Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 藥學專業學院
  4. 臨床藥學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46566
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張上淳(Shan-Chwen Chang)
dc.contributor.authorKuan-Ling Koen
dc.contributor.author柯冠伶zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T05:15:59Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-13
dc.date.copyright2010-09-13
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-07-21
dc.identifier.citation1. Odds FC. Candida infections: an overview. Crit Rev Microbiol 1987;15:1-5.
2. Chen YC, Chang SC, Luh KT, Hsieh WC. Stable susceptibility of Candida blood isolates to fluconazole despite increasing use during the past 10 years. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;52:71-7.
3. Jarvis WR. Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections, with emphasis on Candida species. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:1526-30.
4. Cheng MF, Yang YL, Yao TJ, et al. Risk factors for fatal candidemia caused by Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species. BMC Infect Dis 2005;5:22.
5. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:503-35.
6. Rose AH. Growth and handling of yeasts. Methods Cell Biol 1975;12:1-16.
7. Douglas LJ. Adhesion of pathogenic Candida species to host surfaces. Microbiol Sci 1985;2:243-7.
8. Douglas LJ. Adhesion of Candida species to epithelial surfaces. Crit Rev Microbiol 1987;15:27-43.
9. Rupp S. Interactions of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans with the host. Future Microbiol 2007;2:141-51.
10. Nucci M, Anaissie E. Revisiting the source of candidemia: skin or gut? Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:1959-67.
11. Walker L, Levine H, Jucker M. Koch's postulates and infectious proteins. Acta Neuropathol 2006;112:1-4.
12. van Asbeck EC, Clemons KV, Stevens DA. Candida parapsilosis: a review of its epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical aspects, typing and antimicrobial susceptibility. Crit Rev Microbiol 2009;35:283-309.
13. Krishnan S, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit. Hosp Pract (Minneap) 2010;38:82-91.
14. Ellis M. Invasive fungal infections: evolving challenges for diagnosis and therapeutics. Mol Immunol 2002;38:947-57.
15. Jarowski CI, Fialk MA, Murray HW, et al. Fever, rash, and muscle tenderness. A distinctive clinical presentation of disseminated candidiasis. Arch Intern Med 1978;138:544-6.
16. Donahue SP. Intraocular candidiasis in patients with candidemia. Ophthalmology 1998;105:759-60.
17. Parke DW, 2nd, Jones DB, Gentry LO. Endogenous endophthalmitis among patients with candidemia. Ophthalmology 1982;89:789-96.
18. Radentz WH. Opportunistic fungal infections in immunocompromised hosts. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;20:989-1003.
19. Vejsova M, Buchta V. [Presumptive identification of Candida albicans by rapid diagnostic tests]. Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek 2006;12:180-3.
20. Griffin ER. The value of the germ tube production test in the rapid identification of Candida albicans. J Med Lab Technol 1964;21:298-301.
21. Odds FC, Bernaerts R. CHROMagar Candida, a new differential isolation medium for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1923-9.
22. Gutierrez J, de la Higuera A, Piedrola G. Automated blood culture systems. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 1995;53:25-8.
23. Montagna MT, Caggiano G, Borghi E, Morace G. The role of the laboratory in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Drugs 2009;69 Suppl 1:59-63.
24. Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA 1995;274:639-44.
25. Beck-Sague C, Jarvis WR. Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States, 1980-1990. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. J Infect Dis 1993;167:1247-51.
26. Jarvis WR, Martone WJ. Predominant pathogens in hospital infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 1992;29 Suppl A:19-24.
27. Edmond MB, Wallace SE, McClish DK, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in United States hospitals: a three-year analysis. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:239-44.
28. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, Data Summary from January 1992-June 2001, issued August 2001. Am J Infect Control 2001;29:404-21.
29. Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Brueggemann AB, et al. Epidemiology of candidemia: 3-year results from the emerging infections and the epidemiology of Iowa organisms study. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:1298-302.
30. Kao AS, Brandt ME, Pruitt WR, et al. The epidemiology of candidemia in two United States cities: results of a population-based active surveillance. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:1164-70.
31. Richet H, Roux P, Des Champs C, Esnault Y, Andremont A. Candidemia in French hospitals: incidence rates and characteristics. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8:405-12.
32. Slavin MA. The epidemiology of candidaemia and mould infections in Australia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002;49 Suppl 1:3-6.
33. Sandven P, Bevanger L, Digranes A, Gaustad P, Haukland HH, Steinbakk M. Constant low rate of fungemia in norway, 1991 to 1996. The Norwegian Yeast Study Group. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:3455-9.
34. Doczi I, Dosa E, Hajdu E, Nagy E. Aetiology and antifungal susceptibility of yeast bloodstream infections in a Hungarian university hospital between 1996 and 2000. J Med Microbiol 2002;51:677-81.
35. Marchetti O, Bille J, Fluckiger U, et al. Epidemiology of candidemia in Swiss tertiary care hospitals: secular trends, 1991-2000. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:311-20.
36. Banerjee SN, Emori TG, Culver DH, et al. Secular trends in nosocomial primary bloodstream infections in the United States, 1980-1989. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med 1991;91:86S-9S.
