請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46502完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王榮德 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chi-Yang Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張吉仰 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:12:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-09-13 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-09-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-07-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA 2006; 295(13):1549-55.
2. Sturm R. Increases in clinically severe obesity in the United States, 1986-2000. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(18):2146-8. 3. Prentice AM. The emerging epidemic of obesity in developing countries. Int J Epidemiol 2006; 35(1):93-9. 4. Lee WJ, Wang W. Bariatric surgery: Asia-Pacific perspective. Obes Surg 2005; 15(6):751-7. 5. Huang KC. Obesity and its related diseases in Taiwan. Obes Rev 2008; 9 Suppl 1:32-4. 6. Elder KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric surgery: a review of procedures and outcomes. Gastroenterology 2007; 132(6):2253-71. 7. Li Z, Bowerman S, Heber D. Health ramifications of the obesity epidemic. Surg Clin North Am 2005; 85(4):681-701, v. 8. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004; 292(14):1724-37. 9. Livingston EH, Fink AS. Quality of life: cost and future of bariatric surgery. Arch Surg 2003; 138(4):383-8. 10. Chang CY, Hung CK, Chang YY, et al. Health-related Quality of Life in Adult Patients with Morbid Obesity Coming for Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2008. May 8 [Epub ahead of print]. Accessed on 09/10/2009. Available at: http://springerlink.com/content/120415/ 11. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4:79. 12. Delinsky SS, Latner JD, Wilson GT. Binge eating and weight loss in a self-help behavior modification program. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14(7):1244-9. 13. O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C, et al. Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144(9):625-33. 14. NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115(12):956-61. 15. Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, et al. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142(7):547-59. 16. Davis MM, Slish K, Chao C, et al. National trends in bariatric surgery, 1996-2002. Arch Surg 2006; 141(1):71-4; discussion 75. 17. Steinbrook R. Surgery for severe obesity. N Engl J Med 2004; 350(11):1075-9. 18. Glinski J, Wetzler S, Goodman E. The psychology of gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 2001; 11(5):581-8. 19. Mathus-Vliegen EM, de Weerd S, de Wit LT. Health-related quality-of-life in patients with morbid obesity after gastric banding for surgically induced weight loss. Surgery 2004; 135(5):489-97. 20. Flum DR, Belle SH, King WC, et al. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2009; 361(5):445-54. 21. Moorehead MK, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, et al. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Obes Surg 2003; 13(5):684-92. 22. Chang CY, Huang CK, Chang YY, et al. Cross-Validation of the Taiwan Version of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II with WHOQOL and SF-36. Obes Surg 2009. Mar 3 [Epub ahead of print]. Accessed on 09/10/2009. Available at: http://springerlink.com/content/120415/ 23. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 1993; 2(2):153-9. 24. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46(12):1569-85. 25. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Bullinger M, et al. A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10(4):336-55. 26. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med 1998; 28(3):551-8. 27. Liou HH, Chen RC, Chen CC, et al. Health related quality of life in adult patients with epilepsy compared with a general reference population in Taiwan. Epilepsy Res 2005; 64(3):151-9. 28. Yang MH, Chen YM, Kuo BI, et al. Quality of life and related factors for people living with HIV/AIDS in Northern Taiwan. J Nurs Res 2003; 11(3):217-26. 29. Hsu C, Wang JD, Hwang JS, et al. Survival-weighted health profile for long-term survivors of acute myelogenous leukemia. Qual Life Res 2003; 12(5):503-17. 30. Hsiung PC, Fang CT, Chang YY, et al. Comparison of WHOQOL-bREF and SF-36 in patients with HIV infection. Qual Life Res 2005; 14(1):141-50. 31. Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 1998;8:487-99. 32. Favretti F, Cadiere GB, Segato G et al. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS) applied to laparoscopic gastric banding patients. Obes Surg. 1998;8:500-4. 33. Hell E, Miller KA, Moorehead MK et al. Evaluation of health status and quality of life after bariatric surgery: comparison of standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2000;10:214-9. 34. Victorzon M, Tolonen P. Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in Finland. Obes Surg. 2001;11:740-3. 35. Baltasar A. On BAROS. Bariatic Analysis and Reporting Outcome System. Obes Surg. 1999;9:288. 36. Smith L, Folkard S, Poole CJ. Increased injuries on night shift. Lancet 1994;344:1137-9. 37. Akerstedt T. Consensus statement: fatigue and accidents in transport operations. J Sleep Res 2000;9:395. 38. Akerstedt T. Work hours, sleepiness and the underlying mechanisms. J Sleep Res 1995;4:15-22. 39. Nojkov B, Rubenstein JH, Chey WD, Hoogerwerf WA. The impact of rotating shift work on the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in nurses. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:842-7. 40. Costa G. The impact of shift and night work on health. Appl Ergon 1996;27:9-16. 41. Morgan LM, Aspostolakou F, Wright J, Gama R. Diurnal variations in peripheral insulin resistance and plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentrations: a possible link? Ann Clin Biochem 1999;36 ( Pt 4):447-50. 42. Takahashi M, Iwakiri K, Sotoyama M, Hirata M, Hisanaga N. Musculoskeletal pain and night-shift naps in nursing home care workers. Occup Med (Lond) 2009;59:197-200. 43. Boggild H, Knutsson A. Shift work, risk factors and cardiovascular disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999;25:85-99. 44. Lin YC, Hsiao TJ, Chen PC. Shift work aggravates metabolic syndrome development among early-middle-aged males with elevated ALT. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:5654-61. 45. van Amelsvoort LG, Jansen NW, Swaen GM, van den Brandt PA, Kant I. Direction of shift rotation among three-shift workers in relation to psychological health and work-family conflict. Scand J Work Environ Health 2004;30:149-56. 46. Lin SH. Field Collection and Completeness of Data in the National Health Interview Survey: NHIS Brief Communication No. 4; 2002 47. Ware JE, Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-83. 48. Chu NF. Prevalence of obesity in Taiwan. Obes Rev 2005;6:271-4. 49. Tan CE, Ma S, Wai D, Chew SK, Tai ES. Can we apply the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel definition of the metabolic syndrome to Asians? Diabetes Care 2004;27:1182-6. 50. Choban PS, Onyejekwe J, Burge JC et al. A health status assessment of the impact of weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for clinically severe obesity. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188: 491-7. 51. Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 279-89 52. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA 2002; 288: 1723-7. 53. Dymek MP, Le Grange D, Neven K et al. Quality of life after gastric bypass surgery: a cross-sectional study. Obes Res 2002; 10: 1135-42. 54. Yao G, Chung CW, Yu CF et al. Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. J Formos Med Assoc 2002; 101: 342-51. 55. Cheng TM. Taiwan's new national health insurance program: genesis and experience so far. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003; 22: 61-76 56. Suter M, Paroz A, Calmes JM, Giusti V. European experience with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 466 obese patients. Br J Surg. 2006; 93: 726-732. 57. Duval K, Marceau P, Perusse L et al. An overview of obesity-specific quality of life questionnaires. Obes Rev. 2006;7:347-60. 58. Kolotkin RL, Head S, Hamilton M et al. Assessing Impact of Weight on Quality of Life. Obes Res. 1995;3:49-56. 59. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:157-71. 60. Anderson RT, Aaronson NK, Bullinger M et al. A review of the progress towards developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for international clinical studies and outcomes research. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10:336-55. 61. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M et al. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:875-82. 62. Koh ET, Leong KP, Tsou IY et al. The reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of the Chinese version of SF-36 in oriental patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2006;45:1023-8. 63. Gandek B, Ware JE, Jr., Aaronson NK et al. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1149-58. 64. Akerstedt T. Shift work and disturbed sleep/wakefulness. Occup Med (Lond) 2003;53:89-94. 65. Dumont M, Montplaisir J, Infante-Rivard C. Sleep Quality of Former Night-shift Workers. Int J Occup Environ Health 1997;3:S10-S4. 66. Rajaratnam SM, Arendt J. Health in a 24-h society. Lancet 2001;358:999-1005. 67. Han JH, Park HS, Shin CI, et al. Metabolic syndrome and quality of life (QOL) using generalised and obesity-specific QOL scales. Int J Clin Pract 2009;63:735-41. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46502 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究目的:
本論文研究之主要目的為(1)評估病態肥胖者之生活品質與健康者之差別 (2)經減重手術後隨著體重減輕、肥胖相關合併症之減輕、以及手術後所帶來的併發症之出現,經一年的臨床追蹤觀察其生活品質的動態變化(3)翻譯肥胖專屬之生活品質問卷Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II (MA II)成中文版,並作信效度分析(4)以生活品質的觀點探討長期輪班的影響與適應之道。 研究背景: 肥胖的盛行率在過去數十年間有非常顯著的增加,在台灣,男性與女性的肥胖盛行率分別為19.2% 以及13.4%,肥胖已成為臺灣當前公共衛生之重要課題,其影響的層面甚為廣泛,尤其是與代謝症候群息息相關,而進而受到職業醫學的重視。病態肥胖會影響生活品質中的許多層面,一般而言,身體質量指數(BMI)愈高則生活品質愈差,減重手術可以有效地減低體重,降低合併症以及改善生活品質,然而目前仍缺乏研究來探討詳細的生活品質之動態變化,由肥胖相關的生活品質研究出發,可將此方法應用於職業醫學上探討長期輪班對生活品質之影響。 研究方法: 收案的對象為患有病態肥胖之患者符合亞太減重手術之共識標準而欲至本院接受手術治療者,台灣版的WHOQOL-BREF問卷將被填寫於術前一個月以及術後第一、三、六、十二個月,而同時記載身體質量指數、肥胖合併症以及手術相關併發症。健康對照組將由國健局的全國調查之資料庫中隨機選出。統計方法為使用線性迴歸控制所有可能之變因,分析肥胖會影響哪方面的生活品質面向,並與健康的對照組用trend test來比較其嚴重度之影響。再使用mixed-effect模式來分析重複測量之生活品質分數和身體質量指數以及相關的共變因子隨著時間改變之關係。另外引進目前最受重視的肥胖專用生活品質問卷Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II (MA II),將其中文化,並執行信效度的分析研究。最後,於健檢中心收集特定之鋼鐵廠工人執行年度健康檢查時,以WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version測量其生活品質之影響。 結果與討論: 共收案114個接受減重手術之患者,肥胖患者在WHOQOL-BREF問卷的身體、心理、社會層面比健康對照組有較差的生活品質分數,而這些肥胖者若BMI大於32 kg/m2則生活品質之分數即開始受影響。經一年的長期追蹤研究使用Mixed-effect model將分析出生活品質在WHOQOL-BREF問卷的身體、心理、社會層面分數會受減重手術的影響而改善,而隨著時間的追蹤,生活品質之動態變化亦被呈現出來,在術後第三至第六個月病患的身體、心理層面分數會受減重手術併發症的出現而受影響,分數會下降,但隨後在第六至十二個月其生活品質的分數又會逐漸上升,接近健康對照組的平均分數。由本研究的發現將提供臨床醫師對於此類患者於術前及術後照顧上重要的資訊。而肥胖專用生活品質問卷(MA II)其有相當好之再測信度其組內相關係數為0.73-0.91。而其問卷總分與WHOQOL-BREF的四個層面以及SF-36的兩大面向皆有顯著之相關性,可見此問卷有相當好之收斂效度,本問卷之六個問題彼此間皆有很好之相關性,且迴歸分析顯示MA II的總分與BMI值有顯著的負相關性,可見MA II可能是一個單一面向的問卷。它可以提供迅速好用的臨床標準評估,並進一步可以與國際接軌作研究合作與比較。另外,於健檢中心收集特定之鋼鐵廠工人執行年度健康檢查共471名,共約35.5%是屬於輪班工作者(75.5%是四班三輪的輪班方式),發現長期輪班工作者(大於一年以上)其睡眠與休息之影響不大,與其他不用輪班者相較,並沒較明顯之不良,反而在生理層面相關的細項以及社會層面的總分有正向的相關性。 結論: BMI值愈高生活品質愈差,本研究的結果支持了亞太減重共識會議的手術標準。病態肥胖之患者其健康相關之生活品質經減重手術後有顯著的改善效果,但在術後三至六個月會稍微下降,之後又再回升直到追蹤一年結束。經本研究成功地將MA II翻譯成中文化,並證實此問卷有良好之信效度,將來可以進行相關之臨床研究。生活品質測量在職業醫學的應用方面發現,克服了睡眠障礙以及休息,長期輪班在鋼鐵廠工人似乎會有慢性適應的特色,生活品質的測量顯示在生理層面相關的細項以及社會層面的總分有正向的相關性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: The aims of our study are to (1) compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between patients with morbid obesity and the healthy population in Taiwan (2) evaluate the effects of bariatric surgery on the dynamic changes of HRQOL during one year follow-up (3) translate the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II (MA II) into Chinese and validate it (4) use QOL measurement to investigate the impact of long-term rotating shift work.
Background: The prevalence of obesity has increased markedly in the past several decades, and is now a major public health issue. In Taiwan, the prevalence of obesity were 19.2% and 13.4% for man and woman, respectively. Many obesity-related co-morbidities have been documented and account for the use of considerable medical resources worldwide. In particular, obesity is closely related to metabolic syndrome, which has been emphasized by rotating shift work (RSW) in occupational medicine recently. Morbid obesity could also significantly affect quality of life. Bariatric surgery could reduce body weight and improve HRQOL effectively, but no study has shown detailed profiles of HRQOL changes along with time. The MA II is a obesity specific questionnaire and it has been applied in many studies. The impact of RSW on QOL is unclear. Material and Methods: Patients were enrolled for bariatric surgery by a modified recommendation of the Asia-Pacific consensus. WHOQOL-BREF was administered 1 month before the operation, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. BMI, co-morbidities and operation related complications was also measured simultaneously. A healthy reference group was randomly sampled from the database of National Health Interview Survey in Taiwan. Mixed-effect model was constructed to analyze the repeated measurements and determine the relationship among the BMI, WHOQOL scores, and other covariates. MA II was translated into Taiwan version in Chinese fist. Cross-validation of MA-II with WHOQOL and SF-36 were performed. WHOQOL-BREF was applied for the steel workers in annual health check up. Multiple linear regression models were conducted for the analysis of QOL and its determinants in all steel workers. Results: A total of 114 consecutive patients with obesity coming for bariatric surgery at E-Da hospital were enrolled. Obese subjects had poorer WHOQOL-BREF scores than those of the healthy referents in physical, psychological and social domains but not in environment domain. Patients with BMI >32 kg/m2 had consistently poorer scores in various facets after adjusting for other risk factors. The mixed effect model showed that the physical, psychological and social domains improved after bariatric surgery with simultaneous reduction in weight and improvement in co-morbidities. There was a dip in scores in physical and psychological domains three to six months after surgery, significantly related to complications. All patients gradually improved between six and 12 months after surgery reaching levels similar to those of healthy subjects. Good test-retest reliability was shown by intra-class correlations ranging from 0.73 to 0.91. The total sum of MA II scores was significantly correlated with all 4 domains of the WHOQOL-BREF and 2 major components of SF-36. Totally 471 steel workers were enrolled for QOL measurement and 35.5% of them had RSW. Morbid obesity decreased the QOL scores of psychological domain. The facet of sleep and rest did not showed negative impact by long-term RSW. Conclusion: The higher the BMI level the poorer the HRQOL. Our findings seem to support the recommendations of Asia-Pacific consensus based on HRQOL considerations. HRQOL improved dramatically after bariatric surgery, dipped slightly between three and six months and improved again up to the end of the first year. The MA II Taiwan version is an obesity-specific questionnaire for QOL evaluation with satisfactory reliability and validity. The steel workers in Taiwan with long-term RSW seem to accommodate the circadian rhythm without disturbance of sleep and rest, whose sores of WHOQOL-BREF were better in various associating facets of physical and social domains. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:12:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-F95841023-1.pdf: 2637956 bytes, checksum: 987cab055f65676ee81e9ac06833abea (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………. i
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………… ii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………… iii 第一章 Introduction…………………………………………………. 1 1.1 Background………………………………………………………………. 1 1.2 Aims ……………………………………………………………………... 3 第二章 Material and Methods………………………... 5 2.1 Patients………………………………………………………………….... 5 2.1.1 Morbid obesity………………………………6 2.1.2 Steel workers………………………………6 2.2 HRQOL questionnaire…………………………………… 7 2.3 Reference population……………………………… 7 2.4 Translation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II……8 2.5 Validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II…… 8 2.6 The definition of variables associating with work……………………… 9 2.7 The definition of metabolic syndrome (MeS)……………………………… 9 2.8 Statistical analysis………………………………………………………… 10 2.8.1 HRQOL in patients with morbid obesity before and after bariatric surgery………………11 2.8.2 Dynamic improvements of health-related quality of life after bariatric surgery: A one year follow-up………… 11 2.8.3 Cross-validation of the Taiwan version of the MA-II with WHOQOL and SF-36…………………………………………………………… 11 2.8.4 Adaption to Shift Work: Measuring Health Related Quality of Life with WHOQOL-BREF in the Steel Workers of Taiwan…………… 12 第三章 Results……………………………………………… 13 3.1. Health-related quality of life in adult patients with morbid obesity coming for bariatric surgery……………........ 13 3.11 Demographic chargcterisitis…………….... 13 3.1.2 General linear model (GLM) analysis for the trend of WHOQOL-BREF score changes……………………………………… 13 3.1.3 Multiple linear regression analysis of HRQL scores in patients with morbid obesity and healthy subjects..... 13 3.1.4 Analyses of HRQL scores in facets of each domain by multiple linear regression modeling………………………… 14 3.2 Dynamic improvements of health-related quality of life after bariatric surgery: A one year follow up………………………… 15 3.2.1 Demographic characteristics………….... 15 3.2.2 Changes of QOL during one year follow up……................................ 15 3.2.3 Mix effect model analysis……………. 16 3.2.4 Clinical outcomes of bariatric surgery……………............................. 16 3.3 Cross-validation of the Taiwan version of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II with WHOQOL and SF-36………… 17 3.3.1 Demographic characteristics…………………………17 3.3.2 Reliability of MA II Taiwan version………………17 3.3.3 Validity of MA II Taiwan version……………………17 3.4 Adaption to Shift Work: Measuring Health Related Quality of Life with WHOQOL-BREF in the Steel Workers of Taiwan……………………… 18 3.4.1 Demographic characteristics…………………………18 3.4.2 Determinants of HRQOL………………………………… 19 第四章 Discussion…………………………………………… 21 4.1 Health-related quality of life in adult patients with morbid obesity coming for bariatric surgery…………… 21 4.2 Dynamic improvements of health-related quality of life after bariatric surgery: A one year follow up………………………....... 22 4.3 Cross-validation of the Taiwan version of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II with WHOQOL and SF-36..................... 24 4.4 Adaption to Shift Work: Measuring Health Related Quality of Life with WHOQOL-BREF in the Steel Workers of Taiwan…………………… 26 第五章 Conclusion……………………………………………………29 第六章 Anticipated effects…………………………………………30 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………31 附表………………………………………………………………………38 附圖………………………………………………………………………55 附錄………………………………………………………………………57 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 減重手術 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 肥胖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生活品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 世界衛生組織生活問卷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 效度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 混合效應模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 輪班工作 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | 罹患病態肥胖之成人其健康相關生活品質分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Health-related Quality of Life in Adult Patients with Morbid Obesity | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林肇堂,陳保中,郭育良,吳明賢,黃士哲 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 生活品質,肥胖,減重手術,世界衛生組織生活問卷,效度,混合效應模式,輪班工作, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | quality of life,obesity,bariatric surgery,WHOQOL,validation,mix effect model,shift work, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 105 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-07-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 職業醫學與工業衛生研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 職業醫學與工業衛生研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.58 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
