Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 心理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46289
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor葉怡玉
dc.contributor.authorYu-Chen Tsengen
dc.contributor.author曾郁蓁zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T05:01:53Z-
dc.date.available2010-07-30
dc.date.copyright2010-07-30
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2010-07-27
dc.identifier.citationBrooks, D. N., & Baddeley, A. D. (1976). What can amnesic patients learn? Neuropsychologia, 14(1), 111-122.
Cohen, N. J., & Squire, L. R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science, 210(4466), 207-210.
CorelDRAW! (1994). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Corel, Inc.
DeCarlo, L. T. (2002). Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review, 109(4), 710-721.
DeCarlo, L. T. (2008). Process dissociation and mixture signal detection theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1565-1572.
Dennis, S., Lee, M. D., & Kinnell, A. (2008). Bayesian analysis of recognition memory: The case of the list-length effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(3), 361-376.
Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A., & Adams, J. K. (1999). Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25(2), 500-513.
Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and Explicit Memory for New Associations in Normal and Amnesic Subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(3), 501-518.
Graf, P., Squire, L. R., & Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 10(1), 164-178.
Hirshman, E., & Hostetter, M. (2000). Using ROC curves to test models of recognition memory: The relationship between presentation duration and slope. Memory & Cognition, 28(2), 161-166.
Hollingworth, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 388-403.
Hollingworth, A. (2006). Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 781-807.
Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(4), 761-768.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(5), 485-508.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 513-541.
Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24(1), 3-26.
Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25(1), 3-22.
Jacoby, L. L., Debner, J. A., & Hay, J. F. (2001). Proactive interference, accessibility bias, and process dissociations: Valid subjective reports of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27(3), 686-700.
Lee, M. D., & Webb, M. R. (2005). Modeling individual differences in cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 605-621.
Lunn, D., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2000). WinBUGS - a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10, 325-337.
Malmberg, K. J. (2002). On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 28(2), 380-387.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence Psychological Review, 87(3), 252-271.
McElree, B., Dolan, P. O., & Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25(3), 563-582.
Mickes, L., Wais, P. E., & Wixted, J. T. (2009). Recollection Is a Continuous Process: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Recognition Memory. Psychological Science, 20(4), 509-515.
Mickes, L., Wixted, J. T., & Wais, P. E. (2007). A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 858-865.
Mitroff, S. R., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (2004). Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(8), 1268-1281.
Morey, R. D., Pratte, M. S., & Rouder, J. N. (2008). Problematic effects of aggregation in zROC analysis and a hierarchical modeling solution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(6), 376-388.
Musen, G., & Squire, L. R. (1991). Normal acquisition of novel verbal information in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 17(6), 1095-1104.
Oberauer, K. (2001). Removing irrelevant information from working memory: A cognitive aging study with the modified Sternberg task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27(4), 948-957.
Oberauer, K. (2008). How to say no: Single- and dual-process theories of short-term recognition tested on negative probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3), 439-459.
Oberauer, K. (2008). How to say no: Single- and dual-process theories of short-term recognition tested on negative probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34(3), 439-459.
Onyper, S. V., Zhang, Y. X., & Howard, M. W. (2010). Some-or-None Recollection: Evidence From Item and Source Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 341-364.
Oztekin, I., & McElree, B. (2007). Proactive interference slows recognition by eliminating fast assessments of familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(1), 126-149.
Oztekin, I., & McElree, B. (2010). Relationship Between Measures of Working Memory Capacity and the Time Course of Short-Term Memory Retrieval and Interference Resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(2), 383-397.
Ratcliff, R., Gronlund, S. D., & Sheu, C. F. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99(3), 518-535.
Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Tindall, M. (1994). Empircal generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(4), 763-785.
Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1-3), 17-42.
Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 245-277.
Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368-373.
Robert, C. P., & Casella, G. (2003). Monte Carlo statistical methods. New York: Springer.
Rouder, J. N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(4), 573-604.
Ryan, J. D., & Cohen, N. J. (2004). The Nature of Change Detection and Online Representations of Scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 988-1015.
Schacter, D. L., & Graf, P. (1986). Preserved learning in amnesic patients: perspectives from research on direct priming. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8(6), 727-743.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: User's Guide: Psychology Software Inc.
Silverman, M. E., & Mack, A. (2006). Change blindness and priming: When it does and does not occur. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(2), 409-422.
Simons, D. J., Chabris, C. F., Schnur, T., & Levin, D. T. (2002). Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 11(1), 78-97.
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261-267.
Squire, L. R. (1982). The neuropsychology of human memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 5, 241-273.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 26(1), 1-12.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(4), 336-342.
Varakin, D., & Levin, D. T. (2006). Change blindness and visual memory: Visual representations get rich and act poor. British Journal of Psychology, 97(1), 51-77.
Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 152-176.
Yeh, Y.-Y., & Yang, C.-T. (2008). Object memory and change detection: Dissociation as a function of visual and conceptual similarity. Acta Psychologica, 127(1), 114-128.
