planthopper biotype-4 resistance gene introgressed from Oryza officinalis into cultivated rice, O. sativa. Crop Sci. 42:2112-2117. Sato S. and Shinjo C. 1983. An experiment of genetic study on heading time in rice. Oryza sativa L. Bull Coll Agr, Univ Ryukyus 30:145-153. Sato S., Sakamoto I., Shirakawa K., Nakasone S. 1988. Chromosomal location of an earliness gene Ef1 of rice, Oryza sativa L. Jpn J Breed 38:385-396. Sano Y. 1992. Genetic comparisons of chromosome 6 between wild and cultivated rice. Jpn J Breed 42: 561-572. Sato S., Tamaki A., Shinjyo C. 1994. Genetic relation between an earliness gene Ef-1 and anther length in rice, Oryza sativa L. Breeding Sci 44: 127- 132. Sanchez AC., Ilag LL., Yang D., Brar DS., Ausubel F., Khush GS., Yano M., Sasaki T., Li Z., Huang N. 1999. Genetic and physical mapping of xa13, a recessive bacterial blight resistance gene in rice. Theor Appl Genet 98: 1022-1028. Sanchez AC., Brar DS., Huang N., Li Z., Khush GS. 2000. Sequence tagged site marker-assisted selection for three bacterial blight resistance genes in rice. Crop Sci 40: 792-797. Saito H., Yuan Q., Okumoto Y., Doi K., Yoshimura A., Inoue H., Teraishi M., Tsukiyama T., Tanisaka T. 2009. Multiple alleles at Early flowering 1 locus making variation in the basic vegetative growth period in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 119: 315-323. Seyfarth R., Feuillet C., Schachermayr G., Winzeler M., Keller B. 1999. Development of a molecular marker for the adult plant leaf rust resistance gene Lr35 in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 99: 554-560. Shin B., Lee J., Jeong H., Yun C., Kim J. 2004. Circadian regulation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) CONSTANS-like gene transcripts. Mol Cells. 17: 10-16. Shan JX., Zhu MZ., Shi M., Gao JP., Lin HX. 2009. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of spd6, responsible for small panicle and dwarfness in wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Theor Appl Genet 119: 827-836. Sircar SM. and Ghosh BM. 1947. Effects of high temperature and short days on vernalization response of summer varieties of rice. Nature 159:605-606. Steele KA., Price AH., Shashidhar HE., Witcombe JR. 2006. Marker-assisted selection to introgress rice QTLs controlling root traits into an Indian upland rice variety. Theor Appl Genet 112: 208-221. Sugano S., Andronis C., Ong MS., Green R., Tobin EM. 1999. The protein kinase CK2 is involved in regulation of circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 96: 12362-12366. Sung S. and Amasino RM. 2004. Vernalization and epigenetics: how plants remember winter. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 7: 4-10. Takeuchi, Y., Ebitani T., Yamamoto T., Sato H., Ohta H., Hirabayashi H., Kato H., Ando I., Nemoto H., Imbe T., and Yano M. 2006. Development of isogenic lines of rice cultivar Koshihikari with early and late heading by marker-assisted selection. Breeding Sci 56: 405-413. Takahashi Y., Shomura A., Sasaki T., Yano M. 2001. Hd6, a rice quantitative trait locus involved in photoperiod sensitivity, encodes the α subunit of protein kinase CK2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 98: 7922-7927. Takeuchi Y., Ebitani T.,Yamamoto T.,Sato H., Ohta H., Hirabayashi H., Kato H., An-do I., Nemoto H., Imbe T., Yano M. 2006. Development of isogenic lines of rice cultivar Koshihikari with early and late heading by marker-assisted selec-tion. Breeding Sci 56: 405-413. Takeuchi Y., Nonoue Y., Ebitani T., Suzuki K., Aoki N., Sato H., Ideta O., Hirabayashi H., Hirayama M., Ohta H., Nemoto H., Kato H., Ando I., Ohtsubo K., Yano M., Imbe T. 2007. QTL detection for eating quality including glossiness, stickiness, taste and hardness of cooked rice. Breed Sci 57:231-242. Tamaki S., Matsuo S., Wong H., Yokoi S., Shimamoto K. 2007. Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science 316: 1033-1036. Tanksley SD. 1993. Mapping polygenes. Ann Rev Genet 27:205-233. Tanksley SD. and McCouch SR. 1997. Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277: 1063-1066. Thomas B. 1998. Photoperiodism: an overview. Biological rhythms and photoperiodism in plants. BIOS Scientific Publisher, Oxford:151-165. Tian F., Li DJ., Fu Q., Zhu ZF., Fu YC., Wang XK., Sun CQ. 2006. Construction of introgression lines carrying wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) segments in cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) background and characterization of introgressed segments associated with yield-related traits. Theor Appl Genet 112: 570-580. Toojinda T., Baird E., Booth A., Broers L., Hayes P., Powell W., Thomas W., Vivar H., Young G. 1998. Introgression of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) determining stripe rust resistance in barley: an example of marker-assisted line development. Theor Appl Genet 96: 123-131. Tong HH., Mei HW., Yu XQ., Xu XY., Li MS., Zhang SQ., Luo LJ. 2006. Identification of related QTLs at late developmental stage in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under two nitrogen levels. Yi Chuan Xue Bao 33: 458-467. Tsai KH. and Oka HI. 1965. Genetic studies of yielding capacity and adaptability in crop plants, 1. Characters of isogenic lines in rice. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica 6:19-31. Tsai KH. 1973. Comparison of intra-allelic structure related to the major earliness genes involving in isogenic and radiation-induced early-maturing lines of a rice variety, Taichung 65. J Agric Assoc China, NS 84:23-47. Tsai KH. 1976. Studies on earliness genes in rice, with special reference to analysis of isoalleles at the E locus. Jpn J Genet. 51:115-128. Tsai KH. 1986a. Genes at the Ef-1 locus found in Fujisaka 5 and two Chinese Indica varieties. Rice Genet. Newslett, 3:73-74. Tsai KH. 1986b. Gene loci and alleles controlling the duration of basic vegetative growth of rice. Rice genetics, International Rice Research Institute, IRRI Los Banos, Philippines. pp. 339-349. Tsai KH. 1995. Genie analysis for heading time in wild rice strains. Jpn J Genet. 70:555-562. Vaughan DA., Morishima H., Kadowaki K. 2003. Diversity in the Oryza genus. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6: 139-146. Vergara BS., Chang TT. 1985. The flowering response of the rice plant to photoperiod. a review of the literature. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Phil-ippines, 61 pp. Wan XY., Wan JM., Su CC., Wang CM., Shen WB., Li JM., Wang HL., Jiang L., Liu SJ., Chen LM., Yasui H., Yoshimura A. 2004. QTL detection for eating quality of cooked rice in a population of chromosome segment substitution lines. Theor Appl Genet 110: 71-79. Wei X., Jiang L., Xu J., Liu X., Liu S., Zhai H., Wan J. 2009. The distribution of japonica rice cultivars in the lower region of the Yangtze river valley is determined by its photoperiod-sensitivity and heading date genotypes. J Integr Plant Biol. 51:922-932. Wei X., Liu L., Xu J., Jiang L., Zhang W., Wang J., Zhai H., Wan J. 2010. Breeding strategies for optimum heading date using genotypic information in rice. Molecular Breeding 25:287-298. Williams CE., Wang B., Holsten TE., Scambray J., Silva F., Ronald PC. 1996. Markers for selection of the rice Xa21 disease resistance gene. Theor Appl Genet 93: 1119-1122. Wing RA., Ammiraju JS., Luo M., Kim H., Yu Y., Kudrna D., Goicoechea JL., Wang W., Nelson W., Rao K., Brar D., Mackill DJ., Han B., Soderlund C., Stein L., SanMiguel P., Jackson S. 2005. The Oryza map alignment project: the golden path to unlocking the genetic potential of wild rice species. Plant Mol Biol 59: 53-62. Wing RA, Kim H, Goicoechea JL et al (2007) The Oryza Map Alignment Project (OMAP): a new resource for comparative genome studies within Oryza. In: Upadhyaya NM (ed) Rice functional genomics-challenges, progress and pros-pects. Springer, New York, pp 395–409 Xiao J., Grandillo S., Ahn SN., McCouch SR., Tanksley SD., Li J., Yuan L. 1996. Genes from wild rice improve yield. Nature 384: 223-224. Xu Y., McCouch S., Zhang Q. 2005. How can we use genomics to improve cereals with rice as a reference genome? Plant Mol Biol 59:7-26. Xue W., Xing Y., Weng X., Zhao Y., Tang W., Wang L., Zhou H., Yu S., Xu C., Li X. 2008. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important reg uLator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet 40: 761-767. Yamagata, H., Okumoto, Y., and Tanisaka, T. 1986. Analysis of genes controlling heading time in Japanese rice. In Rice Genetics. Los Baños, Philippines, In-ternational Rice Research Institute, pp. 351–359.. Yamamoto T., Kuboki Y., Lin S., Sasaki T., Yano M. 1998. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci Hd-1, Hd-2 and Hd-3, controlling heading date of rice, as single Mendelian factors. Theor Appl Genet 97: 37-44. Yamamoto T., Lin H., Sasaki T., Yano M. 2000. Identification of heading date quantitative trait locus Hd6 and characterization of its epistatic interactions with Hd2 in rice using advanced backcross progeny. Genetics 154: 885-891. Yano M., Sasaki T. 1997. Genetic and molecular dissection of quantitative traits in rice. Plant Mol Biol 35: 145-153. Yano M., Harushima Y., Nagamura Y., Kurata N., Minobe Y., Sasaki T. 1997. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling heading date in rice using a high-density linkage map. Theor Appl Genet 95: 1025-1032. Yano M., Katayose Y., Ashikari M., Yamanouchi U., Monna L., Fuse T., Baba T., Yamamoto K., Umehara Y., Nagamura Y. 2000. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12: 2473-2484. Yano M., Kojima S., Takahashi Y., Lin H., Sasaki T. 2001. Genetic control of flowering time in rice, a short-day plant. Plant Physiol 127:1425-1429. Yashitola J., Thirumurugan T., Sundaram R., Naseerullah M., Ramesha M., Sarma N., Sonti R. 2002. Assessment of purity of rice hybrids using microsatellite and STS markers. Crop Sci 42: 1369-1373. Yokoo M. and Kikuchi F. 1977. Multiple allelism of the locus controlling heading time of rice, detected using the close linkage with blast-resistance. Jpn. J. Breed 27:123-130. Yokoo, M., Kikuchi, F., Nakane, A., and Fujimaki, H. 1980. Genetical analysis of heading time by aid of close linkage with blast, Pyricularia oryzae, resistance in rice. Bull. Natl. Inst. Agric. Sci. Ser. D 31: 95-126. Yokoo M., Okuno K. 1993. Genetic analysis of earliness mutations induced in the rice cultivar Norin 8. Jpn J Breed 43:1-11. Yoshida K., Miyashita N. 2009. DNA polymorphism in the blast disease resistance gene Pita of the wild rice Oryza rufipogon and its related species. Genes Genet Syst 84: 121-136. Zamir D. 2001. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat Rev Genet 2: 983-989. Zhou W., Kolb F., Bai G., Domier L., Boze L., Smith N.,. 2003. Validation of a major QTL for scab resistance with SSR markers and use of marker-assisted selection in wheat. USDA A Zhou P., Tan Y., He Y., Xu C., Zhang Q. 2003. Simultaneous improvement for four quality traits of Zhenshan 97, an elite parent of hybrid rice, by molec uLar marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 106: 326-331. Zhang X., Zhou S., Fu Y., Su Z., Wang X., Sun C. 2006. Identification of a drought tolerant introgression line derived from Dongxiang common wild rice (O. rufipogon Griff.). Plant Mol Biol 62: 247-259. 米穀安定供給確保支援機構。日本。http://www.komenet.jp/_qa/kome_hinshu/index.html 獨立行政法人 農業・食品産業技術総合研究機構 作物研究所。日本。 http://ineweb.narcc.affrc.go.jp/ 農林水產省,MAFF。日本。http://www.maff.go.jp/index.ht mL 中央氣象局,Central Weather Bureau。台灣。http://www.cwb.gov.tw/ 日本氣象廳,Japan Meteorological Agency。日本。http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/index.ht ml 日本國立天文台,National Astronomical Observatory of Japan。日本。http://www.nao.ac.jp/ National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences,NIAS。日本。 http://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/about_en.php | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47000 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Hd1、Hd6與Ehd1基因對水稻抽穗期之影響
稉稻越光品種具有顯性的Hd1、Ehd1對光週期敏感的基因與隱性的hd6對光週期不敏感的基因,栽種於日本時具有良好的品質與產量,但在台灣因對光週期敏感而提早抽穗,降低產量與品質。台農67號為台灣優良栽培品種,帶有隱性的hd1、ehd1對光週期不敏感的基因與顯性的Hd6對光週期敏感的基因。本研究利用分子輔助選種 (marker assisted selection, MAS) 將台農67號三個抽穗期基因hd1、Hd6和ehd1導入越光中,建立了衍生自編號為#286-85-A4、#286-14-A23和#286-85-A27三株單株之BC3F2族群。2009年二期作於田間自然光照下,三族群之抽穗期皆出現連續性分部,經分析後發現三個基因對抽穗期之影響並不一致,以Ehd1影響抽穗期效應最大,且基因型為ehd1 ehd1者有較長的抽穗期,延遲天數最長可達23.5天,其次為Hd1,以Hd6對抽穗期的影響最小。在三個基因三種不同基因型構成的27種組合中,以A27族群Hd1Hd1 Hd6 hd6 Ehd1Ehd1組合抽穗期的69.4天最早;A4族群hd1hd1 Hd6Hd6 ehd1ehd1之組合的109天抽穗期最晚,大多數組合的抽穗期則介於80 ∼ 90天左右。比較越光與台農67之平均抽穗期後顯示透過抽穗期基因的改變,可達延遲越光抽穗的目的;不同的基因型組合對抽穗期造成不同程度的延遲。透過MAS可育成帶有不同抽穗期基因之越光近似同源系,評估基因型對抽穗期的影響,選育出有最適抽穗期的品種,以適應不同的栽種環境與制度。 野生稻DNA分子標幟之開發 水稻經由人類之馴化、育種培育出許多優良的栽培品種,造就龐大的經濟價值,然造成栽培種的遺傳歧異度越趨一致,為了提高栽培種的遺傳變異性,除了對地方種種原的再利用外,亦可由不同的野生種獲得新的遺傳資源,用以因應詭譎多變的氣候變遷與世界糧食需求激增等挑戰。開發多型性分子標幟及建立連鎖圖譜,將有助於探勘野生稻有用之基因,如耐生物逆境和非生物逆境基因,及分子標幟輔助選種之實行 (Gupta et al., 2002) ,以加速水稻之育種。本研究最終目的為將野生稻O. officinalis (CC基因體) 和O. australiensis (EE基因體) 之重要基因導入於稻O. sativa (AA基因體) 之稉稻台農67號 (TN G67) 和秈稻台中秈10號 (TCS 10),現階段之目標為開發多型性分子標幟。 篩選249個水稻 SSR(simple sequence repeat又稱為Rice Microsatellite,微衛星)分子標幟,只有72 (72%) 個和71 (71%) 個分子標幟能在O. officinalis vs. TCS 10和O. officinalis vs. TNG 67間呈現多型性;而只有51 (76%)個和53 (79%) 個能在O. australiensis vs. TCS 10和O. australiensis vs. TNG 67間呈現多型性。因SSR分子標幟是以栽培稻種O. sativa進行設計引子對,不同基因體間基因染色體結構體歧異度大,造成SSR引子序列於野生稻之鍊合成功率低。為能更有效率的取得具多型性的分子標幟,以生物資訊方法進行栽培種與野生種的基因體序列比較,依據插入/缺失(indel)DNA片段,一共設計了121個分子標幟,在 O. officinalis vs. TCS 10和O. officinalis vs. TNG 67間呈現多型性的有79 (72%) 個與82 (75%) 個分子標幟;在O. australiensis vs. TCS 10和O. australiensis vs. TNG 67間呈現多型性的分別有64 (62%) 個和65 (63%) 個分子標幟。此策略能較有效率的獲得能在野生種與栽培種間呈現多型性的分子標幟,進而進行基因圖譜分析或以分子標幟輔助選種 (marker assisted selection, MAS) 建立帶有野生稻染色體片段的部分染色體置換系族群 (chromosome segment substitution lines, CSSLs),供研究或育種使用,提高野生種原的利用效率。 以多型性分子標幟進行O. officinalis × TNG 67衍生之BC1F1、BC2F1世代之染色體結構分析。因著野生稻與栽培稻種因親源與染色體結構上之差異,二物種間染色體不易發生重組,二個回交世代之染色體中,異型合子比例由86.7% (BC1F1) 下降為18.1% (BC2F1),而TNG 67同型合子比例則大幅提升,顯示野生稻之染色體片段迅速的自子代染色體中剔除,因此不易建立完整的部分染色體片段置換系。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The Effects of Hd1, Hd6, and Ehd1on Rice Heading Date
TNG 67 was an elite cultivar in Taiwan. This variety carried hd1, hd6 and ehd1 three recessive genes and insensitive to photoperiod. The Japanes elite cultivar, Ko-shihikari, possessing good quality, is very popular not only in Japan but also in Taiwan. However, Koshihikari heads early in Taiwan because of 3 photoperiodic genes Hd1, Hd6 and Ehd1. One of elite cultivar in Taiwan, Tainung 67 is photoperiod insensitive. Through marker assisted selection (MAS), in these three heading date genes of TNG 67 had been introgressed to Koshihikari, and three BC3F2 populations derived from three different BC3F1 individuals, #286-85-A4、#286-14-A23 and #286-85-A27. In second crop season in 2009, those BC3F2 populations were planted under natural lightness’ field. The heading dates for each population displayed continuous distribution. After analysis the effect cause by three genes, Ehd1 with the largest effect on heading date. Recessive homozygotes ehd1 could posponed 23.5 days to head, significantly. Hd1 was the second effective gene, Hd6 had the minor effect for heading date delay. Total of 27 genotypes composed by combination of three heading date genes. The earliest heading time was 69.4 days found in A27 population, which genotype was Hd1Hd1 Hd6 hd6 Ehd1Ehd1. The lasted heading time was 109 days. Discovered in A4 population, which genotype were hd1hd1 Hd6Hd6 ehd1ehd1. The heading dates for most of the genotypic combinations in three populations were be-tween 80 to 90 days and transgressive segregants were found. Thus heading date could be adjusit by different genotype combination. By using MAS, near isolation lines of Koshihikari carring different heading date genes could be developed. After evaluation of field trials under different environment, several varieties derived from NILs of Koshihikari possessing different heafing dates could be promoted to growal different location and different crop seasons. Development of molecular markers of wild rice Through human domestication and breeding program, people have developed a lots of elite cultivars and received huge economical reward, but it let the genetic di-versity of the rice gene pool much narrower than before. Recovering the land race and wild rice material is one way to improve the genetic diversity of cultivar gene pool searching for polymorphic markers is essential. Through this method, researchers have discoveried lots of genes, which can endow with elite cultivar resistance of biotic and abiotic stress, developed a complete linkage map to posit the genes; breeders can breed by marker assisted selection (MAS) a more efficient way to utilized wild genetic resource to improve better cultivar