請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46568完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳文方 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ya-Ju Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張雅茹 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:16:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-07-22 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-07-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | References
[1] H.A. Udo de Haes, R. Heijungs, Life-cycle assessment for energy analysis and management, Appl. Energy 84 (2007) 817-827. [2] A. Stoppato, Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation, Energy 33 (2008) 224-332. [3] E. Martinez, F. Sanz, S. Pellegrini, E, Jimenez, J.Blanco, Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine, Renew. Energy 34 (2009) 667-673. [4] R.G. Raluy, L. Serra, J. Uche, Life cycle assessment of desalination technologies Integrated with Renewable Energies, Desalination 183 (2005) 81-93. [5] W. Wanichpongpan, S.H. Gheewala, Life cycle assessment as a decision support tool for landfill gas-to energy projects, J. Clean Prod 15 (2007) 1819-1826. [6] H. Hondo, Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation system: Japanese case, Energy 30 (2005) 2042-2056. [7] Varun, I.K. Bhat, R. Prakash, LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems-a review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13 (2009) 1067-1073. [8] S. Hirschberg, C. Bauer, P. Burgherr, R. Dones, W. Schenler, T. Bachmann, D.G. Carrera, Environmental, Economic and Social Criteria and Indicators for Sustainability Assessment of Energy Technologies, New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability (NEEDS) Integrated Project, 2007. [9] J.L. Bernal-Augustin, R. Dufo-Lopez, Economical and environmental analysis of grid connected photovoltaic systems in Spain, Renew. Energy 31 (2006) 1107-1128. [10] Varun, R. Prakash, I.K. Bhat, Energy, economics, and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13 (2009) 2716-2721. [11] J.J. Wang, Y.Y. Jing, C.F. Zhang, J.H. Zhao, Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 13 (2009) 2263-2278. [12] F. Cavallaro, Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies, Renew. Energy 34 (2009) 1678-1685. [13] A.I. Chatzimouratidis, P.A. Pilavachi, Sensitivity analysis of technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process, Energy Policy 37 (2009) 788-798. [14] B.G. Hermann, C. Kroeze, W. Jawjit, Assessing environmental performance by combining life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis and environmental performance indicators, J. Clean Prod 15 (2007) 1787-1796. [15] V. Papandreous, Z.G. Shang, A multi-criteria optimization approach for the design of sustainable utility systems, Comput. Chem. Eng. 32 (2008) 1589-1602. [16] S. Roth, S. Hirschberg, C. Bauer, P. Burgherr, R. Dones, T.Heck, W. Schenler, Sustainability of electricity supply technology portfolio, Ann. Nucl. Energy 36 (2009) 409-416. [17] 賴明伸，生命週期評估之內容架構，工業技術研究院污染防治專案成果報告，1997。 [18] S.L. Lin, The Study of Eco-efficiency in the STN-LCD Manufacturing, Master Thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, 2006. [19] J.H. Xiao, Assessment of Environmental Impact and Economic Benefit on Wind-Powered Energy in Taiwan, Master Thesis, Graduate Institute of Industrial Engineering, National Taiwan University, 2009. [20] B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, L.A. Meyer, Mitigation of Climate Change, The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. http://www.ipcc.ch/index.htm [21] 臺中縣大安鄉、大甲鎮設置風力發電廠興建計畫環境影響說明書，中威風力發電股份有限公司籌備處， 2005。 [22] J.Y. Teng, Project Evaluation: Methods and Applications, Operations Planning and Management Center, Taipei, 2005, (in Chinese). [23] J. Granat, M. Makowski, Multi-criteria Methodology for the NEEDS Project, New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability (NEEDS) Integrated Project, 2006. [24] P. Frankl, A. Corrado, S. Lombardelli, Photovoltaic Systems Final Report, Environmental and Ecological Life Cycle Inventories for Present and Future Power Systems in Europe (ECLIPSE), 2004. [25] W.S. Ou, M.C. Ho, J.L. Chen, J.F. Chen, S.C. Lo, The study on the typical radiation for solar architecture design of Taiwan, Journal of Architecture 64 (2008) 103-118, (in Chinese). [26] A. Chataignere, D. Leboulch, Wind Turbines Systems Final Report, Environmental and Ecological Life Cycle Inventories for Present and Future Power Systems in Europe (ECLIPSE), 2003. [27] 風力示範推廣計畫網頁，經濟部能源局。http://wind.erl.itri.org.tw/wind.html [28] Ecoinvent data v2.0, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, 2010. http://www.ecoinvent.org [29] International Energy Agency, Renewable Energy Essentials: Wind, 2008. http://www.iea.org [30] Solarbuzz Limited Liability Company, 2010. http://www.solarbuzz.com/index.asp [31] M. Raugei, P. Frankl, Life cycle impacts and costs of photovoltaic systems: Current state of the art and future outlooks, Energy 34 (2009) 392-399. [32] 再生能源電能躉購費率審定會98年度第5次會議報告，中華民國行政院經濟部能源局，2009。http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46568 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 面臨全球暖化及石油短缺日漸嚴重的當今，再生能源發展與規劃成為各國政府重視的議題，為因應此現況，本研究結合生命週期評估 (Life Cycle Assessment, LCA)、3E (Energy, Economics, Environment)指標及多準則決策 (Multi-Criteria Analysis, MCA)三種觀念，提出一套系統化的綜合評估方法，期能客觀衡量臺灣主要風力發電機及太陽能光電系統之3E表現。透過此套評估方法，本研究結果顯示，在台灣發展風力與太陽能發電系統所將產生的主要環境衝擊為吸入性無機物、礦物使用及化石燃料消耗；而配合專家意見的多準則決策結果則指出，在台灣使用風力機較使用太陽光電系統發電具有相對的優勢；特別的，在本研究所探討幾個適合於我國發展的可行方案中，以2500-kW離岸型風力機擁有最佳的綜合表現，其次則為4500-kW之岸上型風力機。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The development of renewable energy has become an important issue nowadays owing to the growing concerns about global warming and the shortage of fossil fuels. The present study combines concepts and methods of the Life Cycle Assessment, 3E (Energy-Economics-Environment) indicators, and Multi-Criteria Analysis to evaluate systematically the effectiveness of potential development of wind power and photovoltaic (PV) systems in Taiwan. By using the proposed evaluation model, the result indicates that the three major environmental impact categories arise in the development of wind turbines and PV systems are respiratory in-organics, minerals, and the consumption of fossil fuels. Based on experts’ opinions, the outcome of multi-criteria analysis suggests that wind turbines have more advantages than the development of PV devices in Taiwan. In particular, among the studied systems, a 2500-kW offshore wind system has the greatest integrated performance, and a 4500-kW onshore wind turbine system comes to the second. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:16:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97546017-1.pdf: 1076941 bytes, checksum: 9bf119b3cfd0212166486fcb1cc5f1f3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract II Index III Table Index V Figure Index VI Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background and Literature Review 1 1.2 Research Objective and Structure 5 Chapter 2 Methodology 7 2.1 Life Cycle Assessment 7 2.1.1 Structure of Life Cycle Assessment 7 2.1.2 Limitation of Life Cycle Assessment 10 2.1.3 Software and Assessment Methods of Life Cycle Assessment 11 2.2 3E Indicators 16 2.3 Multi-Criteria Analysis 19 2.3.1 Structure of AHP 20 2.3.2 Limitation of AHP 24 Chapter 3 Case Study 27 3.1 Renewable Energies 27 3.2 Data Collection 32 3.3 3E Performance 41 3.4 AHP Approach 52 Chapter 4 Result 57 Chapter 5 Conclusion 60 References 62 Appendix I: Inventory of Renewable Energies 66 Appendix II: Results of LCA Software 84 Appendix III: Questionnaire 122 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 多準則決策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 再生能源 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 風力發電 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 太陽能發電 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 3E指標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Wind Power | en |
| dc.subject | 3E (Energy-Economics-Environment) indicators | en |
| dc.subject | Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) | en |
| dc.subject | PV System | en |
| dc.subject | Renewable Energy | en |
| dc.subject | Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) | en |
| dc.title | 應用生命週期評估之再生能源3E多準則決策 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Application of Life Cycle Assessment and Multi-Criteria Decision Making to the Selection of Renewable Energy | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周雍強,馬小康,徐堯 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 再生能源,風力發電,太陽能發電,生命週期評估,3E指標,多準則決策, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Renewable Energy,Wind Power,PV System,Life Cycle Assessment (LCA),3E (Energy-Economics-Environment) indicators,Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 124 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-22 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 工業工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.05 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。