Yeh, Y.-Y., & Yang, C.-T. (2009). Is a pre-change object representation weakened under correct detection of a change? Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 91-102.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1341-1354.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1415-1434.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441-517.
Yonelinas, A. P., Dobbins, I., Szymanski, M. D., Dhaliwal, H. S., & King, L. (1996). Signal-Detection, Threshold, and Dual-Process Models of Recognition Memory: ROCs and Conscious Recollection. Consciousness and Cognition, 5(4), 418-441.
Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Dissociations of Processes in Recognition Memory: Effects of Interference and of Response Speed. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(4), 516-535.
Yonelinas, A. P., & Parks, C. M. (2007). Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 800-832.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/46289-
dc.description.abstract本研究的目的是探討改變偵測成功與失敗下對改變前物體的再認是否都涉及意識回想歷程與自動化的熟悉歷程,而此二歷程涉入的比例是否受到偵測成功與否及表徵完整性的影響。我們在兩個實驗間藉由呈現時間的長短(實驗一為180毫秒,實驗二為2秒)以操控表徵完整性。在各實驗裡,我們使用改變偵測作業加上歷程分離程序來記錄參與者偵測成功與失敗下對改變前物體的再認,並應用修改過的信號偵測雙歷程階層模型與貝式方法來分別估計不同歷程提供訊息的比例。我們的結果發現當參與者可以成功地偵測到改變時,再認記憶的表現會顯著地上升,但只有回想歷程提取的成功率會較高。反之,熟悉歷程可提取的程度則與偵測是否成功無關。這樣的結果顯示在過去關於改變偵測與記憶表徵的文獻中,記憶表現在不同測量方法間的歧異可由記憶雙歷程理論所解釋。此外,我們發現表徵完整性只影響回想歷程提取的比例,而不影響熟悉歷程。這樣的結果代表完整表徵內有較多的細節與情境訊息,可由回想歷程提取出。基於本研究的結果,我們延伸了改變盲文獻裡的提取失敗假說,而進一步的提出回想歷程失敗假說。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study is to understand whether recollection and familiarity processes are both involved in recognizing a pre-change object under change blindness and change detected conditions, and whether they are affected by the completeness of representation. We manipulated viewing duration between two experiments (180 ms in Experiment 1 and 2 s in Experiment 2) to vary the completeness of representation. In both Experiments 1A and 2A, participants were required to detect a change between two arrays and then performed either an inclusion or exclusion recognition task. We used the modified dual-process signal detection model and a Bayesian method to estimate the proportion of recollection and familiarity under change detected and change blindness conditions. The results from both experiments supported the involvement of dual processes in recognizing a pre-change object. The proportion of recollection process was higher under correct detection than under change blindness and was higher when representations were more complete. To further verify the information recollected prior to performing change detection, we conducted Experiments 1B and 2B in which participants performed recognition prior to carrying out the detection task. Participants were also asked to report the contextual information upon which they performed the recognition task. When viewing duration was brief in Experiment 1B, temporal order and object category were the primary sources recollected under correct detection. When viewing duration was long in Experiment 2B, participants recollected temporal, object category, spatial location, and perceptual details under correct detection. These results suggested that successful comparison with a post-change object can be made when more sources of a pre-change object were recollected. Recollection failure is a reason for change blindness.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:01:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R97227105-1.pdf: 622057 bytes, checksum: c233164114cc7885249c1c3e99ca8cfb (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1
第一節 改變偵測與記憶表徵 2
第二節 記憶雙歷程理論與研究方法 4
第三節 工作記憶與記憶雙歷程 9
第四節 本研究目的與設計 14
第二章 實驗一 16
第一節 實驗一A 16
第二節 實驗一B 42
第三章 實驗二 50
第一節 實驗二A 50
第二節 實驗二B 63
第三節 跨實驗比較 71
第四章 綜合討論 80
第一節 提取短期記憶的雙歷程 81
第二節 改變偵測與記憶雙歷程 82
第三節 表徵完整性與記憶雙歷程 84
第四節 回想歷程提取失敗假說 86
第五節 研究限制與未來方向 89
參考文獻 93
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject改變偵測zh_TW
dc.subject貝式方法zh_TW
dc.subject歷程分離程序zh_TW
dc.subject記憶雙歷程zh_TW
dc.subjectchange detectionen
dc.subjectprocess dissociation procedureen
dc.subjectBayesian methoden
dc.subjectrecollectionen
dc.title改變再認的記憶雙歷程zh_TW
dc.titleDual process in recognition under change detectionen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear98-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee鄭仕坤,徐永豐
dc.subject.keyword改變偵測,記憶雙歷程,歷程分離程序,貝式方法,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordchange detection,process dissociation procedure,Bayesian method,recollection,en
dc.relation.page102
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2010-07-28
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept心理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:心理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
607.48 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved