請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46688完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林晏州 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shao-Wen Tou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 竇劭文 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:23:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2012-12-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 危芷芬譯，Mcandrew. F. T.著，（1995），環境心理學，臺北：五南出版社。
2. 李佩衿、游萬來，（2003），尋路地圖表現形式的使用性研究，碩士論文，國立雲林科技大學工業設計系，雲林。 3. 林靜怡，（2003），中學生空間認知能力之研究－以認知圖路網結構分析，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學地理環境資源研究所，臺北。 4. 張天鳳，（2006），3D虛擬環境中地標輔助與尋路策略傾向對空間知識之影響，碩士論文，交通大學傳播研究所，新竹。 5. 張錦桐，（2008），以步行者觀點探討西門圓環周邊開放空間之研究，碩士論文，國立台北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所，台北。 6. 陳文祥，（1990），台南都市意象之研究，碩士論文，國立成功大學建築研究所，臺南。 7. 陳正德，（2004），空間結構與行人移動之模擬-以西門徒步區為例，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所，台北。 8. 陳敦基，（1993），都市行人系統規劃與設計方法之探討，運輸計畫季刊，21，55-68。 9. 曾馨慧，（2009），居民對於臺北市之都市意象：不同交通運具使用族群之比較研究，碩士論文，銘傳大學觀光研究所，臺北。 10. 黃幹忠、葉光毅，（2008），行人於台中市一中商圈之路徑選擇行為模式探討，都市與計劃，35(1)，79-98。 11. 趙晉緯，（2003），人行空間評估綜合指標建立之研究，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學土木工學研究所，臺北。 12. 蔣曉梅，（2001），都市意象之研究－以台南市為例，博士論文，國立成功大學建築研究所，臺南。 13. 黎韋利，（1999），人行道服務水準評估之研究，碩士論文，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所，新竹。 14. 聶筱秋、胡中凡、唐筱雯、葉冠伶譯，Bell,. P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A.著，（2003），環境心理學，臺北：桂冠心理叢書。 15. Allen, G. L. (1999). Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding: Bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 16. Andrew, W. E., & Andrew, W. Y. (1995). Human cognition neuropsychology: A textbook with readings. UK：Psychology press. 17. Ankomah, P. K., & Crompton, J. L. (1992). Tourism cognitive distance：A set of research propositions. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(2), 323-342. 18. Appleyard, (1970). Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and Behavior, 2(1), 100-117. 19. Appleyard, D. (1976). Planning a pluralist city: Conflicting realities in Ciudad Guayana. Cambridge：M.I.T. Press. 20. Aragones, J. I. & Arredondo, J. M. (1985). Structure of urban cognitive maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(2), 197-212. 21. Arrowsmith, C., Zanon, D., & Chhetri, P. (2005). Monitoring visitor patterns of use in natural tourist destinations. Elsevier: The Netherlands. 22. Beck, R. J. & Wood, D. (1976). Cognitive transformation of information from urban geographic fields to mental maps. Environment and Behavior, 8(2), 199-238. 23. Bovy, P. H. L., & Stern, E. (1990). Route choice: Wayfinging in transport networks. Netherlands：TU Delft digital repository. 24. Chang, D. (2002). Spatial choice and preference in multilevel movement network. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 582-615. 25. Chen, J. L., & Stanney, K. M. (1999). A theoretical model of wayfinding in virtual environments: Proposed strategies for navigational aiding. Cambridge：M.I.T. Press. 26. Cubukc. E., & Nasar, J. L. (2005). Influence of physical characteristics of routes on distance cognition in virtual environments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(5), 777-785. 27. Darken, R. P., & Sibert, J. L. (1996). Wayfinding strategies and behaviors in large virtual worlds. New York：A.C.M. 28. Downs, R. M. & Stea, D. (1970). Image & environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. New Jersey：Transaction Publishers. 29. Downs, R. M. (1976). Cognitive mapping and information processing：A commentary. In: G.T. Moore and R.G Golledge(Eds), Environmental knowing, dowden, hutchinson and ross, Hillsdale. NJ, 67-70. 30. Elvins, T. T. (1997). Visfiles virtually lost in virtual worlds and wayfinding without a cognitive map. New York：A.C.M. 31. Fruin, J. (1987). Pedestrian planning and design. New York：Elevator World Inc. 32. Gale, N., Golledge, R. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Doherty, S. (1990). The acquisition and integration of route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10(1), 3-25. 33. Gärling, T. (1989). The role of cognitive maps in spatial decisions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(4), 269–278. 34. Gärling, T., & Golledge, R.G. (1989). Environmental perception and cognition. In E. H. Zube &G. T. Moore (Eds), Advances in environment, behavior, and design, (pp. 203-236). New York: Plenum. 35. Gärling, T., Böök, A., & Lindberg, E. (1984). Cognitive mapping of large-scale environments. Environment and Behavior, 16(1), 3–34. 36. Ghazzeh, T. M. A. (1999). Communicating behavioral research to campus design: Factors affecting the perception and use of outdoor spaces at the University of Jordan. Environment and Behavior, 31(6),764-804. 37. Gould, P., & White, R. (1986). Mental maps. London：Penguin Books. 38. Hill, M. R. (1982). Walking, crossing streets, and choosing pedestrian routes: A survey of recent insights from the social behavioral sciences. University of Nebraska studies, 66. 39. Hillier, B., Pennh, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement or configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B, 20(1), 29-66. 40. Holahan, C. J. (1982). Environmental psychology. New York: Random House. 41. Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Bovy, P. H. L. (2004). Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory. Transportation Research Part B, 38(2), 169-190. 42. Hoogendoorn, S. P., & Bovy, P. H. L. (2004). Pedestrian route-choice and activity scheduling theory and models. Transportation Research Part B, 38(2), 169-190. 43. Jacobs, A. (1993). Great streets. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press. 44. Kitchin, R. M. (1994). Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(1), 1-19. 45. Kitchin, R. M. (1996). Methodological convergence in cognitive mapping research: Investigating configurational knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 163-185. 46. Kosslyn, S. M., Reiser, B. J., Farah, M. J., & Fliegel, S. L. (1983). Generating visual images: Units and relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(2), 278-303. 47. Kuipers, B., Tecuci, D. G., & Stankiewicz, B. J. (2003). The skeleton in the cognitive map：A computational and empirical exploration. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 81-106. 48. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press. 49. Marchand, B. (1974). Pedestrian traffic planning and the perception of the urban environment: A French example. Environment and Planning A, 6(5), 491-507. 50. Matthews, M. H. (1984). Environmental cognition of youth children: Images of journey to school and home area. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 9(1), 89-105. 51. Montello, D. R. (1991). The measurement of cognitive distance: Methods and construct validity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(2), 101-122. 52. Moore, M. G. & Golledge, R. G. (1976). Contemporary issues in American distance education. New York：Pergamon Press. 53. O'Neill, R. V., Turner, M. G., & Gardner, R. H. (1991). Landscape ecology in theory and practice : Pattern and process. New York : Springer. 54. Pazzaglia, F., & Beni, R. D. (2001). Strategies of processing spatial information in survey and landmark-centred individuals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13 (4), 493–508. 55. Peponis, J., Zimring, C. & Choi, Y.K. (1990). Finding the building in wayfinding, Environment and Behavior, 22(5), 555-590. 56. Roger, D & Stea, D. (1973). Image and the environment. Chicago: Aldine. 57. Roger, D & Stea, D. (1977). Maps in minds. New York: Harper and Row. 58. Salthouse, T. A. & Siedlecki, K. L. (2007). Efficiency of route selection as a function of adult age. Brain and Cognition, 63(3), 279–286. 59. Seibert, P. S., & Anooshian. L. J. (1993). Indirect expression of preference in sketch maps. Environment and Behavior, 25(4), 607-624. 60. Seneviratne, P. N., & Morrall, J. F. (1985). Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians. Transportation Planning and Technology, 10, 147-159. 61. Smith, C. D. (1984). The relationship between the pleasingness of landmarks and the judgement of distance in cognitive maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 229-234. 62. Thorndyke, P. W. (1981). Distance estimation from cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 526-550. 63. Timpf, S., & Rüetschi, U. J. (2004). Modeling wayfinding in public transport: Network space and scene space. Berlin：Springer. 64. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55(4), 189-208. 65. Venemans, P. J., Daru, R., & Wagenberg, A. F. (1993). Buildings and wayfinding: A framework for guidelines. In: R. M. Feldman, G. Hardie and D. G. Saile (Eds.), Proceedings of 24th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA24), Chicago: 233-240. 66. Voicu, H. (2003). Hierarchical cognitive maps. Neural Networks, 16(5), 569-576. 67. Zacharias, J. (2001). Pedestrian behavior pedestrian behavior and perception in urban walking environments. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(1), 3-18. 68. Zube, E. H., Sell, J.L., & Taylor, G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9(1), 1-33. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46688 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究之目的在於釐清都市行人空間認知程度、空間移動策略與步行路徑選擇因素等研究變項間之關係，並進一步探討個人特性對於空間認知程度及空間移動策略傾向之影響。研究方法採用現地問卷調查，主要研究內容包括受訪者空間移動策略分析、空間認知程度分析、移動距離與起迄點間實際最短距離差值分析及影響步行路徑選擇因素分析。在空間移動策略分析部份，研究結果顯示性別及主要使用交通工具不同之受訪者，其空間移動策略具有顯著差異，其中女性及以搭乘大眾運輸系統為主要通勤工具之受訪者傾向以地標型空間移動策略為主，而男性及使用私人運具之受訪者則以路徑型空間移動策略傾向比例較高。受訪者空間認知程度分析方面，研究結果顯示男性、以使用私人運具為主要通勤工具、年齡較長、到訪基地頻率較高及路徑型空間移動策略傾向之受訪者對空間認知程度明顯較高。而受訪者移動距離與起迄點間實際最短距離差值分析部份，研究結果顯示當受訪者空間認知程度越高時，移動距離與實際最短距離之差值越小，其中又以地標元素對受訪者選擇最短距離路徑之影響最為重要，路徑型移動策略受訪者則在地標元素與通道元素變項上皆達顯著水準。整體而言，在影響步行路徑選擇因素分析方面，研究結果顯示受訪者對於選擇距離較短或較熟悉路線等「個人空間認知」因素之重視程度最高，「視覺吸引力」因素則重視程度最低。其中地標型移動策略受訪者對於「道路結構與環境資訊」因素之重視程度顯著較路徑型及方位型受訪者高，亦即地標型移動策略受訪者在步行路徑之選擇上較路徑型及方位型受訪者更重視沿途是否提供有足夠的空間知識或交通導引資訊以利方向尋找及定位。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The purposes of this study were to investigate the relationships among the degree of spatial cognition, moving strategy tendency and route choice behavior of pedestrians. Furthermore, to explore whether the different personal characteristics of respondents will influence their degree of spatial cognition and moving strategy tendency. The analysis of the degree of spatial cognition, moving strategy tendency, the difference between moving distance and the shortest distance, and the factors affecting walking route choice were performed by field surveys. The first part of the results showed that there were significant differences among pedestrians that female and public transportation users tend to move by landmark-centred-strategy, while male and private vehicle users tend to move by route-strategy. The respondents who are male, elder, private vehicle users, visiting Xinyi planned district more often and route-strategy tendency have higher degree of spatial cognition. The results also showed that the higher the degree of spatial cognition the respondents have, the shorter the difference between moving distance and the shortest distance. The number of landmark elements recognized by respondents had significant influence on the predictive model of moving distance, and path element also had significance for only route-strategy tendency respondents. Finally, the most important factor that affects walking route choice of pedestrians is “personal spatial cognition”, that is, to choose the route with shorter moving distance or more familiar with, yet “visual attraction” factor is less important. The respondents leaning towards landmark-centred-strategy tendency pay especially more attention to space structure and traffic guidance information for direction searching and locating than others. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:23:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97628304-1.pdf: 7276269 bytes, checksum: 53e6962c841b371e45061f482dcc893f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第三節 研究內容與流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 空間認知與意象元素 7 第二節 認知地圖 10 第三節 空間知識與移動策略 12 第四節 步行者移動路徑選擇 15 第五節 小結 20 第三章 研究設計 23 第一節 研究架構與研究假設 23 第二節 研究基地與研究對象 27 第三節 研究設計與操作 29 第四節 資料處理與分析計畫 34 第四章 研究結果與討論 39 第一節 受訪者基本特性描述 39 第二節 受訪者個人特性對空間移動策略影響分析 53 第三節 受訪者個人特性對空間認知程度影響分析 56 第四節 受訪者空間移動策略對空間認知程度影響分析 62 第五節 受訪者空間認知程度對移動距離差值影響分析 63 第六節 受訪者空間移動策略對移動距離差值影響分析 69 第七節 受訪者空間移動策略對步行路徑選擇因素影響分析 70 第五章 結論與建議 75 第一節 結論 75 第二節 後續研究建議 83 參考文獻..............................................................................................................85 附錄一 問卷 91 附錄二 受訪者空間認知示例 95 附錄三 受訪者路線繪製示例 99 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 步行者 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 空間意象 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 認知地圖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 空間移動策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 移動距離 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 路徑選擇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | space image | en |
| dc.subject | pedestrian | en |
| dc.subject | route choice | en |
| dc.subject | moving distance | en |
| dc.subject | moving strategy | en |
| dc.subject | cognitive map | en |
| dc.title | 空間認知與移動路徑之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Impact of Spatial Cognition on Route Choice Behavior | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林峰田,歐聖榮,鄭佳昆,沈立 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 空間意象,認知地圖,空間移動策略,移動距離,路徑選擇,步行者, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | space image,cognitive map,moving strategy,moving distance,route choice,pedestrian, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 101 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 7.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。