traits (Gupta et al., 2002). The final goal for this research is to develop a complete chromosome segment substitution (CSSLs), each carry chromosome from O. officinalis (CC genome) and O. australiensis with O. sativa sub-species (AA genome) TCS 10 and TNG 67 background, respectively. This research was trying to figure out a new way to received polymorphic DNA markers between wild and cultivar rice. 249 SSR (simple sequences repeat; rice microsatellite) had been selected, but only 100 (40%) and 67 (27%) of markers could amplify in O. officinalis and O. aus-traliensis successfully. Due to all SSR markers are developed based on sequence of O. sativa, the sequence variation between difference genomes, the regions for primers may lose in the others genome. Few SSR markers can be transferred into others ge-nome. To more effencially acquire the polymorphic markers; we compare the sequence of wild and cultivar rice by bioinformatics software, search for indel regions. Finally 123 markers had been developed. 109 (89%) and103 (84%) markers can amplify in two wild species successfully, and 79 (72%) and 82 (68%) of markers can present polymorphic between O. officinalis . TCS 10 and O. officinalis vs. TNG 67; 64 (62%) and 65 (63%) of markers can present polymorphic between O. australiensis vs. TCS 10 and O. australiensis vs. TNG 67. This is an efficient way to receive polymorphic markers for linkage analysis, develop such as CSSLs for research and breeding program, to improve the use efficiency of wild material. From the result of genotying BC1F1 and BC2F1 populations, derived from O. of-ficinalis × TNG 67, the ratios of heterozygous change from 86.7% in the (BC1F1) to 18.1% (BC2F1), the chromosome segment of wild rice be eliminated from progenies, rapidly. So it is almost impossible to develop a complete CSSLs population, which carried the chromosome segment from different genome of wild species into O. sativa background. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:44:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96621125-1.pdf: 2934457 bytes, checksum: 882375b3bdc391f86c65f40d47399637 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 內容目錄
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………I 英文摘要.…………………………………………………………………………….IV 內容目錄………………………………………………………………………...…VIII 表目錄………………………………………………………………………………..IX 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………..X 壹、 Hd1、Hd6 與Ehd1 基因對水稻抽穗期之影響 ............................................... 1 一、 前言 ................................................................................................................... 1 二、 前人研究 ........................................................................................................... 4 1. 水稻抽穗期之研究.................................................................................................. 4 2. 光週期對水稻抽穗期之影響.................................................................................. 5 3. 調控水稻抽穗期之基因.......................................................................................... 6 4. 分子標誌輔助選種 ( Marker-Assisted Selection, MAS) .................................... 11 三、 材料與方法 ..................................................................................................... 15 1. 試驗族群................................................................................................................ 15 2. 抽穗期之調查........................................................................................................ 19 3. 樣本DNA 之萃取 ............................................................................................... 19 4. 功能性分子標誌之分析........................................................................................ 19 5. 統計分析................................................................................................................ 22 四、 結果..................................................................................................................... 23 1. 試驗環境與抽穗期................................................................................................ 23 2. 試驗族群與族群間抽穗期變異............................................................................ 27 3. 抽穗期基因對抽穗期之影響................................................................................ 27 4. 個別抽穗期基因對抽穗期之影響........................................................................ 33 5. 抽穗期基因間之交感作用分析............................................................................ 36 五、 討論..................................................................................................................... 38 1. 試驗族群之遺傳背景............................................................................................ 38 2. 發芽時期對抽穗天數之影響................................................................................ 38 3. Hd1、Hd6 和Ehd1 三個不同抽穗期基因對抽穗期之影響................................. 39 4. 基因間之交感作用................................................................................................ 41 5. 基因型與抽穗期之關聯........................................................................................ 42 6. 未來展望................................................................................................................ 43 貳、野生稻 DNA 分子標幟之開發.......................................................................... 45 六、 前言..................................................................................................................... 45 七、 前人研究.......................................................................................................... 48 1. 水稻之馴化與育種............................................................................................... 48 2. 野生種原之研究與育種之應用............................................................................ 49 3. 染色體片段置換系 (Chromosome Segment Substitution Lines, CSSLs) .......... 50 4. OMAP (Oryza Map) 與International Oryza Map (I - OMAP) ............................. 52 八、 材料與方法......................................................................................................... 54 1. 試驗族群............................................................................................................... 54 2. 樣本DNA 之萃取 ............................................................................................... 56 3. 多型性分子標幟篩選........................................................................................... 56 4. 野生稻之indel 分子標幟之設計與篩選.............................................................. 57 九、 結果..................................................................................................................... 59 1. O.sativa 之SSR 分子標幟之多型性分析 .......................................................... 59 2. 其他O. sativa 分子標幟-栽培種水稻之indel 與Sequence Tagged Site (STS) 分子標幟之篩選......................................................................................................... 59 3. 野生稻indel 分子標幟之篩選.............................................................................. 62 4. 野生稻與栽培稻種間多型性分子標幟於水稻染色體之分布............................ 65 5. 衍生自O. officinalis × TNG 67 二回交世代之染色體結構 .............................. 67 十、 討論..................................................................................................................... 74 1. 分子標幟於種間之轉移性.................................................................................... 74 2. 分子標幟於種間之多型性.................................................................................... 76 3. 野生稻染色體於回交世代之置換情形................................................................ 77 4. 未來展望................................................................................................................ 78 十一、 參考文獻......................................................................................................... 80 十二、 附錄................................................................................................................. 93 附圖一、阿拉伯芥與水稻之抽穗期調控途徑,截取自 (Greenup et al., 2009)。 ..................................................................................................................................... 93 附圖二、不同抽穗期基因於水稻12 條染色體之分布,截取自 (Yano et al., 2001)。 ..................................................................................................................................... 94 附圖三、水稻抽穗期之調控途徑,截取自 (Tsuji et al., 2008)。.............................. 95 附圖四、不同抽穗期基因及基因型之組合於不同環境之適應性,截取自 (Wei et al., 2010)。................................................................................................................... 