37. Rennert G, Rennert HS, Pitlik S, Finkelstein R, Kitzes-Cohen R. Epidemiology of candidemia--a nationwide survey in Israel. Infection 2000;28:26-9.
38. Tortorano AM, Biraghi E, Astolfi A, et al. European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) prospective survey of candidaemia: report from one Italian region. J Hosp Infect 2002;51:297-304.
39. Bregenzer T, Evison-Eckstein AC, Frei R, Zimmerli W. [Clinical aspects and prognosis of candidemia, a 6-year retrospective study]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1996;126:1829-33.
40. Luzzati R, Amalfitano G, Lazzarini L, et al. Nosocomial candidemia in non-neutropenic patients at an Italian tertiary care hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;19:602-7.
41. Macphail GL, Taylor GD, Buchanan-Chell M, Ross C, Wilson S, Kureishi A. Epidemiology, treatment and outcome of candidemia: a five-year review at three Canadian hospitals. Mycoses 2002;45:141-5.
42. Voss A, Kluytmans JA, Koeleman JG, et al. Occurrence of yeast bloodstream infections between 1987 and 1995 in five Dutch university hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996;15:909-12.
43. Garbino J, Kolarova L, Rohner P, Lew D, Pichna P, Pittet D. Secular trends of candidemia over 12 years in adult patients at a tertiary care hospital. Medicine (Baltimore) 2002;81:425-33.
44. Viudes A, Peman J, Canton E, Ubeda P, Lopez-Ribot JL, Gobernado M. Candidemia at a tertiary-care hospital: epidemiology, treatment, clinical outcome and risk factors for death. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;21:767-74.
45. Alonso-Valle H, Acha O, Garcia-Palomo JD, Farinas-Alvarez C, Fernandez-Mazarrasa C, Farinas MC. Candidemia in a tertiary care hospital: epidemiology and factors influencing mortality. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;22:254-7.
46. Wey SB, Mori M, Pfaller MA, Woolson RF, Wenzel RP. Hospital-acquired candidemia. The attributable mortality and excess length of stay. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2642-5.
47. Pittet D, Wenzel RP. Nosocomial bloodstream infections. Secular trends in rates, mortality, and contribution to total hospital deaths. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1177-84.
48. Fraser VJ, Jones M, Dunkel J, Storfer S, Medoff G, Dunagan WC. Candidemia in a tertiary care hospital: epidemiology, risk factors, and predictors of mortality. Clin Infect Dis 1992;15:414-21.
49. Hung CC, Chen YC, Chang SC, Luh KT, Hsieh WC. Nosocomial candidemia in a university hospital in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 1996;95:19-28.
50. Abi-Said D, Anaissie E, Uzun O, Raad I, Pinzcowski H, Vartivarian S. The epidemiology of hematogenous candidiasis caused by different Candida species. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:1122-8.
51. Girmenia C, Martino P. Fluconazole and the changing epidemiology of candidemia. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:232-4.
52. Rangel-Frausto MS, Wiblin T, Blumberg HM, et al. National epidemiology of mycoses survey (NEMIS): variations in rates of bloodstream infections due to Candida species in seven surgical intensive care units and six neonatal intensive care units. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:253-8.
53. Blumberg HM, Jarvis WR, Soucie JM, et al. Risk factors for candidal bloodstream infections in surgical intensive care unit patients: the NEMIS prospective multicenter study. The National Epidemiology of Mycosis Survey. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:177-86.
54. Blot SI, Vandewoude KH, Hoste EA, Colardyn FA. Effects of nosocomial candidemia on outcomes of critically ill patients. Am J Med 2002;113:480-5.
55. Nolla-Salas J, Sitges-Serra A, Leon-Gil C, et al. Candidemia in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: analysis of prognostic factors and assessment of systemic antifungal therapy. Study Group of Fungal Infection in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 1997;23:23-30.
56. Voss A, le Noble JL, Verduyn Lunel FM, Foudraine NA, Meis JF. Candidemia in intensive care unit patients: risk factors for mortality. Infection 1997;25:8-11.
57. Leleu G, Aegerter P, Guidet B. Systemic candidiasis in intensive care units: a multicenter, matched-cohort study. J Crit Care 2002;17:168-75.
58. Kossoff EH, Buescher ES, Karlowicz MG. Candidemia in a neonatal intensive care unit: trends during fifteen years and clinical features of 111 cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:504-8.
59. Debusk CH, Daoud R, Thirumoorthi MC, Wilson FM, Khatib R. Candidemia: current epidemiologic characteristics and a long-term follow-up of the survivors. Scand J Infect Dis 1994;26:697-703.
60. Rex JH, Bennett JE, Sugar AM, et al. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia. Candidemia Study Group and the National Institute. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1325-30.
61. Nguyen MH, Peacock JE, Jr., Tanner DC, et al. Therapeutic approaches in patients with candidemia. Evaluation in a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2429-35.
62. Anaissie EJ, Darouiche RO, Abi-Said D, et al. Management of invasive candidal infections: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of fluconazole versus amphotericin B and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:964-72.
63. Phillips P, Shafran S, Garber G, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. Canadian Candidemia Study Group. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1997;16:337-45.
64. Lin MT, Lu HC, Chen WL. Improving efficacy of antifungal therapy by polymerase chain reaction-based strategy among febrile patients with neutropenia and cancer. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33:1621-7.
65. Wingard JR, Merz WG, Rinaldi MG, Miller CB, Karp JE, Saral R. Association of Torulopsis glabrata infections with fluconazole prophylaxis in neutropenic bone marrow transplant patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:1847-9.
66. Wingard JR. Importance of Candida species other than C. albicans as pathogens in oncology patients. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:115-25.
67. Safdar A, Chaturvedi V, Cross EW, et al. Prospective study of Candida species in patients at a comprehensive cancer center. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:2129-33.
68. Viscoli C, Girmenia C, Marinus A, et al. Candidemia in cancer patients: a prospective, multicenter surveillance study by the Invasive Fungal Infection Group (IFIG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Clin Infect Dis 1999;28:1071-9.
69. Horn R, Wong B, Kiehn TE, Armstrong D. Fungemia in a cancer hospital: changing frequency, earlier onset, and results of therapy. Rev Infect Dis 1985;7:646-55.
70. Anaissie EJ, Rex JH, Uzun O, Vartivarian S. Predictors of adverse outcome in cancer patients with candidemia. Am J Med 1998;104:238-45.
71. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Jones RN, et al. International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: frequency of occurrence and in vitro susceptibilities to fluconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole of isolates collected from 1997 through 1999 in the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:3254-9.
72. Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Sader HS, Hollis RJ, Messer SA. International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: frequency of occurrence and antifungal susceptibilities of isolates collected in 1997 in the United States, Canada, and South America for the SENTRY Program. The SENTRY Participant Group. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1886-9.
73. Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, et al. Bloodstream infections due to Candida species: SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program in North America and Latin America, 1997-1998. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:747-51.
74. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Jones RN, Messer SA, Hollis RJ. Trends in antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp. isolated from pediatric and adult patients with bloodstream infections: SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997 to 2000. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:852-6.
75. Petri MG, Konig J, Moecke HP, et al. Epidemiology of invasive mycosis in ICU patients: a prospective multicenter study in 435 non-neutropenic patients. Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy, Divisions of Mycology and Pneumonia Research. Intensive Care Med 1997;23:317-25.
76. Nguyen MH, Peacock JE, Jr., Morris AJ, et al. The changing face of candidemia: emergence of non-Candida albicans species and antifungal resistance. Am J Med 1996;100:617-23.
77. Stamos JK, Rowley AH. Candidemia in a pediatric population. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:571-5.
78. Karlowsky JA, Zhanel GG, Klym KA, Hoban DJ, Kabani AM. Candidemia in a Canadian tertiary care hospital from 1976 to 1996. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1997;29:5-9.
79. Saiman L, Ludington E, Pfaller M, et al. Risk factors for candidemia in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit patients. The National Epidemiology of Mycosis Survey study group. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:319-24.
80. St-Germain G, Laverdiere M, Pelletier R, et al. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of 442 Candida isolates from blood and other normally sterile sites: results of a 2-year (1996 to 1998) multicenter surveillance study in Quebec, Canada. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:949-53.
81. Pappas PG, Rex JH, Lee J, et al. A prospective observational study of candidemia: epidemiology, therapy, and influences on mortality in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:634-43.
82. Nucci M, Silveira MI, Spector N, et al. Risk factors for death among cancer patients with fungemia. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:107-11.
83. Colombo AL, Nucci M, Salomao R, et al. High rate of non-albicans candidemia in Brazilian tertiary care hospitals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1999;34:281-6.
84. Nucci M, Colombo AL. Risk factors for breakthrough candidemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;21:209-11.
85. Krcmery V, Jr., Kovacicova G. Longitudinal 10-year prospective survey of fungaemia in Slovak Republic: trends in etiology in 310 episodes. Slovak Fungaemia study group. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;36:7-11.
86. Zanetti G, Calandra T, de Muralt B, Bille J, Glauser MP. [Candida fungemia]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1989;119:1213-8.
87. Samra Z, Bishara J, Ashkenazi S, et al. Changing distribution of Candida species isolated from sterile and nonsterile sites in Israel. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;21:542-5.
88. Krcmery VC, Jr., Babela R. Candidemia in the surgical intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:1537-8.
89. Oude Lashof AM, Donnelly JP, Meis JF, van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ. Duration of antifungal treatment and development of delayed complications in patients with candidaemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;22:43-8.
90. Mathews MS, Samuel PR, Suresh M. Emergence of Candida tropicalis as the major cause of fungaemia in India. Mycoses 2001;44:278-80.
91. Chakrabarti A, Chander J, Kasturi P, Panigrahi D. Candidaemia: a 10-year study in an Indian teaching hospital. Mycoses 1992;35:47-51.
92. Mora-Duarte J, Betts R, Rotstein C, et al. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:2020-9.
93. Rex JH, Pappas PG, Karchmer AW, et al. A randomized and blinded multicenter trial of high-dose fluconazole plus placebo versus fluconazole plus amphotericin B as therapy for candidemia and its consequences in nonneutropenic subjects. Clin Infect Dis 2003;36:1221-8.
94. Miller PJ, Wenzel RP. Etiologic organisms as independent predictors of death and morbidity associated with bloodstream infections. J Infect Dis 1987;156:471-7.
95. Pittet D, Li N, Woolson RF, Wenzel RP. Microbiological factors influencing the outcome of nosocomial bloodstream infections: a 6-year validated, population-based model. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:1068-78.
96. Wey SB, Mori M, Pfaller MA, Woolson RF, Wenzel RP. Risk factors for hospital-acquired candidemia. A matched case-control study. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:2349-53.
97. Verfaillie C, Weisdorf D, Haake R, Hostetter M, Ramsay NK, McGlave P. Candida infections in bone marrow transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 1991;8:177-84.
98. Komshian SV, Uwaydah AK, Sobel JD, Crane LR. Fungemia caused by Candida species and Torulopsis glabrata in the hospitalized patient: frequency, characteristics, and evaluation of factors influencing outcome. Rev Infect Dis 1989;11:379-90.
99. MacDonald L, Baker C, Chenoweth C. Risk factors for candidemia in a children's hospital. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:642-5.
100. Krcmery V, Fric M, Pisarcikova M, et al. Fungemia in neonates: report of 80 cases from seven University hospitals. Pediatrics 2000;105:913-4.
101. Chapman RL, Faix RG. Persistently positive cultures and outcome in invasive neonatal candidiasis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:822-7.
102. Pittet D, Monod M, Suter PM, Frenk E, Auckenthaler R. Candida colonization and subsequent infections in critically ill surgical patients. Ann Surg 1994;220:751-8.
103. Haron E, Vartivarian S, Anaissie E, Dekmezian R, Bodey GP. Primary Candida pneumonia. Experience at a large cancer center and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 1993;72:137-42.
104. Karabinis A, Hill C, Leclercq B, Tancrede C, Baume D, Andremont A. Risk factors for candidemia in cancer patients: a case-control study. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:429-32.
105. Bross J, Talbot GH, Maislin G, Hurwitz S, Strom BL. Risk factors for nosocomial candidemia: a case-control study in adults without leukemia. Am J Med 1989;87:614-20.
106. Wiley JM, Smith N, Leventhal BG, et al. Invasive fungal disease in pediatric acute leukemia patients with fever and neutropenia during induction chemotherapy: a multivariate analysis of risk factors. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:280-6.
107. Richet HM, Andremont A, Tancrede C, Pico JL, Jarvis WR. Risk factors for candidemia in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia. Rev Infect Dis 1991;13:211-5.
108. Pelz RK, Hendrix CW, Swoboda SM, et al. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent candidal infections in critically ill surgical patients. Ann Surg 2001;233:542-8.
109. Weese-Mayer DE, Fondriest DW, Brouillette RT, Shulman ST. Risk factors associated with candidemia in the neonatal intensive care unit: a case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1987;6:190-6.
110. Goodrich JM, Reed EC, Mori M, et al. Clinical features and analysis of risk factors for invasive candidal infection after marrow transplantation. J Infect Dis 1991;164:731-40.
111. Botas CM, Kurlat I, Young SM, Sola A. Disseminated candidal infections and intravenous hydrocortisone in preterm infants. Pediatrics 1995;95:883-7.
112. Rex JH, Rinaldi MG, Pfaller MA. Resistance of Candida species to fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:1-8.
113. Rex JH, Pfaller MA, Galgiani JN, et al. Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro-in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and candida infections. Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:235-47.
114. Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD, et al. Practice guidelines for the treatment of candidiasis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:662-78.
115. Roling EE, Klepser ME, Wasson A, Lewis RE, Ernst EJ, Pfaller MA. Antifungal activities of fluconazole, caspofungin (MK0991), and anidulafungin (LY 303366) alone and in combination against Candida spp. and Crytococcus neoformans via time-kill methods. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;43:13-7.
116. Sanglard D, Ischer F, Monod M, Bille J. Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene. Microbiology 1997;143 ( Pt 2):405-16.
117. Vanden Bossche H, Dromer F, Improvisi I, Lozano-Chiu M, Rex JH, Sanglard D. Antifungal drug resistance in pathogenic fungi. Med Mycol 1998;36 Suppl 1:119-28.
118. Coleman DC, Moran GP, McManus BA, Sullivan DJ. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance in Candida dubliniensis. Future Microbiol;5:935-49.
119. Marr KA, Lyons CN, Ha K, Rustad TR, White TC. Inducible azole resistance associated with a heterogeneous phenotype in Candida albicans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:52-9.
120. Rex JH, Pfaller MA, Barry AL, Nelson PW, Webb CD. Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates from a randomized, multicenter trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B as treatment of nonneutropenic patients with candidemia. NIAID Mycoses Study Group and the Candidemia Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:40-4.
121. Masia Canuto M, Gutierrez Rodero F. Antifungal drug resistance to azoles and polyenes. Lancet Infect Dis 2002;2:550-63.
122. Rex JH, Pfaller MA, Walsh TJ, et al. Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001;14:643-58, table of contents.
123. Buchner T, Fegeler W, Bernhardt H, et al. Treatment of severe Candida infections in high-risk patients in Germany: consensus formed by a panel of interdisciplinary investigators. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;21:337-52.
124. Winston DJ, Hathorn JW, Schuster MG, Schiller GJ, Territo MC. A multicenter, randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for empiric antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. Am J Med 2000;108:282-9.
125. Segal BH, Freifeld AG, Baden LR, et al. Prevention and treatment of cancer-related infections. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2008;6:122-74.
126. Goodman JL, Winston DJ, Greenfield RA, et al. A controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med 1992;326:845-51.
127. Marr KA, Seidel K, Slavin MA, et al. Prolonged fluconazole prophylaxis is associated with persistent protection against candidiasis-related death in allogeneic marrow transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Blood 2000;96:2055-61.
128. Noel GJ. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. J Pediatr 1999;135:399.
129. Wingard JR, Kubilis P, Lee L, et al. Clinical significance of nephrotoxicity in patients treated with amphotericin B for suspected or proven aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:1402-7.
130. Ellis M, Spence D, de Pauw B, et al. An EORTC international multicenter randomized trial (EORTC number 19923) comparing two dosages of liposomal amphotericin B for treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:1406-12.
131. Patterson TF, Kirkpatrick WR, White M, et al. Invasive aspergillosis. Disease spectrum, treatment practices, and outcomes. I3 Aspergillus Study Group. Medicine (Baltimore) 2000;79:250-60.
132. Gubbins PO. Mould-active azoles: pharmacokinetics, drug interactions in neutropenic patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2007;20:579-86.
133. Voss A, de Pauw BE. High-dose fluconazole therapy in patients with severe fungal infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1999;18:165-74.
134. Walsh TJ, Pappas P, Winston DJ, et al. Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever. N Engl J Med 2002;346:225-34.
135. Herbrecht R, Denning DW, Patterson TF, et al. Voriconazole versus amphotericin B for primary therapy of invasive aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:408-15.
136. Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1249-72.
137. Nucci M, Anaissie E. Should vascular catheters be removed from all patients with candidemia? An evidence-based review. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:591-9.
138. Patel GP, Simon D, Scheetz M, Crank CW, Lodise T, Patel N. The effect of time to antifungal therapy on mortality in Candidemia associated septic shock. Am J Ther 2009;16:508-11.
139. Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, et al. Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:25-31.
140. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83.
141. Chow JW, Yu VL. Combination antibiotic therapy versus monotherapy for gram-negative bacteraemia: a commentary. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1999;11:7-12.
142. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818-29.
143. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1250-6.
144. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. [CDC definitions for nosocomial infections 1988]. Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena) 1991;85:818-27.
145. Valles J, Calbo E, Anoro E, et al. Bloodstream infections in adults: importance of healthcare-associated infections. J Infect 2008;56:27-34.
146. Bliziotis IA, Samonis G, Vardakas KZ, Chrysanthopoulou S, Falagas ME. Effect of aminoglycoside and beta-lactam combination therapy versus beta-lactam monotherapy on the emergence of antimicrobial resistance: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:149-58.
147. Gomez J, Garcia-Vazquez E, Espinosa C, et al. Nosocomial candidemia at a general hospital: prognostic factors and impact of early empiric treatment on outcome (2002-2005). Med Clin (Barc);134:1-5.
148. Labbe AC, Pepin J, Patino C, Castonguay S, Restieri C, Laverdiere M. A single-centre 10-year experience with Candida bloodstream infections. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 2009;20:45-50.
149. Wingard JR, Merz WG, Rinaldi MG, Johnson TR, Karp JE, Saral R. Increase in Candida krusei infection among patients with bone marrow transplantation and neutropenia treated prophylactically with fluconazole. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1274-7.
150. Tam JY, Blume KG, Prober CG. Prophylactic fluconazole and Candida krusei infections. N Engl J Med 1992;326:891; author reply 2-3.
151. Perlroth J, Choi B, Spellberg B. Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Med Mycol 2007;45:321-46.
152. Garey KW, Pai MP, Suda KJ, et al. Inadequacy of fluconazole dosing in patients with candidemia based on Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007;16:919-27.
153. Klevay MJ, Ernst EJ, Hollanbaugh JL, Miller JG, Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Therapy and outcome of Candida glabrata versus Candida albicans bloodstream infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2008;60:273-7.
154. Fernandez J, Erstad BL, Petty W, Nix DE. Time to positive culture and identification for Candida blood stream infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;64:402-7.
155. Klevay MJ, Horn DL, Neofytos D, Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Initial treatment and outcome of Candida glabrata versus Candida albicans bloodstream infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;64:152-7.
156. Taur Y, Cohen N, Dubnow S, Paskovaty A, Seo SK. Effect of antifungal therapy timing on mortality in cancer patients with candidemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother;54:184-90.
157. Rex JH, Bennett JE, Sugar AM, et al. Intravascular catheter exchange and duration of candidemia. NIAID Mycoses Study Group and the Candidemia Study Group. Clin Infect Dis 1995;21:994-6.
158. Liu CY, Huang LJ, Wang WS, et al. Candidemia in cancer patients: impact of early removal of non-tunneled central venous catheters on outcome. J Infect 2009;58:154-60.
