請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4671
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許銘熙 | |
dc.contributor.author | Tsung-Hsien Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林宗憲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-14T17:45:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-27 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-14T17:45:00Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 高雄市政府洪災淹水勘查圖資,高雄市政府水利局。
2. 災害應變處置報告,颱風事件報告,內政部消防署。 3. 黃成甲,2014,整合建物效應與即時淹水模擬之研究,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程學系研究所博士論文。 4. 林依潔,2012,台北市洪災風險分析,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程學系研究所碩士論文。 5. 張齡心,2013,都市地區洪水減災調式策略評估與研究,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程學系研究所碩士論文。 6. 張倉榮、許銘熙、林國峰、賴進松、潘宗毅,2010,脆弱度及風險地圖分析方法之研究,水利署。 7. 台灣氣候變遷科學報告,2011,行政院國家科學委員會。 8. 鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上),中國統計學報,第27 卷,第6 期,13707-13724。 9. 鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下),中國統計學報,第27 卷,第7 期,13767-13870。 10. 徐村和,1998,模糊德菲層級分析法,模糊系統學刊,第四卷,第一期,59-72。 11. 鄭滄濱,2001,軟體組織提升人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式,國立台灣科技大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 12. 洪雅雯,2004,建立都市災害脆弱度指標之研究,逢甲大學土地管理研究所碩士論文。 13. 鍾佳霖,2006,台灣地區各縣市颱風災害脆弱性評估之研究,朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所碩士論文。 14. 國立台灣大學水工試驗所,2006,子計畫一:淹水災害防護規模設定之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。 80 15. 翁振益等合著,2006,決策分析方法與應用,台北:華泰文化。 16. 江宜錦,2007,天然災害統計指標建構與分析─以台灣各縣市為例,銘傳大學媒體空間設計研究所碩士論文。 17. 吳杰穎、江宜錦,2008,台灣天然災害統計指標體系建構與分析,地理學報,第51期,65-84。 18. 褚志鵬,2009,層級分析法(AHP)理論與實作,國立東華大學企業管理學系教學講義。 19. 陳姿叡,2009,感受性系統模型在台北都會區颱洪災害脆弱度應用之研究,國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。 20. 葉宇光,2009,事件樹於職業安全風險評估應用研究,國立中央大學環境工程研究所碩士論文。 21. 黃昱翔,2009,颱洪災害脆弱度評估指標之建立:以南投水里鄉為例,銘傳大學建築與都市防災研究所碩士論文。 22. 賴可蓁,2010,洪災風險地圖之研析,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程學系研究所碩士論文。吳貽婷,2011,水災風險度分析暨防災地圖研究─以新北市為例,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程學系研究所碩士論文。 23. 吳杰穎、黃昱翔,2009,颱洪災害脆弱度評估指標之建立:以南投水里鄉為例,國科會計畫。 24. 蕭代基、李欣輯、楊惠萱,2010,災害損失與社會脆弱性評估,國家災害防救科技中心,98年度技術報告。 25. 蕭煥章,2008,鄉鎮市區水災脆弱性評估模式之研究,華岡地理學報,第21期,1-18。 26. 邱建勳,2011,建蔽率對都市淹水影響之模擬,國立台灣大學生物環境系統工程研究所碩士論文。 27. Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Kelly, M., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., and Eriksen, S., 2004. New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Norwich, United 81 Kingdom: Tyndall°Center for Climate Change Research. Technical Report 7. 28. Alfieri, L., Pappenberger, F., Wetterhall, F., 2014. The extreme runoff index for flood early warning in Europe. Nat. Hazards Earth Sys. Sci. 14 (6), 1505–1515. 29. Alfieri, L., Thielen, J., 2012. A European precipitation index for extreme rain-storm and flash flood early warning. Meteorolog. Appl.met.1328. 30. Anbalagan, R., and Singh, B., 1996. Landslide hazard and risk assessment mapping of mountainous terrains- a case study from Kumaun Himalaya, India. Engineering Geology 43: 237-246. 31. Apel, H., Aronica, G.T., Kreibich, H. and Thieken, A. H., 2009. Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? Natural Hazards 49: 79-98. 32. Aronica, G.T., Franza, F., Bates, P.D., Neal, J.C., 2012. Probabilistic evaluation of flood hazard in urban areas using Monte Carlo simulation. Hydrol. Process. 26, 3962–3972. 33. Birkmann, T. 2005a. Danger need not spell disaster. But how vulnerable are we Research Brief 1, 8pp. 34. Borden, K. A., Schmidtlein, M. C., Emrich, C. T., Piegorsch, W. W., and Cutter, S. L., 2007. Vulnerability of U.S. Cities to Environmental Hazards. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 4(2): 21. 35. Boruff, B. J., Emrich, C., and Cutter, S. L., 2005. Erosion Hazard Vulnerability of US Coastal Counties. Journal of Coastal Research 21(5): 932-942. 36. Cardona, O. D., Bankoff, G., Frerks, G., and Hilhorst, D., 2003. Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People, Chapter 3: The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. London: Earthscan. 37. Cardona, O., 2003. Indicators for disaster risk management, in: First expert meeting on disaster risk conceptualization and indicator modeling, 37pp. 82 38. Chakravarty, S., Mittra, R., Williams, N.R., 2002. Application of a microgenetic algorithm (MGA) to the design of broad-band microwave absorbers using multiple frequency selective surface screens buried in dielectrics. Trans. Antennas Propag. 50 (3), 284–296. 39. Chen, C.F., Liu, C.M., 2014. The definition of urban stormwater tolerance threshold and its conceptual estimation: an example from Taiwan. Nat. Hazards 73, 173–190. 40. Chen, A. S., Djordjevic, S., Leandro, J., Evans, B., and Savic, D., 2008. Simulation of the building blockage effect in urban flood modelling.11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 41. Chen, A. S., Hsu, M. H., Teng, W, .H., Huang, C. J., Yeh, S. H., and Lien, W.Y., 2006. Establishing the Database of Inundation Potential in Taiwan. Natural Hazards 37(1-2): 107-132. 42. Clark, G. E., Moser, S. C., Ratick, S. J., Dow, K., Meyer, W. B., Emani, S., Jin, W., Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., and Schwarz, H.,E., 1998. Assessing the Vulnerability of Coastal Communities to Extreme Storms: The Case of Reverne, MA., USA. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 3: 59-82. 43. Cutter, S. L., 2007. The Social Vulnerability Index: A County-Level Assessment of Communities and Implications for Preparedness Planning, First Annual DHS University Network Summit on Research and Education. 44. Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., and Scott, M. S. 1997. Handbook for Conducting a GIS-Based Hazards Assessment at the County Level. Hazards Research Lab, Department of Geography, University of South Carolina. 45. Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., and Scott, M. S. 2000. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(4): 713-737. 83 46. Dalkey, N. C., 1969. The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. Rand Corp, Research Paper RM-5888-PR. 47. Dwyer, A., Zoppou, C., Nielsen, O., Day, S., and Roberts, S., 2004. Quantifying Social Vulnerability: A Methodology for Identifying those at Risk to Natural Hazards. Canberra: Geoscience Australia. 48. Fekete, A., 2009. Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9: 393-403. 49. FEMA. 2009. Risk mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk Map) Multi-Year Plan: Fiscal Years 2010-2014. Federal Emergency Management Agency, U.S.A: Fiscal Year 2009 Report to Congress. Homeland Security. 50. Garey, P.R., Zachary, F., and Landsdowne, 1999. Risk Matrix: An Approach for Identifying, Assessing, and Ranking Program Risk. Air Force Journal & Logistics, 18-23. 51. Hsu, M. H., Chen, S. H., and Chang, T. J. 2000. Inundation Simulation for Urban Drainage Basin with Storm Sewer System. Journal of Hydrology 234 (1-2): 21-37. 52. IoMosaic Corporation, “Desi nin an Effective Risk Matrix” 53. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, T., Tamizawa, G., Totsuta, R. and Mieno, H., 1993. The Max-Min Delphi Method and Fuzzy Delphi Method Via Fuzzy Integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 55: 241-253. 54. Merz, B., and Thieken, A. H., 2004. Flood risk analysis: concepts and challenges. Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft. 56(3–4):27–34. 55. Messner, F. and Meyer, V., 2005. Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception-challenges for flood damage research. Netherlands: Springer. 56. Müller, A., Reiter, J., and Weiland, U. 2011. Assessment of urban vulnerability towards floods using an indicator-based approach - a case study for Santiago de 84 Chile. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 11:2107-2123. 57. Murray, T.J., Pipino, L.L., and Gigch, J.P. van, 1985. A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi. Human Systems Management 5: 76-80. 58. Pearce, L., 2000. An Integrated Approach for Community Hazard, Impact, Risk and Vulnerability Analysis: HIRV. The University of British Columbia. 59. Rygel, L., O’Sullivan, D. and Yarnal, B, 2006. A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11(3): 741-764. 60. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York. 61. Schneiderbauer, S., 2007. Risk and vulnerability to natural disasters – from broad view to focused perspective. Theoretical background and applied methods for the identification of the most endangered populations in two case studies at different scales. Phd, Freie Universität Berlin. 62. Schaefer, J.T., 1990. The critical success index as an indicator of warning skill. Weather Forecast. 5, 570–575. 63. Sene, K., 2013. Flash Floods: Forecasting and Warning. Springer. 64. Shaw, D., Huang, H. H., Ho, M. C., and Lin, S., 2005. Modeling Flood Loss and Risk Perception. -- The Case of Typhoon Nari in Taipei. Fifth Annual IIASA-DPRI Forum Integrated Disaster Risk Management: Innovations in Science and Policy. 65. Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., and Foufoula-Georgiou, E., 1993. Frequency analysis of extreme events. Maidment, D. R., New York: Handbook of Hydrology, McGraw-Hill. 66. Steinführer Annett, Tunstall, S., Tapsell S., and Fernandez-Bilbao, A., 2007. Vulnerability and Flooding: A Re-analysis of FHRC Data. UK: European Community, Integrated Flood Risk Analysis and Management Methodologies. 85 67. Turner II, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., and Schiller, A., 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America) 100(14): 8074-8079. 68. Tsun-Hua Yang., Sheng-Chi Yang., Jui-Yi Ho., Gwo-Fong Lin., Gong-Do Hwang a, Cheng-Shang Lee.,Flash flood warnings using the ensemble precipitation forecastingtechnique: A case study on forecasting floods in Taiwan caused by typhoons,Journal of Hydrology,(520) 2015 : 367-378. 69. Velasquez, G. and Tanhueco, R., 2005. Know Risk. United Nations ‘World Conference on Disaster Reduction’, Chapter: Incorporatin social issues in disaster risk assessment. 70. Werritty, A., Houston, D., Ball, T., Tavendale, A. and Black, A., 2007. Exploring the Social Impacts of Flood Risk and Flooding in Scotland. Scotland: Scottish Executive. 71. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., and Davis, I., 2004. At Risk. Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters, 2nd ed. Routledge, London, New York, 496 pp. 72. Wu, D. L., and Fan, R. S., 2009. The report of statistical applications analysis: The vicissitudes of Taipei City population. Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Taipei City Government. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4671 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣位於西太平洋地區,每年夏秋之際,常受太平洋低壓帶影響所生成的颱風影響,帶給台灣豐沛之雨量,而近年來的極端氣候造成颱風生成進而侵台的事件逐年增加,導致台灣各地淹水事件頻傳,也影響人民生命財物的損失。
隨著近年工商業發展蓬勃,人民的生活品質也逐漸提升,對於生命財產的重視也不例外,災害對於人民生命財產的衝擊更是最嚴重的一部份,而對於災害發生的影響與評估,除了靠主動的工程方式、平時的防災演習、救災人員的機動訓練來降低災害的發生外,災害發生前的防災預警與風險分析更是重要的一環。 本研究係針對高雄市研究區域內之社會發展相關統計透過分析與因子轉化成脆弱度指標。並利用六種不同重現期距(5年、10年、25年、50年、100年及200年)與近年造成高雄嚴重淹水之四場颱風事件(潭美颱風、海棠颱風、莫拉克颱風、凡那比颱風)之淹水模擬結果,進行淹水危險度指標計算。最後再利用脆弱度與危險度兩項指標,分析研究區各村里於事件中之風險指標,進而有利政府了解於各事件中哪些地區是處於高風險之狀態,應該加強防災或籌設更多的資源來預防災害。 最後利用風險指標加入預兆得分之判斷決定是否做災害預警之考量,即災害事件發生當下判斷各地區是否該發報預警,進而更有效率分配人力資源救災與物資,達到保護人民生命財產之功效。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Taiwan is on the typhoon path of the west Pacific Ocean Region. During summer and autumn season, typhoons always bring heavy rainfall. Extreme weather in recent years often causes severe flooding and result in serious losses of life and property.
With the rapid industrial and commercial development in recent years, people care about not only the quality of life, but also the safety of life and property. So theimpact of life and property due to disaster is the most serious problem concerned by the residents. For the mitigation of the disaster impact, in addition to works by proactive way, including the disaster prevention and safety drills, mobile training relief workers to reduce the occurrence of disasters, and flood warning system, the flood hazard and risk analysis play an important role for the disaster prevention. In this study, the vulnerability of Kaohsiung city was evaluated by statistics of social development factor. The hazard factors of Kaohsiung city was calculated by simulated flood depth of six different return periods(5 years, 10 years, 25 years, 50 years, 100 years and 200 years) and four typhoon events(Tarmi, Haitang, Morakot and fanapi typhoon) which result in serious flooding in Kaohsiung city. The flood risk can be obtained by combining the flood hazard and social vulnerability. The analysis results provide authority to strengthen disaster preparedness and to set up more resources in high risk areas. The threat score of flood risk can improve the accuracy in flood warning, hence resources and relief supplies can be efficient allocated to protect lives and property during the disaster occurs. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-14T17:45:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02622008-1.pdf: 16745854 bytes, checksum: 9f814f3329de9b3ce4f2d1527fda407c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要..........................I
Abstract....................II 目錄........................III 表目錄........................V 圖目錄......................VII 第一章 緒論...................1 1.1研究背景與動機..............1 1.2文獻回顧...................2 1.3研究架構與流程..............4 第二章 研究方法與分析...........6 2.1 社會脆弱度因子.............6 2.1.1脆弱度地圖...............10 2.2 危險度地圖................12 2.2.1危險度計算...............12 2.3 風險度地圖................14 2.4 預兆得分..................15 第三章 研究區域................16 3.1區域概述...................16 3.2雨量資料...................20 3.2.1 重現期距................21 3.2.2 颱風事件................23 第四章 模擬結果與討論..........26 4.1 社會脆弱度分析結果.........26 4.2 淹水危險度分析結果.........28 4.2.1 重現期距................28 4.2.2 颱風事件................42 4.3 風險地圖分析結果...........51 4.4 預兆得分分析結果...........63 4.4.1危險度預兆得分............63 4.4.2風險度預兆得分............70 第五章 結論與建議..............77 5.1 結論......................77 5.2 建議......................78 參考文獻.......................79 附錄一 模糊德爾菲與層級分析法....86 1模糊德爾菲法..................86 2層級分析法....................89 附錄二 二維淹水模式分析方法......95 1都市淹水模式..................95 1.1基本方程式..................95 1.2數值方法....................98 2地表曼寧糙度修正..............102 3初始及邊界條件................103 附錄三 脆弱度計算表格...........105 附錄四 颱風事件資料表 ..........126 附錄五 颱風事件淹水資料.........140 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 高雄市洪水危險度與風險分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Flood Hazard and Risk Analysis for Kaohsiung City | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張倉榮,葉克家,柳文成 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 脆弱度,防災預警,風險分析,預兆得分, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Vulnerability,Disaster control,Risk analysis,Threat score, | en |
dc.relation.page | 142 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-22 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物環境系統工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf | 16.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。