96 表目錄 表一、不同試驗族群遇不同發芽批次之株數Number of individuals of different germination times and populations .......................................................................... 17 表二、不同發芽批次對抽穗期之影響Varation of heading time between different germantions times .................................................................................................... 25 表三、不同基因型組合於各族群之平均抽穗期Averages heading date of different genotype combinations from each population.. ....................................................... 29 表四、抽穗期基因之效應Effect caused by three different heading day genes. ... 31 表五、不同基因型於各族群之延遲天數Delay days of different genotypes in each population ................................................................................................................ 35 表六、各族群中不同基因之間交感作用Interaction of different genes in populations ............................................................................................................... 37 表七、各組合於各回交世代之數量Backcross numbers in different populations and generations ........................................................................................................ 55 表八、多型性分子標幟篩選結果之摘錄The summary of surveyin polymorphic markers ..................................................................................................................... 61 表九、依CC 或EE 基因體野生稻種序列設計之indel 分子標幟之轉移率 Transferbility of indel markers designed from CC or EE wide rice genome sequences ................................................................................................................. 66 圖目錄 圖一、7 月至11 月嘉義地區之氣象資料Daily environmental condidations of Chia yi, from Jul to Nov 2009 .......................................................................................... 18 圖二、A4、A23 與A27 三個族群之抽穗期分布The distribution of heading date of three populations ...................................................................................................... 26 圖三、三個抽穗期基因之不同基因型與試驗族群的抽穗期, The relationship between heading date and the heading date genotypes in the experimental populations ............................................................................................................... 32 圖四、可轉移至O. officinalis 或 O. ausrealiensis 之分子標幟於O. sativa 染色 體之分布, The distribution of 118 DNA markers on O. sativa which can be transferred on to O. officinalis and O. ausrealiensis chromosomes ........................ 63 圖五、可於O. officinalis 與O. sativa 間呈現多型性之分子標幟於O. sativa 染色 體之分布, Distributions of the DNA markers that show polymorphism between O. officinalis and O. sativa ........................................................................................... 68 圖六、可於O. ausrealiensis 與O. sativa 間呈現多型性之分子標幟於O. sativa 染色體之分布, The distribution of the DNA markers on the O. sativa genome that is polymorphic between O. ausrealiensis and O. sativa .......................................... 70 圖七、O. officinalis × TNG 67 之BC1F1 世代之基因型分析結果The analysis results of polymorphic molecular markers on the BC1F1 generation derived from O. officinalis × TNG 67 .............................................................................................. 72 圖八、O. officinalis × TNG 67 之BC2F1 世代之基因型分析結果The analysis results of polymorphic molecular markers on the BC2F1 generation derived from O. officinalis × TNG 67 .............................................................................................. 73 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | Hd1、Hd6與Ehd1基因對水稻抽穗期之影響暨野生稻DNA分子標幟之開發 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effects of Hd1, Hd6 and Ehd1, on Rice Heading Date and the Development of DNA Markers of Wild Rice | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林順福,侯藹玲,羅正宗 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 越光,台農67號,抽穗期,分子輔助選種,染色體片段置換系,野生稻,分子標幟, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Koshihikari,TNG 67,Heading date,Marker Assisted Selection,CSSLs,wild rice,molecular marker, | en |
dc.relation.page | 96 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農藝學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.87 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。