159. Tsai CC, Wang CC, Kuo HY, et al. Adult candidemia at a medical center in northern Taiwan: a retrospective study. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2008;41:414-21.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46566-
dc.description.abstract目的:
分析近年臺大醫院念珠菌菌血症的(candidemic)流行病學,並評估念珠菌菌血症病人治療之處方模式、感染念珠菌菌血症之死亡率及影響死亡的危險因子分析。另外也針對使用不同的抗黴菌藥物對念珠菌菌血症病人預後之影響。
研究設計、地點及研究對象:
此研究於國立臺灣大學醫學院附設醫院,位於台灣北部的醫學中心,以蒐集病歷資料進行單醫學中心的回溯性世代分析研究。自2009年1月1日至2009年6月30日間確定有感染念珠菌菌血症的病人,只納入第一次感染事件,並排除未滿18歲或病歷資料不全的病人。
研究方法:
以研究開始前設計之病歷個案報告表查閱病人紙本和電子病歷記錄研究對象之相關資料,包含病人基本資料、合併症及造成感染的潛在因子、黴菌血症發作前30天是否有細菌或黴菌感染之情形以及治療方式和抗生素或抗黴菌藥物使用情形、黴菌血症發作時之血液培養結果和菌株對抗黴菌藥物敏感性測試結果、臨床表徵、相關檢驗數據、治療結果。本研究的主要觀察點是病人於30天內的死亡率。
統計方法包含卡方檢定(χ2 test)、無母數檢定(Mann-Whitney U test)、T檢定(t-test)、費雪精確檢定(Fisher’s exact test)。存活分析使用Kaplan-Meier method繪製存活曲線並以Log-rank test比較差異。死亡危險因子分析利用單變項分析及多變項羅吉斯逐步回歸(Logistic stepwise regression)分析。
結果:
本研究共納入126位感染念珠菌菌血症的病人,其中單純黴菌感染的病人有89位。病人平均年齡為64歲,範圍為18歲到98歲,男與女比例為1.42:1.0(74 vs. 52),有95.2%的病人為院內感染,Charlson’s comorbidity score中位數為6分,病人合併症最多的為癌症(72.2%)、其次為心血管疾病(44.4%)、腸胃道疾病(39.7%),平均住院天數為44天;在菌種分布方面,有六成以上的感染是由C. albicans(61.1%)引起,然後發生率由高到低依序為C. tropicalis(19.0%)、C. glabrata(18.3%)、C. parapsilosis(8.7%)、C. krusei(0.8%)。黴菌血症發作時臨床表徵以敗血性休克最多(52.4%),原發性黴菌血症佔31.0%,黴菌血症發作時的Pitt bacteremia score中位數為3分、APACHE II score中位數為22分。
在治療處方模式方面,針對感染C. albicans、C. tropicalis和C. parapsilosis黴菌血症的病人,治療藥物以fluconazole為主,疾病程度較為嚴重、治療一段時間後臨床症狀未改善或嗜中性白血球低下者可能會選用polyenes類或echinocandins類藥物作為治療選擇;針對感染C. glabrata的病人,會根據抗黴菌藥物對菌株的最小抑菌濃度(MIC)作為選擇治療藥物的參考;感染C. krusei黴菌血症的病人,由於本研究中僅有一位病人的黴菌血症是由C. krusei所引起(使用的抗黴菌治療藥物為amphotericin B),故無法看出其大致上的處方模式為何;且因為受限於病人數不足,也無法看出針對特定菌種感染,使用不同抗黴菌藥物對預後的影響。
本研究中全體病人在念珠菌菌血症發作後產生的併發症主要有以下幾種:眼內炎(8.7%)、腦膜炎(4.0%)、心內膜炎(4.0%)、急性腎臟衰竭(27.0%)、呼吸衰竭(17.5%)等,不過產生這些併發症與否對於30天死亡率並沒有顯著的影響(p=0.36)。
本研究針對全體病人在感染後30天內死亡率為57.1 %(單純黴菌血症感染者為50.6%);分析影響30天內死亡率的獨立危險因子,較差的腎功能(OR:1.01;95% C.I.:1.00-1.02;p=0.0148)、Charlson's comorbidity score分數愈高(OR:1.17;95% C.I.:1.02-1.35;p=0.03)、在此次念珠菌菌血症感染前曾經有過念珠菌的感染或移生(OR:3.33;95% C.I.:1.39-7.97;p=0.0071)、念珠菌菌血症發作時伴隨有敗血性休克(OR:4.94;95% C.I.:1.97-12.43;p=0.0007)、念珠菌菌血症發作後未移除或更換血液導管(OR:5.80;95% C.I.:2.61-12.86;p<0.0001),為造成念珠菌菌血症30天內死亡率愈高的獨立危險因子。除此之外,使用適當且劑量足夠之抗黴菌藥物來治療念珠菌菌血症會使30天內死亡率較低(OR:0.02;95% C.I.:0.003-0.10;p<0.0001)。
結論:
感染念珠菌菌血症的病人,30天內的死亡率和病人本身情況的嚴重程度(Charlson’s comorbidity score、腎功能)以及黴菌血症發作時之嚴重程度(敗血性休克)有關;另外,在此次念珠菌菌血症感染前曾經有過念珠菌的感染或移生、發作後未移除或更換血液導管也都是使30天死亡率升高的原因;反之,使用適當且劑量足夠之抗黴菌藥物來治療念珠菌菌血症會使30天內死亡率較低。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractObjectives:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the epidemiology of candidemia in National Taiwan University Hospital and the impact of adequate antifungal therapy on clinical outcomes. To analyze mortality and prognostic factors of candidemia is another goal of this study.
Study design and study populations:
A retrospective cohort study was performed by charts reviewing for all adult patients admitted to the National Taiwan University Hospital(NTUH), a medical center in northern Taiwan, with Candida bloodstream infection since January 1st, 2009 to June 30th, 2009. Only the first episode of each patient was included. Patients younger than 18 or whose medical records were incomplete were excluded.
Methods:
Data were collected from paper medical reports and hospital computerized databases, including patients’ profiles, underlying diseases, comorbidities, predisposing factors for infection, previous infection history, antibiotics or antifungal agents exposure before fungemia onset, clinical presentation when fungemia onset, relevant laboratory data, antifungal therapy during treatment period, treatment outcome. The primary endpoint was 30 day all-cause mortality.
Statistical methods included Chi-square test(χ2 test), Mann-Whitney U test, T test, Fisher’s exact test. Survival curves shown by Kaplan-Meier method were analyzed with Log-rank test. Prognostic factors were examed using univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis.
Results:
One hundred and twenty-six patients with Candida bloodstream infection were enrolled in this study, and 89 patients were pure fungemia among all the patients. The average age was 64 years old (ranged from 18 to 98). The proportion of male to female patients was approximately 1.42:1.0. One hundred and twenty (95.2%) patients were classified as nosocomial infection.
Median of Charlson’s comorbidity score was 6. The most common underlying diseases were malignancy (91 episodes, 72.2%), followed by cardiovascular diseases (56 episodes, 44.4%) and gastrointestinal disorders (50 episodes, 39.7%). The average length of stay in hospital ranged from 2 to 1291 days (median, 44 days). The clinical manifestation, septic shock, at fungemia onset was the most common (66 episodes, 52.4%). Median of Pitt bactermia score was 3 and APACHE II score was 22.
The distribution of Candida species in National Taiwan University Hospital was showed as follows: C. albicans (61.1%), C. tropicalis (19.0%), C. glabrata (18.3%), C. parapsilosis (8.7%), C. krusei (0.8%).
As for treatment of candidemia, patients with C. albicans, C. tropicalis, or C. parapsilosis infection would be mostly treated with fluconazole. But for critically-ill, neutropenia, or clinically deteriorate after a period time of treatment patients, polyenes or echinocandins would be drugs of choice. And for patients with C. glabrata infection, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) would guide the antifungal treatment. Since there was only one patient infected with C. krusei in this study, the treatment rule of C. krusei could not be told. Besides, we could not evaluate the impact of different antifungal agents on prognosis due to inadequate patient number of this study as well.
Acute renal failure (27.0%), respiratory failure (17.5%), endophthalmitis (8.7%), meningitis (4.0%), and endocarditis (4.0%) were complications of candidemia. However, these complications were all statistically insignificantly related to 30 day mortality.
The 30 day all-cause mortality rate was 57.1% (72/126). Multivariate analysis on the 30 day all-cause mortality showed that poor renal function (OR: 1.01; 95% C.I.: 1.00-1.02; p=0.0148), higher Charlson’s comorbidity score (OR: 1.17; 95% C.I.: 1.02-1.35; p=0.03), previous infection or colonization of Candida species (OR: 3.33; 95% C.I.: 1.39-7.97; p=0.0071), septic shock (OR: 4.94; 95% C.I.: 1.97-12.43; p=0.0007) and unchange of blood catheters (OR: 5.80; 95% C.I.: 2.61-12.86; p<0.0001) were factors that made 30 day mortality rate higher. On the other hand, adequate antifungal therapy (OR: 0.02; 95% C.I.: 0.003-0.10; p<0.0001) would make 30 day mortality rate lower.
