請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46891
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 藍佩嘉(Pei-Chia Lan) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Fan Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳伊凡 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:42:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Favell, Adrian, Miriam Feldblum and Michael P. Smith, 2006, “The Human Face of Global Mobility: A Research Agenda.” Pp1-25 in The Human Face of Global Mobility. International Highly Skilled Migration in Europe, North America and the Asia-Pacific, edited by Michael P. Smith and Adrian Favell. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Findlay, Allan et al., 2008, “Ever Reluctant Europeans: the Changing Geographies of UK Students Studying and Working Abroad.” European Urban and Regional Studies 13(4):291-318. Gibson-Graham, J.K. et al., 2000, “Introduction: Class in a Poststructuralist Frame.” Pp1-22 in Class and Its Others, edited by Gibson-Graham, J.K., Resnick, Stephen A., Wolff, Richard D. University of Minnesota Press. Hsing, You-tien. ,2003, “Ethnic Identity and Business Solidarity: Chinese Capitalism Revisited.” Pp 221-235 in The Chinese Diaspora: Space, Place, Mobility, and Identity, edited by Ma, J.C. Laurence and Cartier, Carolyn. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Huang, Shirlena and Brenda S.A. Yeoh, 2005, “Transnational Families and Their Children's Education: China's ‘Study Mothers’ in Singapore.” Global Networks 5(4):379-400. Iredale, Robyn, 2001, “The Migration of Professionals: Theory and Typologies.” International Migration 39(5): 7-24. King, Russell, 2002, “Towards a New Map of European Migration.” International Journal of Population Geography 8:89-106. King, Russell and Enric Ruiz-Gelices, 2003, “International Student Migration and the European ‘Year Abroad’: Effects on European Identity and Subsequent Migration Behaviour.” International Journal of Population Geography 9:229-252. Lan, Pei-Chia.,2006, Global Cinderellas: Migrant Domestics and Newly Rich Employers in Taiwan. Durham and London: Duke University Press. Lavanex, Sandra., 2006, “ The Competition State and Multilateral Liberalization of Highly Skilled Migration.” Pp 29-209 in The Human Face of Global Mobility. International Highly Skilled Migration in Europe, North America and the Asia-Pacific, edited by Michael P. Smith and Adrian Favell. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Nonini, Donald M., 1997, “Shifting Identities, Positioned Imaginaries: Transnational Traversals and Reversals by Malaysian Chinese.” Pp 203-227 in Ungrounded Empires: The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism, edited by Aihwa Ong and Donald Nonini. New York: Routeledge. Ong, Aihwa, 1999, Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logic of Transnationality. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Szelényi, Katalin, 2006, “Students without Borders? Migratory Decision-Making among International Graduate Students in the U.S.” Pp 181-209 in The Human Face of Global Mobility. International Highly Skilled Migration in Europe, North America and the Asia-Pacific, edited by Michael P. Smith and Adrian Favell. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Tsuda, Takeyuki,2007, “When Minorities Migrate: The Racialization of the Japanese Brazilians in Brazil and Japan.” Pp. 225-252. in Asian Diaspora, edited by Rhacel Parrenas and Lok Siu. Wang, Horng-Luen., 2009, “How are Taiwanese Shanghaied.” Positions 17(2): 321-346. Waters, Johanna L., 2006, “Geographies of Cultural Capital: Education, International Migration and Family Strategies between Hong Kong and Canada.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31:178-192. ______, 2005, “Transnational Family Strategies and Education in the Contemporary Chinese Diaspora.” Global Networks 5(4):359-377. Yeoh, S.A Brenda and Willis, Katie., 2005, “Singaporean and British Transmigrants in China and the Cultural Politics of ‘Contact Zones’.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31(2):269-285. Zhou, Min, 1998, “‘Parachute Kids’ in Southern California: The Educational Experience of Chinese Children in Transnational Families,” Educational Policy 12 (6): 682-704. Ziguras, Christopher and Siew-Fang Law, 2006, “Recruiting International Students as Skilled Migrants: the Global ‘Skills Race’ as Viewed from Australia and Malaysia.” Globalisation, Societies and Education 4(1):59-76. 王世英等,2006,《招收海外僑生來台升讀大學之研究》。國立教育資料館。 李永賢,2008,〈台灣採認大陸學歷的政策歷程〉。中國《國家教育行政學院學報》2:62-66。 李盈慧,1997,〈1949年以來中華民國的華僑教育政策〉。《暨大學報》1(1):165-194。 李靜兒,2004,《近代半世紀的「華僑」教育(1950-2000)》。私立東海大學歷史學系。碩士論文。 林平,2010,《中國高校的台灣學生:廣州、上海與北京比較初探》。台灣新社會智庫。 范雅梅,2005,《論1949年以後國民黨政權的僑務政策:從流亡政權、在地知識與國際脈絡談起》。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所。碩士論文。 夏誠華,2003,〈擴大招收僑生來台升學芻議〉,《僑民教育學術研討會會議實錄》第四期,頁189-209。 郁漢良,2001,《華僑教育發展史(上)》。國立編譯館主編出版。 洪淑倫,2008,《 馬來西亞留台僑生之教育歷程與「僑生」身分對其在台生命經驗之影響》。國立政治大學社會學研究所。碩士論文。 孫岩,2008,〈關於兩岸高等教育交流的狀況及前景〉。論文發表於「新形勢下的兩岸關係學術研討會」,台北:致理技術學院,民國97年10月23至24日。 陳慧嬌,2005,《偶然身為僑生:戰後不同世代華裔馬來西亞人來台求學的身份認同》。國立政治大學新聞學研究所。碩士論文。 曾嬿芬、吳介民,2010,〈重新思考公民身分的政治面向:移居中國之台灣人公民身分政策為例〉。《政治與社會哲學評論》32:93-143。 僑務委員會編印,1982,《僑生回國升學教育之研究》。 鄭彥棻,1959,〈我們對華僑教育的信念〉。華僑教育導論。海外出版社。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46891 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究試圖了解兩群在廣義上可被歸類於「僑生」的相似學生遷移,也就是前往中國就讀高等教育的台灣學生(旅中台生),以及來台灣求取高等教育,長期被理解為僑生的馬來西亞華人學生(旅台馬生),其各自遷移的動機與軌跡為何,又各自鑲嵌在怎樣的制度空間與政策環境之中。
這兩個學生遷移的比較案例,都是由移入國基於特殊國族定位而開展的的學生遷移;中國與台灣皆為了在實質統治疆域外,維持或創造與其國族想像中的廣義「華僑」之間的國族關係,因而為兩群學生建立了特殊優惠的入學管道。我比較了這兩個可被放進相似範疇的「僑生遷移」,探討這兩個案例背後中、台兩地不同的國族想像及變化,並比較兩地對「華僑」概念的不同指涉。經由兩相對照的比較研究,我得以更清楚恰當地分析其各自的政策邏輯以及遷移現象。 關照學生遷移現象的文獻,多從國際不平等、區域整合、高等教育國際化等角度,把跨國教育遷移理解為一種培育全球性人力資本的經驗,有助於遷移的個人在未來進行跨國界的專業遷移或地位流動。我認為,旅中台生與旅台馬生的案例,共同構成了學生遷移的特殊案例。首先,中國以及台灣政府,分別提供兩群學生特殊化的入學管道,但這些學生的移出國(台灣與馬來西亞)有很長的時間不承認兩國學歷。這些框架體現在學生遷移背後,跨國之間可能的族群政治緊張的特殊關係、經濟競逐,以及疆域化的治理邏輯。其次,他們的留學目的地不同於傳統的歐美日核心國,中國與台灣的高等教育並沒有取得類似的知識或文化霸權地位,在兩群學生返回原居地無法得到學歷正式認可的狀況下,他們所欲累積的文化資本或是社會資本,涉及不同的內容組成與轉換邏輯。 本研究透過對旅中台生、旅台馬生的深度訪談,了解相關制度與文獻的收集,結合制度環境與主體經驗的層次,來考察這兩個追求高等教育的遷移現象。在遷移的鉅觀脈絡上,台灣與中國政府如何開放並鼓勵招收這兩群學生?這些制度框架經歷了怎樣的轉變歷程?旅中台生與旅台馬生可利用怎樣的入學管道,接受的待遇為何?如何有別於其他移入國的入學者?在遷移的微觀成因上,他們基於怎樣的因素前往台灣與中國求學?他們意圖藉由遷移進行怎樣的資本積累以及轉換?遷移決定主要是基於個人或是家庭的考量?遷移動機又因學科專業的不同呈現怎樣的差異?最後,在遷移的後果方面,他們特殊化的遷移經驗會帶來在勞動市場上,以及微觀認同政治上產生什麼後果? | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis paper compares two interesting cases of student migrants, who are both treated by their receiving countries as “compatriots returning to homeland”. They are: Taiwanese students who acquire higher education in China, and, Malaysian Chinese students who follow the long-lasting tradition to study in universities in Taiwan. For ages, “Studying abroad”, referring to migration to acquire higher education in foreign countries, is a common approach to cultivating human capital and achieving social mobility. In these two circulations of student migration, what they experience cannot be simply counted as the typical pattern of educational migration. Rather, their migrating stories has unveil an underdeveloped category of “compatriot student migrations”, whose favored positions and recruiting channels are provided under the similar yet distinct cross-border relations between compatriot/ huaqiao and homeland/nation.
Most literature on student migration utilizes the theoretical lens of deterritorialization to portray the internationalization of higher education. Educational migration, as an investment in human capital, assists individuals in achieving future professional migration and social mobility in the context global capitalism. Here I argue that the migration of Taiwanese students in China, as well as Malaysian Chinese students in Taiwan, constitute together the deviant case of student migration in the following two senses. Firstly, the government of China recruits Taiwanese students via special venues, and the government of Taiwan refuses to recognize degrees issued by China; likewise, the Malaysian Chinese students have long been offered with also a special channel to study in Taiwan, despite the fact that their degrees issued by Taiwan would not be recognized by the Malaysian government. These institutional frameworks embody the territorialized logics of governance and the contested political and economic relations across Taiwan Strait, as well as the international relation of Taiwanese government towards overseas Chinese. Second, in both cases, these students hold motivations distinct from those going to traditional host countries. They chose to study in China/Taiwan not because te receiving country has obtained a globally hegemonic status in the production of knowledge. Their purposes are often beyond the seeking of degrees or knowledge. Also, their practice in accumulating combination of capitals should be further analyzed. Through in-depth interviews and analysis of relevant policy making, this research examines the motivations and trajectories of Taiwanese/Malaysian Chinese students moving to China/Taiwan for higher education, and to identify the embedded institutional and policy contexts. I pose questions regarding the macro context such as: How does the government of China/Taiwan establish special channels to recruit these two flows of students? How did these institutional frameworks change over time in relation to the shifting cross-border dynamics, the changing imagined community of what counts as “nation” within China and Taiwan? At the micro and meso levels, I ask: What motivates Taiwanese/Malaysian students to study in China/Taiwan? What do they wish to earn while studying in these places? What kinds of capital do they wish to cultivate or accumulate? Was the migration decision made individually or as a family strategy? How do their motivations differ across professions and majors? | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:42:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96325005-1.pdf: 2183226 bytes, checksum: 69ce84ce664df64c8fa54038f3086008 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 導言與研究提問 1
第一節 文獻回顧(一)學生遷移:制度、動機與資本積累 4 一、常見的學生遷移軌跡:西方教育與歐盟內部的學生流動 4 二、家庭影響的遷移路徑與代間連動的資本積累 6 第二節 文獻回顧(二)遷移後果:勞動市場、族群界線與認同 7 一、學生遷移的勞動市場後果 7 二、遷移者的認同政治與主體位置 9 第三節 比較個案與研究方法 12 一、比較的意義:建立再疆域化的學生遷移圖像 12 二、個案概述與研究方法 14 三、研究提問與章節安排 18 第二章 招收國的制度比較 20 第一節 中國招收台生的政策回顧 20 一、台生招收概況與政策 20 二、台生入學的制度與管道 27 第二節 從「僑生」到「外籍生」:台灣招收「華僑」學生的政策回顧 33 一、僑生或外籍生:馬籍旅台生的入學管道 33 二、從僑生到外籍生:資格、管道與待遇的政策轉變 38 第三節 台灣與中國:兩種「祖國」的比較 48 一、從僑生、台生政策看兩國的政治需求 48 二、台灣:過去進行式的文化祖國 51 三、中國:未來進行式的領土祖國 53 第三章 跨海求學─遷移動機與不同軌跡的次類型 56 第一節 旅中台生與旅台馬生的動機分析 56 一、旅中台生的動機分析 56 二、旅台馬生的動機分析 63 三、小結:在「同文同種」的制度召喚背後 74 第二節 留還是不留:學生群體的次類型分析 75 一、你是「第幾代」?:在地資本積累、人力資本與台生類群 77 二、「華文」教育還是「多元多語」教育?:教育背景、族群資本與馬生類群 84 三、小結:「向前看」與「回頭看」的不同遷移軌跡 90 第四章 再疆域化的遷移後果:勞動市場的流動與認同 92 第一節 移入國身分管制與勞動市場的流動 93 一、學生身分上的僑胞,就業身分上的外國人 93 二、政治身分上的台胞,就業市場上的外國人 96 三、小結:再疆域化的勞動市場流動後果 99 第二節 互動、位置磋商與認同形構 105 一、互動情境中的成員身分位置比較 106 二、強調差異與淡化差異的主觀畫界方式 114 第五章 結論 131 第一節 「念書念到哪裡去」:學位以外的腳本與生存之道 131 一、旅中台生:「往前看」的路徑積累軌跡 132 二、旅台馬生:「往回看」的路徑依賴軌跡 133 三、學生資本積累方式與遷移路徑的補充 134 第二節 國家再疆域化的制度與非預期後果 136 一、國家「現身」的再疆域化制度 136 二、非預期後果一:勞動市場的再疆域化後果 138 二、非預期後果二:誰我族類的再疆域化認同 139 第三節 研究限制 140 附錄 142 一、旅中台生訪談個案概述 142 二、旅台馬生訪談個案概述 143 參考文獻 144 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 再疆域化的學生遷移:旅中台生與旅台馬生的比較 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Reterritorialized Student Migrations in Comparison: Taiwanese Students in China and Malaysian Chinese Students in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾嬿芬(Yen-Fen Tseng),汪宏倫(Horng-Luen Wang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 學生遷移,再疆域化,華僑,僑生,國族,祖國,畫界工作,兩岸關係, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | student migration,reterritorializatio,overseas compatriot,overseas chinese,huaqiao,overseas compatriot students,overseas students,nation,homeland,boundary work,cross-strait relation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 146 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.13 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。