Conclusions:
Poor renal function, Charlson’s comorbidity score, septic shock, previous infection or colonization of Candida species, unremove or unchange of blood catheters, and inadequate antifungal therapy were found to be associated with poor prognosis by multivariate analysis in patients with candidemia.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:15:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R97451010-1.pdf: 828097 bytes, checksum: 4a0985316045fd808f1c6c6a1da76c30 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝------------------------------------------------------I
中文摘要------------------------------------------------III
Abstract-------------------------------------------------VI
目錄-----------------------------------------------------IX
圖目錄--------------------------------------------------XII
表目錄-------------------------------------------------XIII
中英對照表----------------------------------------------XIV
第一章 緒論-----------------------------------------------1
第二章 文獻回顧-------------------------------------------3
第1節 黴菌學----------------------------------------------3
二.1.1 病原特性-------------------------------------------3
二.1.2 致病機轉-------------------------------------------4
二.1.3 臨床診斷及鑑別-------------------------------------5
二.1.4 實驗室及其他檢查-----------------------------------6
第2節 流行病學相關研究------------------------------------7
第3節 發生念珠菌菌血症之危險因子-------------------------16
第4節 念珠菌之體外藥物敏感性試驗-------------------------24
第5節 念珠菌菌血症之治療---------------------------------26
二.5.1 治療的分層----------------------------------------27
二.5.2 抗黴菌藥物治療------------------------------------30
二.5.3 非藥物治療----------------------------------------33
第6節 念珠菌菌血症之死亡危險因子-------------------------34
第三章 研究目的------------------------------------------38
第四章 研究方法------------------------------------------39
第1節 研究架構-------------------------------------------39
第2節 研究地點及研究對象---------------------------------40
第3節 資料收集-------------------------------------------41
四.3.1 病人基本資料--------------------------------------41
四.3.2 合併症--------------------------------------------41
四.3.3 念珠菌菌血症發作前之感染及醫療處置----------------42
四.3.4 念珠菌菌血症發作時之資料收集----------------------42
四.3.5 抗黴菌藥物之治療----------------------------------44
四.3.6 後續念珠菌之檢體----------------------------------44
四.3.7 預後因子以及後續黴菌培養結果----------------------44
四.3.8 治療反應及治療結果--------------------------------44
第4節 名詞定義-------------------------------------------45
四.4.1 院內感染------------------------------------------45
四.4.2 醫療照護相關感染----------------------------------45
四.4.3 社區感染------------------------------------------45
四.4.4 免疫抑制劑之使用----------------------------------45
四.4.5 中心或部分靜脈營養輸注----------------------------46
四.4.6 治療之適當性--------------------------------------46
四.4.7 臨床表現------------------------------------------46
四.4.8 重疊感染(superinfection)------------------------47
四.4.9 其他部位感染(other site infection)--------------47
四.4.10 腎功能-------------------------------------------47
第5節 統計分析方法 ---------------------------------------48
第五章 研究結果------------------------------------------49
第1節 描述性統計-----------------------------------------49
五.1.1 收案過程與病人數----------------------------------49
五.1.2 病人基本資料--------------------------------------50
五.1.3 病人合併症----------------------------------------52
五.1.4造成感染之潛在因子---------------------------------54
五.1.5 先前使用抗生素之情形------------------------------55
五.1.6 黴菌血症發作時之疾病嚴重程度及臨床表徵------------56
五.1.7 念珠菌菌血症的菌種分布情形------------------------57
五.1.8 抗黴菌藥物之治療處方情形--------------------------58
五.1.9 死亡率及預後分析----------------------------------60
五.1.10 抗黴菌藥物種類與死亡率之關係---------------------61
五.1.11 開始抗黴菌藥物治療之時間與死亡率的關係-----------64
第2節 存活曲線-------------------------------------------66
第3節 死亡危險因子之單變項統計分析-----------------------72
第4節 死亡危險因子之多變項統計分析-----------------------83
第六章 討論----------------------------------------------84
第1節 感染念珠菌菌血症之病人族群-------------------------84
六.1.1 感染危險因子--------------------------------------84
六.1.2 死亡率分析----------------------------------------85
第2節 抗黴菌藥物治療-------------------------------------86
六.2.1 抗黴菌藥物----------------------------------------86
六.2.2 抗黴菌藥物的治療適當與否--------------------------87
六.2.3 延遲適當抗黴菌藥物的治療--------------------------89
第3節 影響念珠菌菌血症預後之危險因子分析-----------------90
六.3.1 移除或替換中央靜脈導管和念珠菌菌血症的關係--------92
六.3.2 先前抗生素的使用和死亡率的關係--------------------93
六.3.3 APACHE II score、Pitt bacteremia score和死亡率關係94
第4節 研究限制-------------------------------------------95
六.4.1 研究地點及病人族群--------------------------------95
六.4.2資料收集-------------------------------------------96
第七章 結論----------------------------------------------97
第八章 參考資料------------------------------------------98
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject死亡率zh_TW
dc.subject念珠菌zh_TW
dc.subject黴菌血症zh_TW
dc.subject危險因子zh_TW
dc.subject治療zh_TW
dc.subject適當抗黴菌藥物zh_TW
dc.subject預後zh_TW
dc.subjectadequate antifungal therapyen
dc.subjectfungemiaen
dc.subjectmortalityen
dc.subjectCandidaen
dc.subjectcandidemiaen
dc.subjectinvasive candidiasisen
dc.subjectrisk factoren
dc.subjectprognosisen
dc.title念珠菌菌血症之危險因子以及臨床治療結果分析:著重於抗黴菌藥物之治療對於預後之成效影響zh_TW
dc.titleCandida Bloodstream Infection: Risk Factors for Mortality and Influence of Antifungal Therapy on Clinical Outcome.en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林慧玲(Fe-Lin Lin Wu),陳宜君(Yi-Chun Chen),林淑文(Shu-Wen Lin)
dc.subject.keyword念珠菌,黴菌血症,危險因子,治療,適當抗黴菌藥物,預後,死亡率,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCandida,candidemia,invasive candidiasis,fungemia,risk factor,adequate antifungal therapy,prognosis,mortality,en
dc.relation.page123
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2010-07-22
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept臨床藥學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:臨床藥學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
808.69 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved